Comprehensive coverage

Einstein by Max (Moshe) Yamer

Einstein abandoned traditional religion as a child and became a free thinker. Did Einstein's abandonment of the religious paradise lead him straight to relativity? This week, Prof. Moshe Yimer Mauni' Bar-Ilan, who was Einstein's student and wrote a book about Einstein's original religious philosophy, passed away.

Prof. Moshe Yimer. Photo: Bar-Ilan University
Prof. Moshe Yimer. Photo: Bar-Ilan University

Prof. Max Yamer, the physicist and philosopher of science from Bar Ilan University passed away on December 18 at the age of 95. Yamer belongs to the generation of physicists who worked in Einstein's environment. Ymer was a colleague of Einstein and met him at Princeton. Einstein wrote the following about Max Yemmer in 1953, "But the limitation in the individual's ability and working capacity is such that we rarely find a person who has the philological and historical training necessary for a critical and comparative interpretation of the source material, such as is scattered over hundreds of years, and who is at the same time can appreciate the significance of the discussed concepts for science as a whole. I have the impression that Dr. Yamer, through his work, demonstrated that in his case these conditions are largely met for him".

Yamar wrote several books on the history of physics and a book on Einstein, Einstein and religion. Einstein's biographers have not addressed the question of Einstein's approach to religion and Einstein's philosophy of religion. In addition, often - if they briefly referred to his views on the subject of religion - they distorted Einstein's religious views. In his book Einstein and Religion, Yamer analyzes Einstein's philosophy of religion and his approach to religion. I will bring some of Yamer's ideas in his book.
Yimer says that four months after Einstein left Germany, in May 1933, the Gestapo stormed his apartment at Haberlandstrasse number 5 in Berlin. The excuse was a search for anti-German propaganda literature. The Gestapo found a pair of Tefillin in Einstein's apartment. Einstein never put them down. They also found a prayer book along with pictures and valuable cutlery. Needless to say, everything was looted.
Einstein, the humanist, the Jew and the pacifist became a political and ideological target. His theory of relativity was accused of being a typical product of Jewish physics, which tries to remove the true Aryan physics from its foundations. As a result, the Nazi ideologues tried to show that relativity was influenced by the Talmud, the Mishna and the Gemara; The principle of constancy of the speed of light per diem stemmed from the Bible and the Torah. And it was even necessary to develop an elaborate mathematical instrument to show this, according to the Nazis, an instrument whose name was the Jewish theory of relativity. They even attributed the Sabbath laws - according to which one must not travel more than a kilometer and a half - to the Jewish theory of relativity.
"If we ignore the anti-Semitic tone," writes Max Yemer in his book, "we can ask: Are there philosophical and religious motivations in the theory of relativity?" The important question for Lemer is not only how much religion influenced Einstein's work, but also, conversely, how deeply Einstein's work - and especially his theory of relativity - influenced theological thought in general.
Yamer studied the interaction between modern physics and theology and how it sheds light on the debate about the relationship between religion and science. Einstein abandoned traditional religion as a child and became a free thinker. Did Einstein's abandonment of the religious paradise lead him straight to relativity? "Such an approach may lead us to think that science and religion are antagonistic and irreconcilable," says Max Ymer. "However, Einstein himself never thought that the relationship between science and religion was an anti-thesis." "On the contrary," says Yamer, "he saw science and religion as complementing each other, or instead dependent on each other. On this topic, Ymer quotes Einstein as saying: "Science without religion is lame, while religion without science is blind."
What kind of religion did Einstein mean? Einstein sometimes defined himself as a pantheist (identifying God with nature, advocating seeing the world as a reflection of the divine). He said about himself: "I am a very religious person. I cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or who has a will of the kind we experience ourselves." Yamer says that in 1929 Rabbi Herbert S. Goldstein from the New York synagogue asked Einstein in a short message: "Do you believe in God?" Einstein replied: "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the organized harmony of what exists, and not in a God who deals with the destinies and actions of human beings."
And then Einstein was often accused of being an atheist or agnostic (does not disbelieve in God but advocates the view that man and science cannot know about the existence of God). Ymer says that at a charity dinner in New York when he spoke to a German anti-Nazi diplomat, Hubertus zu Loewenstein in 1941, Einstein said the following: "In light of such harmony in the cosmos that I, with the help of my limited human thought, am able to understand, there are still people who say there is no God. But what really angers me is that they quote me as a supporter of such views." After all, atheists deny the existence of God, and it doesn't matter how God is defined. And Einstein denied only one concept of God, the concept of a personal God.
Indeed, we argued that Einstein's statement expresses atheism, since if God - according to Einstein - is not concerned with the actions and prayers of man, he is surely useless to pray to. There is therefore no need for a synagogue, a church, or a mosque and any religious mitzvah and the worship of God and any other characteristic of religion. The whole point of religion is the almighty personal God dealing with man's destinies and actions. indeed?
Einstein's God is Spinoza's and is completely deterministic, and in some ways can be translated into a scientific formula. And it can be argued against him that he is not God at all. However, Yamer says, Einstein himself made a sharp distinction between his disbelief in a personal God and atheism. He did not think that religious education was worthless and that belief in a monotheistic personal God should be condemned. He opposed this only when they sought to teach the laws of religion instead of scientific progress and ethical values.
The concept of an omnipotent personal God is incompatible with the thesis of determinism. Yamer writes that Einstein believed in what he called cosmic religion, a kind of cosmic pantheism, and in this sense he used the term religion and not religion in the traditional sense of the word. Religion for him was in the harmony of the laws of nature, in beauty and belief in the logical simplicity and order of nature, in the imperfect understanding and moral obligations, when there is a "superior intelligence", which according to Spinoza's thought is revealed in the unlimited determinism and causality of nature. This was Einstein's religion, a religion that was based on a firm belief in determinism and an uncompromising denial of anthropomorphism in the concept of divinity.
The problem arose then and surfaced for her, as criticisms were heard against Einstein's view, if God is impersonal and is embodied in space-time, there is no moral order, since the omnipotent God (all-powerful) goes hand in hand with the moral responsibility of man: God was not all could if he had not made man free. And in this situation, who is responsible for removing Professor Einstein from Germany? Is it Hitler? Or is it just a collection of space-time combinations in nature that made Einstein act and leave Germany?
Yamer says that when Einstein denied the concept of a personal God, a historian and president of a historical association in New Jersey told Einstein: "God is a spirit and cannot be found through the telescope or the microscope... As everyone knows, religion is based on faith, not on knowledge." And some were angry and told him after he arrived in the USA: "Take your wrong and crazy theory of evolution and go back to Germany where you came from, or stop breaking the faith of the people who blessed you when you had to flee your homeland." Not only did they confuse here between Einstein and Darwin - hated by the church, but anti-Semitic undertones were angrily attributed to Einstein's choice of Spinoza's religion and his opposition to the personal God.

Of course Einstein's cosmic religion was incompatible with Judaism, Christianity and Islam and all theistic religions. This is because of his denial of a personal God who punishes and rewards and performs miracles, a God who violates the causal orders of nature. And so Einstein did not believe that one should pray to God in order to ask Him for something, in the sense of traditional religion.
David Ben-Gurion, who visited Einstein in Princeton a year before he was invited to become the country's president, felt something in common with him. Both - says Max Ymer - were passionate admirers of Spinoza and the cosmic religion. It is worth noting that Ben-Gurion was interested in Spinoza for different reasons than those of Einstein. If God is identified with nature, then everything is not in the hands of heaven and Israel is not the people chosen by God. The Jews therefore have to work hard to establish a state. The Zionist idea is based on work and creation and not on religious ideas. Here, of course, comes the question of religion and the state.

Ymer points out that in his autobiographical notes Einstein does not mention Spinoza and his ethics even once. Einstein only talks about David Yom and Immanuel Kant as philosophers who influenced his path. And so one can ask, can we find influences of the ethics of Spinoza - the philosopher who is more popular than Einstein on the subject of religion - in the theory of relativity? This is a worthy question, says Yamer, when examining Einstein's philosophy of religion.

If so, asks Max Ymer, did Einstein's concept of religion or his religious sentiments influence his scientific work? Two questions are involved here: 1) Was his religiosity a spiritual or psychological driving force that inspired him in his work? 2) Did his religious concepts affect the very essence of his work? That is, were his physical theories influenced by his so-called cosmic religion? Einstein never indicated that his religious feelings strengthened his ability to work. At the same time, music for him - playing the violin - was an expression of religious feelings and many times while playing the violin he suddenly found a solution to a scientific problem that had been bothering him for some time. For example, general relativity.

Einstein wrote to Max Born in 1926 the saying that became a famous saying, "God does not play dice". Einstein opposed the new quantum mechanics at least partly for religious reasons. God is impersonal and therefore he cannot play dice, beyond being a deterministic god... But whenever a theory appeared to Einstein as forced he said, "God does nothing like that", or "God is witty, but he is not evil"....

At the same time, Einstein once said to Edgar Meyer on January 2, 1915, "Why do you write to me, 'God should punish the English?' I have no close connection to it or the others. I am only sorry that God punishes so many of his children for his countless follies, that he himself may be guilty of it. In my opinion, he can only be forgiven for not existing."

* Editor's note - no matter how Einstein described his religious approach, it is clear that the most correct definition of his thoughts is atheism, since the embodiment of God in nature itself does not have any religious significance, however, Einstein is considered a much better Jew than many religious Jews due to his being a Zionist, he He visited the Technion and laid the cornerstone for the Hebrew University, and also participated in fundraising events and bequeathed the intellectual property resulting from the use of his image to the Hebrew University.
. Avi Blizovsky

18 תגובות

  1. From the English Wikipedia:
    According to biographer Walter Isaacson, Einstein was more inclined to denigrate disbelievers than the faithful. Einstein said in correspondence, “[T]he fanatical atheists…are like slaves who are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle. They are creatures who—in their grudge against the traditional 'opium of the people'—cannot bear the music of the spheres."

  2. To Michael Rothschild:
    Your claim that "the problem has already been solved" and the reference to a survey that tested the opinions of well-known scientists is a caricature, in my opinion.
    Do you not differentiate between the opinions and beliefs of scientists and a solution to a great metaphysical question: Is there a God?? Science is basically only concerned with sense data (energy material in time space) and subject to their laws or correlations. If God exists, he is seen by the religious (at least the traditional Jew) as a metaphysical entity, outside of time and certainly not subject to laws. In other words: God is seen as a spiritual reality - a thought - which is the reason for the existence of the physical world and the laws of nature. In this sense, science cannot prove or disprove its existence.
    I will end with a quote from Einstein: the most incomprehensible thing about the cosmos is that it is understandable to us! It is not clear how an evolutionary organism, the product of local conditions on an insignificant planet, developed a consciousness capable of deciphering all the laws of the universe. This phenomenon was not explained by Einstein and as far as my little opinion goes - stands in contradiction to his pantheistic view.

  3. live:
    You discover in the article what is not there.
    Einstein did not believe in God at all and simply chose to call nature "God" and his admiration for nature "religious feeling".
    In other words - in what most people call "God" he did not believe at all and wrote this explicitly.
    This is also completely understandable from the article.
    So it is true that there is nothing to write a doctorate about - but not because the problem is difficult to crack, but because it has already been solved and among scientists there is almost wall-to-wall agreement on it, including Einstein.
    http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/news/file002.html

  4. Really amazing article. It's amazing to find out that Einstein didn't really know if there was a God and what exactly he was. I started to write a PhD on it and I was actually optimistic but if Einstein didn't succeed I will consider changing the subject.

  5. deer
    I referred to what was implied in Poincaré's writings regarding the structure of the universe. and the three-dimensional sphere hypothesis proved by Perlman through the use of Ritchie flow and the insights derived from it about the structure of space. As Poincare probably saw it deeply as a curved space in his time. To this Einstein exclusively added the idea of ​​equivalence.

  6. neta,

    It is clear that without Riemann's mathematics, Einstein could not have formulated the theory of general relativity (or at least he would have needed the development of the necessary mathematical tools) - he would have needed the Riemann tensor, the Ricci tensor, and if you want to refer to another name, then also the Bianchi identities, to which Einstein did not address this in the first formulation of the theory of general relativity, something that almost cost him the publication of an incorrect prediction.
    General and special relativity are physical theories, therefore it is understood that they are based on mathematics - the major part of which was not developed by Einstein - that is clear.
    If so, Riemann's understanding that space does not have to be Euclidean and his attempt to calculate what happens in a non-Euclidean space, are really not sufficient to produce the theory of general relativity. The cornerstone of the physics of general relativity is the principle of equivalence - and Einstein (as far as I know) signed it alone. This principle carries with it mathematical implications which imply that the space is curved near masses - and the way to deal with curved spaces is Riemann's geometry.
    To make Merriman/Poincare the fathers of general relativity because it uses their mathematics, consider saying that the Navier Stokes equation is an invention of Leibniz because it is based on the use of derivatives.

  7. When Yamer's book on Einstein and religion came out (or when the Hebrew translation came out), there were reviews in the press, and some of them had reservations about Yamer's words. Don't forget that Shimer was religious. Was there anything about this book in "Hidan" as well?

  8. Abby, you always bring your personal opinions. "Einstein is considered a much better Jew than many religious Jews."
    And without noticing you are coming off as racist. It is difficult for me to understand how someone can be called a Jew if he does not observe the mitzvot of the Torah.

  9. deer
    Riemann and Poincaré invented the concept of curved space before general relativity.
    Einstein used the mathematics they developed and the addition of the Italian Ricci flow.
    Without them there would be no general relativity.
    The Poincaré conjecture on the three-dimensional sphere and the proof that Perlman gave her a few years ago that he also used Ricci flow demonstrates the point.

  10. Nte

    Prof. Yoram Kirsch refers in his book to the contribution of Poincaré and Lorenz to the theory of relativity. According to him, the two did understand that there is a correspondence between the electromagnetic theory and Newtonian mechanics (Lorentz even formulated the Lorentz transformations that describe the change of space as a result of a transition between reference systems) but nevertheless they did not formulate a clear and complete theory like Einstein's special relativity.
    It is difficult to find in the scientific world a discovery that has no roots at all (and no one claims that the theory of relativity is one either) and yet, to present it as if Poincaré is the father of the theory of relativity is probably a mistake.
    By the way, saying "relativity" is too general - Einstein won his status not necessarily because of special relativity (1905), but because of general relativity (1915), and of course Poincaré has nothing to do with it.

  11. Dr. Gali Weinstein:
    Poincaré laid the foundations of relativity before Einstein. Einstein used his ideas. By the way, Poincaré also developed the theory of chaos long before others.

  12. But that's why the late Moshe Yamer wrote a book about Einstein and religion, for philosophy. Apparently there is a difference….
    It's not nice to delete the book in one comment...

  13. Oren, from a practical point of view there is no difference, it's just a philosophical question. After all, if God is the totality of the laws of nature and has no other tasks such as watching over every living being, then he is in fact irrelevant until he does not exist.

  14. Note to editor's note:
    But in the article it is said that Einstein defined himself, when asked,
    As a pantheist (identifies God with nature, advocates seeing the world as a reflection of the divine). Not an atheist!!!

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.