Comprehensive coverage

The great conspirator

President of Iran Ahmadinejad - Tana Dahelps the conspiracy theories, dispelled two of them in one day, in an interview with Larry King he denied the Holocaust again, and at the UN assembly he spread delusional theories about the events of September 11

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, from Wikipedia
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, from Wikipedia

On Wednesday, the President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, spoke at the UN General Assembly. He is known as a supporter of conspiracy theories when he claimed that American intelligence agents were responsible, and some say that also factors within the administration, for the September 11 attack. According to him, the agents carried out the attack "to help the economy, and to save Israel"

According to the news in Globes, in his speech at Om, he claimed that there are three theories about the identity of the perpetrators of the attacks: a powerful terrorist organization managed to penetrate through all the security and intelligence rings of the USA and carry out the attack. According to Ahmadinejad, mainly the American politicians believe in this. Certain factions in the US government initiated the attack in order to stop the decline of the American economy, to tighten their grip on Israel and to save the Zionist regime. The president of Iran maintains that the majority of the American people believe this, as well as residents and politicians in other countries. A terrorist organization carried out the attack, but the US government helped it and took advantage of the opportunity. Apparently, fewer people believe that, said the Iranian president.

Even in the speech itself, he repeated his position supporting the denial of the Holocaust, which he claims was invented by the West to justify Israeli imperialism and that the State of Israel, which was created due to a story whose truth is not clear according to him, has no right to exist. He repeated this argument in an earlier interview with CNN's Jewish presenter, Larry King (Zeiger in the original), "Even if there was a Holocaust, it does not provide any justification for the occupation of Palestine by the Jews. The Americans killed a million Iraqis in their wars in Iraq; Should the Iraqis come now and conquer America? "

There is endless evidence for these two events that he is talking about, starting with photographic evidence of the collision of the planes in the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, through an examination of the findings in the field, fairly simple engineering calculations, as well as (comparable) evidence of the planners of the attacks and even of one of the operatives who did not board the plane at the last minute and who is on trial in the US.

The Holocaust is nothing to talk about, there are so many testimonies, they are those taken by the Germans themselves to brag in the future about how they exterminated the Jews, physical testimonies such as the incinerators in Auschwitz, endless documents with which Nazi leaders were prosecuted in Europe and were even used as evidence against Eichmann in Israel. You can't just disappear seven million people like that without leaving evidence, when many of the survivors still live among us, including my mother.

Ahmadinejad is not the only one who believes in several conspiracy theories at the same time. In the article published this week (September 21, 2010) In the Guardian, George Mongbiot writes that climate deniers without any evidence are simply chronically naïve about nature.

"I am sometimes amazed at the way people caught in one set of baseless beliefs suspect others, in areas that are not always related. The internet is full of websites explaining how the US government destroyed the Twin Towers and how the crash landings were covered up by the authorities. Many of those who insist that Barack Obama is Muslim also believe that sex education increases the incidence of unwanted pregnancies."

"A collection of unfounded beliefs is a characteristic of those who deny despite the abundance of scientific facts - the very existence of man-made global warming. Lord Monckton, who lectured about man-made global warming being nonsense and which was watched by 4 million people, also claims to have discovered cures for AIDS, multiple sclerosis, influenza and other incurable diseases.” Mongbiot claims
Mongibot also mentions Nils Axel Mourner, who claims that the sea level is falling, and whose claims are occasionally quoted in the Telegraph and other media, he also insists that he has paranormal abilities to detect water and metals using the dip of a rod, and that he discovered the Hong Kong of ancient Greece in Sweden as well as Peter Taylor, the Daily Express's favorite climate denier, has claimed that a Masonic nexus, including sending ninja freaks, some of whom have been brought back to their past lives, have been sent to kill him, and that he insists that plutonium may contain healing properties, born from the plutonium dimension, phase The preparation for rebirth, an awakening of higher consciousness.”

Ahmadinejad's words caused great anger in the American administration. In an interview with the BBC radio station in Farsi, the American president said that Ahmadinejad's words were "offensive and full of hate". Moreover, Obama noted, "To say such things in Manhattan, just a short distance from the site of Ground Zero, where families of all faiths have lost their loved ones and see this as the tragedy of this generation - is
An unforgivable thing".

This juxtaposition of two denials of reality side by side puts Ahmadinejad in the disreputable club of those who believe in anything, and when such a person has nuclear weapons, the danger to the world is clear, although not all rulers in the world are rational, and those who are not are also good friends of Ahmadinejad Like Hugo Chavez and Kim Jong-il. At least the first of them also believes in quite a few conspiracy theories. It is said about this - tell me who your friends are and I will tell you who you are.

On the same topic on the science site

58 תגובות

  1. The imagination is infinite, the reality is usually much simpler, and what works in 99% of the cases there is no reason why it should not work in the other percent as well, even though it is very easy to believe all kinds of conspiracy theories

  2. Father, forgive me, I really hope you are naive, because stupidity is something I would not want to inherit.

    How do you unequivocally state that the twin disaster was carried out by terrorists without knowing even a single percent of the evidence?
    What makes you believe that conspiracies and opinions contrary to yours are the work of the devil and should not even be listened to but simply ignored?
    So I will give you some examples of situations in which a handful of people decided to band together and establish an opinion contrary to that of the government: the women's war to obtain their rights, the American war for the rights of Negro slaves, in a certain sense also the Holocaust.
    What I understand is that according to your popular opinion all these events would still be going on if people were simply caught in the popular belief that the government imposed on them through the media, financial pressures, and in the early times violence.

    We need to turn a listening ear specifically to those who have opposite opinions to ours in order to think again about everything and maybe find out that we were wrong from the start.

  3. dialect:
    The highlight of the joke is that you write "If you do not agree with what is written elsewhere, and which contradicts your thought patterns, please at least try to behave in a down-to-earth and polite way."
    Here - but you have once again discredited a huge public of scientists and medical professionals and now you are asking others to treat you with silk gloves.
    There will always be those who will use the opportunity of a negative forecast that did not materialize to discredit those who tried to prevent the possibility of it materializing. This is true in every subject and it is true here as well.
    I know many health workers and researchers and I know for sure that they were not bribed and that they expressed their honest opinion on the matter.

    The fact is that with all these "shits" the life expectancy increases year by year - as well as the life expectancy of the healthy years in them.

    I am not saying that there are no mistakes - but the mistake is a human thing.

    What is less human is the unrestrained slander that your article deals with.
    And this is defamation even if in the end it turns out that some of the factual claims you made are true, because you made these claims without knowing them.

  4. Niv, apparently not only I suffer from "burning jealousy" but the whole sane world is very, very jealous of you and the site you manage. You should be proud of this wonderful achievement!!!

    Lotem Eliyahu's article is definitely an exemplary article and one of the best I have read on the subject not only on this site but in general. It's just a shame that instead of listening to the voice of reason, different parties prefer to invent all kinds of delusional and dangerous conspiracy theories. Maybe a few million really had to die for the matter to seep into why and a few stupid heads.

  5. There are those who do not distinguish between "blows" that come from the hands of nature and between blows done by man, really not a stupid way of vaccination or protection..
    And it is strange that it is precisely people who believe in natural selection and natural evolution who are trying hard to change the delicate balance of nature.
    I admit, that as a social creature I did not withhold vaccinations from my children in their infancy and in the education system.. I went with the norm.
    But in a person's maturity, he is allowed to examine for himself what is more right for him.

  6. We will ask you the question raised by Lotem. If millions of people died only then would you agree that vaccines are needed?
    Why kill them if you can save them?

  7. To claim that the businesses work in cooperation with the government authorities is not a conspiracy theory, delusional or not, but what is known in today's economic discourse as "capital-government relations".

    The economic press is full of these reports, and especially DeMarker specializes in reporting on these issues. You should refresh your sources and reading material a little. And thanks to journalists Guy Rolnik and Eitan Avriel for their determined fight against capital-government ties, and their continuous effort to expose them to the public eye.

  8. I actually remember an article byRoey Tsezana in which he describes how he contracted the "swine flu" and survived it!!
    Hahahahaha that day I entered him that he promotes an unscientific agenda and believes in nonsense.
    After months, members of the "Hidan" site suddenly admit that there was no epidemic.
    I remember at that time, every day the media announced how many thousands of people were going to die or, alternatively, how many terminally ill people who died for one reason or another were added to the swine flu statistics.
    In short - you are worked on every day anew and you eat it with a spoon.
    A knowledgeable person - a skeptic - a real person - will take the claims about September 11 seriously and examine not only the films that contradict the approach but also those that show otherwise.

  9. I meant to write: "with" of course, I would appreciate it if my father would edit my comment and correct this spelling error.
    Thanks.

  10. When the pharmaceutical companies introduce lobbyists on their behalf to the World Health Organization committees, thereby influencing the organization's decisions in their favor, it is a conspiracy.
    When there is a deliberate panic that is scheduled by the pharmaceutical companies through the application of political pressure, it is a conspiracy.

    "The handling of swine flu by the World Health Organization, European agencies and world governments has led to unnecessary scaremongering regarding the health risks to the public and the waste of public money. This is according to a new report of the European Council. ” from the website: doctors.co.il

    "Two reports published at the end of the week, one by the Council of Europe and the other by the journal BMJ, sharply criticize the conduct of the World Health Organization in everything related to the treatment of the outbreak of swine flu in the world. According to the findings, the organization intensified the threat unnecessarily and relied on the recommendations of experts who have connections with the pharmaceutical companies" from the NRG.co.il website

    "It is very worrying that some of the members who advise the World Health Organization and boast medical degrees, are actually paid by the pharmaceutical companies" - Professor Tom Jefferson, epidemiologist at a medical center in Rome

    "There is literally a guild of pharmaceutical company representatives, and it was like that for a long time. It is difficult to distinguish between pure facts and facts tainted by interests." - Environmental medicine expert, Dr. Maury Johnson, who was a consultant to the World Health Organization

    "The authorities in Germany refused the demand of the pharmaceutical companies to launch a campaign aimed at making money against a threat that does not exist." - Dr. Wolf Ludwig, head of the drug committee at the German Health Organization

    "A scathing attack by Dr. Wolfgang Woodrag, head of the health department at the Council of Europe and a renowned expert in the treatment of epidemics, on the major pharmaceutical companies: according to Woodrag, the companies organized a "campaign of panic" to pressure the World Health Organization to declare the disease a global epidemic. Woodrag, who called for the establishment of a commission of inquiry to look into the affair, calls this conduct "one of the greatest medical scandals of the century."

    "The massive panic campaign we saw," added Dr. Woodrag, "provided a golden opportunity for representatives of the pharmaceutical laboratories, who knew they would make a fortune if a global epidemic was indeed declared." Following his words, the expert sent incriminating hints towards the World Health Organization when he said that "a group of people in the organization have very close ties with the pharmaceutical industry" - nrg.co.il

    But leave it, it's delusional and not based on evidence and facts.

    I think there is no point in continuing the discussion, so have a wonderful day.
    And the main thing, even if you do not agree with what is written elsewhere, and which contradicts your thought patterns, please at least try to behave in a down-to-earth and polite way.

    Best regards,

  11. dialect:

    Today everyone knows that there was no epidemic, but that is not what you posted and it is not what you are trying to post in your current comment.
    What you published then and what you are publishing again today is an allegation of a conspiracy by the pharmaceutical companies with the World Health Organizations.
    This is a false claim. A blood plot of the easiest kind and the claim that "today's truth is the same other truth that you published" is another lie.
    The right truth (that which is no other) is well presented in this article

    In general - it does not seem that your "other" claims are based on knowledge. It seems that the whole basis for them is the desire to accuse others of conspiracy.

  12. Hello you guys.
    My name is Niv and I am the founder of the Emet Othera project website.
    I want to make it clear that nowhere on the project website did we express "enthusiastic support" for Ahmadinejad or did it say that we believe that "Saddam Hussein was a martyr".

    Gillian Schechter spreads hatred, division and endless anger against the site and its volunteers, and this without any logical basis except perhaps burning jealousy.

    Okay, so you don't agree with some of what is written on the website, you think the theory is "illusory".
    I don't have a problem with that, but why don't you treat people who think differently than you with politeness, tolerance and common sense?

    Even when we published, months before everyone else in Israel, that the pharmaceutical companies created a deliberate panic to push the swine flu vaccine into people's throats (veins), they called us delusional,
    Today this other truth has become an accepted truth.

    Do you want to live in a world where only your opinion is the one, a world where there is no room for difference, for another, for another truth?

    Can you, with the hand of your heart, say that you already know everything?

    Why not allow room, even a very small one, for the supplier?
    A brave person is also a flexible person, who is not afraid of sufficiency, of a different and radical thought.
    All the great inventions, all the significant breakthroughs happened because people thought "differently".

    I wish you all a happy new year,
    Best regards,

  13. By the way, my father - you also use incorrect terms and mislead the public while confusing conspirators and supporters of conspiracy theories. Conspirators (at least) are not the ones who support the conspiracy theory. It is true that there are those who spread such theories on purpose in order to "confuse the enemy" (and it is not impossible that Ahmadinejad himself is one of those behind the spread of the September 11th theory in the first place) and these are really conspirators, but you meant "supporters of theories" The conspiracy".

    To the dear readers who are amazed that there are other crazy people who believe that Ahmadinejad is right, I must say that unfortunately there are many of them, and they come from among us. It is enough to take a look at the website "Another Truth" in order to be hurt, and to be seriously shocked. I personally do not understand how the aforementioned website continues to operate without interruption since it and its people openly demonstrate passionate support for one of the greatest enemies of the State of Israel. Of course, the same people also believe that Saddam Hussein was a martyr...

  14. Turn Gutta upside down - the whole analysis is fundamentally wrong.

    Ahmadinejad is not "a man who believes in everything" - Ahmadinejad is a manipulator who makes use of a delusional conspiracy theory that captured a large part of the public for the needs of his political agenda.

    My father, it is strange to me that such a simple thing escaped your notice. This is similar to the claim made here in the past regarding Holocaust deniers and ignoring the fact that Holocaust deniers do this in the name of anti-Semitism and hatred of the Jewish people, not for any other reason. Any attempt to give the behavior of holocaust deniers, or of Ahmadinejad for that matter, another reason - indicates dangerous naivety, at best.

    By the way, there are large groups in the country that support Ahmadinejad and support him enthusiastically due to the fact that he supports the delusional and twisted theory about the September 11 attacks, and this is exactly one of his goals.

  15. LD:
    They don't answer Ron anymore either.
    In fact, they don't even let him ask because he tends to flood the site and hijack any discussion in the direction that interests him.
    All the questions on the subject have already been answered in Hebrew as well, but these days it is not important because there are translation options on the Internet with which you can understand a text in any language.
    Besides - you should learn English.

  16. OK, Yuval, I made a mistake and I don't have a spell checker and I don't take everything written seriously either.
    And Rothschild don't answer to Iran only to Ron? Protections huh..
    Well, my English is unfortunately not good enough for articles in English.. and why after 9 years there are no interrupted answers in Hebrew? Because there are many interrupted questions in Hebrew..

  17. LD
    Be careful not to over-tighten. You can die from it. Don't have a spell checker?
    In my humble opinion, there is a positive correlation between correct spelling and the readers' tendency to take seriously what is written.

  18. LD:
    Iran is not answered because the issue has already been ground to dust.
    How many times can you refer to the same nonsense.
    Google the string Debunking 911 and you will get all the debunked questions and all the answers to them.

  19. Why don't I see answers to Iran? Is it easy to answer general questions like Ron with general answers but difficult to answer more detailed questions with more detailed answers?

    I also came across pictures and video of the impact on the Pentagon and the question really arises why there is only a round impact hole and no sign of wing rods and engines.. What did they vaporize?
    Also, a plane was supposed to take down with it the light poles that were standing around, but for some reason they are intact and upright..

  20. Yuval, Ron was blocked because he did not meet the demand not to hijack the talkbacks for his needs, and did not meet the demand to be satisfied with one response, therefore he no longer has the right to respond even if the world turns upside down, even retroactively if necessary.

  21. marginal (from the update)
    There are people here who hide behind avatars and nicknames. If I start digging into the history of the talkbacks, I won't get to the important things. Besides, even if the one sitting behind the nickname is known in the wider world as belonging to a certain gender, I have a strong desire to respect the gender he chose for himself.

  22. To the original Ron
    We accept that the truth is one and there is no other. The name of the site you are referring us to is assigned due to an internal conflict.

  23. What is amazing about this story is that for years the Persian worm denies the Holocaust. There was a conference in Tehran for Holocaust deniers. In an interview on one of the world's most well-known programs, the worm said that the Holocaust should be examined in depth. To hear more opinions (maybe we interview Mengele? Let's see what he says? Maybe Auschwitz was a lol?)

    Only when the worm spoke about the Twin Towers did the world rise up with the courage to protest the things "that cannot be denied" including Obama.

    The holocaust? In the slightest, this is not a reason to hurt the leader of the Iranian nation. Like little dogs courting his door. Trying to talk to him. They give him a stage instead of shooting him in the head. Let's not talk about the fact that Lola the dancer from Brazil was received here with respect on her way to meet the worm.

    But we will expand on the disgrace called the Israeli government (and on drones and Kurds) another day.

  24. My father, Ahmadinejad is not an "enemy" of science, or some kind of problem for the world of science. All in all, he is a man who believes (or rather, claims that he believes - probably only for provocation) in all kinds of nonsense like the holocaust did not exist.
    I would understand your claims if he was a respected scientist, for example. But this is a politician that no one in the world of science (or outside it) takes seriously.

    I understand, for example, the need for the site to discuss the issues of people who oppose evolution and want to implement it in textbooks, or people who deny global warming. These are potentially destructive things.

    But not some politician who says nonsense.

  25. Alak progressed.
    We are all surrounded by technology toys and advanced science
    But they are still unable to turn on the light on the dark soul of man.
    Fanaticism, belief in conspiracies, racism, incitement, just hatred... until all these remain
    With us we will never be forced to walk in repeated circles of construction and destruction.
    We enjoy several decades of relative peace and simulated security and I wish I was wrong
    But there is an increased wave of markers indicating a deteriorating trend. Although pessimistic see
    Trends and optimists are aware of turning points so let's hope for a surprising turning point for the better.
    Happy holiday.

  26. point!
    Is Oth trying to convince readers not to watch the movie?
    Do you have an ulterior motive such as belief in the existence of the man in heaven? Are you afraid of the movie?
    What the director decided to be true these are only the things perceived by the senses or agree with logic. Belief in a man in heaven (or lest you demand that I write Adosham or Elohim) is not included in them. These are not stigmas and the film is not stupid but threatens your worldview.

  27. Indeed bin Laden's motives are to dominate the world with extreme Islam by the force of the sword as many did before him, if you see Bush's stupidity as a motive, then you are probably giving him too much credit.

  28. Yuval, this is a stupid movie. Full of stigmas that the director decided were true. And obviously it was intentionally put in there. But it only shows you what the "truth" everyone is talking about is.

    Father, surely there is only one truth, only when the rest of us don't know it we try to draw reasonable conclusions and then there are many, many different conclusions with different probabilities.

    And it doesn't seem likely to me that twin buildings fall to them just like that as one and only terrorist attack in the USA. It's unlikely.
    It is unlikely that bin Laden was not captured. It is unlikely that no one knew about an attack of this magnitude.
    It is unlikely that a third building falls just like two buildings that fell because planes entered them. And calling it a chain reaction is ridiculous.

    Always look at motives.

  29. A must see film for readers and commenters here, a light comedy from 2009 that has a very deep idea in it:
    "The invention of Lying"
    Imagine a world that differs from our current world in only one thing - the people are not able to lie.

  30. Okay, so Bin Laden is not guilty, it is possible to leave Afghanistan and let Al Qaeda slaughter those who do not seem to them to be pious enough in Islam or who just happen to be in their way on a bad day, is that what Ahmedosh-Mamoosh meant?

  31. I want to start by saying that not every conspiracy theory is wrong simply because it is associated with a pair of words that often arouses disbelief in our relatives..

    First of all, my brothers and I were in Manhattan at the time of the attacks..I photographed everything and my brothers worked right next door..
    Many people were not there simply because of the early hour...but the planes hit and everything collapsed...and it was really hard to believe that they would collapse...I personally missed the photo of the first building collapsing because I thought there was nothing more to photograph and I closed the camera....

    At the same time there are all kinds of strange things in these events...maybe true maybe not..
    .1. The fall of the twins to the ground was after a series of explosions that you can clearly see in the movies...to this day there is no explanation as to why exactly they were natural since no one has seen anything like this except in controlled explosions.
    2. The fall of the buildings was perfect to the ground..that is, they did not lean and collapse to the sides, they fell straight vertically...this is simply physically impossible...unless you did a controlled explosion that was planned and drilled months in advance...hitting one part of a building will directly cause it to collapse in the same direction from which it came The injury...since it is where the whole skeleton is the weakest.
    3. Almost a week later, a building collapsed in the same area that was not at all damaged by the explosion but was considered from that day on as if it was... I no longer remember exactly what it was called but it was something related to finances and government....
    4. The whole part of the other planes is here, but I haven't seen it with my own eyes, so I'll leave it to theories. There are enough oddities in Manhattan for this whole thing.

    Regarding Ahmanejad - it's not his fault...it's us...who allows such a person to be interviewed and doesn't put him in prison...they did the same nonsense with Hitler...the British Chamberlain declared "We have brought peace in our generation" shortly after all of Europe was trampled by the errors of the "Peace" and surrendered to Hitler...this surrender later gave birth to World War II of course.

    Regarding the climate, we have already debated it a lot... while no one doubts what is happening in the world, the question is who is the cause... are we?? Or is it a product of the sun...
    As long as they don't find a positive correlation between CO2 and warming...for my part, they can tell a thousand and one stories here...because the only truth is that the activity of the sun is the one that affects us...that the correlation between CO2 and the warming of the temperature here is completely reversed (800 years difference on average between an increase in one and the other by the way)
    Increased or weakened solar activity is the one that affects the temperatures here... the CO2 comes from huge reservoirs, mostly trapped in the sea... when it's hot they are released... when it's cold they are trapped... as simple as that.

    Now I don't live in a movie, but sometimes in movies there are punch lines that sum things up really nicely...one of them from the last Batman movie was about terrorists:

    "Some people just like to watch the world burn"

    Or in the Jewish version "Don't look for reason in madness"...

    Who cares why they explode...what do I care about the attitudes and the conversations..there is no talking to psychopaths...you have to kill whoever they are, no matter how small they are...because if you have Stalin and Hitler on your hand.
    Let's not get to her name... even though at the current rate we are on a fast lane on Route 6.

  32. It's time to send a squad to the depths of Iran, and pierce this monkey's brain with as much lead as possible. It is unbelievable what dark and racist creatures reach positions of power and the leadership of entire countries. Mr. Ahmadinejad should be returned to the bosom of Allah, and the Iranian opposition should be helped to come to power. Woe to the citizens of this country, who have to endure a new dictator every 20 years.

  33. This time he pretended to be Yoel, and repeated the same unfounded claims from a different truth site. It is a fact that he addressed the other claims and ignored the claim that it was Ron.

  34. point:
    They once asked a bank robber why he robbed banks.
    His answer was simple: That's where the money is
    As in the whole sane world - even in the pharmaceutical companies, people want to make money, but this does not justify conspiracy claims.
    What we do see is that human life expectancy is increasing, fewer and fewer diseases are fatal and more and more diseases can be fully cured. Doesn't quite agree with your theory.
    Nevertheless - these are people who went to work for a pharmaceutical company even though there is enough demand for bank robberies.
    I don't know where you derive the evil claim that the American government was willing to sacrifice tens of thousands of people for the interests of some oil company. I, in any case, do not believe this nonsense.

    On 9/11, many people committed suicide.
    To think they did it for money is silly.
    According to your theory they had no reason to do so but that's only because your theory is wrong.
    They didn't do it for money - because humans have many non-monetary motives.
    The religious and nationalistic motives of people are much stronger than their economic motives and only motives of this type can motivate them to commit suicide.

  35. Avi,
    You are responding to someone named Ron, but since he is not recorded among the responders, it seems to us as readers from the side that you are responding to a ghost :) In other words, we have no idea exactly what content you are responding to.

  36. Avi,
    Ironically what you lied about the drug companies is true. Their whole purpose is to report profits. And also on a personal level. No one there will continue to work if they don't get paid. And it is likely that most of the people there are ordinary human beings who care about their personal interests and not about some vaccine for me or for you. So if they have an interest in producing a vaccine they will produce it and if not then not.

  37. Joel,
    1. Do not know
    2. I did not examine the security cameras
    3. When a plane crashes it doesn't stay intact. Certainly they will not allow access to a plane crash area, not during the events of 9/11 or anywhere else. A plane in flames emits dangerous gases and substances.
    4. Thousands of workers did arrive. Don't forget the early crash time, about half an hour - do before the work day starts around 9-10
    5. There is no war of civilizations, in any case no more than there was before 9/11
    6. The fact that an intelligence organization is incapable does not mean that there was a fraud.
    7. No. The president approves any intelligence operation, and certainly operations outside the US territory. Commanders in the field can make decisions within a narrow range of events.
    8. Research the types of materials, ask chemists. Don't rely on YouTube videos.

  38. Even the great conspirator is not exempt from conspiracies concerning him.

    A few months ago, a claim was published that Ahmadinejad was born a Jew. His previous surname was some Persian word that means "weaver of talithots" (Paulus, the founder of Christianity, is also said to have made a living by weaving talithots). His parents converted to Islam only after his birth. He was born a Jew, and according to rabbinic Jewish law he is a kosher Jew.

    But this is still nothing compared to the claim that Adolf Zorrano's father (or grandfather) was born a bastard to a Jewish father.

    Are these Jewish conspiracies that came to corroborate the biblical claim "Your swords and your destroyers have come out of you"?

  39. to the point,
    According to the same logic, the pharmaceutical companies push vaccines on us not to prevent disease infection but so that the companies can report on their health and well-being to the shareholders. There is a limit to every conspiracy, after all there is the World Health Organization and there is the FDA or its parallels. There will always be an excuse of money. Even on the topic of global warming, where it is clear where the big money is, they managed to twist the logic and claim that those who claim there is warming are doing so for money.

  40. For politics - the conspirators are the biggest enemies of science, they oppose vaccines, bully researchers who deal with global warming, and more. Endless things (and I think a look at the other truth website will explain to you who we are dealing with). What do you think, that on a sports website we won't write about the factors that prevent sports from progressing? Not instead of reporting sports results but in addition to them.
    And one more thing, these columns - from the Demon Haunted Country series (this time I gave up on the series because it is not about anything Israeli), are not written with a certain frequency except when there is a need to respond to events, and when the world goes crazy this need is greater and the column was updated three times in one week. If the world doesn't go crazy, the dose can be lowered.

  41. Father, you are a little confused.
    The Holocaust certainly has evidence and no one really thinks there was no Holocaust.
    The twin attacks also have evidence and no one thinks they were not an attack.
    The question is whether the authorities cooperated, which sounds completely absurd at first glance. But when you take into account the big money that was made there and the huge interests that have been expressed since the attack, you have to consider everything a second time.
    There is one basic and important rule for us: follow the money
    And as far as I know the money flows to those who have oil. And Iraq has a lot of oil that the Americans took over under the pretext of financing the war.

  42. What is the place of this "news" on a science website?
    This site is slowly becoming political and less scientific, and it's a shame.
    My esteem for him decreases every day.

  43. Conspiracies rise and flourish on the fertile soil of the pits. That's how it always was, that's how it will be in the future. You will say: "Then we will eradicate the ignorance". Even if this "utopia" is realized, there will still be ample room to exploit education for fraudulent purposes. We see this in the "educated Palestinians". In short, one has to learn to live with one's imperfection. Nothing will convince Joel that his mistakes are refutable, that he has circled a target. He has already decided that there are "oddities" here and from now on everything is open. that's how it is.

  44. I didn't know there are other crazy people who think Ahmadinejad is right.
    We saw the plane hit the tower live. What more do you need?

  45. Ahmadinejad is being used as bait by the Ayatollahs in order to lull the West into submission
    Let him talk his own bullshit, whether he believes it or not.
    The media's involvement with this yard clown is scandalous, the media said
    But this site also started treating him as someone who would really be responsible for a bomb
    If and as soon as the Iranians open it, I really hope I'm not wrong and this man really has no power in Iran, but in my estimation and after seeing the Ayatollah several times
    Khamenei in interviews I do not believe he will give such a person the power to rule the truth
    on Iran

  46. To Joel, at least I can answer your first question.
    The reason the building collapsed, gradually, and supposedly without any explosives - is because there was no need for them.
    The plane's tanks contained fuel, and this when over time heated the foundations of that floor - weakening them and causing the collapse of the floors above the plane's impact. This is where the chain reaction started, as a massive momentum was created that the infrastructure of the floors below could not handle.
    This explanation is not mine, and was presented, among others, by a professor of physics at Berkeley University (albeit in more scientific detail).
    Second, Yoel, I don't know what your education is, but if you don't come from a background in civil engineering, physics, or related subjects - your opinion alone is worth nothing. In that case it is better that you delve into philosophy, because in science there is no room for opinions and speculations.

  47. There is simply no arguing with facts. All the "theorists" of all kinds are not able to bring one concrete proof of the conspiracy. Anyone can put together a fictional logical theory that sounds good. And whoever wants to believe it (usually because it's fashionable) will believe it and the facts won't confuse him...
    The only "conspiracy" that is a fact is the movements carried out in the American stock market in anticipation of the attack (referring to the short selling of futures contracts that deal with the various indices), by financial entities that acted on behalf of the terrorists and their associates. In fact, this is one of the first things that was discovered by the American authorities and the monitoring of the executive orders for the aforementioned movements led to investment companies in Saudi Arabia...
    This heinous act of terrorism is the conspiracy.

  48. I really don't think he believes the crap he says.
    This is an offensive strategy
    It is better to attack than to be attacked
    And this is also an excellent way to divert them from what his core is.
    And also spoil the connections so that they have no one to talk to and demand.
    The very presentation of Peschi, he broadcasts out that he is a dangerous person, and it is not worth messing with him.

  49. Ron, you got the right to comment despite your well-known trait of impersonating others and flooding the site with idle comments.. This is not a true site otherwise. Let others answer you.
    Read the linked articles. I think they make the point well.

  50. Ahmadi is not my friend, go to hell as soon as possible.
    WT7 fell because of a chain reaction? Shlomo ? (maybe controlled explosions)
    The Pentagon - you don't see any part of an airplane there.
    The net is full of materials for those who are really interested.
    The important point is that his words should be considered. We were already in the disdainful arrogant movie 37 years ago.
    Isn't this man telling the truth about his intentions, telling lies about his plans but maybe also telling the truth about his....insights.
    There is a war of civilizations. Some even say that of more than two civilizations and all means (that surpass the imagination) are indeed kosher. The results of this war will determine the picture of the future perhaps for hundreds of years.

  51. Thanks Ron, in whatever character you are, this was your last comment. And one more thing, if these are your friends, woe betide us.
    The thousands of people who didn't come is because it was early - a quarter to nine. The seventh tower was close to these two and its fall was a chain reaction. On vacation in New York a few months ago, I lived in a hotel near and passed by Ground Zero every day on the way to the bottom and the sacrifice is visible.. The photos from the Pentagon were published in a million places, as for the claim that the US organized it - It is a production of hundreds of billions, it is a bit difficult to produce something like this in a democratic country. The president is also directly responsible for the national security agencies.
    8 has no meaning. These are materials that were created after the fire and not before it.

  52. In general, every speech of a madman has a kernel of truth.
    Number of open questions left since 9/11:

    1. Why did WT7 collapse twenty minutes after the collapse of the towers regardless of the collision of the planes in a manner reminiscent of a planned engineering building demolition?
    2. Why don't you see in any video the tail end of a plane that hit the Pentagon despite the dozens of security cameras there?
    3. Why was access not allowed to the crash site in Pennsylvania, even there there is no trace of intact plane parts but only a pile of crushed metal?
    4. Why didn't thousands of workers come to work in the towers that day?
    5. Is the claim that the demolition of the towers was intended to be used as an opening card to start a war of civilizations with an American initiative logical? The answer - yes.
    6. Is an intelligence service as sophisticated as it is capable of hiding such a scam over time? The answer - not in the long term but through compartmentalization and intimidation
    7. Are there bodies in the American government that plan and carry out moves without the knowledge of the president, but in retrospect for reasons of national security? Very likely yes.
    8. What is the meaning of engineers' testimonies about the inventions of standard explosives in the foundations of the towers?

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.