Comprehensive coverage

Goodbye Kepler, hello Tess: a new telescope will take over the baton in the search for planets

TESS was designed in such a way that it can discover planets very close to their star even if the stars are very bright, and thus among other things it will be able to locate planets in solar systems close to our own solar system and examine them in depth

TESS simulation. Source: NASA.
TESS simulation. Source: NASA.

An image of Kepler-10b, a planet orbiting one of the 150,000 stars tracked by the Kepler space telescope. NASA / Kepler mission / Dana Berry, CC BY
author
Jason Stephan
Assistant Professor of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

For centuries, humans have wondered about the possibility of planets orbiting distant stars. Perhaps some of these worlds will be inhabited by strange life forms or have unique histories. But it wasn't until 1995 that astronomers identified the first planets orbiting planets outside our solar system.

In the past decade, in particular, the number of planets known to orbit distant stars has grown from less than 100 to more than 2,000, with another 2,000 potential planets awaiting confirmation. Most of these new discoveries stem from one project - NASA's Kepler Space Telescope.

The number of happy planets continues to increase. NASA / Ames Research Center / Wendy Stanzel and University of Texas at Austin / Andrew Vanderburgh, CC BY

The Kepler space telescope is a satellite that carries a telescope with a diameter of one meter, and a digital camera of 95 megapixels. The instruments on the satellite detected tiny changes in the brightness of 150,000 distant stars, looking for the signal that comes when the planet blocks some of the star's light as it passes through the telescope's line of sight. The telescope is so sensitive that it can detect a buzzing fly hovering over one Chicago streetlight from orbit in space. He can see stars trembling and vibrating; He can see small stars like the moon.
Kepler's thousands of discoveries revolutionized the understanding of planets and planetary systems. Now, however, the spacecraft is running out of hydrazine fuel and will end its life sometime in the coming months. Luckily for planet hunters, NASA's next exoplanet search mission is right around the corner.

The history of Kepler
The Kepler mission was born in the early 2000s with an idea put forward by NASA scientist Bill Borkey, who was later assisted by his colleague David Koch. At that time there were no known planets outside the solar system. Kepler was eventually built in the 2009s and launched in March 2008. I joined the Kepler science team in XNUMX, eventually collaborating with the group studying the motions of stars led by Jack Lissauer.
Originally, the mission was planned to last three and a half years with possible extensions as long as the spacecraft's fuel, or camera, or other components last. Over time, parts of the camera began to fail but the mission continued. However, in 2013, when two of its four stabilizing gyroscopes stopped, the original Kepler mission ended.
Even then, with some sophistication, NASA was able to use the reflected light from the sun to help navigate the spacecraft. The mission was restarted as K2 and continued to find planets for another half decade. Now, when the fuel gauge runs out, its orbit around Earth will twist and the spacecraft will drift into the solar system. The final catalog of planet candidates from the original mission was completed late last year and is now processing the latest observations of K2.

Kepler's science
Extracting knowledge from Kepler will take many more years of reviewing data and pointing telescopes at planet candidates, but what we've seen so far has also amazed scientists.
We have seen several planets that orbit their host stars in a matter of hours, and are so hot that the rocks on their surface vaporize and float in space behind the planet like a comet's tail. Other systems have planets so close together that if you were to stand on one planet, the other planet would appear 10 times larger than the full moon. One system is so packed that eight planets are closer to their star than Earth is to the Sun. Many of these planets orbit their suns in the habitable zone - the area where water can exist in a liquid state on their surface.

In its four years of operation in its original form, Kepler stared at one area of ​​the sky and scanned it over and over again. TESS will use the same detection technique as Kepler, but instead of circling the Sun, it will "have a relationship" with the Moon, it will circle the Earth exactly twice in the entire orbit of the Moon. In addition, instead of staring at one part of the sky, Tess will scan almost the entire sky with the photo fields overlapping (much like the petals of a flower).

Following the knowledge we learned from Kepler, astronomers expect Tess to discover thousands of planetary systems. By scanning the entire sky we can discover systems where the planets orbit the stars 10 times closer and 100 times brighter than those Kepler could detect. In this way, we will be able to discover planets around the brightest stars closest to the solar system. This will open up new possibilities for measuring the mass of the planets and their density, studying their atmospheres, studying their host stars and learning about the nature of the systems in which the planets are located. This information, in turn, will tell us more about the history of our planet, how life began, what fate has been denied us and what is expected in the future. The quest to find our place in the universe continues as Kepler completes his part of the journey and TESS takes up the baton.

to the article on The Conversation website

More on the subject on the science website

8 תגובות

  1. Thank you Epsom,

    It frustrates me because part of the point is igniting the imagination, and there is nothing like a pale blue dot to arouse a little interest...

    Regarding waiting for a future mission, I understand that the James Webb telescope is late and it is also infrared, and from the wfirst telescope the coronagraph was taken down (if any) and atlast is not visible on the horizon.
    Maybe esa will take care of us

  2. Sparrow, TESS operates at much redder wavelengths than Kepler, so also in terms of the spectrum of the suns they gave up suns similar to ours.
    The goal is to collect the largest number of planets that are also close to us, and that are fundamentally different from those that can be found in the solar system. That's why we look for stars around dim red glasses and planets that are very close to them.
    In addition to this, the closer a planet is to its sun, the better chance there is of being able to see its eclipse from here and thus locate it. The reason they want to focus on closer stars (and therefore brighter, but not hotter, because they focus on red and relatively cold suns) is so that it will be possible to continue studying these planets also using telescopes located on Earth.

    And what about discovering Earth-like stars around G2 type glasses? They will probably have to wait for some future discovery mission. And in any case, I'm starting to get the impression that in the future it will be easier for humanity to create huge and comfortable space stations near alien stars, than to find something barely habitable at a great distance from the solar system, and then colonize it for a few hundred years (at best).

  3. "By scanning the whole sky we can discover systems where the planets orbit the stars 10 times closer and 100 times brighter than those Kepler could detect."
    It's a little frustrating.
    "Scanning the whole sky" means that there is no continuous observation of the same place all the time, meaning that only planets that orbit the star in a short period of time will be discovered,
    "10 times closer", again,
    "100 times brighter" meaning hotter stars.
    If I understand correctly, this means that the chance of finding an Earth-like planet via TESS tends to zero.
    I understand right?

  4. The computers in space have to be "smart" enough to perform their task. Beyond that, they have to withstand extreme conditions, which usually include a transition from freezing to very hot temperatures, as well as resistance to cosmic radiation, which may disrupt the information they handle.

    If we take TESS for example, the spacecraft that will be launched this Monday, the computer on it is of the Athena III Single Board Computer type, whose manufacturers pride themselves mainly on its compactness, its low energy consumption, its support for many types of connections to external devices, its durability and reliability in a wide temperature range and in shocks according to military standards . The processor installed in it (the most powerful among them) is an Intel Atom® Processor E680T, which was announced in 2010, and which was mainly intended for energy-saving products, such as laptops. It can be assumed that the person who bought a laptop with this processor has already had time to replace it with another one.

  5. If as it is written "Kepler was eventually built in the 2000s and launched in March 2009" then it can be understood that the time that passes from planning to execution results in the use of old technology in the mission

  6. If as it is written "Kepler was eventually built in the 2000s and launched in March 2009" then the time that passes from planning to execution causes the use of old technology in the mission

  7. Hello, which processors are used in this equipment? I read that the processors in space are not smart enough.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.