Comprehensive coverage

Why did the mammoths become extinct?

Researchers from the Natural History Museum in Sweden tested d.na. of mammoths in an attempt to determine why they became extinct.

Cave painting depicting a mammoth hunt. Photo: shutterstock.
A cave painting depicting a mammoth hunt. Photo: shutterstock.

Researchers from the Natural History Museum in Sweden tested d.na. of mammoths in an attempt to determine why they became extinct.

The researchers led by Dr. Love Dalen publish their findings inProceedings of the Royal Society B . The findings contradict the accepted assumption that the death blow to the mammoths was given by human hunters.

According to the researchers, "extensive examinations of the woolly mammoths added evidence that the giants were wiped out due to climate change". The researchers were looking for the signature of the genetic code that is transmitted in the maternal lineage and for that they examined the DNA sequences. From 300 samples of mammoth bones, teeth and tusks. The data revealed the genetic diversity, which made it possible to estimate the size of the populations and their migration routes. With the help of the discovered data, the researchers built the mammoth family tree, which branches out over 200,000 years in Eurasia and North America.

Two periods were identified in which there was damage to the large populations, both of which coincide with the warming between the ice ages (interglacials). Until the first intermediate period, the size of the mammoth population is estimated at several millions. About 120,000 years ago there was a warm period in which the populations dwindled and became scattered. The dispersal caused a different subspecies to appear in Western Europe.
The cold returned for a period of about 100,000 years (the Pleistocene) - the last ice age that lasted until about 14,000 years ago. The mammoths that were adapted to the cold dominated the north and their distribution was from Western Europe to the northern parts of North America (Western Europe and North America were linked to Eurasia by the ice bridge that covered the Bering Straits). Later, the temperature began to increase, the mammoth population was pushed into small niches where there were suitable living conditions for mammoths, but according to the researchers, the extinction already began at the height of the cold, about 20,000 years ago, perhaps because the cold did not allow the growth of grass for grazing.

According to Dr. Delen, the next chapter in the mystery surrounding the mammoths was the final one. Many researchers attribute the final blow that caused their extinction to the human hunters, but Dr. Delen claims that "if the mammoths were competent - people should not be blamed." Warm periods made mammoths more vulnerable, but to understand why an entire species became extinct it is necessary to study the last places where they survived.
Suitable candidates are two islands, one is St Paul near Alaska and the other island is Wrangel in the Arctic Ocean off Siberia. The two islands are considered the "last refuge" of the mammoths that survived there until about 5000 years ago.
The fact that populations survived in places that were far away and less accessible to human hunters who came to the islands later brings back to the discussion the role of early hunters in the extinction of mammoths.

This is the gist of the study and its conclusions, which were also published in the daily press. I would not have addressed the subject if I had not seen the similarity between what happened in ancient history and what is happening nowadays. The researchers do claim that the influence of human hunters on the extinction of the mammoths was minimal, but this claim does not stand up to the fact that the last of the mammoths survived on two islands that were difficult to access, so it can be assumed that human hunters almost never reached them. This fact allowed two remnant populations of mammoths to continue to exist thousands of years after the populations on land had already disappeared. That is to say, the conclusion about the lack of influence of the hunters is neither unequivocal nor perfect.

The imagination to our day is on two levels. One: is climate change. The researchers claim that climate change was the main cause of the extinction of the mammoths. Nowadays, man-made warming (anthropogenic warming) which causes difficulties in existence, is already harming many diverse environmental systems, causing severe damage to human populations.

The second similarity is no less disturbing and is the similarity in the hunter's activity between our ancestors and "hunters" today. The fundamental difference is that our ancestors hunted mammoths in order to survive, whereas today, after the Americans completely destroyed the millions of migratory pigeons (Ectopistes migratorius), after they slaughtered about 50 million buffaloes (Bison bison) and brought the species to the brink of extinction - they continue to kill elephants by the thousands to satisfy traditions Unnecessary and senseless vanities. Gloomy forecasts predict that if the killing continues, by the end of the century the (African) elephants will disappear despite international efforts that increase the enforcement of wildlife protection laws and the trade in animals or their parts such as talks between East African countries and China.

The US provides surveillance drones, and the local authorities have initiated the destruction of tens of tons of ivory in Kenya, Tanzania and the US. Despite the (welcome) activity, every year thousands of elephants are killed in Africa. Our ancestors hunted mammoths to survive.
Nowadays... they kill elephants for nothing.

And it has already been said that the time has come that instead of controlling the environment for the sake of the human population, there will be control of the human population for the sake of the environment.

9 תגובות

  1. This whole assumption that the oil giants are behind the opponents of global warming seems loose to me. With all the war for renewable energies it is clear to everyone that the world will not wean itself off fossil fuels in the coming decades. In the meantime, oil prices are rising and the main beneficiaries of this are two - the oil companies and the renewable energy companies, which by the way, are already a very large economic force, so this presentation of evil powerful corporations vs pure-hearted and impoverished environmental activists is a false presentation. Regarding the mammoths, it seems that we do need to punish them because even if we killed a small part of them, the very fact of relegating species to limited living areas also limits their ability to survive, for example if a natural disaster strikes a certain area. Indeed, we can learn from this today and live in crowded cities and leave as much space for nature as possible. We can live great in animal farms not.

  2. I suggest reading Pulitzer Prize-winning (Prof) Jared Diamond's book Collapse. on the extinction of civilizations. There is now a trend of civilization books, I think this is one of the best. He is a professor with a background in a number of diverse fields: from biology to anthropology, for physiology. The example of the mammoths has something to learn from it, even though there are processes in humans that do not exist in mammoths. But the similarity is surprising.
    He lists 5 reasons that a group of them leads to collapse:
    1. Damage that the person causes to his environment unintentionally
    2. Climate change
    3. The existence of hostile neighbors (waiting for weaknesses).
    4. Withdrawing the support of neighbors.
    5. How the company deals with its problems.

    The professor suggests not to underestimate the primitiveness of the ancient societies, since in Kabbalah, their level of sophistication and way of dealing with them is more modern in certain ways than that of modern society. And they have success stories: for example, the Icelandic society that first consumed its natural resources: trees and then learned to utilize them by reducing them and prosper again, compared to societies that became extinct.

  3. Although the reaction was expected in advance, it is impossible to answer to the body of an object, so we answer to the body of a person

    I totally agree with you Glenn Beck is an idiot

    How does this change the fact that eighty percent of the total tax money in every western economy comes from the top two deciles?

    Glenn Beck is no less a fascist than those who are against a halachic state - but they established a fascist halachic state in Gaza
    and pushes to establish another such state in the United States

    The same liberals turn a blind eye to the murder of gays in the Palestinian Authority, the stoning of women in Gaza, the murder of bloggers for their Twitter status and the trampling of the rights of non-Muslims
    Proportionality in law requires defining Yair Lapid and the left as fascists on the same weight as a fascist

    One last thing
    Fox is no longer a right-wing channel since it was bought by a Saudi sheikh
    You hear it in his voice
    Fox's anti-environmental stance serves Saudi oil no less than American or Norwegian oil

  4. A gog and a demagogue, a fascist who receives money to defend the extreme conservative right is absolutely not an example of anything.
    Even from Fox they fired him because he is too extreme for them,

  5. 'The accepted assumption that human hunters gave the final death blow to the mammoth population'

    I have no interest in defending the corrupt tycoons
    I have an interest in protecting the honest tycoons who are the steam of every western economy (Intel for example)
    They provide jobs, each of which starts at twenty thousand shekels
    They push technology forward
    Almost eighty percent of all tax money comes from those tycoons you love to hate so much

    Strip them of their assets and you have barely twenty percent taxes
    With all due respect, engineers, doctors and academics do not create jobs and do not pay seven or eight figures in taxes per month
    By the way, it is interesting that when it comes to socialist 'tycoons' such as the Norwegian government, there is silence of criticism

    Here's a less popular take on haircuts or tax breaks for tycoons
    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mwQ4mrH59HE

  6. Gog and demagogue, first of all Ephraim is right, but in any case, if the problem is the other way around, the people who come to defend the oil tycoons have a tendency to underestimate the damage capacity of the person, so that their senders can continue to do more damage without any restraints.

  7. Another imagery of our time is the (neo-Marxist) desperate desire to blame man for all biological, historical, social, geological, chemical and physical ills and injustices.

    Need an explanation or correction-
    It is implied from the article that 'after the Americans slaughtered... they continue and kill elephants by the thousands'
    Is this a typographical error or is the US really behind the march of elephant extinction these days?

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.