The priesthood as you did not know it - XNUMX: The Sabbath crowned with its old age

So far it is clear to us why President Raban Gamaliel is strengthening his ties with the priesthood and why a decision, albeit somewhat loose, to renew the temple, physically and substantially, has rewarded him in his heart.
Moreover, after the destruction, the assumption that the temple building should not be renewed except by a miraculous, miraculous action of God did not develop, not even by implication, so that the president could certainly dream of renewing the face of the temple, of course with the consent of the Romans.

A tomb structure in the city of Yavne attributed to Rabbi Gamliel. Photo: faithful photographer Michael Jacobson, Hebrew Wikipedia, license to use
A tomb structure in the city of Yavne attributed to Rabbi Gamliel. Photo: faithful photographer Michael Jacobson, Hebrew Wikipedia, license to use
It is impossible to know when the traditional, legitimate, mythological presidential dynasty returned to control Jewish society after the usurpation period of Ribaz's presidency, and this is because the Sage literature provides only partial and imprecise chronological information. It is likely that Rabbi Gamliel's presidency begins somewhere in the early 1980s, that is, after about ten years of leadership of the Rivaz. By then, Rabbi Gamliel had been appointed and the continuity of the presidency was not yet ripe in the minds of the Romans, and this after the rebellion was led by Rabbi Gamliel's father, the He is Rabbi Shimon ben Gamaliel, my guess is that President Hinoka was under the supervision of Rebz, though I have yet to find the appropriate sources to support this or reject this assumption. This hypothesis is based on Roman customs and rules regarding areas that were suppressed after a rebellion. This hypothesis is supported by the very growth of Ribaz's leadership under the auspices of the Romans.

And what do we find in the sources, or at least an insinuation, that Ribaz's opinion was not so comfortable, to say the least, from his premature "kicking" of the presidency, and in the sources of many sages who stand at the head of their communities, Ribaz is listed in a secondary place. In other words, a kind of counter-revolution to the actions of Rivaz is taking place before our eyes, with Raban Gamaliel recapturing his position in the leadership of the society and its institutions, and it "remains" for him, for the matter at hand, to formulate his position regarding the priesthood.

The central institution of Jewish society in the days of the Second Temple was the Sanhedrin (from the Hellenic syndreon), in the sense of a leadership council in various fields - legal, halachic, executive and even political, and headed by the president. Until 150 B.C., when Jonathan the Hasmonean received the title of priesthood from the Syrian-Seleucid government, and became the leader of Jewish society (a kind of king without a crown), two figures were named as the head of the Sanhedrin, and they were called a "couple" - one a president and the other a father - Court, and it was convenient to split their roles in light of this between the legislative leadership and the legal leadership.
Up until this time, the High Priest from the House of Zadok was considered the head of Jewish society and had the right of representation (proteasia) towards the Hellenistic government, first the Egyptian and then the Syrian, but from the time the Hasmonean leaders were appointed high priests on behalf of the Syrians, the firstborn migrated to the House of Hasmon from the Yehoirib Guard.

From the beginning of the Roman rule (63 BC onwards), when the monarchy and the priesthood of the House of Hasmoneans were abolished, there was a competition, except during the reign of the House of Herod, between the presidency and the great priesthood for the presidency of the Sanhedrin, and immediately after the destruction of the Second House all the cards were destroyed and the priesthood found itself mired in a catastrophe continuous

The fact that the Rebbez was the head of the Sanhedrin ("the committee", as the sage literature calls it), and he was one of the Pharisee class, greatly reduced the status of the priesthood, and the question arises, does this situation continue to be conducted even in the days of Rabbi Gamliel?

This phenomenon did not last since Rabbi Gamaliel's status and the essence of his position were different from those of the Rebbez. First - Rabbi Gamaliel was granted rehabilitation by the Roman authorities, what is known in the language of the Sages as "he went to take permission from the governor in Syria" and thereby strengthened his presidential status; Second - Rabbi Gamliel enjoyed the traditional-mythological lineage of the father's/grandfather's/great-grandfather's house; Thirdly - in the days of Rabbi Gamliel, and at least for the most part, the relationship with the Romans was established and the president could turn his head to dealing with internal affairs.

Apparently, Rabbi Gamaliel could have continued to cut the status of the priests, on the basis of strengthening his power above, but he did not do so, and why? More on that later.

The Sage sources of Rabbi Gamaliel's time are filled with information about the temple and the priesthood. Apparently this should surprise us, since the temple is a sword and other matters take the place of the temple's procedures, but the matters of the priesthood never cease to "bother" the life of the Sanhedrin and its work routine. The discussions deal with the donations given to the priests (even though the temple was destroyed), about their rights, about various events that took place in the priesthood during the The house, and the colorful celebrations of the pilgrimage and the holidays in general are described in all seriousness.

In Tractate Shekelim 5:1 there appears a text, somewhat anachronistic, that discusses the affairs of the temple and is rich in its colors as follows: "These are the priests who were in the temple: Yochanan ben Pinchas (a supervisor) on the seals (which were used as signs that the priest received the money donated equal to the sacrifice fees such as a calf, a ram and a goat ), Ahya on the princes, Mattia ben Shmuel on the pieces (the casting of lots between the priests regarding the distribution of the work among them), Petahia on the quinine (for selling bulls and doves for sacrifices) ... Ben Ahiha on intestinal patients (on the medicines and concoctions for the intestinal disease that was common among the priests) ... Gebini Koroz (the one who used to announce every morning: 'Priests stand up for your work, and mourners for your booth and Israel for your position '), Ben Gaber on locking gates (in the temple in the evening) ... Ben Arza on the bell (percussion musically, after which the Levites answered with a song), was torn over the song (as a musical conductor)..." (Shekelim 5:1).

And in Tractate Tamim 5:6 we read as follows: "The two contributing priests arrived, the one who won the incense and the other the anointing. One took the rake (a musical instrument that made sounds while being thrown) and threw it between the hall and the altar. No one hears the voice of his friend in Jerusalem over the sound of the rake And she used three things: A priest who hears her voice knows that his fellow priests are coming in to bow and he runs and comes (to bow together with them). And Ben Levi, who hears her voice, knows that his Levite brothers are coming in to speak in song (to stand on the platform that was placed between the help of Israel and the help of the priests) and he ran and came (to join the choir) and the head of the class would place the impure at the east gate (the Nicanor gate purify the impure)".

The amount of information in the Mishnah, such as above, about the temple and the priesthood during the presidency of Rabbi Gamliel is not casual. It is true that the trend that dominated the Sanhedrin since the days of the Ribaz was to create a balance between continuing to live even in the absence of a temple and remembering the temple and its customs, but another trend was hidden during the presidency of Rabbi Gamliel, and it is not known whether and to what extent it stemmed from pressure from the families of the priesthood, who were trampled during the days of Rabbi Gamaliel. Ribaz, or it was integrated into Rabbi Gamliel's tendency to renew, perhaps, the temple and the work in it.
The renewal of the temple was there to show the thawing of relations between the Jews and the Romans, to symbolize the strengthening of the position of the president and the presidency in general, and above all this move symbolized an aspiration to economically strengthen Jerusalem and Judea, since half the shekels that were poured into the temple for many hundreds of years, turned it into an astronomical economic center, And indirectly it can serve the Romans as the rulers of the region, say by raising the level of taxes and more.

That is, so far it is clear to us why President Raban Gamaliel is strengthening his ties with the priesthood and why he has rewarded in his heart a decision, albeit somewhat loose, to renew the temple, physically and substantially.
Moreover, after the destruction, the assumption that the temple building should not be renewed except by a miraculous, miraculous action of God did not develop, not even by implication, so that the president could certainly dream of renewing the face of the temple, of course with the consent of the Romans.

Did she make it through? About that in the next list.

The series of articles "The Priesthood You Didn't Know" by Dr. Yechiam Sorek

Comments

  1. There is only one difference, my friend, in comparing the priests to the ultra-Orthodox

    There were very few priests once...there are many free eaters today...
    So that even the priests - their respect receded compared to what is going on today.

  2. Darwinist,
    You adopted the lies that the ultra-orthodox spread. You are expressing yourself today on this website only thanks to the people who abandoned Orthodoxy and went out into the wider world, according to the broad view. They did not preserve the Hebrew language, they did not speak it. They spoke Yiddish and wrote incredibly garbled Hebrew. Those who allowed you to speak Hebrew - not of the "holy" books, but Hebrew, a living and rich language, are the people who understood two hundred years ago that the Jewish religion is a physical and spiritual prison.

  3. Darwinist:
    It is indeed stupid to kick indiscriminately (even in football) and therefore you need to kick with indiscretion because if you don't do it you will find yourself without a country and without a spirit of life.
    Do you really think it's a good thing that a growing sector of superstitious people lives off you and doesn't join the military?
    Kicking this phenomenon doesn't hurt your behind but protects your life!

  4. To Teutincus Ordos: The things you say are true. so what? This is how the human mind is built. Humans will always look for something scary to believe in and human characters to attribute preventive powers to. This is true among children who believe in adults, citizens who believe in the government and also followers of God who believe in priests, rabbis or imams. Each person has to make his own home, and the religious leaders in general.
    ===
    You will also find idleness, parasitism and vanity in the theater or in the cinema. And if you're a fan of this type of entertainment, wouldn't you buy a ticket with the best of your money?
    ===
    For the avoidance of doubt, I believe that the ultra-Orthodox population, which does not constitute a significant source of income, is a significant burden on the shoulders of the productive sector. Da Aka, this society is the spiritual nucleus of the culture to which you and I belong. Although my belief in idols is lacking, I embrace the (illusory, perhaps) history of the Jewish people and speak the language of the scriptures they have preserved (often fiercely) for centuries. Parasites or not, if it weren't for them I wouldn't be who I am. If I kick them indiscriminately, I will also find myself with bruised behinds.

  5. The Temple was a source of livelihood and wealth for groups of parasitic priests and sages who terrorized the people of the country and this reminds us of the ultra-orthodox parties on their rabbis today who are extorting the state budget and their voters are stuck in idle yeshiva,
    Nothing has changed during history, parasitic idleness and nonsense!!

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.