Comprehensive coverage

UFO sighting - are the aliens only in our heads?

Visitors from space are the folk legend of the 20th century. Millions of people are convinced they are real. Some claim that they were even kidnapped but does anyone have real proof?

A small town in northern Arizona found itself in 1975 at the center of an extraordinary event. A team of loggers, who were working in a remote area of ​​a local forest came home with a strange story about one of them - Travis Walton, who disappeared in the forest. They claimed that he was knocked to the ground and rendered unconscious by a blue-green beam fired at him from a flying saucer. All the others saw it and tried. Five days later, Walton returned with a similar story and a sequel - he claimed that he was abducted and woke up on board the alien spaceship and found himself among creatures with undeveloped facial features and no hair by mistake. His captors put a mask over his face until he lost consciousness again. He does not remember anything else until he woke up again on solid ground, close to the site from which he was abducted.
His story received nationwide resonance in the USA. Some people cited it as the most impressive case of its kind. However, an organization called Ground Susser Watch, an organization that studies such phenomena, and which was the first to arrive at the scene. The conclusion was that the story was a scam. This was also determined by the local police. Walton was interrogated in a truth machine and failed this test. "He was not in any spacecraft," said the police investigator.
The skeptic of the thickets, Philip Klass, suggests that the story was invented by the miners who saw that they would not be able to stand the time that they demanded for the supply of wood, something that could have resulted in a heavy fine. However, despite the suspicious circumstances, Walton's "experience" became one of the most common stories of encounters with aliens and formed the basis of several movie plots filmed in the XNUMXs that dealt with abduction by aliens. "Fire in the Sky, the story of Travis Walton's encounter with the aliens, was released in the nineties. .
Visiting aliens from outer space have become an integral part of modern mythology, as dragons and dragons once were. It is clear that the public has an appetite for the fantastic, which Hollywood is happy to satisfy.
But such abductions are the latest turning point in the history of UFOlogy - the story of sightings of unidentified flying objects, or flying saucers. The era of UFOs began in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold, flying a plane over the Cascade Mountains in Washington state, saw a chain of nine luminous flying objects flying "like a saucer thrown across the water." The press shortened it to "flying saucers" (although the description was of their movement and not of their shape) and the Air Force began a series of tests of the case. The official explanation was of a phenomenon known as a mirage, caused by a temperature reversal in the air. But this explanation did not change public opinion and thus a myth of the 20th century was created for him.
One of the explanations for the phenomenon was the great interest gathered by the space experiments that began after World War II. Scientists began to seriously investigate whether life could exist on other planets in the solar system. In particular in the two planets next to us - Mars and Venus.
Scenes from science fiction stories and movies explaining about aliens from space stimulated the imagination of the war-fearing public and the hunger for fantasy. Incorporating the paranoia of the Cold War, the culture of the masses established itself on the national subconscious, and has remained there ever since.
Today, despite the fact that there is no solid evidence whatsoever that Earth has ever been visited from outer space. The result of some American studies shows that the majority of the public is convinced that ABMs exist. A Gallup study published in 1991 showed that 13 percent of Britons – over 5 million adults – had seen what they believed to be obscene. Even one American president claims such an observation. In the early 300s, then-Governor of Georgia Jimmy Carter visited the local Lions Club where he and others saw a mysterious light low in the western sky. As Carter described it, the light was visible at a distance of 1973 to 1969 meters. It changed colors, moved closer, then moved away again, becoming as bright and large as the moon before flying away. "I will never laugh at people who say they saw an unidentified object in the sky," he told the press. Carter's observation gained sympathy among the Abominists, who saw it as powerful support for their argument. In further investigation, it became clear how the testimony of even respected eyewitnesses could be broken. When Carter reported the sighting in 6, more than four years after the event, he recalled that the event read in October XNUMX. Robert Schieffer, a skeptical researcher of yeasts checked the records of the Lions Club and found that the actual date was January XNUMXth, nine months earlier. The bright planet Venus was then low in the west-southwest sky that night, just as Carter saw the UFO. If the UFO was as bright as Venus, Carter should have seen two bright objects in the same direction.
"Mr. Carter is in good company in the misinterpretation of Venus as an UFO," said Shaffer in a diplomatic way. Carter's experience is typical of thousands of UFO reports from UFO enthusiasts all over the world every year. Most of the observations had a simple explanation - Venus being the brightest planet is often the cause. Even though Venus does not appear as bright and large as the Moon, nor does it approach and move away suddenly, people are often mistaken in interpreting the size and behavior of an isolated light in the sky.
Eyewitnesses described the following case from Valencia, Spain. Antonio Serena and his wife were driving home around ten one night in February. when they saw a large bright light in a southeasterly direction that seemed to zigzag in front of their car before rising to a height of 7-8 meters above them and extending what appeared to be a landing. The car's engine started to stop and the car's lights went out. The couple's three children became afraid and one of them fell ill.
After about an hour, the UFO disappeared and the family returned home safely. The case was investigated by an American professor of physics, Willie Smith. He ruled out Venus as an explanation because even though the planet was at its brightest, it set around half past nine Greenwich time, while the obscurity of the axes was still visible an hour later. Therefore, it is clear to him that the UFO was controlled by an intelligent entity that had a physical effect on the witnesses and their car.
However, Prof. Smith did not refer to the fact that Spain keeps the same time as Central Europe, that is, one hour before Greenwich Mean Time. When the time difference was taken into account, the time and direction of the observed UFO matched that of Venus. The zigzagging of the UFO and its upward movement can easily be explained by the windy, hill-climbing road conditions. A mixture of travel sickness and fear were the causes of the child's illness. Also, the car's electrical problems were caused, according to the test, from a broken battery, which was found dead the day after the incident. So it seems that even one of the spectacular and convincing stories of the observatories recorded by a physics professor is no guarantee that the event does not have a simple and prosaic explanation.
Such cases demonstrate the difficulty of estimating the size and distance of an unknown light with any precision, and how easy it is for humans to get carried away with the description of the event. This was beautifully illustrated by the British physicist David Simpson, who performed a series of pranks. He flew a 3 volt flashlight attached to a kite and a balloon among a group of people who had become UFO watchers and recorded their reactions. "The thing was brighter than any man-made light"; He maneuvered much more complex maneuvers than an airplane can perform"; It was metallic and had windows”; "I flashed the flashlight at this object and it flashed the same code back to me"; "He communicated with me telepathically."
In another prank, Simpson pointed a bright purple light at a group of ghost watchers and asked them for help photographing the ghost. In reality the film is considered to show a different part of the horizon with a different light on which a double exposure was made. There were many hints in the film that it was fake. However, when paleontologists, including a French astronomer, examined the film, they said that it looked believable.
British UFO skeptic Ian Ridpath describes how one incident showed him how easy it is to find a simple explanation if you look hard enough. On October 2, 1983, the front page of the "News of the World" announced: "A UFO has landed in Suffolk, and it's official." According to the seasonal story, one evening, guards at the US Air Force Base in Woodbridge, near Ipswich, UK, saw a bright light rising above the nearby woods - Randall Sham... When a group of Air Force personnel went outside to investigate the event, they were surrounded by a flashing light that appeared Gets out of an aircraft that moves away from them towards the forest, leaving behind landing marks, fire on tree trunks, and traces of radiation. One of the security personnel, who later left the Air Force, even talked about meeting aliens.
The newspaper published a memo from the base's deputy commander, Lieutenant Colonel Charles Hallett, to the British Ministry of Defense confirming the event, apart from the encounter with the aliens. Three British paleontologists who wrote a book about the case described it as unique in the records of the history of UFOs - the first UFO to be observed in an official and officially confirmed UFO landing and contact with aliens." However, when I did my own investigation, I found that even for an obvious case, there could be another explanation.
And Ri'path describes: "First, at the same time that the Air Force personnel reported that they saw the object rising above the grove, a particularly bright meteor burned in the air over southern England. The flickering UFO in the forest was exactly in the direction of the Orford Ness lighthouse, 9.5 kilometers towards the Suffolk coast. To the people standing in the forest, the lighthouse appears as if it is only a few feet above the ground among the trees and appears to move with the viewer. Local police were called to the scene by the US Air Force on the night of the incident, but said the only light that could be seen was that of the Ortford Ness lighthouse. If there was a real UFO there, the Americans should have seen two flashing lights, not one."
"Secondly, local foresters said that the "landing marks" were actually old rabbit burrows, while the "fire marks" and the place where the trees were cut were made by foresters, to mark which pine trees were bubbling with resin. The radiation levels measured by the colonel were not higher than the radiation accepted in this area."

Paleontologists are people who are always eager to support any plausible explanation for their observations. This feature translates into conspiracy theories directed at the government - which in their opinion knows the truth about the Jews and hides it. Unfortunately for the supporters of the cover-up theory, the files in the Blue Book Project, in which an attempt was made by the US Air Force to analyze the Abamim reports, were published a few years ago, and showed that the Air Force's knowledge of Abamim is no greater than anyone else's - in fact, they often knew a lot less.
Anthropologists who claimed that the CIA had its own investigation, which even the Air Force did not know about, but the CIA files released under the American Freedom of Information Act, did not support the cover-up theory. Because they contain newspaper clippings, letters from philologists, and official memos at an average rate of one page per week. One of the CIA's secret memos from 1952 concluded that "there is not a shred of evidence that the ABMs were alien spaceships." Another memorandum, a year later, reported that they had collected very little material worth keeping. And two years later came a recommendation to stop the research, which was being done part-time anyway, on the subject of the obelisks. An internal memo from 1976 commented that the government does not carry out any research on the subject of the UFOs, and no such research has been done by any entity belonging to the intelligence community.
However, a CIA position paper from 1952 reported that the Air Force had seen the sites where the sighting was made, but given the exact information, each of these sightings can be explained on the basis of a misinterpretation of known objects, or as lesser known natural phenomena.
Why, then, do people continue to claim that they saw ghosts? And even taken aboard? Psychologists turn their attention to the question of what motivates the obscene and the "kidnapped", and it seems that the connection with the unknown has a special status in the human soul. There is a deep, unconscious and emotional need to have a supernatural experience or one with extraterrestrial influence, which affects various aspects of human behavior, both on a personal level and on a cultural level.
There are many parallels between the roles of religious belief and Ambology. Waves of sightings are recorded in times of crisis - such as in America during the Cold War, or in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union - this is also the time when people look for protection from the sky. In the period between 1940 and 1970, two Italians - Roberto Pinotti and Corrado Malanga, found the correlation between the number of reports of sightings of the Virgin Mary, and the number of sightings of the obelisks. Carl Jung, the renowned Swiss psychologist, suggested that like religious visions, "obsessions may be involuntary consequences of emotional stress during an emergency."
In fact, many of the pagan believers adopted religious figures and provided their attributes to visitors from space with missionary messages, often also with a special message for the human race. Dr. Alex Crowl, UFO researcher from Australia, found that a large proportion of humans who reported close encounters with aliens also claimed a mystical experience. It seems that there will always be a deep psychological need for many people to hand over responsibility for their lives to a mysterious force outside our world, whether gods or aliens, and to give them credit for playing a central role in the destiny of humanity.
The history of aliens in science fiction

Carl Sagan - Intelligence on Earth and beyond

What is the difference between abductees and victims of battle shock?

24 תגובות

  1. It says on the Google website a real flying saucer... a plan to build a flying saucer in a size that allows humans to fly anywhere.... No fuel... Respond you scientists and don't be shy because someone has to start from any point and if you leave a phone number they will contact you maybe you will get a part in the construction it all depends on whether you know how to think a few steps ahead......good luck

  2. Disclosure Project
    "The Exposure Project" is a non-profit organization founded by Dr. Steven Greer.
    The purpose of the organization is to reveal all the secret files that the US government hides in regards to extraterrestrial visits, as well as the disclosure of extraterrestrial technologies, such as free energy and the elimination of dependence on oil that the US government hides in order to protect sensitive geopolitical interests, economic interests and the oil industry.
    The organization gathers hundreds of testimonies from government officials, senior military personnel, pilots, air traffic controllers, radar operators, FAA (Federal Aviation Office) investigators and CIA agents, most of them with a high security classification!
    This project works to hold a special hearing on this issue in Congress.
    Here is a press conference that was held in 2001 and was widely covered in the major networks, why didn't we hear it here in Israel? Just remember the security situation we were in...
    (Please set aside two hours of free time for viewing):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUk

  3. I saw a thick, I mean a spaceship when I lived in New York in some village I ran home and told my parents and my parents didn't believe me and suddenly the power went out, the light was still good, my lights come on, I cut off

  4. Listen!
    At the time Galileo was considered eccentric and he burned most of his writings.
    Being against a phenomenon that has not yet been studied is a conservative behavior that only harms science.
    By chance yesterday I saw a video of the Mexican Air Force in which unidentified objects (not planes) are observed
    I personally saw an unidentified object on Palmahim beach a few years ago
    If this object is an "earthly" aircraft then I have seen a military secret that in your wildest dreams you would not imagine what it can do
    I don't belong to any cult or eccentric group
    But we must not forget that what has not yet been explored does not necessarily not exist

  5. Avi Shalom,

    Sorry, but your claims are incorrect.
    I invite you to read the series of articles by Hanan Sabat and myself where you can find all the counter claims to the arguments you make, including about the invention of clear physical findings. After you read, I'd love to have an in-depth discussion with you.

    Nice weekend,

    Gili

  6. To my father Blizovsky. Perhaps none of the evidence meets the scientific standard necessary for proof, but there is plenty of evidence, and this is also enough to suspect that aliens exist with great certainty.

    Ockham's Razor is not proof. This is just a general way of thinking that is not suitable for every case and always. For example: if an alien lands with a loud noise and someone watches the spaceship from afar then the simple and incorrect explanation is that it was a military aircraft. Simple and incorrect.

    If a phenomenon like aliens exists and the knowledge about it does not increase, then this is not a sign that something is wrong with the claim that the phenomenon is caused by aliens, but a sign that if the aliens do not want to meet with us, then it is very difficult to meet with them and add knowledge. By the way, the number of testimonies is increasing.

    It doesn't matter if the scientists are happy or not. What changes is that the thinking of some (I believe not all) is not suitable to decipher a phenomenon in which the cause of the phenomenon does not want to be discovered and in which the cause of the phenomenon is much more sophisticated than us.

  7. We're all humans
    Even people who think "not in a scientific way"
    Even if their opinion is not acceptable I would not call them a derogatory nickname.
    In history it is known about a country that was not democratic that scientifically decided on a group that does not deserve the title of person.
    One of the democratic principles is pluralism and the right of everyone to speak as they wish as long as it does not harm themselves or society.

  8. "What's new". In a democratic country everyone has the right to be an idiot. But from a philosophical point of view it is inappropriate to call such a person by the name Adam.

  9. Hagay Moti and Ronit
    We are in a democratic country and you have the right to believe any fantasy
    even call it a religion.
    Like I was allowed to believe that the moon is actually yellow cheese
    As it is said, the righteous in his faith shall live.

  10. I'm also in favor of you removing the ads, maybe keep the first one of Hagai, but delete all the others if you want

    I intended to do this, but then I saw that they were all from the same IP, and therefore this hinted at an attempt to deceive the site surfers and me (and I see that you also write from the same IP. Therefore, please purchase paid ads if you want an audience, but not on the science site. This site speaks in praise of rationality and will not support In any sect, even one in which a science fiction story is considered the Bible, and I speak as an avid science fiction fan, including books about aliens, but I know how to differentiate between imagination and reality.

    Best regards. Avi Blizovsky

  11. I left one advertisement for a whimsical sect, but then came two more comments that try to prove with signs and wonders that a science fiction story they believe in is real, this is already starting to become a method. I remove the ads. Forgiveness is with you - a. Commercial advertising costs money. B. I don't post things I don't believe in.

  12. The message was deleted due to being an advertisement - all these messages came from the same IP

  13. The message was deleted due to the fact that it was an advertisement and due to the audacity of the commenters who thought that from the same IP they could pop up under 5 different names and praise and praise a certain organization and that the surfers would think that it was a lot of people.

  14. The probability that aliens will arrive on Earth is almost impossible.
    I believe there are maybe a few or dozens of alien technologies in our galaxy and if we take the vast distances
    In our galaxy, the chance that they will reach us is almost zero.
    Nevertheless, if they come, the options are:
    1. They will destroy us before we know they have arrived.
    2. They will see us as a nature reserve and investigate us without us knowing
    (I mean they are intelligent enough not to meet
    all the judges}.
    3. They will officially meet with heads of state and appear on television.

    As an example of what could happen if aliens come to us:
    About one hundred and fifty years ago the alien English conquered Tasmania at the same time the natives lived there in a stone age culture.
    It didn't take long for the English to destroy all the natives!!!
    Includes the Tasmanian tiger.

  15. It's all a matter of probability. It's much more likely that a few hundred million people are psychotic-detached frauds than that some intelligent being from another planet will arrive here.

  16. Hello Gillian, there are endless attempts at proof, but none of them meet any scientific standard. According to Ockham's Razor if there is a more complex reason and a simpler reason, most likely the simpler one is correct. If a certain phenomenon has existed for such a long time and the established knowledge about it has not increased accordingly, it is a sign that something is wrong with its explanation.
    The scientists will be the first to rejoice at every meeting and meet themselves with aliens to learn new insights and technologies from them. See an example with the stone from Mars, how quickly they announced that they had discovered life on another planet, even bacteria. It is not important that later there were many appeals to the theory.

  17. It's a shame that the old claim of "there is no evidence" is repeated again and again. There are things that cannot be planned experimentally to prove them (for example an encounter with aliens) and also the aliens themselves, if they do not want it, it will be very difficult to photograph them.

    not only that. Even if there is a photograph that proves this, Shamush will make the claim - "this is not proof that the photograph can be fake". That is, only if there is a scheduled meeting with scientists will it be considered proof.

    In other words - everything that is not done and brought as evidence and evidence that there are aliens, will be dismissed as worthless and since the words "maybe it happened so and so..." when so and so contradicts the evidence, we will never have proof.

    not only that. If aliens organize a meeting with scientists, it will probably be in coordination with the government and then most likely the event will be hushed up.

    Of course, one should also be careful with the following combination of words: "There is another explanation for this". It is true that there are other explanations for many things. The question is whether they are true. Everything can be said to be - an optical error, a red night lamp that turned on in front of an open shutter, etc. - the question is the question of plausibility. I think that in light of the thousands of pieces of evidence that have been collected, it would be difficult to assume that the claim that "thousands of red night lamps are lit in front of open blinds" is reasonable.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.