Comprehensive coverage

Strange cousins: Molecular alternatives to DNA and RNA provide new insight into the origin of life

Researchers synthesized TNA molecules, and showed that they could have been used as a genetic coder before RNA and certainly before DNA. Has this solved the question of the beginning of life?

TNA molecule. A candidate as an alternative to RNA in pre-cellular life
TNA molecule. A candidate as an alternative to RNA in pre-cellular life

Living systems owe their existence to a pair of information-carrying molecules: DNA and RNA. These molecules constitute chemical bases that have two essential properties for life: they are heredity - that is, they can encode and transmit genetic information, on the other hand, they can also change over time, through processes of Darwinian evolution.

The question that has been in dispute for many years is whether heredity and evolution can be carried out by molecules other than DNA and RNA.

John Chaput, a researcher at Arizona State University's (ASU) Institute for Biological Design who recently published a paper in the journal Nature-Chemistry describing the evolution of threose nucleic acids, together with a multidisciplinary team of scientists from England, Belgium and Denmark extended these characteristics to acids Additional nucleus or XNAs.

The group demonstrated for the first time that six natural polymers are able to act as nucleic acids and share information with DNA. One of these XNAs, a molecule known as anhydrohexitol nucleic acid or HNA is capable of directed, unfolded evolution into biologically useful forms.

The results of the study were published in the current issue of Science. The work sheds new light on questions concerning the origin of life and provides a wide range of practical applications for molecular medicine that were not available before.

Nucleic acids that have been engineered in vitro so that they attach to several molecules behave similarly to antibodies - they specialize in precise attachment to their target. "This feature could be good for building new types of diagnostic kits and biological sensors," says Chaput. while noting that XNAs are molecules with a strong effect, but natural enzymes do not recognize them".

Both RNA and DNA imprint their sequences on four nucleotides - essential information that enables the granting of hereditary traits and also provides an essential coded recipe for building proteins from 20 amino acids naturally. The question of exactly how (and when) the use of this system began remains one of the most intriguing and hotly contested areas of biology.
According to one hypothesis, a simple molecule preceded DNA and RNA and served as the original information conduit. The "RNA World" hypothesis suggests that ancient forms of life were based on RNA and simple proteins. This is because of the great versatility of RNA - so that not only is it able to carry genetic information, but it also acts as an accelerator for chemical reactions like an enzyme, and is therefore considered by many to be an important part of pre-cellular life.

However, the spontaneous emergence of RNA through a sequence of random mixing events of primitive chemicals is at least an unlikely event. "This is a big question," says Chaput. "If the world of RNA existed, how did it come to be? Does it form spontaneously or is it the product of something even simpler than RNA?”

The pre-RNA world hypothesis is gaining momentum, mainly through the study of the XNA molecules, which provide reasonable alternatives to the current biological regime and can be used as chemical building blocks until the current manifestation of life. The current study strengthens the hypothesis that something like this might have happened.

The nucleic acid Threose or TNA, is one of the candidates for the role of the critical mediator. "TNA does some interesting things," Chapot says, noting the molecule's ability to bind with RNA through nonparallel base pairing. This property provides a model of how XNAs can transfer information from the pre-RNA world to the RNA world.”

Nucleic acid molecules, including DNA and RNA, are composed of 3 chemical components: a sugar group, a group of three phosphates that constitute the basic structure of the molecule, and combinations of the four nucleic acids. Through changes in the structural components researchers can engineer XNA molecules with unique properties. However, in order for these exotic molecules to function as a first step towards RNA in the prebiotic era, they had to be able to transfer and reproduce their information from the RNA. For this, special enzymes, called polymerases, are required.

Nature produced DNA and RNA polymerases, capable of reading, transcribing and converting transcription into nucleic acid sequences. For XNA molecules, however, no natural polymerase exists. Thus the group, led by Phil Holliger of the MRC in England, painstakingly developed synthetic polymerases that can copy DNA into XNA and other polymerases that can copy XNA into DNA. In the end, the polymerase was able to copy and encode six different genetic systems. The experiments showed that these natural DNA sequences could have been created with the help of the XNA.

These enzymes are used as tools in molecular evolution and have been associated, for example, with the HIV virus and the HEL lysosome. "This is a synthetic Darwinian process," Chaput says. "The same thing happens inside our cells, but it's done in a test tube."

The next step is to use the technology and apply it to the production of unnatural nucleic acids. Only after many such proteins are formed, will it be possible to piece together the puzzle and assess how the process took place at the beginning of life.

to the notice of the researchers

15 תגובות

  1. Thanks a lot, I'll watch it as soon as it gets home (next week).

    arsenate
    Well, I understand what you are trying to achieve, and there is something in it.
    But again, I don't understand almost anything about it, unfortunately..

  2. Beautiful Maut! I guess we don't have to look at life as something so separate from the other chemical processes that take place in the universe. It can be said that there is a possible developmental axis of increasingly complex chemical reactions where one "family" of complex reactions is what we define today as "carbon-based life". It is currently impossible to know how far this complexity can go and if DNA and RNA are the only material that serves as a hereditary basis for life in the universe.

    Amino acids too, for example, have hundreds if not thousands that have no known function in the living world today, but you know..

  3. Grace

    First of all, we did the definition of life, although not all its details and grammar are agreed upon,
    However, most of the definitions are accepted and based on this we determined what are the limits of the minimum conditions for sustaining life.
    And since they did not exist in their created, suitable conditions, it remains to find the situation and time when life was created for the first time.

    To you it seems logical and absolute, to me at this point, it doesn't seem logical, I think the very definition, from them
    life and what are the conditions for its formation, creates a barrier to seeing a different reality, for example, that life is a continuation
    Either a part or a split, whichever comes first.

  4. Han and for anyone interested in the subject, I highly recommend going to the YouTube website, typing in the search box "the magic of biology", and watching at least the first lesson, the course is really fascinating and suitable for anyone who wants to broaden their horizons a bit.

  5. Amit
    I noticed now that you wrote "mysterious"
    Half of my previous response is invalid..

  6. Amit
    I have almost no knowledge on the subject, I do know that the border between living and inanimate is very large in its complexity and the processes involved in creating it, to make a comparison between them shows a lack of knowledge and understanding of the subject.
    I will refrain from saying more things on the subject, because I am really ignorant of it.

    I will respond as long as it is something more philosophical, a bit like the direction that Arsant presented..

    PS - I would appreciate it if someone could direct me to sources on the subject, popular science (some book), preferably in Hebrew.

  7. Grace ,
    It seems to me that the intention is not that there is no beginning at all, but the definition of "life" is very simplistic:
    I wouldn't be surprised if the line between "alive" and "inanimate" is much more mysterious than we think today

  8. Arsant what are you talking about?
    I have no idea what you are drawing conclusions from, somewhat delusional I must say.
    Looking for a sequel? Are you suggesting that life could have existed in the young universe?
    Was life created with the big bang?
    It is likely that in the first few years of the big bang, no life was created (a cell replicates, etc.) and this leads to the conclusion that there was a beginning.

  9. Seems a bit similar to that search for the ancient "father" and the attempt to trace one's family line
    which changes from time to time due to new findings, only that...there are no findings of this type here, therefore every finding is immediate
    Nance really adapts to the existing concept and every test and experience is already waiting for proof or flowering.

    Life, in a different sense than we define, always exists and we witness a life that is the continuation or a part, there is no point or time or place, which is found to have begun because it did not begin...it is more correct to look for a continuation or a connection, than to look for a beginning or a re-creation.

  10. some problems:

    a) Can these molecules be created even without intelligence in the laboratory?
    b) Is there even a possible transition from tna to dna?
    c) How many bases are able to replicate and is a specific sequence of a certain length required?

  11. It's amazing that no matter how much I tried to read about DNA, RNA, chromosomes, etc.. I forget everything all over again, this information refuses to be absorbed in my head.

  12. And for the threose structure:

    Threose is a four-carbon monosaccharide or carbohydrate with molecular formula C4H8O4. It has a terminal aldehyde group rather than a ketone in its linear chain, and so is considered part of the aldose family of monosaccharides.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threose

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.