Comprehensive coverage

Fear of damage to science and technology due to a reduction in the helium gas stock

In America, helium is running out. The solution - increasing recycling

The element that allows balloons to fly, voices to change and bodies to refresh is depleting so quickly in the world's largest reservoir, outside Amarillo, Texas, that its contents are expected to be completely gone within eight years. The biggest impact of this situation is on science and technology, according to Dr. Lee Sobotka, a professor of chemistry and physics in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis. "The use of helium in science is very extensive, but its most important role is as a refrigerant," says Sobotka, an expert in nuclear chemistry and physics who collaborates in his research with researchers from several national laboratories. In general, the "heavy" users of helium (He), such as the national laboratories, have appropriate infrastructures that allow them to recycle and use helium efficiently, says Sobotka. But this is not the case for many other "light" users. Helium is used in the fields of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), mass spectroscopy, welding, the production of computer chips and optical fibers, among its many other technological uses. NASA uses large amounts annually to maintain a constant and controlled pressure of the fuel stocks in the space shuttles. "Helium is an energy resource that is not renewable or replaceable. Its properties are unique and unlike in the case of hydrocarbon fuels (fuel or natural gas), there are no biosynthetic ways to prepare its substitutes. Everyone must make the utmost effort to recycle it," says the researcher.

drift

The helium present on Earth has been accumulated over many millions of years as a result of the decay of the natural elements uranium and thorium. The decomposition of these elements progresses at an irregular rate. For example, one of the most important isotopes for obtaining helium is uranium-238. During the entire life span of the earth, only about half of the uranium-238 atoms decayed, giving eight helium atoms from each uranium atom, in the general process. Such partial and inconsistent disintegration occurs every 1000 years or so. During the decay of uranium and thorium, part of the helium atoms that are released is captured in natural gas deposits that exist in different geological layers. Some of the helium atoms formed seep out of the Earth's mantle and drift into the atmosphere, where they exist at a concentration of 5 ppm (five parts per million). However, this helium, as well as any other helium that is eventually released into the atmosphere by those who use it, is swept up and essentially lost forever. "When we use all the helium that has accumulated over the nearly 4.5 billion years that the Earth has existed, its supply will be completely depleted," says Sobotka. We have no possibility of receiving significant amounts of helium from the sun - which can be seen as a helium factory at a distance of about one hundred and fifty million kilometers - and not even from any other factory that will be built on Earth. Eventually, it will be possible to produce helium directly in nuclear fusion reactors and indirectly in nuclear fission reactors, but the quantities obtained in these processes are dwarfed compared to the quantities we will need. Unlike other elements, helium-4 (two protons and two neutrons) liquefies below a temperature of 4.2 Kelvin (-269 degrees Celsius), just four degrees above absolute zero. When an object is brought close to liquid helium, energy is transferred from that object to the helium and thus cools the object. The energy released from the object causes the helium to vaporize. These helium vapors, Sobotka explains, should be captured by the user in order to recycle them and use them in the future. Most of the world's helium supply comes from deposits that exist on the edge of the state of Texas. The scientists did not even begin to think about extracting helium from the air because the costs of such a process are extremely high.

A loner, a rebel

Both hydrogen and helium, the first two elements in the periodic table, are extremely common in the universe (close to 92% and 8% of all atoms, respectively). Helium is rare on Earth, while hydrogen is very common. The reason for this is that helium is isolated and rebel, and does not join other atoms while hydrogen does. Hydrogen is one of the two elements that make up water. Under standard conditions, there are no molecular or combined forms of helium. "It is the most noble of the existing gases, which means it is stable and most inactive, in most cases," says Sobotka. "Helium has a closed electronic configuration, that is - its atoms are tight and compressed. If you try to remove an electron from the helium atom, you have to invest a lot of energy for that. Its ionization energy (the minimum energy that must be invested in order to release an electron from the atom) is extremely high. It is this greed of helium for its electrons that prevents it from combining with other atoms." In addition to the Texas deposit, helium can be found in smaller areas in Colorado, Kansas and Oklahoma. It is also marketed in Australia and Algeria. Russia has the most extensive natural gas deposits in the world, where helium reserves are sure to exist. There is still no motivation to market large quantities of helium, because in the short term, for now, the supply is sufficient, but the price for this product is rising rapidly. Sobotka believes that Russia will become the main helium supplier in the world within the next thirty years. The price of liquid helium today is 5 dollars per liter, and this price is after a fifty percent increase in value over the last few years due to what Sobotka calls "routine economics". He attributes this to the withdrawal of some companies from the market, to the appearance of others that do not yet produce the helium and the motivation behind high prices, as well as to the low prices, for now, of this element. Helium production in the US began immediately after World War I, when the main use for this gas was for airships. Since helium is non-flammable, its use in balloons prevented other cases such as the Hindenburg disaster (a German airship, made by a Zeppelin that burned completely during an attempt to land in New Jersey, in the United States, on May 6, 1937. The fire killed 36 people: 13 passengers, 22 crew crew and one ground crew member. 62 other people who were on the ship were saved). The US government managed the helium industry for 70 years, but since the mid-XNUMXs most of the production has been transferred to the fuel and natural gas companies.

The simple truth

"Governments have the right vision to store helium, and the question now is: Will industry have the vision to capture it when natural gas is extracted, and consumers the wisdom to recycle it?" Sobotka says. "To this end, a long-term vision is needed because current market forces are not sufficient to force a wise use of the current helium stockpile." Helium is used in a secondary role in the fuel and natural gas markets, and most of it is lost in the process of removing non-combustible nitrogen and helium from the main product. "When they insert the suction pipe into the soil to extract the fuel and gas, the helium is also released, and if it is not captured it evaporates into the air and is wasted," says Sobotka. Helium production is a side industry to the fuel and natural gas industry, a secondary effort that no one is willing to invest in." In the meantime, laboratories around the world will have to work harder to preserve helium. They will be able to use one of the following ways: 1) using cheap machines called liquefiers that allow helium to be captured, stored and liquefied on the spot, or 2) the researchers will be able to take recycled helium in gaseous form, return it to the company that sold it to them in the first place and receive a refund, similar to a deposit on Different bottles. "It is our duty to think about these issues," he says. "Until now, the issue has not been important enough to bring it up for discussion frequently - this is a problem for the next generation of scientists. But it requires us to grow a vision and express the truth simply - helium is a non-renewable resource in a stricter way than fuel or natural gas."

For information on the website of Washington University in St. Louis

18 תגובות

  1. Once again the price was updated, on 1.10.2010 the price of helium increased by 15.8%.
    There is a situation in Jordan, because of the discovery of uranium, there is also helium.

  2. two things:

    1. If the helium was created in a nuclear explosion, it might be worth setting up some plants around Tehran to capture it, in case there is...

    2. Parties wouldn't be the same without people inhaling helium and talking in a funny voice...
    We need to take a picture of it for the sake of our children….

  3. to the cool commenter,
    You're right, we need to give a jump to the sun (the closest "facility" I know at least) to bring some helium...

  4. Why does the article directly rule out nuclear fusion?
    It can (in my limited opinion) produce helium with high efficiency and in large quantities, and if possible then the facility will also be able to produce the energy for itself and thus be in a remote area that is not dangerous to the population in a direct form of leakage or something.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but the radiation is caused by nuclear fission that flies full of electrons and neutrons and unnecessary protons. But in the case of fusion that connects two hydrogen atoms to a helium atom, is there also dangerous radiation? particle or gamma.

  5. I liked the overview of the sources of helium production on Earth. Although Texas produces most of the helium, it is not the only one, followed by Colorado, Kansas and Oklahoma (all in the USA).

    From the article it can be understood that helium is also produced in small quantities in Australia and Algeria.

    But there is no doubt that Russia has the largest (known) reserves of helium on Earth (more than the USA). But let's not forget that there are many places in the world with potential for helium drilling.

  6. Age:
    I agree that the meaning of "N." Your words may be better than my interpretation.
    I agree with "N." Even in that it doesn't make your words logical.
    The problem is that when you say illogical things people are forced to look for interpretations.
    I wonder where you get the information about the intelligence of which of us.

  7. For age

    I hope the level of intelligence you are talking about is that of the first responder and not ours.
    Let's hope there will be agreement on more intelligent things as well.

    On second thought, it's more interesting to respond in a forum with differences of opinion rather than one where everyone agrees with everyone else.

    So pleasant snow for those who now see snow.
    Sabdarmish Yehuda

  8. Congratulations to Michael and Yehuda 🙂 that there is finally an agreement between you.
    With such levels of intelligence and IQ I am also really surprised.

  9. Yehuda:
    This is not the first time.
    There was also agreement on the subject of the temperature map (I no longer remember the exact name of the article).

  10. To Michael

    Well, something happened in Israel, you and I agree on something.

    Sabdarmish Yehuda

  11. If we are talking about options, then what I understand from the article is the opposite: a number of scientists decided to make a cash-out, they purchased a lot of helium, and now they are sending us a message that soon there will be a shortage, meaning that you should buy helium, and anyway, the price will go up and those scientists will make a cash-out …

  12. Investing in companies is always a problem, especially in issues related to wells in the world... see the Shell entry.
    It is safest to invest in the goods themselves...

  13. What it seems to me Gil was trying to say is that due to the increasing use of gas instead of oil, there will be more drilling for gas whose secondary product is helium.
    Then the stock we know of helium will "increase".

    One of Gil's mistakes here is that, etc., almost no one uses the gas drilling to store the helium, which is a secondary product.
    Anyway, does anyone know if there is an option on helium on the Chicago stock exchange?
    : )

  14. Yehuda:
    Gil's response is full of nonsense from beginning to end.
    Is helium used as a substitute for oil?
    Helium is not used as a substitute for oil. You can know this even without checking all the uses that are made of helium because, as explained in the article - helium is a noble gas and it is not possible to extract any energy from it by chemical means.
    Will the use of gas or its price drop increase its inventory?
    The amount of any resource cannot be increased by using it.
    Will increasing demand lower the price?
    In the real world, the complete opposite usually occurs.
    In short - it is "comfortable with seven errors" and it is even possible that some errors are intentional.
    This could also be expected from the name of the responding troll.

  15. For age
    Why does increasing use of gas instead of oil change the price of helium?
    It doesn't seem to me that there is a connection between the two things.

    Sabdarmish Yehuda

  16. In the short term the price of helium can only go down
    Because of the increasing use of gas as a substitute for oil.
    Which means that the helium stock will only grow.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.