Eighteen samples of the heaviest antiparticle ever discovered, the nucleus of the antihelium particle, were prepared at the US Department of Energy's Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Eighteen samples of the heaviest antiparticle ever discovered, the nucleus of the antihelium particle, were prepared at the US Department of Energy's Brookhaven National Laboratory.
"Our experiment is unique in that it is able to detect the anti-helium particle (4)," said the experiment's spokesperson. "The unique experiments carried out in this laboratory have already succeeded in generating a record for the heaviest antiparticles when last year the team of researchers discovered the "anti-hypertriton" particle consisting of three different antiparticles: an antiproton, an antineutron and an anti- Hyperon (Wikipedia term). Antihelium 4, which consists of four antinucleons, is obtained at the slower rate by thousands of counters. In order to obtain these 18 examples, the researchers had to search for them among the remains of billions of collisions of these gold atoms with each other."
The collisions of powerful gold nuclei during the experiment recreate, for an extremely short time, the conditions that existed in the hot, early and compressed universe in the first millionth of a second after the Big Bang. Since equal amounts of matter and antimatter were created in the Big Bang, they should have destroyed each other, but due to reasons still unknown to science, only normal matter (and not antimatter) survived in our universe.
In general, it can be said that the amounts of matter and antimatter are also equal for collision experiments of heavy ions (gold nuclei). The resulting "fireballs" spread and cool quickly so that the antimatter is prevented from being annihilated, and it exists for a period of time sufficient for its detection by the special equipment used in the experiment.
A normal nucleus of helium atoms contains two protons and two neutrons. When they are emitted as a result of radioactive decay, they are called alpha particles and this form of them was discovered about a hundred years ago. The antihelium nucleus consists of two antiprotons bound to two antineutrons.
The most common antiparticles are the lighter ones, since they require a smaller amount of energy to create them. The researcher Karl Anderson was the first to find an anti-particle, the anti-electron (positron), in the remnants of cosmic radiation back in 1932. The anti-proton (the nucleus of anti-hydrogen) and the anti-neutron were prepared at the Berkeley Laboratory by Bevatron in the fifties. A nucleus of antideuterium ("heavy antihydrogen", consisting of an antiproton and an antineutron) was prepared in the particle accelerators located at the Brookhaven Laboratory and the CERN facility in the XNUMXs.
Each additional nucleon (known as a baryon) increases the baryon number of the particle and in the experiment conducted in the current laboratory, each increase in this number reduces the rate of formation by thousands of counters. The nucleus of the antihelium isotope containing only one neutron (antihelium 3) was prepared in particle accelerators as early as 1970; The antihelium nucleus with a baryon number of 4, which has long been announced by the current research team, is based on 16 samples prepared in 2010 and two samples from an earlier experiment. "It is likely that antihelium 4 will be the heaviest antiparticle to be discovered in particle accelerators for a long time to come," explains one of the researchers. "After antihelium the next stable antimatter nucleus will be antilithium, and the production rate for it in particle accelerators is expected to be about two million times slower than that for antihelium." The news about the study
14 תגובות
cedar:
I don't know where you read that the principle is incorrect.
Today it is thought to be true and is a central part of quantum theory.
In principle, it is a bud for refutation, but experiments that were done and that could have disproved it if it were not true actually confirmed it.
Hello, I would like to receive an answer regarding whether, in theory, the principle of non-admissions is going to be far-fetched possible???? I read in an article on the scientist's website that the principle of non-acceptance is wrong, or that this principle is a fundamental rule that cannot be refuted
A. Ben Ner:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-neutron
If I understood correctly, the meaning of slow is not in relation to any time, but a reference to the number of events per collision, that is, the number of antimatter atoms created per collision. The scientific significance of the discovery is further confirmation of the antimatter theory. One of the unsolved questions is why the world is made of matter and not of antimatter in such a clear way. The hope is that such experiments will help solve the problem.
When you say slow, what order of magnitude do you mean?? Does it mean that it will take more time to find them among the digams? I didn't really understand the idea and in general what the scientific significance (I guess practically there is none) of the discovery
Ariel,
They did not create an anti-helium atom but only an anti-helium nucleus, i.e. without the positrons.
"After antihelium the next stable antimatter nucleus will be antilithium"
To Itzik C:
Anti and normal is a matter of definition, you can say that black is the opposite of white, and thus call black a thesis and white an antithesis, and you can say that white is the opposite of black, call white a thesis and black an antithesis.
It really doesn't matter.
I still think that what disappeared in the big bang is actually the matter and what remains is actually the antimatter that we call matter for some reason.
http://newscenter.lbl.gov/news-releases/2011/04/24/antihelium/
Do you know what black holes are? It is a remnant of civilizations that reached our technological level but destroyed themselves with a black hole created in one of these very experiments.
Ariel:
It is written in the article: "The resulting "fireballs" spread and cool quickly"
Avi Blizovsky,
The link to the original news is not working.
No. Ben Ner, an antiparticle not only has an opposite charge to the particle, but is actually a perfect mirror image. That is, particles that do not have a charge (such as neutrons, neutrinos, etc.) also have spin. Antineutrons have opposite spin, and when they meet they antagonize each other. In addition, an antineutron will decay after a number of minutes (unless it moves at a relativistic speed) into an antiproton and a positron, i.e. into antihydrogen.
I'm interested to know how they managed to accelerate the antiparticles enough to turn them into helium atoms. After all, at energies where antiparticles are formed, atoms and also nuclei break down into the particles that make them up (protons, neutrons and free electrons that move at enormous speeds).
A question for Dr. Moshe Nachmani and/or anyone who knows:
What is the definition of antineutron?