Comprehensive coverage

The future of hospitals, medicine - and the health of all of us

*** This entry was written following three lectures I gave - at the Bio-Executive Forum, at the Novartis "Future of Medicine" conference, and in front of senior managers at the Maccabi Hospital Fund - all about the future of medicine, of course. The time has come for the general public to know where medicine is going, and not just the drug companies. Hope you enjoy reading! ***

It seems that as a result of several technological trends that will integrate and reinforce each other, hospitals will become less and less relevant for the majority of patients in the coming decades. They will not disappear completely, but most citizens will be able to avoid visiting them, or at least being hospitalized for a long time. Illustration: pixabay.com.
It seems that as a result of several technological trends that will integrate and reinforce each other, hospitals will become less and less relevant for the majority of patients in the coming decades. They will not disappear completely, but most citizens will be able to avoid visiting them, or at least being hospitalized for a long time. Illustration: pixabay.com.

The patient was rushed in a wheelchair to the emergency room at the hospital, with her eyes wide open in terror and struggling to breathe. A few weeks before she was hospitalized and diagnosed with pneumonia. Doctor David H. Newman, the attending physician, described her in the following words in a published article in the New York Times -

"Her arms were covered in red and purple bruises, the product of daily blood tests; Her face was emaciated; Her lips were dry. According to her husband, while she was in the hospital she rarely slept and did not eat well. She lost weight.”

When the patient arrived at the hospital's emergency room, Newman examined her and discovered that the pneumonia was long gone. Her lungs sounded clean, but the suffering and difficulties she experienced in the hospital clearly affected her. Newman believes that they led to a new type of syndrome - "post-hospital syndrome".

Doctor Harlan M. Krumholtz, a professor of medicine and public health at Yale University, first recognized the syndrome and gave it its name In a study published in 2013 In the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). According to Krumholz, the patients are unable to sleep well in their rooms, do not enjoy the food they are used to in their homes, are unable to engage in physical activity and suffer from isolation from their loved ones, acquaintances and workplace. Although the hospitals provide great physical proximity to the doctor and emergency medical services, they also make it difficult for the hospitalized to recover from the disease.

What is good, then, that the hospitals are reduced in their roles and in the number of hospitalized patients they receive. The trend can already be seen today: Report of the Medicare Payments Advisory Committee From the last year reveals that between 2008 and 2014, the number of hospitalized patients in the United States decreased by eight percent, while the number of visitors to outpatient clinics increased by 32.9 percent.

The total change in the number of those admitted to hospitals, compared to the number of visits to outpatient clinics between the years 2000 and 2014. Source: Report of the Advisory Committee for Medicare Payments.
The total change in the number of those admitted to hospitals, compared to the number of visits to outpatient clinics between the years 2000 and 2014. Source: Report of the Medicare Payments Advisory Committee.

In the prediction I will describe in this entry, it seems that as a result of several technological trends that will integrate and reinforce each other, hospitals will become less and less relevant for the majority of patients in the coming decades. They will not disappear completely, but most citizens will be able to avoid visiting them, or at least being hospitalized for a long time.

In the rest of the post I will briefly review the various technological trends that will affect the future of hospitals. If they seem familiar to you, it's for a good reason: these trends are so powerful and significant that they affect every area of ​​our lives, so you must have been exposed to them in other places as well, and certainly in previous entries on this blog. It is precisely for this reason that we need to take them seriously, because they will surely also affect the future of medicine and hospitals. I will show how they can influence in these areas and further some of the functions of the hospital, and finally I will ask what will be left for these institutions in the future.

First technological trend: connectivity and sensing (the Internet of Things)

The world is getting filled with sensors of all kinds, big and small (mostly small), and many of them are linked to what is known as the "Internet of Things". The Internet of Things connects all these sensors and allows us easy access to them and a quick way to cross-reference information that did not exist before.

How big is the Internet of Things? There are assumptions that by 2020 we will reach a number of 200 billion objects to be connected to the Internet of Things. Even under the lowest assumptions, by 2020 each person is expected to own 6.3 connected objects on average. Most people, especially in developed countries, will own even more connected objects.

But what kinds?

The most important health-related objects will surely be those that fall into the category of wearable computing. We will carry them wherever we go. These include Smart shirts, Smart Watches, smart rings, smart shoes, Smart belts, smart glasses and even Smart hats. And when I write "intelligence" I mean it in the full sense of the word: we are going to embed sensing capability, connectivity and limited artificial intelligence in many of the objects we carry on our bodies. In fact, we are about to instill "wisdom" in them and give them the ability to alert us to any future changes in our physiological state.

The smart bra: a bra that includes sensors and is able to track the physical activity of the wearer (did not fall between the sexes). Source: OMbra
The smart bra: a bra that includes sensors and is able to track the physical activity of the wearer (did not fall between the sexes). source: OMbra

The second important category will be that of ingestible and skin computing. This category includesProteus company's balls, which include a sensor and a transmitter and are able to report the state of the drug inside the stomach and intestine, and the tattooed sensors (don't worry, this is a tiny transparent sticker attached to the skin, not a tattoo etched into the skin) that can transmit messages about what is happening in the body.

The third main category will be the home sensors, and especially those that are starting to appear in homes for other general uses, such as the Kinect (a smart camera connected to the Internet), Amazon Echo and Google Assistant (a smart microphone connected to the Internet), home robots and more.

Electronic tattoo - a thin transparent sticker that sticks to the skin and carries electronic components such as sensors, a microphone, LED lights and even tiny needles. Source: Photo courtesy John Rogers.
Electronic tattoo - a thin transparent sticker that sticks to the skin and carries electronic components such as sensors, a microphone, LED lights and even tiny needles. source: Photo courtesy John Rogers.

All these sensors will provide a level of surveillance that can only be found today in the most sophisticated hospitals. But beyond that, they will open a window to a new model of medical monitoring that will include all human beings.

At this point, the skeptics and wearable computing experts usually respond, explaining that young people and healthy people are not enthusiastic about buying devices that will monitor their health. That's true, but those experts miss the point: in the Internet of Things world, All objects will be smart. Every young person will carry a smartphone in their pocket, an electronic tattoo on their skin, and will enjoy the services of computerized assistants and robots in their homes. And all of these will listen to him all the time and assess his health status automatically. The big question is not whether people will purchase health monitoring devices, but what is the marketing and economic model through which the insurance and medical companies will be able to get people to volunteer the information read on those devices.

We can learn about the future economic model of these companies from the story of Nokia and Wise in the first decade of the 21st century. Nokia tried to gain control over the information market coming from the roads by placing large, expensive and sophisticated sensors at every intersection. Wise tried to do the exact same thing, but she assumed that in a few years everyone would have smart phones with portable GPS receivers, and would want to share every incident on the road with each other. In other words, Wise realized that when everyone is purchasing end devices - even if for other purposes - it can take advantage of them and concentrate on software development and service provision, rather than purchasing, installing and maintaining the expensive and cumbersome physical hardware.

The story of Wise and Nokia is about to repeat itself also in the context of the hospitals. Many of the services provided by these expensive, slow and outdated institutions will not be able to compete with similar services that will be provided by medical companies and information to citizens, and that will rely on the devices they already have in their homes and on the body: small, cheap sensors, and most importantly - that the customer has already purchased and uses them for various needs.

The trend of artificial intelligence development

We are, therefore, about to enter a world full of sensors. These will flood us with information - more information than today's doctors can use. Fortunately for us and for them, they will not be responsible for analyzing, processing and drawing conclusions from this wealth of information. This role will be played by Watson-type artificial intelligence engines and the like. Already today, Watson is able to diagnose and provide medical recommendations that match those of talented and experienced human doctors in the field of cancer - but it reaches these conclusions in a matter of seconds, while they need long hours of reading medical literature and medical documents to reach the most successful determination (we think).

We are seeing Watson's successes begin to reach the awareness of the medical community. In August 2016, he was able to correctly diagnose an unusual type of cancer in a Japanese woman, which had eluded doctors. He did it in just ten minutes, and while he relies on the twenty million medical studies he has gone through, and at the same time offers an appropriate treatment plan. In Germany, Watson is currently being used to diagnose rare diseases, in a medical institute designed to treat patients for whom the normal medical system is unable to decipher the causes of their illnesses. Some of the lucky patients who come to the institute have already gone through forty previous doctors who could not understand what they are sick with. The doctors at the institute have to go through thousands of pages of medical records of each patient and try to solve the mystery. Is it any wonder that the waiting list for the institute's services reaches the length of 6,000 patients? But now the institute is starting to use Watson's services - and initial tests already show that it is manages to reach similar conclusions Like those reached by entire committees of doctors at the institute.

I am not trying to claim that Watson - or any other artificial intelligence engine that provides diagnostic and medical consulting services - does not make mistakes. Of course he is wrong, just as human doctors are confused, wrong, or simply not exposed to the most up-to-date medical information on the same level as Watson. And anyway, human doctors areDear: You have to teach and train them for decades, provide them with an office and a secretary, pay them high salaries and more. But even more than that, they are limited in time. By virtue of being human, they can go through a limited amount of documents and patients per day. The artificial intelligence is not expected to have similar limitations, and the meaning is that any of us who agree to link the sensors on it to the Internet of Things and give the artificial intelligence access to them, will be able to benefit from constant and regular monitoring and medical advice - every minute, in fact.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=116&v=_kH5iXm8P5I

The artificial intelligence known as Vi: contacts the user through headphones, monitors his health condition and provides him with recommendations regarding the best physical activity for him. Of the company LifeBeam (with a development center in Israel)

Artificial intelligence, therefore, will bring us to a world where medicine is no longer a service separated from our daily lives. We will not have to make an appointment at a health fund or wait for a doctor to diagnose us. Instead, the computerized medical advisors will provide us with an opinion every morning regarding our medical condition - and this without us having to waste time at all visiting the clinic or the hospital.

The trend of robotics in homes

Home robots have turned from science fiction into reality in the form of the Roomba and the iRobot - the small robotic vacuum cleaners that run around in many homes today. Now, thanks to the impressive developments in the field of artificial intelligence and sensors, we are starting to see new and impressive types of home robots. From robots equipped with a projector with which they can add meaning and color to walls, surfaces and even objects in the house, to 'sensitive' robots that are able to understand the emotional state of their owners and react accordingly.

The most important robots for medical purposes are those that can treat patients in their homes. Molly is one of these, for example, which is based on two human-looking arms and hands, and is able to cook thousands of different dishes with maximum precision. Molly should reach the market in 2017, with an estimated cost of about 15,000 dollars, and you can prepare even patients with disabilities their favorite dishes. Another impressive robot recently demonstrated was Boston Dynamics' Spot-Mini, which looks like a friendly little dog - with a robotic arm coming out of its back. Spot-mini can go up and down the stairs, walk around the house, and even put the dishes in the dishwasher using the arm. And of course, even robots that will carry the patients around the house are now in advanced stages of development.

When the robots in homes will be developed enough, there will no longer be a need for one of the central important functions of the hospital: providing constant care for the physical needs of those hospitalized who cannot take care of themselves. Robots will not reach a high level in the next five years, but in ten or fifteen years we are expected to see really sophisticated robots arriving in almost every home.

The trend of rapid production

In the previous post, I touched on the future possibility of producing medicines at home. This activity is still far away, and more importantly - it will be limited in terms of the law, so it will be forced to take place under the spotlight for a large part of the drugs. However, machines (and possibly robots) will be able to produce cookies, creatives and sweets containing different combinations of active substances in different doses, depending on the patient's physiological condition. The machines will operate using cartridges of food and medicinal substances, and will combine them together according to doses determined and controlled by the doctor.

Such machines are especially important for chronic patients who have to take dozens of different pills a day. Since they will also be connected to the Internet of Things, they will be able to balance the required doses automatically every hour, and without the involvement of human doctors. The meaning, in practice, is that giving pills in the usual way will become primitive and crude medicine, which does not adapt itself optimally to the patient's needs. Basically, exactly as she is today, without a choice.

The trend of fast transportation

If you've been reading the blog for a long time, you've probably noticed the constant improvement in the capabilities of autonomous vehicles. When the autonomous vehicles reach the roads in large numbers, we will see a new type of public transportation: cheap, efficient, and requiring a much smaller number of vehicles to meet the needs of the residents. Beyond that, everyone will be able to comfortably use this public transportation, including the elderly and people with disabilities.

Along with autonomous public transportation, we are expected to see two more developments in the next two decades: the entry of drones into the delivery market, and the use of flying taxis. As you probably remember from one of the previous entries, Uber Develops plans to use flying taxis (and more precisely as VTOL - Vertically Take-Off and Landing aircraft) that will be cheaper to use than regular taxis. The flying taxis operate thanks to advanced artificial intelligence that will provide them with autonomy, batteries and electric motors that should provide them with enough power to cross the entire city, and a large number of blades to make sure that even if several systems fail together - the blades that will continue to function will be able to land the vehicle without casualties.

All these tools will start to be used for medical purposes as well. we You can already see the drones today are used for efficient, safe and fast transportation of Medicines and blood samples for hospitals or to isolated villages. Other drones are able to fly at speeds of one hundred km/h and function at the scene as a defibrillator monitor With remote activation by a doctor.

What all these developments mean, when they come to fruition, is that distances in the physical world become less important. Or more precisely, the only distance that changes is the one measured "as the crow flies" - that is, in a straight line stretching between two points on the map. Obstacles, roads, buildings, traffic jams - all of these can be ignored in calculating the estimated arrival time. As a result, services that could previously only be provided effectively when they were held in the same building, will be possible to start providing in the next decade even when they are located in different buildings dozens of kilometers apart. That is, we can start to 'decentralize' the hospital services in the area. Of course, we will not be able to provide all patients with the same level of care in their homes, as they would receive in the hospital, but at least some of them will no longer be obliged to be admitted to the hospital in order to receive emergency treatment quickly and efficiently.

The trend of accurate forecasting

In the last twenty years, the costs of sequencing the genetic code - that is, reading the programming and operating instructions of the human body - have decreased at a dramatic rate. If in the early XNUMXs sequencing the genetic code of one person cost almost one hundred million dollars, then the price dropped to one hundred thousand dollars in only eight years, and today it stands atA thousand dollars only. It appears that the costs will continue to decrease as the number of people who undergo the procedure increases. 23andMe, which provides partial genetic sequencing, already has 1.2 million registered customers, myself among them. Each of us received certain estimates from society - at least before the United States Food and Drug Administration forced it to stop giving medical diagnoses - about the statistical consequences of our genetic code on our health.

In the coming years, anyone who wants to will be able to know what information exists in their genetic code, and accordingly we will be able to provide better predictions regarding their chances of developing certain diseases in the future and prepare for them.

The continuing decline in the costs of sequencing the genetic code of individuals. Source: The NIH.
The continuing decline in the costs of sequencing the genetic code of individuals. source: The NIH.

Our forecasting abilities will not be limited only to the long term. Thanks to the Internet of Things and artificial intelligence that is always watching over us, we can accurately predict when people need emergency medical care - in many cases before the catastrophe. We know, for example, for algorithms that receive information from sensors on the patient's body can warn of an impending heart attack Four whole hours before the event. Artificial intelligence engines running on all the data coming from the monitored people will probably be able to report ahead of time on a multitude of other emergency cases.

Given such advanced forecasting capabilities, it seems likely that in the not-too-distant future we will be able to predict accurately and in advance when a person is going to experience a health crisis that will require him to go to the hospital and receive treatments that only the large institution can provide. Other cases could be treated in smaller clinics near the patient's home, or in his own home.

A future without hospitals?

All these trends lead me to formulate a prediction according to which in the next twenty years the role of hospitals will be reduced, and the number of patients in them will decrease significantly. Many chronic patients will receive home care, and will come to the hospital only in extreme emergencies. Others will be able to visit smaller clinics that, thanks to sophisticated robotics and advanced artificial intelligence, will be able to provide medical services at a level that rivals that of hospitals today.

But what will be left for the hospitals to do?

The future hospitals

Even assuming that all the trends I described will mature together, we will still see the hospitals providing a number of services that will be very difficult to replace. I divide these services into several different categories -

  1. high cost: Any examination or treatment that involves particularly expensive equipment, such as an MRI, will still be left within the limits of the hospital that can afford to purchase and maintain them.
  2. special preparation: The hospital will continue to perform examinations and treatments that require special preparation of the kind that is difficult to achieve in a normal home - for example, surgery that must be performed in a high-level sterile environment.
  3. Trauma care centers: In any situation where people are unexpectedly injured - for example, as a result of a car accident - they will surely be sent to the hospital for initial treatment until their condition stabilizes.
  4. Fear of immediate deterioration: In cases where there is a fear of deterioration requiring immediate treatment, hospitalization will continue in the hospital.

These, then, will be the hospitals of the future: institutions containing the most sophisticated laboratories and the most advanced medical equipment, but with a much smaller number of patients who will have to leave the comfort of their homes and endure the difficult living conditions in the hospital.

And to tell the truth, this is a future I can hardly wait for.

Additional assessments regarding the future of medicine, monitoring, and the way in which part of the medical responsibility will pass to the patients themselves, can be found in my soon-to-be-published book - "The Rulers of the Future: Capital-Government, Technology, Hope" published by Kinneret Zamora. If you want to be updated when the book is published, you can subscribe to the blog in the box on the right. 

12 תגובות

  1. Yaron
    What do you want to say?
    Just throw away data?
    To say that it sucks to live here?
    There is much to improve in the country, some of the problems are not unique to the country and some are. Part of the solution seems simple to you from the armchair, but it is not.
    But just throwing data that 80% of the income goes to tax. It's just rambling and showing ignorance.
    I can refer specifically to the examples you gave (for some I will also agree that there is a problem) but it would be pointless because you will continue to fire more complaints about automat.

  2. A hearing aid for one ear costs 15,000 NIS. On EBAY, the same Siemens device costs NIS 2,500. But what - when you bring it to Israel, no ear laboratory will agree to calibrate it for you. To hear well with 2 ears, a person needs to sell his car and pay 30,000 NIS. Why does it cost 6 times the cost abroad?

  3. I turn to other directions.
    In Israel 30% of the families = over 1/2 million families with a permanent deficit in the bank. For the price of one apartment, you buy 2-4 abroad, and the price of a car is 2-3 times its price abroad. The price of vehicles like Mercedes, Audi in Slovenia, half a third of its price in Israel. The fuel also goes up like that. According to you, it has nothing to do with taxation. Check again.
    The long-term care part of your insurance, if you did, costs you several hundred NIS per month because the state is canceling collective long-term care insurance. The part that gives you platinum in a health fund, is perforated. Give you Germany as a comparison. A citizen wants to connect electric charging, to photovoltaic collectors and earn himself another 15,000 NIS per month in euros, receives from the state up to 30,000 euros as a gift for the purchase of batteries - for example from Tesla. A citizen wants to study 3 degrees. Free academic education. As far as I remember, the top tax rate is 28%. A pregnant woman, etc. gives credit points and tax reduction.

  4. I re-read your calculation for 80% tax and it is more distorted than I thought at first. You are talking about a top tax bracket, meaning a person who earns a lot. You are talking about 5% social security even though this is not true because a person with such a large salary only pays social security for part of the salary because social security only insures you up to a certain amount. And then you add from p.m. and start from the assumption that he takes everything out. This is not true, a person with such a large income his income is greater than his expenses so he pays less than 17 percent. (His property tax will also be more than NIS 1000, but in percentage terms not even a tenth of a percent. Regarding water, I don't understand what it has to do with the tax calculation. Water is not a tax, it's something you buy)
    If you are talking about someone who is not rich, then he does not come close to 50% income tax (the highest level)
    In short, there is no one who comes close to paying the state 80 percent of taxes. Even if we add taxes that you did not consider such as a tax on car cigarettes and certain imported products.

  5. Yaron
    If I understand correctly you count anything that the state provides not for free as a tax.
    Even water will be deducted from your tax, as will health services.
    You write in a very childish way. You calculate together both direct and indirect taxes and mandatory health insurance as if they were one thing. A vassal in the Middle Ages paid no tax for health insurance and did not receive subsidized education for his children. The money went directly to the noble and was intended to serve him only. Apart from a loose commitment to defense in case of war. The whole figure of 80-85 percent is just a game of numbers, it includes the average income tax of course all income compared to all income tax payments. Because most of the income is from the upper deciles and they pay a high percentage, it creates the appearance that the majority pay a high percentage and the opposite is true, the majority pay much less (at least 60 percent of the citizens pay a percentage lower than the average percentage)
    Not everything is perfect because, for example, the upper percentages do tax planning and pay percentages less than the upper middle class, for example. But compare to the days of the buildings? !

  6. A number of additional developments, mainly in the field of diagnostics, will make family/internal medicine almost unnecessary and will dramatically reduce the number of referrals to emergency departments:
    * Labs on a chip - just like today we sample sugar, it will be possible to receive a complete diagnosis at home for almost any medical condition and to know if it is an emergency or not, sensors that sample our blood, saliva, smell our oral cavity and secretions, the sensors will be embedded in objects that we use daily .
    * Personal cameras that (for the purpose of diagnosis) take pictures of our throat, ear, skin, as well as internal cameras with decoding capability
    * Home ultrasound systems are very sensitive, cheap, simple to operate with decoding algorithms
    * Abilities of royal intelligence to process all information, receive a diagnosis, issue a prescription, and monitor the duration of the disease

  7. Yaron
    Where does the figure come from that 50% of US citizens do not have a medical waiver? This is far from reality!

  8. At 2 a second opinion on the article. However, we already feel the accessibility of medicine at the clinic level, and the accessibility of non-chemotherapeutic treatments for cancer such as biological and genetic, for those who have a sufficiently organized job to finance such platinum insurance. And this increases the chance of being cured even 50 times or more. That is, we are not completely slaves like in the Middle Ages, even though the establishment strives for us to be. Immigrants to the civilized world, without medical insurance, and 25% of US citizens - without medical insurance there is nothing to talk about this innovation. She doesn't reach them. And about us: employed citizens. This year, for example, the collective long-term care insurance was canceled, I think, and the long-term care part of my policy went up from 400 NIS to XNUMX NIS.
    The state gave coverage to Platinum buyers in general, for example, first 5 years long-term care insurance, not including: hostilities, road accidents and beyond 5 years. Monthly salary for nursing care is 15,000-20,000 NIS.

  9. The proliferating factors are not to blame - that is, there is no defiance here against religious people of any kind: Arabs and Jews and others. There was an immigration to Europe of 14 million refugees. Volumes no less than the migration of the barbarians to the Roman Empire. Then eventually came the collapse of the Roman culture from which the European countries emerged after 1000 years of the Middle Ages: 500-1500 AD. When civilization does not pull up about 2/3 of humanity and run forward, the forces that remain below, pull back down like massive springs, and do not allow the force that pulls up to advance until after the whole mass is lifted up.

  10. Examining the total tax rates collected from citizens reaches about 80-85%. In the Middle Ages the vassal took 90% of the serf's income. That is, in about a thousand years of progress, humanity has managed to deduct 5-10% of taxes. Out of every 100 NIS that the citizen earns, the state in some way takes about 80-85 NIS.

  11. The article assumes a futurism that is guided by only one axis: technological progress. There are more forces in the design of futurism and they are not weak at all. A prediction that you want to pass the test of comparison with reality should present at least roughly two more components. The element of significant weakness of the citizen, to the point of his inability to live in reasonable conditions. Like in Elysium with Matt Damon. Therefore the scenario presented here is a possible scenario, not necessarily the most likely.
    There is a trend for governments to completely eliminate the weight of workers and any association for protection purposes, and we as humans, probably as a global phenomenon, as workers contribute to it. When a public broadcasting authority is eliminated, we are happy to help them. So gradually: electricity company, doctors and nurses, teachers, engineers. Passing laws that on the one hand the mechanism fires workers at age 55 and on the other hand postpones the retirement age to 69. When the life expectancy of an average man is 74 years and he saves about 40-50 years. The state pays him for 5 years and pocket 35-45 years. This is after taxes, the total collection of which is about 80% of the employee's salary: top tax bracket - 50%, health 5%, national 5%, VAT 17%, entering and exiting the stock market, buying an apartment in an attempt to achieve financial well-being in retirement, property tax and water - 500 -1000 NIS per month. It does not look like a rosy future for humanity. There may be robots and advanced medicine, but these are only for the rich.
    Another third trend, apart from technological innovation, and the weakening of the citizen, which acts as a counterweight is the strengthening of factors that do not encourage progress: religious people of any religion and their culture at a much higher rate than the section of the population that strives for progress. This trend will work against the trend of technological innovation for everyone, and may return humanity to several centuries of the Middle Ages. Cultural progress is only possible given 2 conditions: technological progress and social progress. Usually the technological achieves, then the social pulls down.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.