Comprehensive coverage

new driver

About Shabtai Kor's new book "New Driver", and the first chapter of the book

new driver
new driver

A special introduction to the site of knowledge by the author Shabtai Kor

"Rabbi Eliezer Menachem of Shech Rosh yeshiva of Ponivage is not wrong. And it's not just him, mind you. In general, all the great men of Israel are not wrong. They just don't. They can never be worked on either - never. They are holy and pure, understand that is something completely different, they are not ordinary people, like me like you, they are angels. Higher angels".

Rabbi Shech once asked Rabbi Mabrisk how it was that we were commanded to believe that "I am the Lord your God" - if we were commanded to believe, then there would necessarily be a possibility of frost - how is that? Rabbi Shech asked - could a person be able to believe that the world was created without a creator? For what will the believer receive his reward, for not being a fool?

When the Rabbi of Brisk heard this question coming out of Rabbi Shech's mouth, his face lit up, "I also had a hard time with this question," he said happily, I offered it to the late Rabbi Chaim of Brisk and he answered with all his holiness that the mitzvah is to "live" the faith - not to know that there is a Creator For the world, it is clear, this is what every rational person knows, to live means to be in a state of accumulation of a believer. Remember the faith. The more time she spends in the mind, the greater the reward in heaven.

Near Rabbi Shech's house, at the Ponivage Yeshiva, one of the disciples recited the same mitzvah, and asked the same question. "I am the Lord your God, you shall have no other God before me" How were we even commanded to believe, the guy asked? How can I be punished for a mitzvah that I cannot fulfill - I cannot. I can appreciate, hope, want very much to believe there is a God - but to be XNUMX percent sure? How is that possible? I am a skeptic by nature…

In Rabbi Shech's house, whoever asked asked. Wait, if it is so clear that there is a God, how is it that there are still unbelieving sages? Ask and answer "to teach you what the power of lust is" People are able by the power of lust to lie to themselves in the face and deny with a determined forehead the darkest truth in the world, which all means honor - God. (Then rumors began, maybe the reward is for rejecting lust, etc. This is not the place to extend)

in the room of the nearby infidel. The same question was asked. Such a deceptive mind we have. We are so aware of his delusions. After all, we live and argue from his delusions. One day they think one way and another tomorrow. The issue shines a light on us from one direction and tomorrow from the other. Seventy faces are to the Torah. Such a deceptive mind, how can one trust its conclusions one hundred percent? How is it that there are smart and good Haredim who believe.

Here their answers merged - he was also an unbeliever, he replied to himself "To teach you what the power of lust is, they are so eager to believe, so need God to listen to them, so afraid of losing him, so absorbed are they in their studies that they are prevented from casting doubt.

Here I leave it to your imagination to draw for you a meeting between your rabbi and the unbeliever - they will bicker and bicker. He will ask a cry and he will answer him a cry and so on - the equal of them both say one to the other, you are guided by your desires.

I was there, in Rabbi Shech's place. And I was there, in the place of the heretic. The transition from Rabbi Shech's side to the unbeliever's side involved internal struggles - describe the moment of the meeting, when both forces worked in me with equal strength - on the one hand Rabbi Shech and on the other the unbeliever - how I felt, how big the tear was.

Now I am far away - looking at these and those with a little longing.

From the distant and missed place I wrote my book, "New Driver" which tells the story of my departure from Shala. We are familiar with the feeling of identification with a bad hero in a good book. The story brings us the hero in the right dose and immerses us in his character. It is difficult to penetrate the character of Rabbi Shech like the character of the apostate. Both have a burning position. The story succeeds, and that is the power of a story.

Here is the first episode.

Dusk, Friday. The last moments of calm, after the storm of energetic preparations and before Shabbat begins. When peace enveloped me like a blanket, I walked to the synagogue. Just this week I turned thirteen, an age that qualified me to complete a minyan and receive financial compensation for the prayer. For many months I envied my friends who pray in an abandoned synagogue, complete a minyan and each of them receives a payment of fifty shekels Tabin and Tekilin for participating in Shabbat prayers. I walked down Rashi Street in the "Mokor Baruch" neighborhood in Jerusalem, crossed Jaffa Street near the old "Shaari Tzedek" hospital and got off at Agrippa Street. I still haven't adjusted to the "Yeshiva Bocher" look that the suit and the wide-brimmed Borsalino hat gave me, and the limitations involved. This was the second time in total that I showed off my new havarch clothes, and every suspicious passer-by was seen by me as someone who was testing how appropriate the marks of matriculation were on me.

"Satan's emissary" was fleshy and gigantic. While he rolled up the windows of his car and locked it in the parking lot of the "Shok Kenyon", he sang loudly and looked at me ironically as I crossed the street diagonally. It seems a bit childish to me to play "downloads" with my eyes, that's why I looked at him.

"Hey young rabbi," he called out to me teasingly, "where are you going? To a synagogue? What do you have from synagogue? What do you think, that God hears you? that he cares about you?"

I did not know my soul from confusion. "Do you think yours cares more about me than him?" I asked.

"It's not that I care, it just hurts me, that you're just wasting time in idle confusions, that you won't get anything out of, I also have a tassel," he said while lifting the hem of his shirt and pulling out his tassels. "It's not that I'm an infidel or anything, I have faith, but I know how to set the limit. I'm not stupid, I don't take religion seriously."

The fence between us. He found a hole in it, passed through it, and approached me. I was a little scared. "Well," I said, "I am me, and you are you. I grew up and was brought up on the knees of religion, and I have no intention of changing my customs. I'm sorry that you care about me... Sorry, you don't care, it just hurts... Shabbat Shalom."

For a moment, I felt angry at the man. What exactly does he think to himself, that all the sages of Israel were wrong when they believed there was a God? What does "not taking religion seriously" mean? Is this something that is subject to our discretion? But unwittingly, and without meaning to, an unruly thought popped into my mind that I couldn't tame and couldn't push to the edge of my consciousness: maybe everything is really just a lie and a lie? Maybe my faith is just a product of a dogmatic upbringing? Maybe there is no afterlife at all, heaven and hell and I'm just a baby caught? Something in me shook. I arrived upset at the synagogue, I unfolded the story to my friends ("He told me that God doesn't care about me!"), but they looked at me mockingly. One of them even suggested, with feigned seriousness: "Let's go beat him, is he still there?"

We prayed in Arabic. Being slightly distracted, I muttered the prayer quickly, praying that it would be over already and I could go home and forget about everything. Indeed, the disturbing thought subsided when I got home, but it returned and bothered me more and more later, especially at moments when I did not expect it at all, especially in the middle of the prayers, which I tried to say with the utmost devotion.

The days of the exams for "small yeshivas" have arrived. It was important for me to be admitted to a successful yeshiva, so I spent most of my hours memorizing the material for the exams. The pressure and the drive to succeed made me forget all the annoyances. I passed the tests successfully, was accepted to a number of yeshiva and on the advice of the supervisor of the "Talmud Torah" I chose to go to the "Mishkan Zion" yeshiva which was built on the purity of the traditional Sephardic learning method which Rabbi Ben Zion Abba Shaul ztzel passed on to his son Rabbi Eliyahu who was the head of the yeshiva. All I had to do was prepare myself for the long journey of studying in a yeshiva. At school I excelled in sacred studies, which took up the first part of the day, and I was a bad student in the mundane subjects. Day and night I dreamed of a full day of Gemara study, without boring week studies, so that I would have the opportunity to excel throughout the day.

The fervor grew stronger and accompanied me throughout the "between times" period. I already knew the first page of the tractate "Gittin", which we were supposed to study in the "small yeshiva", in Alfafa a week before the beginning of the studies in the yeshiva. On the first day of school, the students all gathered in the yeshiva hall, being careful not to attract too much attention. The head of the yeshiva, the overseer and the two teaching rabbis sat at the front of the hall. The educator rabbi briefly explained how important the first academic year in the yeshiva is, and invited the head of the yeshiva to deliver his words. The silence of God reigned in the hall. The head of the yeshiva spoke about the unique nature of the yeshiva he heads, and about the great privilege we had to be a part of it.

After that the overseer spoke. The overseer, we all knew, is a true tzaddik. "I can't believe that there is a student sitting here who doesn't want to be the next generation's 'rabbi,'" he began. "Everyone wants it, but there is only one 'rabbi of yours' in each generation. Why? Because the initial ardor fades. The trick is to preserve the enthusiasm, to understand that we are subject to a daily war, which succeeds in sacrificing thousands of your 'rabbi' every day and turning you into ordinary people. Don't allow yourselves to die in the war you are just starting. In this war whoever wants wins and becomes the greatest of the generation. Being Yeshiva students is a privilege that we must bless every day: 'Blessed be our God who created us for His glory and set us apart from the lost.'" And so he continued to enthuse us until it was time for prayer.

When we left the Beit Midrash, on our way to the racks of hats and suits, I felt great happiness and it seemed to me that the whole world was surrounded by an atmosphere of holiness. I got on the bus, with a book of laws in my hand, and sat down to read. The driver turned on the radio receiver. Rabbi Amnon Yitzchak's voice was carried at a high level. "I give many lectures," said the rabbi, "and in every lecture, I repeat the same question and no one is able to answer. The question is why you came into the world. I want to hear a secular answer."

The rabbi brought the microphone closer to a number of seculars who gave confused answers ("to bring children into the world", "for the sake of living", etc.), which ended with the rabbi's disdainful concluding words: "Everyone understands that there cannot be a secular answer to this question, because if you came into the world to live , then why do you die, and if you came into the world to die, why do you live?" The rabbi concluded and burst into loud laughter.

His laugh managed to wake me up. Does he believe that laughter can cover up a superficial argument? Who said there should be a "secular answer" to this question? I failed to grasp how a person like Rabbi Yitzchak, who does not understand so many areas, is able to prove "something" due to his lack of understanding. Shimo came out in public as the leader of "massive" people, and perhaps because of this, because of the need I had to shake off this mass, his words so upset me.

When I got off the bus and walked to my house, thoughts of heresy began to nest in me again. God, I asked, please don't try me now. I just started the AL lesson. I know God, that I must prove the truth of your existence by myself, but I am not able now. Please, have faith in me, I begged. I remembered that when I was in the middle of rehearsing for exams, and thoughts of heresy began knocking on the walls of my thoughts, I asked God to heal me of thoughts of heresy at least until I finished the exams. Only after that, I promised him, would I turn to prove beyond any doubt the reality of his existence. But here things turned out for them in such a way that already on the first day of school I heard R. Amnon Yitzchak. The Almighty, in his great grace, waited patiently until the end of the first day of studies at the yeshiva, and knowing that I had no intention of keeping my promise, sent me the temptation again in the form of Amnon Yitzchak. By the time I got home I decided to put an end to my doubts and find a solid foundation for my faith. I told my parents about the wonderful day I experienced in the yeshiva.

The next day, after morning prayer, I took out a sheet of paper and a pen, with the aim of writing down difficulties that I must find out for myself. But see it's a miracle - I tried to raise more and more questions, and they all seemed stupid to me. The central question that required proof of God's existence was solved by Hiskel. I, the questioner, became living proof, for I felt beyond all doubt that there was a God in heaven. I also felt that he conducts a kind of dialogue with me, watches over me, infuses me with unlimited strength to learn Torah and keeps my mind from being distracted during prayer. I felt that I just love my God, and He really loves me. I wanted to hug him but I only hugged myself, while I was engulfed in the depths of the divine being.

The yeshiva where I studied, on the outskirts of Mea Shearim, was next to the monastery. Some of the students of the Yeshiva used to plug the holes in the locks of the monastery with toothpicks, so that the inscription "Mishnaich Hashem - Ashna" would be in them. An elderly Christian woman knocked on the yeshiva gate one morning and scolded us loudly, without anyone understanding her words. One of the staff members tried to calm us down, and then talked to us about the importance of "peaceful ways", but the yeshiva students continued their harassment of the monastery. I was not one of them. vice versa. The monastery piqued my curiosity, and I was thirsty to know what was going on inside. I was afraid that they would molest me in turn (I had nightmares of them catching me, imprisoning me in a monastery and offering me there as a sacrifice), so I contented myself with a glimpse through its windows. One day I saw through the window a monk kneeling in prayer. The thought flashed through me, that he prays just like me, and I asked myself, what would have happened if I had switched with him - he would have studied in the yeshiva in my place, and I would have become a monk. Would I then have been able to decipher the counterfeit in Christianity? Would I have remained a Christian for the rest of my life? After all, there are Christians in the world smarter than me who fail to discover the light of Judaism. I began to question myself, do Christians also have their own Rambam, and who is the wiser Rambam, and which is the false religion and which is the true religion? After all, there are three main religions, two of which are false, obviously. The world blurred before my eyes, when I thought for a moment about the possibility that maybe all of us - Jews, Christians and Muslims - are wrong and there is no God.

It is told about a righteous rabbi who was asked: "After all, most of the world are Gentiles, and it is well known that they follow the majority, and why don't we convert to our religion?" The rabbi replied: "The majority rules only where there is doubt, and Judaism is not in doubt." As for me, I thought, Judaism is questionable. Will I be allowed to follow the majority and do as I please?

23 תגובות

  1. Isaiah:
    And the fact that the Inquisition followed science and charged a bloody price is good?
    Is not agreeing with this tantamount to expressing disbelief in the human spirit?
    And that every time there is an article here about evolution or the big bang, all kinds of people jump up and talk nonsense, is that good?
    And that such brainwashed people become ministers in the Israeli government and gain influence over the allocation of budgets for scientific research is this good?
    Opposition to all this damage is not an expression of disbelief in human creativity - it is only an expression of faith in religion's ability to harm.

  2. Roy and Michael - you have no faith in the human spirit, human curiosity and freedom of choice. The divine command did not prevent Adam and Eve from eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge. The active Inquisition did not succeed in stopping, only delaying and at a terrible blood price, the progress of science. Scientific research is currently thriving in strictly religious institutions. Religious people win the Nobel Prize and make amazing discoveries. One should not present things as more demonic than they are.
    I live mentally that science and religion can find a formula to live together. Religion simply did not know how to understand that if it wants to exist, it must disconnect itself from science completely and operate on a different level. A religion cannot rest its existence on the results of stirring in a test tube and neither should it pretend to stir in a test tube itself. It should accept the facts that science reveals and give them a moral interpretation. that's it.

  3. Isaiah,

    As soon as you are ready to discard God as the final solution to any unsolved problem, there is contempt for religion and God. But worst of all, science does not progress, because there is no motivation to investigate anything. The answer is already known, and God bless you.

  4. Isaiah:
    All this is fine and dandy in relation to what has already been discovered (although it has already been discovered that the rabbit does not ruminate, but that is another story) but it is bad and wrong in relation to what has yet to be discovered.
    As soon as the god of the gaps is placed in the gaps of our knowledge, the motivation to explore and check what is really found in them decreases.

  5. Michael - I completely agree with you that you should not lie to everyone all the time. Of course the truth is the default and the king's way. There is no dispute about that. I also think that a spiritual leader who incites the believers not to use a drug whose life-saving ability is proven, is a person who does not deserve to be a spiritual leader and he also perverts the spirit of Halacha.
    Halacha does not consider spells, amulets and idol medicine! The Rambam, who was a great Halachic teacher and philosopher, was also an excellent doctor of his generation, and he had no need at all for pagan medicine, amulets and spells and other crazy nonsense, but advocated, for example, a healthy lifestyle - a balanced diet, physical activity and a healthy lifestyle.
    By the way, the Halacha commands a person to save his life with whatever medicine the doctors prescribe (even if the doctors are secular, of course!), and even if this medicine constitutes a serious halachic sin! According to the Halacha there are only three things you must not do to save your life - killing others (bloodshed), needing idol doctors (foreign work) and having sex in the family (incest).

  6. Roy Tsezana - but that's not what I wrote. Where there is a cure, there is a cure. But instead of science raising its hands and saying - "I don't have an answer yet", what's wrong with consolation? In general, science is unable and unwilling to invent consolation.

  7. Isaiah:
    I'm not saying that there aren't situations where a lie is better for certain people, but what the religion is trying to do is lie to everyone all the time.
    In general - as Roy's words already hint - ignoring the existence of the truth and adopting some example under it loosens the hands of the people who might have found the truth (and perhaps - in the case of the plane - save him from crashing or - at least - in another case - give the child a chance to thank his father for the beautiful period of his life who gave him, everything according to the talent and character of the child).

  8. Wow, you're right. What's wrong with letting people believe that diseases come from demons and vengeful spirits, and not from bacteria, and that one should be careful not to do harm - instead of inventing antibiotics?

  9. Michael - here is a dilemma for you to illustrate a certain point in my words:

    A man is found with his small child in a plane that is about to crash shortly. Man knows that his immediate and certain death is inevitable.
    The little boy does not know this. He asks his father what is happening and why the people around them are frightened.
    according to your method -
    The father, faithful to the "right at all costs" method, tells his child the horrifying truth and the toddler's last moments pass him by in hysteria and unbelievable agony.

    according to my method -
    The father calms the toddler down and tells him lies and fiction, deliberately hiding the terrible truth from him and the last minutes before the sudden death pass over the toddler when he is happy, calm and feels secure in his father's protective arms.

    In both scenarios, death comes suddenly.

    In your opinion, in these last moments, the toddler should not be allowed to live in a "fool's paradise". In any case, his happiness is meaningless according to your approach and his feelings are "nonsense".

    In my opinion, human happiness has meaning. Even if it is false, momentary and fleeting. In any case, our entire physical existence is temporary and fleeting. We will return our atoms to the stars from which we were made. What do we have left? Collect small moments of happiness. to give our lives meaning.

    If only we manage to get along with all kinds of Michaels who have trouble with our happiness.

  10. Dear Michael,

    Because, in the end, our way of perceiving reality is through our senses, and because these senses differ in their function between people and, moreover, because people tend to give their own interpretation to the facts, even if they experience them in a more or less identical way, there is not always a "correct absolute".
    (See on this matter http://wiki.tau.ac.il/maphilos/images/1/1b/Brkly.doc)
    At least, there is not always an absolute truth that all people will agree on. And note - I am not claiming that absolute truth is never possible, but that there may be cases in which it is not or at least, cannot be proven yet.
    And as for those absolute truths that are in a sense gone yet, I don't see anything wrong with people holding an opinion that makes them personally happy. It is almost certain that the riddle of the entire universe and all its mysteries will not be solved nowadays. It is almost certain that a very high percentage of the people in the world will not take a practical part in the solution when it is found and it is almost certain that many will not understand anything and a half about the solution when it is found. What then does the attitude of absolute right at any cost and nothing else offer them? After all, as long as you didn't provide them with such an "absolute truth" to the questions that bother them, you leave them without answers in your method. And what's wrong if they live happily with wrong answers (provided they don't harm anyone)? Are people no longer allowed to find comfort and security and happiness? Will your quarks and bosons keep them happy and relaxed? Enough, Michael, don't be an inquisitor in the name of rationalism. Treat human emotion with respect, because it has content and reality no less and perhaps more than unproven scientific theories.

  11. Isaiah:
    The question of whether he is happier is not a relevant consideration when it comes to finding out what is right.
    Even if life in a fool's paradise is happier than life in the real world, that does not make a lie the truth.
    After all, the other addicts are also happier (or delude themselves that this is the case) - otherwise they would wean themselves.

    I read the article in the link and in my opinion this is just nonsense.
    We do not have any way to find out the truth other than the scientific method and the only way to test if there is truth in religion is through this method. Everything else is in BLA.
    In the test of the scientific method, religion fails miserably and the fact that people try to find refuge in all kinds of interpretations they decide that the fabricators of religion did not have the sense to write them in the Holy Scriptures to avoid contradictions with reality is simply pathetic.

  12. Is Saturn Kor happier now? Did his repetition of the question provide him with answers to the questions?
    And what do his personal doubts prove? Just as the rationals of converts do not constitute conclusive proof of something beyond their personal experience, so the experience of a convert does not raise or lower a question.
    But - if it's better for him that way, blessed be he. Maybe you weren't born to be a believer. Maybe it has another purpose. May he be healthy and happy.
    I hope he found another reference group and another social connection.

  13. Mor:
    Why do you think there must be a point to something?
    The very question presupposes the existence of God, so what wonder you have complaints against the author?

  14. I loved the matter of lust, the desire to believe and lean and the desire for freedom from religion.
    After all, does the author have an answer about the nature of the world? There is some kind of excuse for what is happening here. What is the point and benefit in the universe?
    Or is the purpose of the book to tell about choosing a path while justifying it?

  15. Why is the religious establishment allowed to justify the religion, and at the expense of the tax payer and a private person is not allowed to justify what you call heresy?

  16. I have always been amazed at the wonderful memory of the biographers of themselves.. the memory of every scrap of conversation they had at the age of 13 with someone about something..

    In short, Saturn has a creative memory. And it's a shame. Instead of writing what he really felt as it was. He goes into the justification of heresy and an attempt to strip the feelings of a boy down to philosophical logic.

  17. Answer to Noam:

    Katunati criticizes others (Rabbi Shech or distinguish the author Shabtai Kor)
    But it seems to me that the Ponivage yeshiva is not an archive...
    Shabtai Kor and his books will be forgotten in so-and-so years, while Rabbi Shech and his books are condemned to eternal life (at least in the world of Judaism).

  18. I read your book, dear Shabtai Kor, I enjoyed every word. Indeed a fascinating and special book.

  19. A nice opening, but I was bothered by the expression "in a state of accumulation" given by Rabbi Haim of Brisk.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.