Comprehensive coverage

"We are at the beginning of the second wave in the world of robotics"

Says Prof. Zvi Schiller, from the Ariel University Center, who lectured at the Robotics and Motion Controls Conference, of the magazine Technologies

Prof. Zvi Shiler
Prof. Zvi Shiler

Prof. Zvi Shiler, from the Ariel University Center, presented last week, as part of the Robotics and Drive Systems Control Conference, his concept in a lecture: "The Israeli Robotics Revolution - From Vision to Reality". The conference was produced by Technologies Group, which publishes Technologies Magazine.

Prof. Schiller said: "Technological development usually occurs in two waves, and we are at the beginning of the second wave of the field of robotics. In the report from Cobb they identified low productivity in traditional industry. Without a significant change we will not be able to face the global competition. The Eckstein report recommended reducing the number of foreign workers in Israel in the fields of agriculture and nursing. None of the reports mentioned robotics as a solution. We are trying to convince the decision makers that the investment in robotics is worthwhile."

As an example, Schiller cites South Korea, where a robotics law has been enacted under which 100 million dollars are invested annually. The result is the establishment of 50 start-ups in the field and an expected growth of 60 billion dollars by 2018.

"The investment in robotics is relatively cheap. In Japan, they invest endlessly in the field and have recognized the advantages that this field provides, for example in treating an aging population. Today in Japan the robotics industry generates 7 billion dollars and the global expectation for 2020 is 420 billion dollars. In the USA they are establishing the robotics lobby and in the European Union they will invest 400 million dollars until 2010. In Israel there are only 10 companies that produce robotics solutions, apart from academia and import companies. These companies have a reputation all over the world. We hold robotics competitions in Israel and train engineers in the field of robotics, but there is no industry to absorb them. It is not certain that only the field of software development will take us forward".

Why is it difficult for Israel to invest in robotics? According to Schiller, the main problem is that it is possible to manage without robots. It is necessary to create a technological push - since there is still no demand from the market. Another reason is the fear of competition with unskilled workers. What will happen to all the people that the robots will replace? According to Schiller, they will simply have to find something else, but it is not right to delay the development of technologies for this reason. Schiller brings up the fact that the concept of using people as a smart machine is also disappearing, when industrial engineers stood in the past and measured the productivity with a stopwatch and looked for how to optimize every minute of work.

"There is a reluctance to products that work by themselves," Schiller adds to the reasons that make it difficult to adopt robotics. "In 1997 I participated in a demonstration in the US of an automatic vehicle. I sat in the back seat of a car and she drove completely alone, making detours. The purpose of the demo was to demonstrate the programming of an automatic car, but there is a fear that the public will not accept it. There is also a fear that the machines will take over us - but since there is no way for robots to have charisma and intuition, this will not happen."
According to Shiller, the economic crisis is an opportunity for development, and that alongside nanotechnology and biotechnology, it is also necessary to invest in robotics, and that if we invest today, we will have an advantage in the future. According to him, there is also a need to convert the high-tech companies into the field of robotics, since they have the software and electronics development infrastructures. Knowledge of robotics should be added to them. Schiller called on the government to establish a national institute that would serve as a laboratory for innovation, similar to nanotechnology and other fields.

Coup happens every 25 years

"The revolutions come according to a predictable cycle of new technologies. There is the curiosity stage, so everyone invests in the innovative companies. In the early 80s there was a robotics bubble that burst in 87. There is enthusiasm at first, but then you discover that the technology is not yet ready to meet all expectations, and then comes the disappointment and everyone decides to get out of the investments. In 87 all funds in the field of robotics dried up. In the stage of disappointment, the technology continues to mature but moderately until the stage of reality, in which the technology enters the market. Usually with a killer up that breaks the ground - it takes 20-25 years. If you look at the Internet - in 1969 the first NODE was activated at UCLA and then in 96 the Netscape browser came out."

Schiller described the milestones in the world of robotics that led to the point where we are today: "The first patent in robotics was registered by George Dewell in 1954, following which the Unimation company was established which created the first industrial robot. In '97 the first robot landed on Mars. He was primitive, he only knew how to receive orders from the ground and moved centimeter by centimeter and in total he traveled about 100 meters on Mars. In 1999, Sony came out with its first robot dog, and in 2000, an Israeli company developed a robot lawnmower. A robot that became a model for all lawnmowers in the world. In 2002, a robot vacuum cleaner, "Rumba", is produced, which marks a turning point in robotics, since it is sold for less than $200, at the price of an inexpensive consumer product. In 2004, again, two robots landed on Mars, but this time they are planned to operate only for a few months, and despite this, they have been operating there for 5 years now."

Schiller provided an extensive overview of the applications of robotics in the various industries. Starting with industry, where robotics is accepted, and especially in the high-tech industry, where robots must be used to prevent infections. In medicine, remote surgery eliminates the need to enter the body with the hands, and instead only a tube can be inserted through a small hole. The operation is performed by controlling the handles by the surgeon. An advantage would be the ability to perform surgery when the machine is in one place and a specialist doctor can be found anywhere in the world. Schiller also sees a future for the use of remote medicine on the battlefield, with the wounded being on the battlefield and the doctor sitting in a safe place.

According to Schiller, the field of nursing will provide a great incentive in the field of robotics, especially in light of the fact that the population is aging. An extraskeletal system that helps the disabled to walk is already under development and in about 20 years will be a matter of course. The field of security is also starting to adopt the field of robotics. The US Army predicts that one third of the vehicles, mainly for logistics purposes, in 10 years will be driverless. If it is possible to deliver supplies without endangering a driver and attaching attendants to him, then the money invested in the vehicle has gone to the maximum. The handling of the tunnels should also be handled by robots. Schiller noted the field of entertainment and leisure as neglected, but with potential. About Sony's dog, Schiller said, "It's amazing how interacting with a machine affects a person. In 2002, I happened to visit Tokyo on the dog's birthday (two years after it went on the market). There was a woman there who dressed two dogs in clothes and treated them as living beings."

The natural selection of robotics

7 תגובות

  1. "There is also a fear that the machines will take over us - but since there is no chance for robots to have charisma and intuition, this will not happen"

    If anyone has doubts about the possibility of the development of computing machines, it is worth taking a look at the following links, which provide interesting details and updates regarding the progress in an amazing and ambitious project, which aims to create a complete computer simulation of the human brain, which is expected according to the developers within about 10 years -

    1. Interview with Idan Segev, the Israeli representative in this amazing project:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bz5IUaRr8No
    .
    .

    2. Lecture by the head of the project Henry Markram -

    http://neuroinformatics2008.org/congress-movies/Henry%20Markram.flv/view
    .
    .

    3. Lecture by Idan Segev from the same conference:

    http://neuroinformatics2008.org/congress-movies/Idan%20Segev.flv/view
    .
    .

    4. Hebrew: a fascinating lecture by Idan Segev on the subject (requires installation of QuickTime) wait about 10 minutes for the movie to start playing, do not activate or open additional windows in the background (may cause the movie to freeze or the sound to stop) -

    http://icnc.huji.ac.il:554/segev_madua2006.mp4
    .
    .

    5. Another lecture by Idan, also in Hebrew:

    http://icnc.huji.ac.il:554/segev_openday2004.mp4
    .
    .

    6. A really fascinating PDF document about the project! From the website of the "Odysseus" magazine, right-click on the link and select "Save as..."

    http://www.odyssey.org.il/pdf/עידן%20שגב-מסע%20מודרני%20אל%20נבכי%20המוח.pdf
    .
    .

    7. An article from R-T-K (and updated) in English about the project -

    part 1 - http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/out_of_the_blue/?page=2

    part 2 - http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/out_of_the_blue/P2
    .
    .

    8. Seeing through the mind, from Amnon Carmel's blog -

    http://www.tapuz.co.il/blog/ViewEntry.asp?EntryId=1399918
    .
    .

    9. The singularity is near! The future is much closer than you think -

    http://www.tapuz.co.il/blog/ViewEntry.asp?EntryId=1065939
    .
    .

    10. Link to another interesting article in Hebrew -

    http://www.themedical.co.il/Article.aspx?itemID=1868
    .
    .

    It seems that intelligent computers are closer to us than ever, and if someone trusts "Asimov's laws" to protect us - these laws are beautiful and good for a science fiction book - in reality it does not seem that we can really impose them on robots with a higher level of intelligence than ours, this is like a prisoner in a prison cell with a group of monkeys guarding him, sooner or later he will be able to trick the "guards" to get the key and go free, it's funny to think that a computer or robot whose level of intelligence will be billions of times higher than ours will continue to be subservient to us and continue to serve us, this is a possibility that seems a bit illogical.

    On the other hand, we cannot give up the continued development of such robots because intelligent robots of this type will give a huge advantage to any country that owns them, for example in the military field - intelligent robots and computers that will control the fighter planes, tanks, missiles and other weapons and control systems will constitute a crushing force that no other country (such that does not use similar means) will not be able to resist it, and we can also talk about many advantages in other fields such as medicine, development, transportation, financial management and more.

  2. You've seen too many movies. But even if we assume that you are right and the robots will indeed destroy us, it will happen whether Israel develops the field of robotics (and makes money from it) or not. Therefore, no matter what, it is better for us to at least make money from robotics until the inevitable time of destruction.

  3. The fifth revolution in the field of robotics will be that robots will start producing humans to replace them in doing stupid jobs.

  4. Israel has a very good reason to invest in robots: soldiers.

    There is no doubt that in the future there will be robots on the battlefield doing most of the work.

    In my opinion, the entire field of robotics currently depends mainly on one thing - a major breakthrough in the field of energy production/storage.

    When these two are solved, it will be possible to put powerful chips on a robot with AI at a level that will be enough to complete simple tasks such as patrols on the fence and even armor and artillery combat.

    Ironically, the infantry soldiers who supposedly require the least intelligence from the soldier will be the last to be replaced, because precisely they require AI abilities related to natural language communication with people (such as for example in TSH activity, roadblocks or urban warfare) which is currently not even close to being considered good enough.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.