Dr. Yehiam Sorek comes to the defense of Prof. Ariel Tuaf from Bar-Ilan who claimed that according to the arguments of the testimonies of the Inquisition investigators, there may have been some use of blood by Jews. In the name of academic freedom and in the name of the possibility, however faint, that someone might still have a cult similar to the satanic cult of our day or wanted to take revenge on Christians
Recently, the public has been upset, and especially the academy, and in particular - the various departments for the study of history, here in our provinces and even in the maritime countries. And why? Because Prof. Tuaf, head of the School of History at Bar Ilan University, dared "with most of his audacity" to publish a book, and by the way, in Italy, and in Italian, under the title "Passover of blood" (pasque di sangue in Italian, and note the rhyme), and all of it is dedicated For the blood plots that were spread in the late Middle Ages, in Italy, about the myth of Jews using the blood of Christians, mainly of boys and girls, for ritual, magical and medical purposes.
The professor's claim was that there probably is/was something true, although his arguments are based on the testimony of inquisition examinees and the feasibility, the logical probability of using blood, and at least for medical purposes.
The fact that the book caused an uproar in the street, no Mila, because I have no difficulty in understanding this, no matter the myths that have been internalized among the public for years and years of "Am Segolah", "You have chosen us", "Light to the Gentiles", "Seed of priests and a holy Gentile", against "The whole world is against us", "everyone is anti-Semitic" and more.
The fact that the book caused an uproar in the academy, well "Mila", and even here I didn't have so much trouble understanding it, for no myth-mongers even in the academic ivory tower.
But, what really bothered me, is the fact that no one from the academy came forward to defend Prof. Tuaf's arguments, and I don't expect anyone from the academic world to defend him just because he is a renowned researcher and a serious personality from the world of research, but at least for the simple reason of freedom Research and freedom of expression, since the beginning of the embryonic stage of universities, dating back to the Middle Ages, was a free association between professors and students in order to carry out even "delusional" research.
Furthermore, I was particularly outraged that the Knesset's Education and Culture Committee convened last week, at the initiative of a MK from the ultra-right wing, Prof. Eldad (from the "National Union"), to rebuke the disobedient and rebellious professor and present him in public as a traitor to the people of Israel. This trend, which even prevailed during the time of Minister Limor Livnat, against the new historians, the post-Zionists, is very infuriating for any interference by politicians in areas that are not theirs, which is very reminiscent of dark regimes in Europe and other parts of the world.
That's why I was so insolent and posted here and there words of support for the respected professor's arguments, and I almost put my life on the line as a result. I did not do this out of compassion or non-conformism for his sake, but for three reasons: the first - to protect academic freedom and freedom of expression, even when the things that are heard cause shock and even nausea on their faces; The second - to protest against the attempts of the political Zhadanovism to rewrite history and its reincarnation according to its judgments; The third - to claim his kindness and mercy, which may be true as her cry. Is the professor right?! partly right? Right in the minority?
And what do I base my arguments on? About ancient arguments that were voiced against the people of Israel, and especially around the question: when did it start?
Well, accusations and slanders against the Jews and their customs are not found in the very ancient period, the one called the biblical or biblical period. We do not find in any source, not Egyptian, not Moabite, not Assyrian or Babylonian, claims and answers against the Jewish people and their customs. Arguments of slander and bitterness are found from the Hellenistic period onwards. The reason for this, in my humble opinion, lies in the fundamental and ritual change Israel underwent during the Persian transition period, that is, in the region of the sixth-fifth centuries BC, when, yes-yes, the Jewish people consolidated their monotheistic and abstract faith.
There is no doubt that this religious and ritual move raised doubts, bewilderments and question marks among those peoples who came into contact with the Jews in this era, especially as rulers. The monotheistic belief aroused in them astonishment on the one hand and skepticism which gave rise to antagonism on the other. We cannot rule out the possibility that the new faith aroused suspicion and even fear about its outbreak and explosion in general in the ancient world. And in the pagan world, when almost the entire population was a believer, this fear aroused various trends, the most prominent among which was, so it seems, the Plaster and the Satan, and this in the face of the fear of the victory of Judaism over the idols.
However, one point is worth noting, and that is the pragmatic proportionality. Even when the Hellenists took over the eastern basin of the Mediterranean Sea - the House of Ptolemy and the House of Seleucus, the successors of Alexander of Macedonia, the chance that they would come across the Jewish cult was extremely slim, since Jerusalem and the Second Temple were geographically far from the initial centers of control of these royal houses, and therefore it cannot be assumed that it developed So an antagonistic attitude against Judaism.
This phenomenon grew, it seems, following the rebellions caused by Jewish zealots during the Seleucid rule (the Maccabean rebellion), which incorporated very strong elements of religious war and worship mixed with political and personal partisanship. The confrontation of the Seleucid royal house with the rebels created a fertile ground for the spread of hate articles against Judaism and its customs.
It should be noted and emphasized that at the same time as the plaster and hostility articles, an interesting phenomenon was discovered of Hellenistic and Roman writers, respected and famous, who expressed appreciation and shared words of praise for Judaism and the Jews. If so, let's be honest with ourselves and say that if we lovingly absorb the articles of praise, why should we push away from Mania and Bia the articles of reservation and attach to the lapel of their clothes the label of "just-haters-Israel"?!
Moreover, among the Jewish apologetic writers of the ancient period, in the face of the antagonistic accusations, Philo of Alexandria stood firm, and he, a button and a flower, occasionally uses anti-Hellenic sayings that discredit the customs of the Greeks, considering "attack is the best defense". It is true that the claim "If Philo is allowed, then why is Apion (an Alexandrian writer who slandered the people of Israel) forbidden" is childish, but "among us", it should not be dismissed casually, even for emotional reasons.
In the course of the Maccabean rebellion, the rebels carried out cruel measures against the local, Hellenistic population, which were not part of the military measures, and similar to them during the Great Revolt in the Romans (where also phenomena of terrible brutality of the fanatics against the moderates were discovered - the Ein Gedi massacre and more, such as casual murders and even the application and subversion of hunger that caused , among other things, to cannibalism in Jerusalem), and these probably served as leverage for an antagonistic outburst against the Jews and Judaism among Hellenistic writers. It is true that one of the other factors for this was the phenomenon of conversion, one that expanded in the Roman period, and even reached the emperor's palace, when his wife wanted to convert, and that created a kind of hidden fear of the spread of Judaism in the world at the expense of the Roman Empire and its achievements, but, it cannot be compared with the uprising against the Jewish rebellion, one that served A comfortable and fertile breeding ground for prominent anti-Jewish writers. At the time of the rebellion in Egypt during the time of Emperor Trianus, for example, evidence was spread about severe phenomena behind which stood Jews, rebels or those who were attached to the rebellion.
Historian Dio Cassius recounts rebels who unleashed their fury on the Greeks and Romans - "They ate their flesh, they girded their intestines like sashes, they anointed themselves with their blood, they wrapped themselves in their skin, and many were cut in half from their heads (and below)...".
In the papyriological treasure is a letter sent by the mother of one of the Roman commanders to her son (Apollonius), in which she very much hopes and wishes that the rebels will not rescue him.
These testimonies, whether true or false, are perhaps "understood" against the background of the difficult atmosphere that prevailed between the two forces, the Jewish rebel from the other and the Hellenistic and the Roman defending and striking from the other. However, they can indicate situations in which the parties lose the patterns of discipline and act according to rather dark impulses.
And from here I am thrown straight back to the Yahweh era and claim that on the one hand the various accusations regarding the Jewish use of the blood of Christian boys and girls for ritual needs should not be accepted as a matter of course. On the other hand, against the background of the many testimonies and even the confessions (albeit after an inquisitorial investigation), the possibility of cases where they were used for ritual purposes cannot be ruled out. Whether as vindictiveness, whether as madness or as a grave and bacchanalian ideology. A phenomenon that certainly (so similar) did not exist. Abnormalities, as we witness throughout history, in all times and in all places (and what will you say about the satanic sect in our districts?!), there probably were and were.
In any case, the "alloyum" that took place around Prof. Tuaf's research reeks of shameful odors of personal development, conservative and fixed conformism and a terrible syndrome of protecting the tribe's campfire. Precisely the war that was waged against Prof. Tuaf is reminiscent of the inquisitorial tendencies that dominated the dark basements of the church in the Middle Ages. Remember the witch hunt and putting them at the stake? Remember Giordano Bruno and the like?
Dr. Yehiam Sorek, Historian, Beit Berel College
* Note, the opinions of the external writers do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the site.
Atun Ha'aretz adds that in the meantime Prof. Tuaf clarified his intention: according to him, the intention of the book was to shed light on elements of religious-Jewish extremism, which infiltrated worship in the form of curses and severe verbal violence against Christians. This refers to Ashkenazi Jews from Germany, who suffered from the hostile attitude of the Christians during the Crusades, and who fled in the 15th century through the Alps to Italy. Among these Jews, according to Tuaf, religious extremism developed, which greatly frightened the Christian majority, and which ultimately led the environment to treat them with false accusations and to persecute them. According to Tuaf, this is the reason the blood plot was directed towards the Ashkenazi Jews who came from Germany, and not towards the "Italian" Jews
44 תגובות
This is not his first sensation, after all he had an article about the dog according to sages or something
There was shown a picture of dogs with a tallit and a kippa, in the Christian style of a priest.
This is absolutely not surprising, after all it is known that there are quite a few people with doctor's degrees
Or a professor who gets bored and their life becomes so monotonous to the point of a strong desire to commit suicide, they lecture on the same things and slowly grow old, and they know it.
That's why the aforementioned Dr. or someone like Prof. what's his name, create a public sensation from time to time to say I'm here. Dr. Sorek recognized a wave of Prof. what's his name and got on top of it.
He rode up like the fly on the elephant's back that tells him - look how much dust we left behind.
But after all, it was to be expected - after all, it is said "from your enemies and your destroyers shall come forth from you"
This is said about such people. That's why in Judaism we are connected to the material we study and maintain it and live it. In a system like the one he grew up in where he whistles there is a disconnect, today you study and in a moment you go out on the street and go back to behaving like... Dr. Shork?! He spat on the plate from which he ate, didn't he? All his livelihood comes from the subject of Judaism, which he teaches in a superficial scientific manner and not a high-quality and deep spiritual one. That's what he made a living from and that's what he now spits on. Either way, when I did my bachelor's degree I realized that he was empty
Every dimension and volume of quality and taste is good from studying. This is history for him and not the present.
Wonder….. Wonder…. No! Definately not!.
With all due respect to Dr. Yechiam Sorek - I am very surprised by him: if he is a scientist, then his first question should be - is there any truth in Prof. Tuaf's words? Is there really any reliable evidence of the use of the blood of Christians for any kind of Jewish worship? What does this have to do with extremist Jews? First and foremost, he must show Jewish worship, Jewish custom, Jewish tradition, Jewish law or anything else that mentions that the blood of Christians should be used for matzo baking. I am Jewish (secular) and as much as I dug into the sources - I did not find anything similar to this - so what is he talking about? His whole defense of Prof. Tuaf is also very strange: what kind of academic freedom is this about? If an antagonistic opinion is published and it is based on false information or does not make sense - do we have to protect it in the name of academic freedom? The new historians are persecuted not because of their opinions but because of their reliance on false data and presenting those lies as truth. And when those historians are confronted with their lies, they immediately accuse you of Zhdanovism, fascism and all kinds of other isms designed to cover their nakedness. Today there is also a new academic stream that justifies any creep whatsoever (regardless of the truth but of the political opinion). The name of this current is postmodernism - which destroys every good part and every trace of substantive discussion under the pretext of enlightenment compared to the "darkness" of the Middle Ages.
Dr. Yachiam, the phrase silence is worth a thousand words has been said about you (and with you even more). I do not understand where your desire to protect the weak comes from when you are also in danger from that "weak". In the long "story" you wrote above, you did not hide your hatred Towards the Jews (you're also a Jew, aren't you?!).I follow your letters, and I discover new limits to your religious extremism every time - you don't believe in anything and try to cause conflict between the Jews.
You really don't act like a Jew! You should be ashamed that you are willing to sell the land that so many have shed their blood for and died for.
In one word - shame on you!
the "scientist"
Not only do you not know, but you also do not understand what you are being told.
The truth is that I don't believe you saw a collapsing building and also from your words - even though you say "I definitely saw it" then later you say "at most a few floors were damaged or the building fell to the side."
In short - what you give as a detail for the answer "yes" is "no".
Then the little brother asked you the first question that came to my mind after reading your words and that is how, in your opinion, they created a situation where the building collapses quickly due to gravity.
It was a rhetorical question and I'm sure the questioner thought it would shut you up but no one like you will address the facts. What's simpler than starting to talk about something else?
So I actually insist:
How do you think, without attaching jet engines to the blocks that push them down, the building fell "faster than gravity" (not that force has speed but let's assume you at least meant the right thing which is the speed of free fall under the influence of gravity).
This is still a rhetorical question because the answer to it is of course that it is physically impossible and it just shows the level of credibility of your claims in general.
Take this poor credibility and add to it the fact that very few people saw a plane hit the building and you will also understand why I do not believe your lie on this subject.
Come and tell us a little about the circumstances in which you saw a building hit by a plane.
I'll take the ending about "what a fool he is" from you.
I don't know who you are quoting but I already know at least one thing about him and that is that he is also stupid.
He, at least, was smart enough to lie to a fool who couldn't catch the lie but you couldn't do even that.
I promise not to get bored, what about you?
I saw the clip, the fall of building 7 does resemble a 'controlled demolition' but the investigation report found that the collapse of the building happened due to a fire.
Are you claiming that the Americans are the ones behind all the 11/9 attacks?, that all al-Qaeda involvement is fibrock?, that American authorities murdered their own citizens and destroyed American icons?
If your answers are positive. Why aren't you going to file a complaint with the police? Israelis were also killed there.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3898962504721899003
Catch the ball!
instead of being overwhelmed.
debriefing.
Building 7 collapsed in a few seconds not because it defeated gravity but because it was carefully trapped by the demolition team.
His basement was blown up to allow the building to collapse in on itself.
Without all of this there is no chance of the building collapsing "accidentally"
The building was demolished due to a decision of the building's owners.
Did they show on TV how he falls? Apparently they didn't really want us to talk about it.
Is it hard for you to believe that Americans would do this to themselves?
It was hard for me too at first.
to "Hidan",
So we have an interest in entities that know how to control the force of gravity?, or that pressed the building from above?
Who has such technology?, who is able to do it?
(By the way, the fact that I am addressing you seriously is not serious. I think you are mentally ill.)
I definitely saw it.
I saw what happens to a building that is hit by a plane.
At most a few floors were damaged or the building fell sideways.
I know that never in the history of history has a 50-story building fallen to the floor faster than gravity.
Never in the history of history has a building crumbled to ashes because its foundations "heated" or it was hit by pieces of another building.
what a fool Quoting others without thinking.
FYI:
Have you ever seen a building collapse at all?
What a stupid question!
Which one is smart? The learner from the experience of others!
To little brother, did you really bother to check what happened in building 7 that day? How did it fall? Who is responsible for his downfall?
Or did you just accept the popular media position of completely ignoring the fact that we fell?
Have you ever seen a building crumble to ashes in 7 seconds due to "natural" causes?
You are ignorant.
A soft and innocent calf that will also eat mud if told it's chocolate.
I agree with Michael (formerly Michael), in my opinion there is no scientific innocence here, this is naivete.
As a young manager, my teachers taught me that it is important not only to pass the ball, but to make sure that the ball is indeed caught (and how it is caught!). With all conspiracy theory enthusiasts (mostly Americans), give them a scrap of information that has a respected professor behind it and they will make a meal out of it. Remember building 7 from 11/7? Before the researchers could gather data (because they were focused on the twins and didn't want to delay the report), the internet was already filled with conspiracy theories centered on that building XNUMX.
Shimon Peres also once had an affair with "Arab Mother", obviously there was nothing here, but whoever wanted an excuse - found one!.
Same here, it's a bit of a negative and criminal thread for all kinds of anti-Semitic racists. That idiot knew exactly what he was doing.
Where do you think the Pope's outfit came from?
http://xd0.xanga.com/062c746238d32185281596/z142091056.jpg
A long-standing tribute to the Philistine pagan god Dagon.
He is considered half god and half fish and therefore the Pope wears a fish-like hat for ceremonies.
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42091000/jpg/_42091892_pope_ap_416.jpg
http://bp1.blogger.com/_VazGRi-TpwY/RvVtqqko2_I/AAAAAAAAABU/E7bRu4VbAV4/s1600-h/Pagan+cross.jpg
The Catholic "cross".
The Catholic Church was not spread by Jesus but by the Roman Empire. In order to bring the whole empire under one faith, they created a new religion based on Christianity but mixed it with Egyptian paganism that was known and "served" in those days.
Pagan rituals are still held today under "Christian" auspices.
Pay attention to the picture of Benedict XVI on Wikipedia
http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%AA%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94:BentoXVI-30-10052007.jpg
He wears the "pagan cross" - symbolizing the zodiac, the four directions of the winds, an ancient Celtic symbol symbolizing the sun.
The Vatican Church is built like Stonehenge at the same time as the sun on the shortest day (December 22)
It is also the day they celebrate the birth of Jesus, the day the sun was "reborn" after 3 very short days.
They also pray on Sunday - SUN DAY - the day of the sun.
Michael R.
These enlightenments that appear to all kinds of people. who suddenly rediscovered how to quarter the circle.
You see it here on the site. People come up with revolutionary ideas and seemingly new approaches that magically eliminate work and existing knowledge and create a completely new Peta Morgana.
A new science that questions and undermines previous thinking.
You see the phenomenon in all scientific fields and this matter has enough representatives as you already know from your experience here.
I am intrigued by the psychological motivations outside of the desire for attention for creatively frustrated people.
A long evening of fantastic ideas that sometimes people get attached to it and it becomes a kind of delusional reality.
Probably a matter of personality structure. Although it is true that to create something new you have to think outside the box. But sometimes it's outside the box. Outside of raising an eyebrow it doesn't give much.
By the way, the current Pope, came to his position after being the head of the "Congregation of the Doctrine of Faith" - it is the same body formerly called the "Inquisition".
Something to think about.
Harvard is an institution of lizards and snakes.
The Catholic Church is also pagan, according to its rituals they drink the blood of Jesus, take pride in the cross on which he was crucified and mock him by wearing the pagan cross in public, as a kind of joke at the expense of his believers.
It is strange to find the many cases of harassment by pedophile Catholic priests in innocent children.
There is no doubt that Tuaf's words were written without much thought and only to create a sensation.
After all, the blood plots were a common phenomenon.
There have always been criminals in every society, and even if there was some case of a Jewish criminal who harmed a Christian (as there certainly were Christians who harmed Jews, Jews who harmed Jews, and Christians who harmed Christians) this would not justify the phenomenon of bloodshed.
The fact that there were criminals here and there is obvious and you don't need to conduct research or write a book to discover and publish this.
Therefore, the question is asked what is the purpose of the research and publication and the only possible answer is "to give the blood plots some legitimacy".
In my view, this is a criminal purpose regardless of the findings.
Dr. Yehiam Sorek
Below is a quote from your words:
"On the background of the many testimonies and even the confessions (albeit after an inquisitional investigation)"
Well, according to your opinion, these interrogated testified according to their wishes while serving refreshments and refreshments
in the luxurious and comfortable accommodation hotel.
I wonder if they would host you in the basements of the KGB or the Saiai or the Shin Bet if you didn't sing
all your opinions from right to left and not as usual.
Personal acquaintance with Mr. Yehiam Sorek: He received a doctor's degree at Harvard.
Hello to Eli
I received your response with welcome and support, and also to turn it over to Sipa.
Hello to David,
There is no connection between the "name" of the institution where I work and my views, as well as that I did not choose the name of the street where I live in any political and ideological context.
And "huts-a-mayisha" Berel Katznelson was as far from nationalism as east is from west and his unifying, compromising and unifying positions in relation to the workers' camp, unlike the Bangorionist partisanship, is actually very close to my heart.
Calling Berl Katznelson a racist and extremist is about the same as defining Martin Luther King as being associated with the Klu Klux Klan.
Hello to Jonathan
Despite your desire, just for the sake of "pure curiosity", allow me to leave a few details of my life private.
And another question: Why do you work at Beit Berel, even though Berel Katznelson said things that in your eyes are surely nationalist, extremist, racist, etc.?
Dr. Sorek
I asked before and did not get an answer.
So I ask again:
In which academic institution did you receive your doctorate and in what field?
I would appreciate it if you finally answer my question.
Thanks
Another important thing:
After the many tasks and constraints; Life quickly strives for its end, and its action - there is no end).
Many issues, and solutions at the end of the tunnel, which still does not see the penetration of light rays into it?
In order to try to deal with the many issues that are raised in this forum, and due to the problems with arithmetical calculations such as: how many injustices nations have done to nations different from them; We may come to an agreement if we ask: How many cases are known in human history, when a nation that held territories as a result of a military conflict, established settlements in them (reminder: Yamit and the settlements that were returned to Egypt; the Gaza settlements that were handed over to the Palestinians), with the aim of reaching peace?
And with another goal of dealing with the issues, among other things, by testing the universal interdependence of humans on the earth (each person will live and live where he wants), when at first thought there is no possibility of realizing this kind of idea, because no country will allow its implementation; Perhaps it is at least possible to start in a regional framework, by determining the average country's area for the amount of population, when developed countries will in return delegate information on important issues such as: health, education, welfare, and more?
Even an idea of this kind, if it really exists, does not seem to have any chance of ending the almost eternal violence; and cause the peoples of the region to relax, develop healthy, well-being and peace.
Until the next article (Doctor whistles with your permission: be considerate and don't rush, the tasks and constraints are many), good luck to everyone.
uncle Shalom
No, I didn't choose to live here. I was born here as a result of a random meeting between sperm and egg, as might have happened in Alaska, Massachusetts or Petropavlovsk.
Put it another way - why do I stay here?
Well, my people have a kind of mission that I took upon myself - to fight for peace, to stop the occupation and to support a neighboring people who are in dire straits.
Not acceptable to you? Your non-acceptance actually convinces me more and more to fight for the above vocation.
Good night!
You did not answer me. Why did you choose to live in this country?
Hello to Eli,
What's wrong with you because you came to collect the Psalm articles from Ha'ob? And by the way, the hatred of nothing, at least from the literature of the Sages, was born and developed precisely among ultra-religious fanatics, delusional-fanatics, followers of the beliefs of Judaism and folk-virtualism.
The people of Israel were no different from other peoples who lived in ancient times, for "good" and/or "bad". Everything stated in the Ten Commandments is based (albeit with a historiosophical reservation on the very status of Mount Sinai, but this is not at all relevant to our case) on an existing reality. That is to say that the people of Israel did indeed murder, did indeed rape, did indeed torture their fellow man for false testimony, did indeed covet their neighbor's property and more of this kind. What to do, with as many peoples as there were. And by the way, the entire legislative system from then until today is based on a desire to fence and limit existing phenomena and not imaginary phenomena that are expected to occur somewhere in the future.
Peace to Socrates
What does it matter where the cult of Satan was born? Those who connect to it are not necessarily problematic from a socio-economic point of view. You will actually find many good sons among them.
If you had kept looking at my list you would have noticed that I am not relying on the lack of evidence.
to David
I live only on earth. If you want to realize the idea of a Jewish state, you surely support the Arab Trinspor and the establishment of a pseudo-Khomeinist halachic state, and from that these statements are no different from anti-Semitic and racist incitement in general throughout history, even this not-so-distant one.
Laish Kash-please refer to the sentence you mentioned and memorize it again. Throughout history Jews were persecuted and expelled from their countries even without the State of Israel.
A strawman, I know, I asked Sorek why
He - chose - to live in Israel
Blatant irresponsibility, in front of as large an audience as possible:
of Professor Tuaf, who decided to deal with an entire book, the most adopted plot in the history of mankind, ignoring it, like the audience that expected as always, and still expects, the establishment of the plot, while ignoring facts such as the adoption of the Ten Commandments, which include the sixth commandment: You shall not murder, Exodus chapter XNUMX , which the Jewish/Israeli people adopted much more than three thousand years ago, and before other peoples, had no idea about basic social values of this type.
And regarding Jewish religious extremism, which greatly frightened the Christian majority (according to Tuaf):
The professor and especially his audience (mainly the kind that expects "proof": even a historian, a Jewish professor, claims that there are things in the body); They are ignored, or they have no idea, or it is not their interest to know about acts of pogroms, bloodshed, riots, decrees, and massacres; Some of them also received nicknames, names and more such as: the cook: in Odessa, Galtsi, Mako, Sarmasho; Riots: Chisinau, Rindflesh... and the list is long, as well as decrees, and Kristallnacht; The lack of responsibility, which is revealed in front of an audience, which has no interest in thinking in terms of balanced judgment (if there is any room here to think sanely in the direction of balance); There are in this audience and outside of it, a great many who are eagerly awaiting a book of this type.
And this is different from the text: Hellenistic and Roman writers, respected and famous, expressed appreciation and shared words of praise for Judaism and the Jews.
The descriptions below from a number of Psalms, will testify a little, or will describe something about a very large part of the aforementioned audience:
Set / E: Rabbo, the hairs of my head - I hate you for nothing: close my prison, my enemy is a lie - which I did not rob, and I will restore.
Kit/Kenz: many, persecutors and tsari.
To David
Let me reveal to you a small fact that may shock your narrow world like the world of the ant: in Eretz Haim, in addition to the majority of Jews, there are also Christians, Muslims, Druze, Circassians, Buddhists, atheists, deists, agnostics, Scientologists, and priests and priests as the best imagination of them. Also, Jews live all over the world and not just in Israel. Woe to us if the country was closed to the existence of Jews only, because then the rest of the countries of the world would have the legitimacy to expel their Jewish citizens from it.
Please, for the sake of all of us, write the following sentence in white Kiddush letters on your doorstep: "Ignorance Is Bliss"
Yahyam Sorek, if you claim you are not Jewish, why do you live in Israel?
Not because of the weather or the view, right?
By chance, I also came across the article by the self-made man, who I usually consider a demagogue, but this time he hits the mark:
"Toaf restored the doubt in the minds of the brains by apparently confirming the justification of the plots by a Jew, and he bears responsibility for the blood that may be spilled, God forbid, in future plots, after providing them with "approval"
Will the "research" justify itself, even if it spills blood?
For those looking for advertising - maybe even more.
Dear Dr.
I will use simple words: you "blow" us with high words, and stories from Jewish history. Not only did you not manage to convey your idea clearly, even when you get down to the bottom of it, it hangs on a very thin thread, and on barbed wires of hypotheses: "can't rule out the possibility of cases...", "only supports, even if only slightly, even if it's possible..." - what is this - It? It's a balloon.
Let me give you a hint: theories of this type are not accepted in the exact sciences, and this is the difference between history and science - in history there is no absolute truth, a truth that serves those who deal with it and forces them to distinguish between true and false.
Why stop here? You could write a book, if you only contribute your talent to speculative arguments, why it is possible that the Holocaust was invented by the Jews. You could also go to a training conference in Iran...
If researching the truth was the author's goal, he could submit his findings in an academic paper, but in this case, let me use a non-scientific tool - my intuitions, there is a strong smell of a desire to be published. We would still forgive that, but harming others, like denying the Holocaust, is unforgivable.
Shalom to Shimon Ezer,
No, I'm not Jewish. I am an obsessive atheist. Faith is a question of choice and identity that comes from some kind of maturity. Any tendency to see a person's religion in the light of his genetic connections does not just border on racism. This is racism for its own sake.
Hello to Absalom,
The witnesses are not Jews but Christians. The cruelty of the Jews thousands of years ago only supports, if only somewhat, if only possibly, the claim expressed by Prof. Tuaf.
What is the connection between Judaism, being a professor, and being a rabbi? Only you have the solutions.
Yahyam whistles. I'm not religious, but your hasty attack makes me think that you are running after publicity faster than you are chasing historical truth.
Does the investigation of the Inquisition constitute for you a possibility of a historical reference on which to lean?!
Extremists exist in every nation at any time and in any place! Even in the people of Israel there are, were and will be. Did it come to the real use of children's blood as some kind of ritual act? proven. If you can't, shut up.
For your information, the Satanic cult in Israel was imported from abroad, it is not connected in any way with Judaism. on the contrary. and exists sparsely among teenagers with social problems. Check and see.
Since I also follow your articles on this site that interest me from a historical point of view, your point of departure is clear and you consistently base yourself on the lack of findings in order to rule out rather than on proven findings in order to confirm.
The inability to prove the disappeared does not prove the existence of another disappeared.
A theory contradicts a theory only in theory.
I, too, can weave together threads of articles based on the "unknown", "not found", "no possibility to prove" etc.
By the way, just out of curiosity, did you deal with communications in the Air Force in your past?
Even if the findings are correct, there are things that should not be disclosed, lest they accidentally cause a new wave of anti-Semitism, the murder of Jews, etc. What's more, according to the above information, the sources are not particularly reliable.
I'm interested in how Dr. Sorek will feel when the first Jew is murdered in Europe because this "finding" was discovered.
There is no more stupid and bloated person than a person who is willing for people to die and people to suffer because of "academic freedom"
In the name of freedom of speech you are leading to hell
How can Jewish confessions under Christian Inquisition investigation be treated as findings worthy of historical research
And what about the cruelty of the Jewish rebels and the compassionate Inquisition when the gap between them is at least fifteen hundred years
As far as I know blood has never been used in our worship
And if there is someone who claims otherwise - why does he have to be a Jew and a professor and the son of the rabbi of the Italian community. stupid man
And he also has such a friend
Dr. Yahyam whistles as usual, talking nonsense and nonsense and raking out of it.
The truth is that his words, after the words of another Torion who injured his mouth, raise thoughts that perhaps the entire subject of history is not applied at all in academic studies as a "science", and it should perhaps be removed from there as soon as possible.
It is enough to read "Havareka" one of his words to understand the depth of things and their seriousness.
With all the negative connotations of this study and the use it can have in the hands of various neo-Nazi and anti-Semitic elements, this is an important study that has come to shed light on an unpleasant side of Judaism, however small and one-sided it may be and does not necessarily reflect the majority. There is no logical reason to think that a collective of people who suffered persecution, humiliation, oppression, molestation and abuse and other shameful things will not grow within it a group of extremists who will commit terrible acts out of desperation and a sense of "enough".
History has shown that many myths have a kernel of truth one way or another that has become a myth over the years.
I strengthen the hands of the brave researcher.
"Doctor" whistles, you hate Jews so much...
You are also Jewish.
Therefore, do us a favor and turn the hatred towards the Jew
The closest to you is yourself.