Modern technologies made it possible, for the first time, to read the contents of a burnt scroll found 45 years ago in archaeological excavations in Ein Gedi. Much to the excitement, this is a passage from the beginning of the 1500-year-old book of Leviticus
Advanced technologies made it possible, for the first time, to read part of the content of a scroll that was burned about 1500 years ago and was found inside the Ark of the Covenant in the ancient synagogue in Ein Gedi. At the end of an effort that lasted over a year, verses from the beginning of the Book of Leviticus were revealed to the eyes of the researchers, much to their excitement.
Yesterday (Monday) the rare find was presented at a press conference in Jerusalem, with the participation of the Minister of Culture and Sports MK Miri Regev and the Director of the Antiquities Authority Israel Hasson.
The scroll, which is made of parchment, was discovered as early as 1970 in archaeological excavations at the synagogue in Ein Gedi, led by the late Dr. Dan Barag and Dr. Sefi Porat, but due to its charred state, it was not possible to discover its sides.
Modern and advanced technological developments, which are used by the Judean Desert scroll laboratories of the Lunder family of the Antiquities Authority for the purpose of preserving and documenting the scrolls, made the discovery of the important find possible. It turns out that this is part of a scroll containing the beginning of the Book of Leviticus, written in Hebrew, and dated according to carbon dating,14 to the end of the 6th century CE. As of today - this is a scroll from the Pentateuch, the earliest after the scrolls from the Judean Desert, most of which date from the end of the Second Temple (1st century BC - 1st AD).
For the purpose of preserving and documenting scrolls from the Judean Desert, the Antiquities Authority collaborates with scientists from Israel and the world. About a year ago, Merkel Technologies Ltd) from Israel offered to scan parts of scrolls and tefillin found in the PA, in a three-dimensional scan, using a micro-CT system it developed. On the same occasion, a section of the Mein Gedi scroll was also scanned. The results of the scan were sent to Professor Brent Sills from the University of Kentucky, who developed digital imaging software that allows the photograph of the charred and rolled scroll to be virtually unfolded, and restores the writing. Thus, parts of the first eight verses of the Book of Leviticus were suddenly discovered before the eyes of the astonished researchers:
"Speak toChildren of Israel, and you said to them, Man, because he will offer a sacrifice from you, to Jehovah, from the animal, from the cow And from the sheep, offer your sacrifice. Mother of God our sacrificeFrom the cattle, Zakhar Innocents will be sacrificed; Al Petah A tent of promise, he will sacrifice it, to his will, before Jehovah and his hand is strong, on the head of the burnt offering; And it was done To him, to atone forLeo. And he slaughtered the firstborn before me Jehovah; And Aaron's sons, the priests, sacrificed the blood, and threw the blood on the altar around, which was open a tent due in. And he stripped, the offering; And we will dissect her, to dissect her. And the sons of Aaron the priest put fire onthe altar; And put wood on the fire. XNUMX And set them, the sons of Aaron the priests, the butchers, the head and the stubble - on the wood that is on the fire, that is on the altar.. (Leviticus XNUMX-XNUMX).
The director of the Antiquities Authority, Israel Hasson, said: "The find reflects a heritage that is thousands of years old, which, to my delight, has met, at this time, the professional determination of the Antiquities Authority employees who have exhausted the full range of existing scientific abilities in order to present the world with this wonderful find, and for that they will Congratulations!"\
According to Dr. Sefi Porat, the scroll was discovered in the Ein Gedi excavations of the 70s, that "deciphering the scroll, which was a puzzle for us for 45 years, is extremely exciting. Ein Gedi was a Jewish village during the Byzantine period (4th-7th century CE) and had a synagogue with an elegant mosaic floor and an ark. The settlement was completely burned down, and none of its residents returned to settle there again, or rummaged through its ruins to save valuable property. In the archaeological excavations of the burned synagogue, we found, in addition to the charred scroll, a bronze 'seven reeds' menorah, the community treasury with about 3,500 coins, oil candles made of glass and pottery, and vessels for preserving perfumes. We have no information about the causes of the fire, but the hypotheses for the cause of the destruction range from a Bedouin raid from the area east of the Dead Sea, to conflicts with the Byzantine government."
According to Panina Shor, curator and manager of the Judean Desert Scroll Works at the Antiquities Authority, "The handling of the Judean Desert scrolls is exciting every day. The knowledge that we are preserving one of the most important cultural treasures for the Western world, makes us conduct ourselves with utmost care and use the most advanced technologies available today in the world in order to preserve them. This discovery really amazed us: we were sure that we were shooting in the air, but we decided to try to see if we could possibly read the burnt scroll after all. Now, we will be able to pass down to future generations not only the scrolls from the Judean desert, but also a Torah book from the Ark of the Covenant! of a 1500-year-old synagogue".
This is the first time that a Torah book has been found in archaeological excavations inside an ancient synagogue, and in particular inside an ark.
54 תגובות
Ofer,
Response pending.
Ofer,
Regarding the translation into Hebrew of an inertial system, I made sense. Regarding LIF, then like I said - it exists locally! After all, its range of existence is related to the radius of curvature in space. I mean, you can sit here on the Earth and work in LIF, but I think the whole point of the discussion is in the dynamics between the Sun and Earth, and on these scales it is clear that LIF is not relevant because of the curvature of space. Regarding what you said next (common gravity field, center of mass is in the sun) I think that is exactly what I said in my last two comments. Maybe your wording will be more convenient for some readers. It doesn't seem to me that there is any kind of disagreement between us, maybe except that I am probably more firm in my opinion that it should be made clear to people who are not versed in the mathematics of relativity that it *does* not mean that there is no answer to the question of who orbits whom in the solar system (which, as I understood, is what "outside the box" meant Because, as I said at the beginning, the centrality of the universe has nothing to do with the subject).
albenza,
The inertial frame system.
In the paradigm of general relativity a system in free fall is locally a constant system. The sun and all the planets around it fall freely in their common gravitational field whose center of gravity is inside the sun itself. Since the Sun is much more massive than all the planets combined, its movement around the center of gravity appears to the observer from afar as tiny and periodic disturbances in its position, while the planets appear to obey distant Keplerian orbits. This is a slightly more 'democratic' view of the dynamics in the solar system and is completely normal. Maybe not so practical, but standard. I don't think I'm renovating anything for you here, I'm writing this for those who are clueless, whatever their approach to life (religious/atheistic) may be.
Ofer
Outside the box he referred to Rambam - and in a way that seems wrong to me. What's wrong with that?
I also gave a simple explanation why we know observationally, for over two hundred years, that we orbit the sun and not the other way around. The theory of relativity is just a red herring here...
Ofer,
I have never heard the concept of "permanence system" again, at least not in Hebrew. can you say what you mean in english The fact that the system is in free fall has no meaning in the context of who surrounds whom. Except that the influence of any factor outside the solar system is irrelevant within the dynamics of the system (at least in that it can be ignored by factorizing relative motion and motion of the whole system. It is zero-mode, if you will). In practice, our solar system is in a gravitational field created solely by the sun, and therefore an observer sitting on the Earth is actually sitting on a geodesic and is accelerated, compared to an asymptotic observer (or an observer sitting on the sun) who is not accelerated. I don't quite understand where you're going, but the simple truth is that nothing in the theory of relativity says that Earth does not really circle the sun, as "outside the box" tried to claim. In any coordinate system you look at - whether it is inertial (say, asymptotic) or whose basis vectors are geodesics (which is what I understand you call the "permanence system") - it is easy to determine that the Earth moves in the gravitational field of the Sun and not the other way around (that is, surrounds her). And of course, as before, the meaning here is that the center of mass is in the sun (obviously, both move in each other's gravitational fields, but at any point you find in the solar system, you can easily measure and see that it effectively orbits the sun).
Albenzo, I understand that, it is clear to me that he does not really understand what is behind the slogans, but I estimate that the intention is this: the persistence system is a (point) system in free fall. If we ignore for a moment the small accelerations associated with the rotation of the Earth and the fact that the Earth does not appear to be a point up close, and since the Earth is in free fall in the gravitational field of the solar system (which is also in free fall in the gravitational field of the galaxy), then it can be considered a "constant system ”, like any other body in the galaxy that is in free fall in the gravitational fields around it. The concept of "centrality" is, in my humble opinion, meaningless in the cosmological context, so I assume that he unconsciously meant that no system (permanence) is attributed, which is of course true. Either way, it is clear that geometrically (and from every practical point of view) the heliocentric view is the one that correctly describes reality for us, and the geocentric view is wrong. It seems to me that everyone understands this today, whatever their religious (or secular) view may be.
Ofer,
Let's start with the fact that a system of an observer who rotates with the sun (and therefore apparently thinks that the sun rotates around him) is not inertial. It accelerates, so it is clearly distinguishable from a "laboratory" system. We will conclude by saying that the equivalence of coordinate systems has no meaning for finding the center of the universe.
The problem was not understanding the words "outside the box". The problem was to produce from them a coherent thought that does not amount to slogans that can be found on the websites of converts (he is not the first to try to say that the theory of relativity says that it is impossible to say who surrounds whom).
albenza,
I will expand on "this hashing": it is almost certain that he meant to say that all persistence systems are equal to each other.
Miracles,
Maimonides is not an example of anything. He was a private man with private thoughts and more than once his private thoughts did not line up with the legacy of the prophets and the legacy of the Psalms. The fact that there are people who admire him is their responsibility.
Out of the box,
Your belief in God is a wonderful thing (I really think so) but: you must understand that you do not have any professional knowledge in science and therefore any "scientific" statement of yours will immediately become a target for arrows of ridicule. There is and should not be any connection between belief in providence and scientific facts, and any attempt to provoke such a connection only harms the believers themselves.
outside the box
You throw slogans into the air, on which you build an entire Torah.
You wrote "everything has a space and a limit".
This is simply not true (you don't want me to repeat Einstein's quote, do you? 🙂 ). And if this is true - then even God has a limit. If you state something - 1) base it and 2) think about the meaning of what you say.
You wrote "Hiroshima.. the greenhouse effect.. the ozone layer... diseases added due to progress" - none of these are related to science!!! Science is a method, a way of thinking.
Hiroshima - a political/military decision.
The greenhouse effect and the hole and the problem of the ozone layer - the result of an uncontrolled industry, the scientists are the ones who discovered the dangers and are fighting to solve the problem.
Diseases? you are joking??? Scientists have tripled life expectancy!!! three times!!! What are you talking about??? The "diseases due to progress" are the result of longevity - do you give it up?
You wrote, "It is clear to anyone with an understanding that the Creator of whom the Torah of Israel speaks as defined by Rambam (The Strong Hand Chapter XNUMX) cannot be scientifically measured. "
It was Maimonides - in "Morah Nabokim" - who tried to provide scientific proof of God's existence (Book Two). Just a curiosity - Rambam believed that the earth is in the center and the whole universe revolves around us.
You wrote "this so-called experiment to say that there is no creator is fundamentally barren... and we are not scientific at all" - what is not scientific is your way of thinking. You believe that God exists - and adapt what you see to your belief. Scientists look - and try to give explanations for observations, then test those explanations.
You chose not to think - and this is what distinguishes a religious person from a scientist.
cultural promiscuity????? What does this have to do with science? Are scientists culturally promiscuous? What is not included in your framework is considered cultural promiscuity? Could you explain this sentence of yours?
You wrote "the theory of relativity makes it very clear that it is impossible to know whether the earth is the center of the universe or not". Are you embarrassing yourself or what? Beyond Albanzo's explanation - I will tell you something that is not written in the Torah - listen carefully!!!
We know for sure that the earth revolves around the sun because we see that the image of the stars in the sky changes during the year. Almost 180 years ago, a German astronomer named Bessel measured the distance to a certain star in this way, a distance of over 10 light years.
Neither relativity nor plaster 🙂
If you are interested in learning - stay on the site. If you just want to preach nonsense, go to the "faithful stake", where you will find a large group of non-thinkers....
"The theory of relativity makes it very clear that it is impossible to know whether the earth is the center of the universe or not.."...
Say, do you want to expand on this hashing? The theory of relativity will not help you. The sun and so on both rotate around the center of mass of the system which is located in the sun. That is, they both revolve around the sun. And the center of the universe has nothing to do with the question of who revolves who, it is a cosmological question after all. It also has nothing to do with the theory of relativity (besides that the theory of relativity is the mathematical model within which we talk about cosmology, as of today).
Outside the box, God does not exist and the Torah was written by humans, when will you understand that already?
for miracles
All eyes have pros and cons. Everything has a space and a limit..Science has a great advantage, a simple example is this correspondence between us...in the ability to learn the laws of creation and bring them to the benefit of man..etc, etc...on the other hand, these abilities in many cases lack restraint and self-examination...a few examples...Hiroshima...effect The greenhouse.. the ozone layer... diseases that have been added due to progress... (of course science has solved many problems) in urology and ecology, etc... This does not mean that the progress of science should stop... on the contrary, it should advance more strongly and more vigorously... but one of the problems of Some of the scientists.. from the very feeling of the knowledge they possess, they have penetrated into a field that they supposedly understand.. like the creator of the world.. It is clear to anyone with an understanding that the creator of whom the Torah of Israel speaks, as defined in Rambam (the mighty hand, chapter XNUMX) cannot be scientifically measured. The simplest reason is that it is simply above the nature of creation and above the nature of the created man.. a clumsy example to speak of.. it is like a throne understanding who the person sitting on it is.. and as for the Creator and the created, this is a reality. To Ein Aruch.. this so-called experiment to say that there is no creator is fundamentally barren.. and we are not scientific at all... unfortunately another detail that resulted from scientific progress is cultural lawlessness.. and it does not require that it arose from the scientists.. but from the nature of the created man who took upon himself the innovations of science to use In them for the worse.. such laws are not in the science.. and if so unfortunately man still remains a carnivorous animal full of lust and uncontrollable desires.. Here the Torah enters from the language of an instruction that teaches the creature how to behave in consideration and love for your neighbor as yourself which is a great rule in the Torah.. whose ways are pleasant ways Peace be upon all its paths... It is true that there are many religious people and unfortunately I too sometimes fail in the high requirements of the Torah's teachings and its teachings.. but the shortcoming in me only proves the perfection of the Torah.. There is another futile attempt by some of those employed in this science to attack religion with force. Unfortunately, the contrast is out of place..and to say who started the contrast and who continued is not so clear..and once again it is a childish argument..as is the case even with Galilean Galileo. Regarding the rotation of the earth around the sun.. it seems more likely until the discovery of the theory of relativity that Galileo is right. The theory of relativity makes it very clear that it is impossible to know whether the earth is the center of the universe or not.. and it is true that the calculations according to Galileo's method are less problematic.. there still remains today a parallel possibility.. In any case, it is possible to expand more and more.. and the main thing is that I wanted to wish you a happy Shabbat and an easy and pleasant fast
Out of the box
I have very close religious friends, and also a large part of my family. Everyone in his faith will live.
It was not the secularists who started this discussion. The debate started when religious people claimed that they knew physics better than physicists, philosophy better than philosophers and biology better than biologists.
The discussion continued with the religious claiming to be the source of morality.
The first sin in the Torah is the desire to know, curiosity. To this day, curiosity is the enemy of religion. Shmulik, Yariv, Eitan, Albenzo, Maya, myself and others are interested in learning, and passing on the little knowledge we have (at least to me...) to anyone who is interested in listening.
Now - add to that the desire of the religious (some of them, of course) to control our lives, to decide what we will eat, when we will hang out, who we will marry - up to the point of evading military service in an illusion - then maybe you will understand that we (again... at least I) are getting a little angry.
I do not preach in "Yeded Na'am" - please stop preaching in "Yaden".
I apologize to everyone.
But gentlemen, as a religious person... I address you without linguistic violence... at least not until after Tisha B'Av...
And for miracles..indeed the Torah speaks of killing at the very beginning...because it proves its truth...the nature of the human heart is evil from its youth...it abhors hatred...and grudge...and what is being done now is also a kind of...those who know the story of Cain and Abel know that it all started with talk of jealousy... The Torah reveals the lesson to us.. it does not hide.. it educates.. and it's a pity for you... I find it hard to even believe that if you were neighbors you would behave this way towards each other... who knows a rival and miracles... maybe your kind neighbor or childhood friend is actually Raphael . Please consider that behind the internet stands a person with strong feelings and belief in his way of life.. You may not like it.. But just as people's faces are different, so are their opinions... I apologize to everyone. That I provoked this way of fighting in him... that was not the goal..
Nissim, you are a wretched liar who is motivated by an abysmal hatred for the people of Israel and their Torah. After all, I already asked you to give examples for your claim of the immorality of the Torah. Like the first one you gave on the subject of Cain and Abel, I was talking nonsense. Then you gave a second example regarding the tying of Isaac and I also proved to you that you are talking nonsense, but then you already made yourself neither seeing nor hearing so that you would not have to admit your stupidity again. That's why everything you say is the nonsense of an exiled Jew who left the country in order to assimilate the Gentiles and become one of them
Raphael
And ask your dog to stick out his tongue... it's already completely brown.
Pal
Have I ever lied???
What exactly are passwords here? You know very well that everything I said exists in the Torah - it already exists in the first four chapters of Genesis - lies, violence, mistakes and immorality. Don't work on yourself Raphael, go read the book again, without "interpretations".
On the other hand, where is your answer to my question?
Raphael
Have I ever lied???
What exactly are passwords here? You know very well that everything I said is in the Torah - it's already second hand rime where is the answer to my question?
Miracles
You speak in passwords without cover. This is the way of liars who hate Israel.
It is not clear to me why they are taken to the description of creation in Genesis
as a holy thing?
After all, it is clear that in the Torah there are also things that are not true
So why wouldn't it be one of them?
Raphael
If a rival and everyone who thinks like him stop trashing the brain then they will have to commit suicide 🙂
After all, this brainwashing of theirs is actually their way of life. And when you put them in front of real things, they start rattling for fear that they will have to pay to the Creator for their criminal actions... hence their hatred towards you and towards everyone who does not think in their delusional way... luckily they are a minority and they have no influence (and if there is then only to their detriment and to the detriment of those around them).
outside the Torah
Pure truth that is full of violence, immorality, lies and mistakes. Show me which book you believe in and I'll tell you who you are...
Simply put, the Torah is pure truth given by the Creator of the world.. Science is knowledge accumulated by human beings. ..for example, a few days ago we received a photo of the sea from Pluto.. something that immediately changed the assumptions we had about this planet... after all, it is a planet that is at the end of our solar system
...According to this, the question arises, what is the accuracy ratio in the assumptions regarding other stars found in the Milky Way. And in the Andromeda galaxy and in more distant galaxies... is it possible that we will reach far-reaching dangers... literally... with time
Raphael
When you find a "contradiction" in science - you celebrate. You remain silent when it is explained to you that there is no contradiction in science.
When you find a contradiction in the Torah... the excuses come.
What will? 🙂
Raphael
What would you say about a person who has two "free choices"? Does he have two souls in your eyes? Or maybe two soul halves?
What is your explanation for this phenomenon?
rival. Indeed, I agree with you that it is a stupid excuse to say that a day in the Torah is a million years.. and I will help you to attack religious people with this. who try to compare the Torah with science.
A. The religious rely on the verse a thousand years in your eyes as yesterday.. that is, every day in creation is apparently a thousand years.. and apparently they do not read the exact verse. Because the words yesterday refer to the time that has already passed... and this is a reality of time that does not exist... and actually it should have been written... a thousand years in your eyes as one day. And then it is a comparison of a day equal to a thousand years.. and certainly even if you try to say a million years there is no source for this in the Holy Torah.. More than that.. Sages ask in the chapters of Avot why the world was created in ten essays and after all in one essay it can show...
But the real point is that the Creator is above time and place, therefore even a thousand years are in his view a time that has already passed... and the second thing is the unlimited abilities of the Creator and the Sages wonder why with such an ability the world was not created in a moment after all the Creator could have said let there be a world and then immediately let it be Olam... and if you are looking for the Sage's excuse for this problem (which most likely will not be accepted by you and will seem stupid to you) you are welcome to check in the chapters of Avot.
between us …
This time is a time when we need to talk about the love of Israel.. Please...
Raphael,
I do not hate you and the words are not said out of hatred, absolutely not.
Your explanations regarding the contradictions in the Torah are indeed stupid excuses, to say that a day in the story of creation is actually millions of years, just so that it fits the age of the world according to science, is a stupid excuse, to say that the rabbit of the Torah brought up by Gera is not the rabbit of today, is a stupid excuse.
And of course there are many other examples.
Get this nonsense out of your head, I don't hate you, I just hope you grow up a little.
rival,
You are of course right and that's why YouTube was aimed specifically at you, Nisim and anyone who doesn't think that the word spiritual is a get out of jail card because I assumed you would enjoy another interesting lecture by Sean Carroll
Shmulik
"A soul cannot exist, if the field theory is correct"
A soul is a spiritual thing that can never be proven or disproved by the laws of physics that relate only to materiality. There is no measuring device that can measure or sense a spiritual thing. So enough with the rubbish.
Shmulik,
I started hearing and it sounds interesting, but if you think that this is really what will convince the blind believers that the soul does not exist, then you have too high expectations that do not really correspond to reality.
You probably haven't talked enough with people of faith.
Miracles
Because a rival treats the explanations of the contradictions as a stupid excuse, does that mean he is right? After all, no matter what is said, you will always reject the explanation. And the reason - an abysmal and dark hatred for the Torah of Israel and its keepers. Really reminds me of the mockery of the haters of the State of Israel to all our explanations of the anti-Semitic claims of genocide and war crimes committed by the IDF. So just as we are not moved by them and know that justice is with us, so we are not moved by your claims loaded with hatred and hatred.
*A soul cannot exist...*
A follow-up lecture by Shawn Carroll (thank you miracles) on the subject of naturalism.
Minute 21: Astrology is incorrect and the soul cannot exist, if the field theory is correct
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xv0mKsO2goA&index=16&list=PLV4bq2vDW158E3ZS0fjD2fiiv2ns8w6VF
outside the box
An opponent has kicked you out of the game. In chess they call it "mat cobblers".
And like all Torah greats - you "get stronger" from it.
Yes outside the box, they do address the contradictions and find a silly excuse for each of them.
keep being blind
My beloved rival.. Thank you..
In practice, you strengthened the possibility of my free choice... should I follow the holy Torah commentators like Rashi... who relate to contradictions and do not ignore them... who are clear that there is no error in the Holy Torah... or those who explain differently... thank you for the reinforcement... Zohari you already know where the choice is my free
Or is it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKvjitwkF2w
Out of the box,
Are you talking about many wonderful depths like this for example?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndC9AeyMP44
Indeed this is true of all languages. And even in the holy language. This is how many more wonderful depths are revealed in it. But unlike the other languages.. this language has been accepted by the people of Israel for thousands of years as an almighty language, a language in which the world was created..
...and because there is a more developed language than this language..?? And in fact, unlike other languages, the effort is to deepen and understand this developed language and assimilate to the enormous revelation inherent in it... In any case, this has been accepted by our people for thousands of years..
outside the box
Language develops as you use it. It is not a compliment to the language when it does not change. Sanskrit has not changed over a period of 2500 years. What exactly are you trying to infer from this?
for miracles
Indeed many things have changed in the world. ..in almost every field..the special thing is that There is no change here. And it's interesting... Anyway, it seems interesting to me. And we will look at archeology as well.. since they themselves marvel at the comparison of the identity of then and now..
outside the box
So it hasn't changed for 1500 years. Yes, it changed (and a lot) before that. There are other languages that haven't changed - what's special about that?
correction . I wrote the eyes and it should be the thing
See below.. Above Herzl... It's just the eyes I wanted to convey. no more..
Out of the box
What is the point you are trying to get across? The shape of Hebrew letters has changed a lot over the years.
Strong.
A. Who writes the Odyssey today?
B. Does Christianity write in the same ancient Hebrew script from which it took its inspiration... i.e. the Old Testament for their definition..
C. As for Islam, why do you write in Arabic?
D. Today there are already several types of Koran .. in the custody of their religion.
E. Regarding the writing that was found written... and deciphered... it is the oldest writing that was found... and I believe that if it is found older until the times of Moses, it will be found to be the same. And it is about 3000 years..
and. For in any case in the same Torah it is said that it was written over 3000 times. year.. while both Christianity and Islam attest to a later period in their own writings
Box
1500 years ago there were also New Testament books that have not changed to this day.
About a hundred years after this scroll was written, the Koran was written and neither it nor the way it was written has changed since then
The Odyssey was written about 2800 years ago and apparently has not changed in the last 2500 years.
The first two teach that as soon as a group makes a text canonical - holy, the likelihood that the text will change decreases greatly and the only way to make the text disappear is to make the group of people disappear.
The third example shows that there are also earlier texts that have not been changed.
I will guess that you choose not to see any hidden meaning in the fact that the Koran, the New Testament and the Odyssey are ancient and preserved.
Rival if you find a book written on parchment at a time when few had the ability to mass reproduce that book. And after one thousand five hundred years you will find exactly the same way of writing. That is, with a quill on the skin of an animal. Indeed then it will be unique... or to your question... are you able to find a book by Zoll Warren today... written with the same letters and printed in the same form and on the same machine in which the book was printed at the time... I think the same will be true of Harry Potter... in much less than 1500 sleep. By the way.. One of my hobbies is buying old books.. that were printed several hundreds and even decades ago. And believe me they are very hard to find... I will go for a Torah book that is printed and written exactly according to what was done thousands of years ago.. It is found all over the world full of churches.
There is no doubt that the Torah that was given to all the people at Mount Sinai is amazing and moving. It is the root of our existence as a people. And she is the humanization files for a truly enlightened life. Regarding you, the opponent of the work, that so many people receive a Torah book in which their own history is written. And in addition, in this book there are glimpses of life in which the will of the Creator appears (which is the desire to do good in an olymptimate way to His creatures) and none of those who received this book protested and said, "Hey, that's not true, no They brought us out of Egypt with such visible miracles" It is definitely a blow to me that there was the status of Mount Sinai where an entire people accepts the will of God
Out of the box,
If in 1500 years we find Harry Potter books that do not differ in one word from the Harry Potter books of today, will this prove that the story about Harry Potter is true and happened in reality?
Well done. It's nice to hear about the history of the people of Israel and it's nice that it's also published in the media even though it's not related to Bar Refaeli
Unbelievable 1500 years ago, not only has there been no change in the exactness of the verses, the shape of the letters has not changed, these are exactly according to Halacha
Well done!