Comprehensive coverage

About Sophie Germain, the unsung hero of France

About the 18th century mathematician who managed to tackle the most difficult problems in mathematics in a society where women were not even allowed to study

(This article is taken from the programMaking history!', a bi-weekly podcast about the history of science and technology. )

In 212 BC, the forces of the Roman general Marcus Marcellus invaded the city of Syracuse (Syracuse) in Sicily. Syracuse was a Greek settlement, and the most famous of its sons was the philosopher Archimedes. Archimedes' name went before him in Rome as one of the greatest mathematicians, and General Marcus sought to protect him from the dangers of war. He sent one of his soldiers to bring Archimedes to him.

No one knows for sure what happened in the fateful meeting between Archimedes and the Roman messenger. It is a fact that Archimedes met his death. Legend has it that the Roman soldier found Archimedes engrossed in solving a complicated geometric problem. He demanded that Archimedes come with him, but he replied: "Don't disturb my circuits." The soldier got mad at Archimedes and killed him.

Almost two thousand years later, in 1789, a young Parisian girl rummaged through her father's bookshelves and found a book about the history of mathematics. She read it eagerly, and was especially fascinated by the story of Archimedes. If a person can be so engrossed in a mathematical problem that he is willing to risk his life to solve it, then mathematics must be a particularly interesting pursuit! From that moment the girl decided to dedicate her life to the science of numbers.

The young woman's name was Sophie Germain, and the decision she made at the age of thirteen went against all social conventions. A woman in eighteenth-century France was not supposed to be educated. At most, women from the upper class, the aristocracy, were allowed to acquire a little general knowledge so that they could have a fluent conversation with their husbands.

Her parents anxiously followed their daughter's new hobby. Out of desperation, they tried to force Sophie to abandon mathematics. When Sophie stayed up at night to read books, her father confiscated all the candles in the house. When she sneaked into the library, he took all her clothes so she couldn't leave the room. Sophie did not give up. She hid makeshift candles in drawers, and continued to read math books under the blanket in the freezing Parisian cold. Finally the parents had to give up. They realized that the mathematical bug was incurable, and decided to support their daughter.

After devouring all the math books she could find, Sophie realized that if she hopes to one day become a real scientist, she must acquire an education. In Paris, right near it, a prestigious science school was recently opened: the Polytechnic. The mathematics lecturer at the Polytechnic was none other than Joseph Louis-Lagrange, one of the greatest analytical minds of all time, a genius of stature.

For Sophie, the polytechnic could also have been in another country. This respectable institution was locked and closed to women - she had no chance of being admitted to it. To be accepted...in acceptable ways, that is.

One of Sophie Germain's acquaintances was Antoine LeBlanc, a boy of her age. Sophie, who had a passion for mathematics, couldn't even get into the Polytechnic but LeBlanc, who was a walking accident when it came to numbers and arithmetic, was a full-fledged student by virtue of being 'Monsieur'. For one reason or another, Antoine decided to leave the polytechnic - but for some reason the school's secretariat did not receive the notification about this. Sophie noticed the bureaucratic confusion, and realized that she had fallen into her hands a gift from heaven.

Elegantly and without arousing suspicion, Sophie stepped into Antoine's (small, intellectually speaking) shoes. She received the summaries of the lectures and exercises that were intended for him, and submitted the homework on his behalf. This arrangement was perfect for her: she enrolled in the lectures of the great Joseph Lagrange and expanded her mathematical knowledge immeasurably - and no one at the Polytechnic noticed her - Blanc stopped coming to classes.
I mean - almost no one. In circumstances we do not know, Lagrange managed to reveal Sophie's secret, and remove the mask of 'Monsieur Le Blanc' from her face. But Lagrange was not angry with Sophie. He supported her, continued to teach and advise her and even introduced her to important scientists and intellectuals.
Sophie was encouraged by Lagrange's support and recognition of her skills. She knew that as a woman, she had to succeed in a big way to gain the attention of the other French scientists. Sophie decided to aim high, very high - and try to solve the greatest mathematical puzzle of all: Fermat's last theorem.

The Pythagorean theorem is one of the most well-known and basic laws of mathematics: X2+Y2=Z2. This equation has many solutions - that is, three numbers (X, Y and Z) that satisfy the equation. For example: 3^2+4^2=5^2. Pierre de Ferme was a mathematician who lived one hundred and fifty years before Sophie. Fermat examined equations of similar form to the Pythagorean equation, but with different powers than 2: for example, X3+Y3=Z3 or X4+Y4=Z4. Despite the obvious resemblance to the Pythagorean theorem, Fermat claimed that all these equations had no solution. That is to say, no matter what power is chosen, for example - X10+Y10=Z10, there is no group of three numbers that satisfies it. In the days of Sophie Germain, after countless efforts, mathematicians managed to prove the theorem only for the third and fourth powers. The solution to this puzzle is not even in sight. When Sophie was 25 years old, the book 'Arrhythmic Studies' by Carl Friedrich Gauss was published. The book ignited in her mind possible ideas for solving Fermat's Last Theorem, and she asked to share them with Gauss.

Sophie was a very good mathematician and Agrange was one of the best - but Gauss was something else. He was a genius the likes of which only appear once every few hundred years. No wonder, then, that Sophie adored the ground upon which Gauss's foot had trod. She didn't want to take the risk of Gauss rejecting her letters due to her being a woman, so she went back to assuming the identity of good old Monsieur LeBlanc. The German genius was very impressed by the understanding and originality demonstrated by the young Frenchman, Monsieur LeBlanc, and wrote to her - "I am happy that mathematics has found such a talented friend in you."

Gauss and Sophie corresponded back and forth. He encouraged her to continue trying to prove Fermat's theorem, and wrote to her that her ideas were in the right direction. Gauss's support was of immense importance to Sophie. But in 1806 this friendship was in danger. Napoleon Bonaparte fought the Prussians to expand his French empire and Brunswick - Gauss's city - was occupied by the French army.

Well, there might be a little unnecessary drama here. After all, the French army is not the most terrifying army in the world. Bureau-Disney is said to have banned the use of fireworks because every time a firework is fired, the French army tries to surrender. It is also said that a French tank has four gears for traveling in reverse and one gear for traveling forward, in case the enemy attacks from behind. The only reason the French won the French Revolution is probably because they fought other Frenchmen.

And yet, when Sophie heard about the events on the war front, she was filled with anxiety. She feared that the story of Archimedes would repeat itself again - and this time, Gauss in the role of the Greek genius and a French soldier in the role of the Roman legionnaire. One of the family's friends was a general in the French army, and Sophie sent him a telegram in Hall asking him to take care of Gauss's well-being.

When the officer arrived at the front, he approached Gauss's house, and showed him the letter that Sophie wrote in which she asked to protect his life. Gauss was confused. He was grateful for the unexpected assistance...but who is Mademoiselle Germaine? He did not know any French mathematician. The only French mathematician that Gauss knew was… Monsieur… Le Blanc!

When the realization dawned on Gauss, he wasn't angry at Sophie for cheating on him. On the contrary: "I cannot describe to you," Gauss wrote to Sophie, "I was surprised when I realized the true identity of Monsieur LeBlanc... The love for the abstract sciences and the mysteries of numbers is extremely rare, and the charms of this science reveal themselves only to those who have the courage to dive to their depths. But when a woman succeeds, despite the formidable difficulties arising from prejudices and cultural customs in your country, to overcome these obstacles... then without a doubt she must be brave and noble, possessing exceptional skills and a clear genius."

Sophie and Gauss continued to exchange letters for several months, until their relationship faded and died. Gauss was appointed to an official position at one of the universities and the academic load, combined with the fact that his interests wandered from the world of numbers to other fields, caused him to lose interest in Sophie's research but she continued, nevertheless, to work on Fermat's last theorem. She managed to show that every possible solution must be a huge number, thirty digits long or more, and greatly strengthened the feeling among researchers that Fermat's last theorem is true.

Gauss was not the only German who had a profound influence on Sophie's life. Ernst Chaldani was a physicist and musician who performed a very interesting experiment. He took metal beams, sprinkled fine sand on them - and played them with a violin bow. The pull of the bow caused the beams to vibrate and shake, and as a result the white sand on the beams arranged itself in strange and fascinating patterns. These forms were named 'Chaldeni patterns'.

While visiting Paris, Cialdani performed the experiment for Napoleon, who was very impressed by this interesting phenomenon. The French emperor offered a respectable reward - a whole kilogram of pure gold - to whoever could explain the results of Chaldani's experiment. The French Academy of Sciences picked up the gauntlet, and organized a competition between the scientists: the first to give a physical and mathematical explanation for Chaldani's experiment, will win the gold.

Sophie worked for two years on the explanation of the 'Chaldani patterns', and in 1811 she submitted her work to the prize committee. It turned out that Sophie was not only the first to submit a proposal for a solution - she was the only one! Unfortunately, there were flaws in Sophie's proposal - errors that stemmed mainly from a lack of formal education and too weak a background in physics. The committee decided not to award her the award. Personal disagreements between Sophie Germain and Simeon Poisson, one of the members of the committee who was a well-known and influential mathematician, also contributed to this decision.

The committee decided to extend the competition for another two years. In 1813, Sophie submitted another proposal to the committee - and again she was the only contender for the prize. But there were still errors and deficiencies in her work, and she was denied the prize.

The competition was extended for two more years, and Sophie submitted a third solution proposal - still the only competitor. This time the committee approved the solution, and Sophie finally won the long-awaited gold. Angry and resentful of the many rejections she received, Sophie refused to come to the award ceremony and boycotted it.

When Sophie was 53, she was diagnosed with breast cancer. After two years of stubborn struggle, Sophie passed away in 1831. She never married and had no children. Sophie published very few articles during her lifetime. Her important result about Fermat's Last Theorem, for example, appears only as a brief footnote in a paper by another mathematician with whom she worked.

Sophie Germain's story is a source of inspiration for many young women around the world. Her fight against discrimination and the narrow horizons of her male colleagues became a symbol of the victory of merit over cultural chains. And in the words of the historian Mozens:

"Looking back, Sophie Germain was probably the most intellectual woman France has ever produced...and yet, strange as it sounds, on her death certificate she appears as 'a woman without a profession' and not a 'mathematician'...was she pushed aside for the same reason that Bettia was not Was she entitled to be considered a full member of the French Academy of Sciences? If so, those responsible for this should be ashamed of themselves for forcing kindness against someone who has contributed so much to science, and whose achievements have earned her a place of honor in the hall of fame."

26 תגובות

  1. Hello Ran
    My name is Judit, a former mathematician, currently a tour guide in Paris.
    I want to upload a post on my Facebook page about Sophie German, can I write in the post to the page you uploaded?
    Best regards
    Jewish girl.

  2. An exciting and infuriating story

    And as for Torah believers, from my personal experience, they are much less moral than non-believers
    Rather - their morality is the opposite of mine, everything that is good in their eyes is bad in my eyes, and everything that is bad in their eyes is good in my eyes.
    It's like speaking different languages.
    Even interpretation of the most basic words, such as good and bad, lie and truth, are interpreted by many religious people and believers the opposite of reality.

  3. Ran Levy
    Looks like he got ahead of the astrophysicists with dark matter.
    When he invented the "that's somebody else's problem" machine
    What do you think.

  4. Yanon Sharab:
    I think otherwise but that is not the topic of the article so let's leave.
    I was just wondering about Rabbi Nachman Parkash's words that I have no idea if he really is a rabbi.

  5. Hello everyone, thanks for all the responses,
    Glad most of you liked the article. Higgs boson: I will read a little more about the story of Emi Nether, thanks. Haim the French - I apologize if I offended 🙂 It's all in humor. And regarding Ferme's last sentence: an excellent book... I took some biographical details about Sophie from it, and added many more from other sources.

    A question for the readers: What do you think of Douglas Adams, the famous writer? I am writing about him in the upcoming episode of 'Making History!', and those who are interested in participating (with his voice) in the program - are welcome to leave a message on the voicemail of the program, and tell which of Adams' books he liked the most, which are characters and which are ideas, etc. Phone number - 035 66 23 072. The most interesting and original messages will be included in the program! You are welcome to join.
    We'll hear
    Ran

  6. Michael,
    If you have already looked at something, maybe I can explain the meaning of things,
    His Honor meant those who are included in the People of Israel, [it does not seem to me that Sophie is counted as such]
    In saying the sentence, his honor referred to the carnal and insipid knowledge, that our elders did not imagine that we would reach such a low point in the search for the lie.

    Whoever teaches his son Torah teaches his son values ​​that come from his father that came to his father from his grandfather and so on. This means that these values ​​are based on a historical background and even on the fact that there is a God who wrote these values ​​and with that comes the fear of preserving values ​​and morality.
    Naham,
    Your response is true, but deepened and explained in order to understand the general,
    There are two types of people: believers in G-d, and non-believers,

    The one who believes in God has two fears in him - the fear of God, a conscience measured by the awareness and feeling for good and evil.
    The non-believer will have one fear: a conscience measured by the awareness and feeling for good and evil.

    I imagine that many did not understand, I will give an example,

    A man walks in the city and in front of him walks a woman [rich, and he knows about it, and they don't], and then her purse falls without her knowing,
    He picks up his wallet and doesn't know what to do with it.

    I know from facts that a non-believer has low or even zero chances that he will return the wallet to its owner, and even if he does he will do so hesitantly and after that he will have a bad conscience about why I returned it.

    A religious person will pick up the wallet out of values ​​by which he lives and out of fear of God he will return the wallet, without any bad conscience.

  7. To Michael
    The Torah does not fall because all acts of kindness and charity that are done for the sake of heaven actually help human beings
    It is a well-known fact that the percentage of donations and volunteering from among the religious public is much greater than among the general public
    In other words, the Torah is an excellent (perhaps not the only) way to increase the measure of mercy in Israel. Apart from that, religion is an existential necessity and without religion Israel would not have arisen of course. And all donations to Israel would cease and more....

  8. Rabbi Nachman Farkash is actually right.
    In fact, nowadays we have already progressed even more than our rabbis will know and today it is also known that those who teach us Torah teach falsehoods.
    It doesn't matter at all who is taught - blasphemy is blasphemy is blasphemy.

  9. To Rabbi Nachman Parkash (if you really are a rabbi). The article proves exactly the opposite of what you claimed and our gentlemen were very wrong.

  10. It is unnecessary to laugh at the French army. In Napoleon's time, it was the strongest army in Europe that terrorized its surroundings, so this disdain is really out of place.

  11. Our masters said:
    Anyone who teaches his daughter Torah teaches nonsense!
    The article proves how right they were.

  12. Ran Levy
    So maybe you'll also write about Emi Neter that the sentence connecting consecutive li bruises to conservation laws on her credit.

  13. An exciting story indeed.
    In a certain sense it can be argued that Marie Curie was also French. Although she was born in Poland, she studied and studied in France.
    Since she lived about a century later her fate was different.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.