Comprehensive coverage

An exempt thief writer - about J.R.R. Tolkien and 'The Lord of the Rings'

Among the reasons for the success there is also another unknown factor: the affair that accompanied the publication of the book in the United States

The Lord of the Rings movie poster, which was produced based on the book
The Lord of the Rings movie poster, which was produced based on the book

When The Lord of the Rings was published in 1954, sales were not encouraging: the first edition of the trilogy sold only a few thousand copies.

Fifty and more years later, 'The Lord of the Rings' is already considered one of the properties of the Iron Sheep of modern Western culture. From computer games to 'Harry Potter', the familiar 'Lord of the Rings' fingerprints can be seen everywhere. Over one hundred million copies of the work have been sold to date... When and why did this dramatic change in the history of the famous literary outlet take place?

Many words have been written about the reasons for the success of 'The Lord of the Rings'. The fictional world created by J.R.R. Tolkien was deep and rich almost without precedent in those days, and the plot itself deals with topics that have fascinated the audience since the days of ancient mythologies: brave friendship, the simple villager who saves the world, a king who proves himself worthy of royalty, and more.

But among these reasons there is also another, unknown factor: the affair that accompanied the publication of the book in the United States.

In the XNUMXs, Tolkien was a professor of literature and languages ​​at the University of Oxford in Great Britain, and one day he checked students' exams. It was a mind-numbingly boring assignment and so Tolkien was delighted to discover that in one of the tests the student skipped a question, leaving an entire page completely blank.

Out of a momentary impulse that he could not explain, Tolkien scribbled on the page the following sentence: "A boy in the earth lived a hobbit."

What, exactly, is a hobbit? Why does he live in the ground? Tolkien had no idea. The whole sentence just popped into his mind without explanation and Tolkien decided to continue developing the idea and try to explain to himself who that Hobbit was and what he was doing inside the hole.

Hobbits, Tolkien concluded, are human beings about a meter tall. Their legs are hairy, their ears are slightly pointed, and they like to wear colorful clothes. The hobbits are far from adventurous: they prefer to live peacefully in their underground homes and eat six meals a day.

This is the starting point of the plot of the book 'The Hobbit'. Its unexpected hero is Bilbo Baggins, a hobbit who goes on an adventure with Gandalf, a mysterious and powerful wizard, and thirteen dwarves in order to recover the dwarves' treasure that was stolen by a real dragon. Bilbo, like all hobbits, is not exactly Chuck Norris - but during the journey he shows great courage and resourcefulness that help the group achieve its goal. Equally important, he manages to lay his hands on a magical ring that makes the wearer see and not be seen.

Tolkien read 'The Hobbit' to his children at the same time as the writing process, and in 1936 he sent it to George Allen & Unwin publishing house. Stanley Unwin, one of the heads of the publisher, gave the book to Ryan, his ten-year-old son, and Ryan really liked what he read. Unwin decided to publish the book.

'The Hobbit' was a great success. The reviews hailed it as one of the original and excellent children's books of its time, and sales were accordingly. Stanley Unwin went back to Tolkien and asked him for a sequel. Tolkien was happy to comply with the request and sent him a draft of a manuscript called 'The Silmarillion', which he had been working on even before he wrote 'The Hobbit'.

The problem was that The Silmarillion was… how to put it mildly… boring. When I tried to read The Silmarillion for the first time, as a teenage boy, I broke down before I even got to the middle. The Silmarillion is essentially a history book: a book that describes the events of Middle-earth, its tradition and the creatures that inhabit it. It is not a travel book or an adventure book, but almost a textbook.

The editors decided that the book was not successful enough, and the publisher rejected the manuscript. Unwin asked Tolkien to write something else - this time interesting, and preferably with Hobbits in it. Tolkien agreed, without a choice, and began writing The Lord of the Rings. The plot began to take shape in his mind while writing: in fact, when he wrote the first chapters the ring was not part of the story at all! Only later, when he was looking for a strong motive that would push his heroes on a long and dangerous journey, he remembered the ring that Bilbo had found in the previous book - and the rest, as they say, is history.

The atmosphere in 'The Lord of the Rings' is very different from that of 'The Hobbit'. Although 'The Hobbit' was not a children's book, or in any case not only for children, but it was funny and funny in many parts. The Lord of the Rings, on the other hand, is a much darker and darker book, full of emotional conflicts, moral dilemmas and brutal battles. It is also longer and more complex than The Hobbit: the plot is spread over six parts, each of which can be considered a book in its own right.

In 'The Lord of the Rings', we discover that the ring that Bilbo found is actually the key to the future of 'Middle Earth' as ​​a whole - the imaginary world in which the story takes place. Sauron, the Dark Lord, needs her to complete his plan to take over the world. Frodo, Bilbo's nephew, receives the ring and sets out on a dangerous journey to destroy it in Mordor, the seat of the Dark Lord. He is joined by Gandalf the Wizard, the knights Aragorn and Boromir, Gimli the Dwarf, and Gols the Elf. Together they fight against the forces of the evil Sauron, while in the background they are constantly being chased by Gollum - a deformed creature who once owned the ring, and is now unable to break away from its bewitching influence. Here are three fat books in ninety words.

The writing process of 'The Lord of the Rings' lasted over ten years. When the book was finally published in the fifties, the publisher decided to divide the monometallic work into three books, mainly for financial reasons: binding so many pages made the book considerably more expensive. The first and second volumes in the series were printed in only about three thousand copies each. The third volume was a greater success and was printed in... seven thousand copies. These are very modest numbers, even on the scale of the Israeli market - and even more so in the British book market.

The weak sales, along with the mixed reviews the book received in the newspapers, signaled a bleak future for The Lord of the Rings, to say the least. And as if to add insult to injury, there was someone who conspired to do Tolkien a great injustice, and rob him of the little royalties he could receive in return for his arduous effort.

In 1965, the book caught the eye of the people of the American book publisher 'Ace'. At 'Ace' they really wanted to distribute 'The Lord of the Rings' in the United States - but unfortunately for them, the rights to the series in North America had already been given to another publisher.

Ace did not give up, and managed to find a surprising loophole in the American copyright law. To be included in the copyright law, the book in question must be printed in the United States itself - but all existing copies of The Lord of the Rings, as it turns out, were printed and bound in England, and only then sent overseas. This fact turned The Lord of the Rings into a work in the public domain - that is, a work that anyone can print and sell as they wish, without paying royalties to the author.

And 'Ace' definitely printed... 150 thousand copies!

Tolkien and his publishers were furious, but could not force 'Ace' to stop selling the book, even in court. Tolkien launched a media attack against 'Ace' and asked his readers not to purchase the unapproved edition of the book. 'Ace' came under fire from all directions for its dirty exercise, and finally broke: the publishers agreed not to print new editions, and to pay Tolkien royalties for the books sold.

Ironically, it is precisely the vile act of 'Ace' that injected new life into 'The Lord of the Rings'.

First, all the copies printed until then were hardcover - which made the book more expensive on the one hand, and on the other hand also created a too serious and dry image for the work. Ace's books, on the other hand, were paperbacks and were therefore much more accessible to the general public both financially and mentally. Second, the scandal that accompanied the struggle between Tolkien and 'Ace' attracted the attention of the media and gave the book excellent free publicity. The result was a meteoric jump in sales of the book and its transformation into a bestseller that has not left the printing press ever since. As a bonus, the royalties paid by 'Ace' to Tolkien were higher than those paid by his publisher... and they made him a very rich man.

John Ronald Reuel Tolkien passed away in 1973, when he was 81 years old. The legacy he left behind is powerful and the basic plot he weaved in 'The Lord of the Rings' still resonates in hundreds of computer games and fantasy books even today. The Lord of the Rings movie trilogy directed by Peter Jackson in the early XNUMXs gave the series a boost, exposing it to a young and new audience. The tremendous success of the last fifty years shows no signs of abating.

[Ran Levy is a science writer, and hosts the podcastMaking history!'- witness science, technology and history. ]

18 תגובות

  1. Well, I read The Hobbit to anyone who cares to listen and I bought it for all my nephews. I read the Lord of the Rings trilogy once a year! And the rest of the time I don't touch any fantasy! I'm far from it. I read different and varied books - and now for the reason for writing the email: it is individual - who loves or gets bored, or like me, loves to the point of childish enthusiasm (I am close to closing the seventh decade) and it seems that I will continue (:

  2. There are those who do not find interest in Picasso's nonsense, but it is clear that for him (or at least for those who believe in the method in our generation) it was the creation of a life, to say that the work of Tolkien's life was born almost accidentally and developed because of the publisher's request is delusional, some say that it is certain that in the end he himself believed in the world he created So even if you didn't go deep, think about the fact that he was able to give food for thought to all of today's fantasy, and really The Silmarillion is a completely philosophical book and this (pure) philosophy is the basis of all his writings - even the Hobbit!!!

  3. Tolkien left behind a masterpiece
    which inspired many writers in the fantasy genre.

    His books are excellent, the fantasy with the most beautiful world, and the mystery he left behind after his death on several issues such as Tom Bombadil, etc.
    Makes the story more appealing.

  4. I'm 15 years old and five years ago I read The Silmarillion and I couldn't stop for a moment. Since then I continue to read about two to ten fantasy books a week and still all Lord of the Rings, The Silmarillion, Unfinished Stories, The Hobbit, etc. stand in the first row for me also in terms of depth of plot and characters Not to mention that they are the basis of all fantasy books today (and a few more books, but they too...)

  5. Sorry gentlemen, I read The Lord of the Rings in the 14th grade, and I couldn't stop for a second! The first thing I did when I got home was open the book and read. I finished the three volumes in less than two weeks, I'm XNUMX today and not some nostalgic adult, and I just can't stop the "Tolkien craze", which started with me then.
    One of you claims that Tolkien is too complicated, and the matter of languages ​​was unnecessary, I say: look at what an investment! Look how deep!, he created an entire mythology, including everything! Which other writer from the "geniuses of our time" did this?!
    Another claims that the characters in the Silmarillion are superficial, from here you can easily see the shallowness with which you read the book, without any attempt to delve deeper, reach more sources and understand beyond! I agree that it is difficult to read, especially at the beginning, but as a person who tries to lay hands on everything that bears the name Tolkien, and every school assignment, with the choice of a topic, is done on Lord of the Rings (or the other writings) I read it (in the sixth grade) and found in the characters Layers deep and wide, you can't argue that Thorin is a shallow character. Maybe you don't know, but apart from Sil' there are many other writers, who continue, and expand the canvas regarding the events of Arda (Tolkien's world). Everything you know is the result of Christopher Tolkien's editing.
    As for the movie, Alone is one of the great movies in history, but it doesn't create the same effect as the book. I think I've made the point so I'll cut it short and say I prefer the books.

  6. Although I am forty plus years old.. but.
    The movie is a completely pale Hollywood version of the book, there is no doubt that the strongest places
    They miss there in favor of special effects and shortcuts because who has patience.
    The problem that always bothered me in the trilogy is the fact that the world is divided into absolute good and evil.
    It is impossible to imagine a kind or good-willed orc. You can't think of nice trolls..
    There is a slight and lingering smell of racism that comes up and is a bit stinky throughout the entire book.
    Other than that, this is a wonderful story about courage, friendship, loyalty and fulfilling the highest possible calling.
    Try and enjoy.

  7. Like you, I tried and failed several times to read the books...but when the movies came out, I read the books on a handheld computer (then there weren't exactly iPhones)...while I was exercising...that's how I read the entire series

    This is the most boring fantasy series I've ever read in books and it only makes the movies more genius for how Peter Jackson made them for the sake of this unpalatable thing..

    I don't doubt it... after all Lord of the Rings is the prototype for all modern fantasy books .. and thus it is loaded with problems .. let's not talk about the guy delving too much into his linguistics ... or his pessimism that somehow the world is not developing .. he was born developed and from there he only Deteriorating more and more....really an optimistic view of life.

    Anyway compared to dragon lance....game of thrones...death's gate cycle etc...it just doesn't compete on a dime

    So I agree with Uri XNUMX percent...only older people who haven't read genius fantasy books of our generation can think that the books are some kind of masterpiece in themselves...
    The similairion is simply suffocating…….you have to make a very, very hard effort to get to the parts where you can actually imagine the fantasy book and when you can't imagine a fantasy book it's quite a problem after all... let's not talk about the fact that despite the incredible amount of family affiliations...the depth of the characters is really, really not high
    Once again a prototype for everything...but a really shitty prototype.

  8. If there is a movie that is much more successful than the book, it is Lord of the Rings,
    Almost all who disagree with this statement are people aged 40 and over who like the book more for reasons of nostalgia

  9. I read the first volume of Lord of the Rings eagerly (in 1978). The second and third already put me to sleep with every sentence. All that detracts!

  10. I happened to read the Hobbit captive version while serving in the army
    And it was a particularly fascinating pleasure
    מומלץ

    Also all those who love fantasy
    You are invited to check out 'The Return of Korah' - an Israeli fantasy book
    which is now in bookstores

  11. The Hobbit had an interesting Israeli angle when prisoners of the Yom Kippur war in Egypt translated it into Hebrew while in prison and then this edition was sold.

  12. Husham I and my brother are just like you, The Hobbit was just a wonderful experience.
    And I gave up on The Lord of the Rings after three attempts..

  13. As a child I remember reading The Hobbit avidly
    And I tried to read Lord of the Rings 3 times
    Last time up to page 100 without success.

    As if they were written by 2 different writers.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.