Comprehensive coverage

Tzedek - findings from recent years

Photographs taken by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2014 showed that the Great Red Spot, as it is known, had shrunk from its size when visited by the Voyager spacecraft in the XNUMXs

Jupiter as photographed in 2014 by the Hubble Space Telescope. You can see that the red spot has shrunk a lot in a process that lasted about thirty years. Photo: NASA/ESA
Jupiter as photographed in 2014 by the Hubble Space Telescope. You can see that the red spot has shrunk a lot in a process that lasted about thirty years. Photo: NASA/ESA

atmosphere

On Earth, hydrogen is a transparent, colorless gas. On Jupiter it becomes what it is most strange due to the special conditions for this planet. Jupiter is a predominantly gaseous planet. As you go deeper into the atmosphere, atmospheric pressures and temperatures rise. With the descent to great depths, the hydrogen becomes liquid and then solid. It is not a clear distinction like on Earth, between water vapor, bodies of water and snow. According to one estimate, at a depth between 10,000 and 13,000 km the temperature reaches 5000 degrees and the atmospheric pressure is 2-1 million times that of the Earth. The hydrogen under these conditions takes on metallic characteristics and becomes a conductive metal. In large parts at these depths, its metallic characteristics and the self-rotation speed of Jupiter (10 hours) create a magnetic field around Jupiter that is 720 million km long, the largest in the solar system. It creates an electric field with a strength of 10 million amperes and glows at both poles (1).

Due to these conditions of Jupiter, it was suggested that the helium condenses into droplets and behaves like rain. A very strange thing indeed, a shower of helium. Initially the helium condenses into a mist in the upper layers of the atmosphere like a cloud and as the drops get bigger they descend to greater depths like a rain cloud. The helium droplets form 13 - 000 km below the top of the hydrogen clouds. Under conditions of atmospheric pressures and tremendous temperatures, the hydrogen is also in a state of liquid accumulation or in a state of transition between gas and liquid. The helium rain is mixed with neon and this is what explains the removal of helium from the upper layers of the atmosphere (10,000).

Molecules of acetylene were found in the poles. The discovery of these molecules enables an understanding of the chemical reactions between them and sunlight (3). As for the source of water in Jupiter's upper atmosphere, there were quite a few disagreements among researchers due to the lack of knowledge. The source of water in the lower layers of the atmosphere is deep within Jupiter. The source of the water in the upper layers is external to Jupiter. Several possible sources were examined. The observations showed that their distribution in the atmosphere is not homogeneous and they are mainly concentrated in the southern hemisphere. The observations made by the space telescope showed that their origin is the impact of the comet Shoemaker Levi in ​​Zedekb-1994 and that 95% of the water is from this comet, (4).

Observations from 2010 showed that the dark band had disappeared. This is the south equatorial belt. In 2009 she was seen. This disappearance has a history. One disappearance was observed in 1973 when it was photographed for the first time by the Pioneer 10 spacecraft. And the second disappearance, also temporary, was in the early 90s. White clouds developed above them in the southern hemisphere. At the same time, global changes occurred in Jupiter (5). Following the disappearance of the layer and its return, it was decided to investigate a similar phenomenon that occurred in the northern equatorial strip. Between 2011 - 2010 it was very white, a brightness not seen in 100 years. In March this year it started to darken again. Infrared observations showed a thickening of the lower layers. Infrared observations showed elongated formations in the white clouds in the bright area and they were named brown barges.

An observation was also made of a series of blue-grey formations along the southern edge of the northern strip and they looked the brightest and driest on the planet. In infrared light they were seen as hot spots. Since they revealed the exit of the radiation from a deep layer in the atmosphere. They disappeared between 2011-2010 and reappeared in June 2011 (6).
A film produced from a series of photographs taken by the Cassini spacecraft on its way to Saturn in 2000 discovered waves in the jet streams in Jupiter's atmosphere. Like the Earth, Jupiter also has jet streams, except that they are straight and narrow. What the spacecraft did in its photography was to focus on one jet stream in the southern hemisphere. When examining the film, they noticed a dark line of chevron formations in the form of the letter V formed at the end of the jet stream which moves in a west-east direction and at a later stage this formation became ripples when each chevron moves up and up - north and south. This is actually the seal of a Rossby wave. The chevrons in the fast jet stream come into contact with the slow Roseby wave and here oscillate. It also turned out that the chevrons are related to another type of wave in the atmosphere (gravity inertia waves). Investigating these waves can teach about the deep layers of the atmosphere (7).

It turned out that it is the Roseby wave that creates the hot spots, the size of each of which is the size of North America. This wave rises and falls in the atmosphere like a horse on a merry-go-round. The same film produced from the series of photographs covers a period of two months, so that it was possible to follow daily and weekly changes in the course of the atmospheric phenomena. Since the hot spots create "breaks" in the clouds, it is possible to observe deeper into the atmosphere, which under normal conditions is impossible. Since they are hotter than their surroundings, they are bright in the infrared, hence their name (8).

The red spot
Thermal observations made using powerful telescopes in the Red Spot showed swirls of warm air and previously unseen cold regions in the Red Spot, making it possible to map weather deeper in the atmosphere. It turned out that the darkness of the spot originates from a hot core inside it. The photographs also showed "lanes" at the edges of the spot, places where gases descend into deeper regions of the atmosphere. One of the most interesting findings is that the red-orange area in the center of the red spot is the hottest in the spot. 4-3 degrees higher than its surroundings, enough to allow the storm to circulate generally counter-clockwise. For the first time it can be said that there is a close connection between environmental conditions and temperatures - winds, atmospheric pressure and chemical composition - and the color of the stain. At the same time it should be noted that it is still not clear which chemicals create the dark red color of the stain (9).

Photographs taken by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2014 showed that the spot is smaller than thought. Its diameter is 16,000 km and it is circular. The photographs of the Voyager spacecraft showed a diameter of 25,000 km per year and it is not clear what causes this. Shrinkage is at a rate of 1000 km per year(10).

In a laboratory experiment, a combination of ammonia and noble gases (these gases are known to be found in the atmosphere) was bombarded with ultraviolet radiation in order to imitate the effect of the sun's heat on these substances found in the highest places, in the clouds found within the red spot. A reddish substance was formed which was compared to the red spot as observed by the Cassini spacecraft. In the visible light and in the infrared, it turned out that the property of the light scattering corresponds to the model according to which it is limited to the high parts of the spot. The conclusion they reached is that the origin of the stain's color is in chemical compounds that are broken down by sunlight and not in internal sources as thought until now.

It is estimated that the high altitude where the red spot is located allows the increase and darkening of the red color. The winds in their spot move ammonia ice very high in the atmosphere, where it is exposed to the sun's ultra radiation. In addition, the vorticity of the spot prevents the escape of these particles from the atmosphere (11).

Sources
1. Dauna Coulter - "A freaky fluid inside Jupiter" 10. 8. 2011
http://www. spacedaily. com/reports/A_Freaky_Fluid_Inside_Jupiter_999. html
2. "Helium rain on Jupiter explains lack of Neon in atmosphere" 23. 2. 2010
http://www. spacedaily. com/reports/Helium_Rain_On_Jupiter_Explains_Lack_Of Neon_ In_ Atmosphere_999. html
3. PIA13699 : "Acetylene around Jupiter's poles"
http://photojournal. jpl. nasa. gov/catalogPIA13699
4. "Herschel solves mystery of origin of water in the upper atmosphere of Jupiter"
23. 4. 2013
http://scitechdaily. com/herschel- solves- mystery-of- origin -of- water- in- the- upper -atmosphere-of-Jupiter
5. Shiga D. "Jupiter loses a stripe" 11. 5. 2010
http://www. newscientist/article/dn18889jupiter-loses-a-stripe. html
6. "Jupiter: Turmoil from below' battering from above" 18. 10. 2012
http://www. spacedaily. com/reports/Jupiter-Turmoil_From_Below_Battering_From _Above_999. html
7. "Cassini spies wave rattling jet stream on Jupiter" 19. 3. 2012
http://www. spacedaily. com/reports/Cassini_Spies_Wave_Rattling_Jet_Stream_On _Jupiter_999. html
8. "Hot spots ride a merry go around on Jupiter" 14. 3. 2013
http://phys-org/news/2013-03-hot-spots-ride-a-merry-go-around-on-jupiter. html
9. "See spots on Jupiter see spot glow" 17. 3. 2010
http://www. spacedaily. com/reports/See_Spots_On_Jupiter_See_Spot_Glow_999. html
10. "Klotz Irene - "Jupiter giant spot shrinking Hubble images show" 15. 5. 2014
http://uk. reuters. com/article/2014/05/15/us-space-jupiter- idUKKBNODV1620140515
11. "Jupiter red spot is likely sunburn's not a blush" 11. 11. 2014
http://saturn. jpl. nasa. gov/news/newsreleases/newsrelease20141111

9 תגובות

  1. Haim,

    Instead of going straight into a defensive position, you should listen to the criticism. All the things you were told here are correct - the word km was unnecessary, ampere is a unit of current and not field (and the original article also says electric current and not electric field) and the length of the magnetic field is also unclear (in this case, the error is in the source, but it is appropriate that you explain her or leave her out. Quoting an unclear or even rather closed sentence does not help anyone).

    No one here wants to out you idiot. If you post something you wrote in an open forum, you should be open to the comments you receive.

  2. skeptic
    I will try to explain in another way. Atmospheric pressure at sea level is considered to be 1 atmosphere. This is a unit of measure, when you go to the top of Everest the air is thinner, so water will boil at 96 degrees, not 100 degrees. When diving, the deeper you dive the atmospheric pressure increases. A greater pressure is exerted on the body, because with the deepening the amount of water on the body increases. Thus, every 10 meters the atmospheric pressure increases by 1 atmosphere. Whales can reach a depth of 900 meters, a pressure of 90 atmospheres. The deepest place in the oceans is in the Pacific Ocean, a depth of 11 km. Atmospheric pressure 1100 atmospheres. Now let's get back to justice. As you go deeper, the hydrogen gets more and more compressed until it takes on the characteristics of a metal. The diameter of Jupiter is 140,000 km and it probably has a solid core that is slightly larger than the Earth. For this reason, with the deepening in the atmosphere, the atmospheric pressure increases and reaches monstrous dimensions. Neither you nor I would want to be there. not nice. Now I hope you understand. I can't explain more than that. If you still want to go a little deeper with numbers, take Sears Zymansky's book "Mechanics". As for the word km here, you are indeed right. I must have missed it in proofreading. It is inevitable. Go to the Hebrew encyclopedia, there you will also find mistakes of this type. In publishing houses there are linguistic editors who go over writers' manuscripts even after they proofread their own writings. This is a type of mistake that the writer does not always see, for this reason an external editor is needed and I do everything myself.

  3. Ofer
    In my profession I am a linguistic editor of technical literature and I have been writing for many years and have hundreds of publications, so don't try to teach me how to write.

  4. skeptic
    This is not a new unit, but an estimate based on models regarding the atmospheric pressure at very great depths in Jupiter's atmosphere.

  5. "Atmospheric pressure is 2 times - 1 million km that of the Earth"
    interesting
    This is surely a new physical unit of pressure.

  6. Why go to the sources? My criticism is not about the source but about the presentation.
    (I really appreciate the effort, but things should be submitted in a more professional manner)

  7. Rhetorical questions:
    Electric field is measured in amperes?
    Does a magnetic field have length?
    Review:
    A confusing and confusing review.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.