Comprehensive coverage

The shocking story of Mariah daughter of Elazar

About one of the atrocities from the bloody civil war that preceded the great rebellion

In 69 AD, on the eve of the Roman siege war on Jerusalem and with the end of the suppression of the rebellion, or quasi-rebellion in the Galilee, groups of Galilean fanatics made their way to Jerusalem, such as those of Shimon bar Giura, Yohanan of Gush Halab and the horrible-delusional of all - the sons of the "fourth philosophy" ”, as Yosef ben Mattathias calls them, who were fanatical zealots, whose whole object was to rule the kingdom of God on earth and drive out the Romans. These groups flee towards Jerusalem, with the aura of redemption, messiahship and apocalypse surrounding them, because mother Jerusalem is calling her sons, and they immediately mobilize to her aid.
Following the arrival of the groups to Jerusalem, when each of them believes that she has the right to lead the struggle, Jerusalem is dragged into a hard and bloody civil war. The most surprising of all in its violence, its zeal and its cruelty was the group of Sikriim, who did not resort to any means, including destruction, robbery and murder, to realize their desires. This group carried out a mysterious and cruel act of burning the food treasures in the city, apparently, so it seems, in order to arouse all the inhabitants of the city, most of whom were sick of opposing Rome, to take up arms without any choice and rebel against the Romans. This story about the burning of the food and its dire consequences, as recorded by Yosef ben Matthew, receives an interesting verification in the literature of Sages, when in one of the versions of Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai's departure from Jerusalem, the Rabbi turns to Abba Sikra, "Rish bully of Jerusalem", and wonders how the zealots cause hunger Unbearably heavy in the besieged city to the point of high mortality in the population.
This move, including the terrible war between the brothers in Jerusalem, brought down a terrible famine on the city and "in every house there was a war at the time when the shadow of something that would be eaten was seen there, and the lovers ran together arm in arm and devoured each from his brother's hand the poor little ones, in order to revive their souls" - says Yosef ben Matthiyahu in his book " The Wars of the Jews" (Book XNUMX, Chapter Three) - and continues with the description of the horror: "Even in the dying, no one believed, since they had nothing, and the robbers (the zealots) attacked the dying and searched them, lest someone hid something edible in the wing of his cloak and led them astray by disguising themselves as prone to die. Due to the magnitude of the hunger, the people opened their mouths like mad dogs, and as drunken people reveling in subam, they smashed the doors, and, at a loss for any advice, broke into one house two or three times. The lack forced them to have nothing between their teeth, and they collected the things, which even the unclean animals were sick of, and did not refrain from chewing and swallowing. Recently, they didn't even pull their hands from the old leather belts and shoes, they even tore the skins over the guards and chewed them."
But, and this is what Joseph ben Matthew testifies to, all the above-mentioned testimonies are dwarfed in front of a terrible story, which will make anyone who hears it stand on end. And the act that was like this was: one rich and generous woman from across the Jordan named Marya daughter of Elazar from the village of Beit Azov arrived in Jerusalem in the general stream of refugees from the east of the city and with her her great possessions. The zealots had no mercy on her assets and often looted them and left her destitute. In her anger and heartbreak, she took her baby and called to him: "O wretched wretch! Who and why will I take care of you this time? Here the hater (referring to the Roman) is standing outside, and hunger and brotherly strife are leaving the house. Both a house of slaves is our inheritance in the hands of the Romans, if we also have our souls for booty, and hunger will have a harvest for us before we enslave them, and the rebels are harder for us than both of these judgments together. death! There was peace for your mother and an evil spirit for tyrants, and also, for example, for wit in the mouth of life, because only this thing remains to fill the seven sufferings of the Jews." (The Wars of the Jews, XNUMX:XNUMX).
At the end of her agitated words, which contained a heavy accusation against the rebels and what they had caused in Jerusalem, much more than the Romans who had besieged the city, she killed her son, roasted him and ate half of him, and left the rest to watch. When this became known to the fanatical rebels, they asked to see the horror with their own eyes, but they immediately fled from the place, gripped by the oozing and boiling water. The account of the event that spread throughout the city resulted, according to Yosef ben Matthew, in an increase in the number of suicides.
Atrocities of this kind were expressed, albeit somewhat allegorically, in the external literature and the literature of sages that were compiled and written after the rebellion. In the composition Baruch al-Suri, the writer brings the atmosphere of terror after the destruction in this way: "Blessed is the man who was not born, or who was born and dies, and we the living, woe to us, who see the distress of Zion... you farmers do not sow any more... and you bridegrooms do not come to your shelter... and you wives do not Pray for her to give birth... after this mother (Jerusalem and the Temple) is desolate and her sons have gone into captivity" (XNUMX:XNUMX). In Sage literature it is told about Rabbi Yehoshua ben Hananiah who learned about groups of ascetics after the Holocaust, who imposed severe asceticism on themselves in the field of nutrition (Tosefta Sota, XNUMX, XNUMX-XNUMX).
Phenomena of this kind after the destruction were indeed logical and natural, but all of them hide a sharp criticism towards the rebellion and the rebels, to such an extent that here and there you also find defiance towards God, how he allowed the horrors of the destruction to take place. It is not known whether the story of Marya daughter of Eleazar took place, or whether it was a product of Joseph's writing. In any case, he teaches about the true horror of the rebellion, about which Agrippa II warned in his moving speech, who asked to prevent the rebellion from happening, namely - the fraternal wars and their consequences. This is not a fight between the supporters of the rebellion and its opponents, but between the fanatical elements that caused the rebellion and seem to have been fed by the bloodshed they themselves initiated. 

6 תגובות

  1. Hello to Ram Amit Shalom

    a) The inscription in Joseph's sources is "Miriam" and not "Miriam". There is no connection between this Mary and the Virgin Mary, the mother of Jesus, or any of the Marys appearing in the New Testament. For your information, in the New Testament they are called Miriam. The origin of the name is Demotic Egyptian and means - the Lord of God, the chosen of God.

    b) If you had read carefully, and even skimmed through my list, you would have found my certain historiosophical reservations about the credibility of Agrippa's speech. However, this is not relevant at all, and even if the speech was drilled into the burning mind of Joseph ben Mattathias and formulated after the Holocaust, in terms of fait accompli, it does not at all change the horror of the atmosphere that prevailed in besieged Jerusalem during the actual days of the Holocaust.
    And by the way, there is a contradiction hidden in your words - on the one hand you claim that there is no historical indication of reliability, and on the other hand you define the story as fiction from the start.
    By the way, if we go by your method, Yosef ben Matthiyoh did not betray at all after the siege of Yodefat, since the event appears in his own writings.
    And maybe-maybe all the stories about the destruction in Jerusalem were nothing but fiction.
    On the other hand, Zil is perfect!

  2. Some notes:
    A. Why Maria and not Miriam? Yosef ben Matatiyo, in any case, calls her Miriam.
    B. It is worth noting that, along with the historical facts, Yosef ben Matthiyehu also mobilized his (great!) literary talent and his personal views to create several speeches and exchanges in the "Jewish Wars". There is no reliable indication that Agrippa's speech was actually given in the text that appears in the book. Those who come to draw immediate and decisive political conclusions, and expect a serious attitude from the reader, would do well to be more respectful in distinguishing between historical facts and fiction.

  3. What determines: development and updating of laws and laws.

    Under normal conditions, as part of attempts to deal with disagreements in any society, rules and laws are used; And even under these circumstances, extreme trends break out from time to time, which can undermine that society; And if society is immune enough, it usually manages to deal with extremism of some kind.

    In the conditions before the Great Revolt, when the rift in Jewish society was growing, due to the frustration caused, among other things, by the Romans (more reasons below); Jewish society was helpless to the point of final collapse, and to the point of severe phenomena as described in the article.

    For the other reasons:

    The ideas expressed in the Bible, culminating in the Ten Commandments in Deuteronomy, were so successful for a time that they were internalized into a deep religious belief, to the point of sanctity that cannot be changed.

    But the historical events have proven that no matter how successful ideas are, they are timed, and others, more successful, dictate the historical developments.

    And it is true that the impressive development that was manifested in democratic Athens (revolutionary social change for the time), demonstrated the ability to continue development in many subjects, far beyond what was known before, and in addition served as an inspiration to the Romans, who decided not to fall behind, and developed a legal system, in terms of the science of law, in a period of about a thousand years, and dictated history for a long historical period.

    Note: The capabilities developed in the nations that adopted social developments, collapsed mainly in security and foreign policy issues at the very beginning, when the development of social values ​​was stopped.

  4. peace to Doron,

    I'm not trying to imply or direct any kind of path, and certainly not in the context of the modern era. I belong to that school of historians that opposes and disapproves of creating an equal demarcation between events spanning several years, especially when it comes to thousands of years.
    However, expect to see in one of the following articles a reference, albeit a marginal one, to the subject of "gratuitous hate" in relation to the destruction of the house.
    I have already addressed the topic of free hate in one of the articles on this website.

  5. Why are you telling this story on the website?
    Are you trying to imply something? Maybe warn?

    Yes, they say that the house was destroyed for free sleeping
    Today things are going differently..

    Doron.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.