What will come before why? Extinction of species or exploitation of their genetic knowledge?

Comments

1. Wow, how interesting!!! (I haven't read it, it looks and sounds just as bad as it is)

2. green,

   On the one hand, you say that human life is sacred. On the other hand, you are tempted to kill all human beings on earth. There is a contradiction here that I suggest you think about carefully.

   I agree with you about all the sick evils we do, but I am more optimistic and believe that this is the maturation phase of humanity. things will get better. Humanity will find more pleasant ways to coexist with the environment.

   Hoping we get to that day soon,

   Roy.

3. God forbid, I wouldn't go that far,
   Human life, at least for me, is sacred.

   Yesterday I was in a refresher driving course, suddenly such a big beetle entered the class, and the people started shouting, the beetle stopped next to the teacher on the floor,
   So some told him that he would step on her, so he said: Step on her? (through) and after that he even said it was crispy.. a beetle is a beetle it's not a baby I know,
   But the beetle also has a role in the ecosystem, that doesn't mean it's okay to start killing quantities of certain animals because that's how humans feel..
   In any case, I didn't have time to get up to take her out..

   But I'm just here to point out that we are all animals, and that doesn't give us any excessive privileges regarding what we can do with all the other animals in the world,
   Including: experiments, slaughtering in huge huge commercial quantities, even hunting for fun.. and many other things..

   העולם כבר לא מורכב מכפרים קטנים ששוחטים פה ושם איזו כבשהפרה תרנגולת או אפילו כל יום.. הוא בעצמו נהיה מה שמכנים "כפר גלובלי" עם 7 מיליארד איש או משהו כזה ותרבות צריכה שעוזרת לצריכה העצומה הזאת לא להיפסק ואף לגדול, אפילו קראתי פה כתבה על שרימפסים שלא יהיו עוד 50 שנה אם הביקוש ישאר אותו דבר..
   injecting substances into chickens and cows and cattle that will have a greater output,

   What kind of shape is this world to be I ask..
   What is so sublime about humanity now?

   I'm not saying it's forbidden, I'm saying it's excessive..
   There are too many people on earth and the outlook is not good!!!

   Who are we to control animals like this? And that species become extinct? And that we invent substances that will suffocate and destroy the earth and cause it irreversible damage????????

   אולי כבר הסקת מהדברים שלי, זה שאני לא מתלהב כל כך מתרומה לאנושות, כמובן שאני אשמח בשורט אם ימצאו תרופה לסרטן ולאיידס וכו'

   In Long - I still think that the human race has a self-destruction mechanism, for all animals and the earth and finally for humanity as well,
   I simply think that humanity does not deserve anything from nature after what humanity gives to nature is only bad and bad and bad and bad. (X is almost infinite)

   And who knows, maybe if I had a button to kill only all humans on Earth,
   Maybe I would click..

   You know anyway they say that in World War 3 they will fight with sticks and stones.

   So who did we name?

4. green,

   כדבריך, המערכת האקולוגית חשובה מאד, ולכן אני תומך בשימור החי והצומח על פני כדור-הארץ. אני מתנגד רק לדבריו של גיל לפיהם התועלת היחידה של החי והצומח היא 'להיראות יפים'.

   As for the rest of your words, I am also against useless experiments on animals (although I support most of the experiments done today, and believe that the useless experiments are a tiny minority).

   אני חושב שהמחלוקת בינינו נחשפת בנקודה קריטית אחת, ואני מצטט, "חיי אדם זה לא דבר שרחוק שמיים וארץ מחיי כל חיה אחרת".

   Would you agree to kill a human baby, in order to save a mouse? Because this is the full meaning of the sentence you wrote.

   Thanks for the proofreading.

   Roy.

5. And by the way, no sarcasm, just a little proofreading..

   "Information that you value to humanity cannot be assumed (not for the rest) and measured."

   And to speculate then:
   "Information of your value to humanity cannot be guessed or (nor f) measured."

6. Have you ever heard of a concept called ecology???!!!

   Do you know what is the role of all the animals in the ecosystem on earth???!!!

   I didn't expect to see such comments here.

   And Roy Cezana, if you ask me,
   Human life is not something that is far from the life of any other animal,
   And personally I agree with experiments being necessary on animals,

   But not in order for L'Oréal Paris to release a new mascara, so they have to inject the substance into the eyes of rabbits to know what it can cause..

   And not in many, many, many, many other cases.

   Who are we anyway? only animals

   Humans are a kind of animals.

   ההבדל הוא שאנחנו הרבה יותר אינטלגנטים ומפותחים מוחית ומודעים לעצמנו ולסביבה, יש לנו יכולת תקשור אדירה בינינו ויש לנו את היכולת "לטרוף את כל החיות בממלכה" ולייצר כלים ולבנות בניינים וכו' וכו'

   This does not turn us away from God, I am against the unnecessary killing of animals in all its forms, for the purposes of clothing, wheat, fish that should not be caught in a net in huge quantities, other marine species that are caught in nets that should not be caught, and more..)

   And the list doesn't end.

   אפשר לכתוב על זה ספר בעובי התנ"ך על כמה שהאדם מזיק לחיות בעולם,
   and the environment.
   As long as humans are on Earth,
   The earth will continue the process of self-destruction.

   Geology and ecology are intertwined and are an inseparable part of the world.

7. age
   Exploitation of species for the benefit of man is not their extinction - on the contrary.
   The most talked about exploitation is all kinds of compounds produced by animals and which may have a benefit - for example medicines. In such cases the creatures will actually be nurtured and multiplied.
   Humans use them for food and they, on the contrary, become extinct.

8. Regarding the permanent disappearance of the species...
   What about genetic replication?
   Even if the phenomenon cannot be stopped, how do you maintain the other features...

9. Nature lovers / greens are convinced of the need to preserve a natural environment,
   they don't need to be convinced,
   It has long been clear and known to everyone who deals with the issue that the strongest factor, the charged
   The most influential is the economic charge,
   Everyone understands the economic charge,
   (See my previous lists that refer to the economic viability of nature conservation)
   That's why this argument has been made for a long time in every debate
   And it turns out that he wins!

10. age,

    Beauty is a thing... beautiful. that's it. But as much as I appreciate the noble beauty of tigers, I would sacrifice them without hesitation for the good of man. Beauty is a beautiful thing, but human life is an important thing.

    At the same time, I absolutely agree with Dr. Rosenthal's words. The human race must be careful in its steps, and avoid the wanton destruction of the species existing on the planet. Both due to the beauty inherent in them (as marginal as this argument is) and also due to the benefit that the information contained in them can bring us.

    Thanks for the article.

11. This thinking of exploiting the species for their benefit to humanity is really shocking.
    The mass extinction is the result of the exploitation of the environment and the species for the sake of humanity.
    Their real benefit is in the variety of beauty in the environment
    And not in a petri dish

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.