Comprehensive coverage

540th anniversary of the birth of Nicolaus Copernicus: "The fool wants to turn the whole idea of ​​astronomy upside down!"

The quote is from Martin Luther, the father of the Protestant Church, who only intended to defend science. Because of the fear of such criticisms, Copernicus waited until his last days to publish his controversial book in which he denounces the heliocentric system

Nicolaus Copernicus. From Wikipedia
Nicolaus Copernicus. From Wikipedia

On February 19, 1473, a child was born to the rich merchant Nicholas Copernicus in the Hanseatic city of Torn. His father calls him at the time of his baptism the name Nikolaos.

When Nikolaus was ten years old, his father died. The young orphan was taken to the home of his uncle, Doctor Lucas Watzenrode, who was later the bishop of Colm.

The young Nicolaus Copernicus, later called Copernicus, (Nicolaus Copernicus) studied at the school in Kolm. When he was 18 years old, he moved to Krakow, where he enrolled in the famous Jagiellonian University in the winter of 1491 and graduated from the humanities and mathematics departments.

Copernicus studied mathematics and astronomy at the University of Krakow. Thanks to his uncle's influence, Copernicus was appointed a canon (ecclesiastical official) of the Catholic Church. He used the income from the position to help pay for his studies.

At the age of 24, Copernicus moved to study law and medicine at the universities of Bologna, Padua and Ferrara in Italy. While studying at the University of Bologna, his growing interest in astronomy began. He lived in the home of mathematics professor Dominico Maria de Novara, who encouraged Copernicus' interest in geography and astronomy and indirectly influenced him to question conventional beliefs in astronomy.

Copernicus returned to Poland in 1503. For the next seven years he worked as the private secretary of his uncle who was at that time the bishop of the Aram region. While performing his church duties and working in practical medicine he also studied astronomy. In Copernicus' day, most astronomers believed in the theory developed by the Greek astronomer Ptolemy over 1,000 years earlier. Ptolemy claimed that the earth was at the center of the universe and did not move. He believed that all other celestial bodies circled the Earth in complex orbits.

Copernicus felt that Ptolemy's theory was wrong. At an unknown time between 1507 and 1515, he first propagated the principles of heliocentric astronomy, according to which the sun is at the center and not the earth. Copernicus' observations of the sky were made with the naked eye. He died more than fifty years before Galileo became the first person to study the heavens with a telescope.

From his observations, Copernicus concluded that all the planets, including the Earth, revolve around the Sun. He also stated that the Earth rotates every day on its axis and that the movement of the Earth affected what people saw in the sky.

In the meantime, Bishop Lucas Wartznerode died. After the death of this ecclesiastical prince, Copernicus was beset by many troubles and troubles. As a member of the church in Freinbrug he had to fulfill various administrative roles. At some point he was forced to leave his place of residence and move to Allenstein.

When Copernicus returned to Frauenburg at the end of his mission, a war broke out between Poland and the Knights of the Order and he was forced to leave his homeland again. In the fall of 1521 when he finally returned to Freuenburg, he found his house, which stood outside the walls - destroyed. He bought a house inside the walls. This house was the residential tower at the northwest end of the campus and had a balcony that was needed outside the wall.

During his stay there, the idea of ​​a new world system ripened in his mind. A simple and vast idea, like the extensive view that was visible to his eyes from the window of his room in the tower. Here he was allowed to indulge unhindered in his astronomical studies.

As mentioned, even during his stay in Italy, doubts about Ptolemy's image of the world already pricked his heart. Finally, the sermon of Bishop Powell of Mildburgh, as well as the calls to repair the tablet, motivated him to start making his own observations of the moon and planets, and he installed the necessary instruments with his own hands.

At first he was able to prove that the distance of the moon changes less than Ptolemy's theory required and as he progressed in his work, it became clear to him that the world building of the great son of Alexandria does not correspond to reality. It is not the earth that stands at the center of the world of the planets, but the sun. In 1541 he finished his great work and these are his assumptions:

 

  1. The center of the earth is not the center of the world but only the center of the moon's orbit.
  2. All the planets revolve around the sun, which is almost in their center, therefore the center of the world is near the sun.
  3. The daily movement of the dome of the sky is a result of the rotation of the earth on its axis. The earth rotates once a day on its axis, while the dome of the sky remains in place.
  4. The apparent movement of the sun is a result of the movement of the earth around the sun. The other planets orbit the sun in the same way.

Copernicus called his life's work De Revolutinibus orbiun nundi "On the rotation of the worlds" but the name of the book was changed without Copernicus' knowledge and desire by the publisher Osiander who called it De Revolutinibus orbiun coelestium (On the rotations of the heavenly worlds).

Copernicus hesitated for some time to get the manuscript out of his possession. He knew how difficult it would be to swim against the current and 'spit against the wind'. He knew that only a giant would be able to subdue the invincible wave of public opinion, and he no longer felt within himself the strength for war. At the request of his friend, Bishop Tidman Giza, in May 1542 he decided to send the manuscript to Nuremberg in order to have it printed there, after dedicating his work to Pope Paul III. The printing house was engaged in printing the book for a year.
Copernicus fell ill in 1538. It seems that the pressures involved in publishing his books undermined his poor health. He was also aware that the book was revolutionary and challenging.

Ironically, his book arrived in Freuenburg on May 24, when the old scholar was about to die. The printed book, the book of his life, was brought to his deathbed. It is said that he placed his right hand on him, as if asking for his blessing. Moments later his eyeballs say forever.

It is no wonder that Copernicus' ideas met with fierce opposition at the time. It is possible that Martin Luther expressed this in the most explicit way, when he said: "The fool wants to turn the whole opinion of astronomy on its face." Important scientific institutions, such as the Universities of Leipzig, Vienna and Paris and even Oxford took a stand against the New Torah.

There were also stormy outbursts of rage that mercilessly denounced the establishment of the heliocentric world figure. Thus, in the preface to his treatise (Venice 1575), the mathematician Maurolico allowed himself to publish this comment: "Long live the name of Copernicus, who allows the sun to stand in its place and rotate the earth like a spinning wheel. He deserves to be flogged."

In writing this article I used the chapter on Copernicus "in the book Man and the Universe - a journey full of surprises in space, across the stars and the earth, the progress of science and the atom". Translated and edited by Yosef Frost, Hadar Publishing House - Tel Aviv 1964 (XNUMX).

10 תגובות

  1. Eliyahu

    A.
    Copernicus simplified the theory dramatically when he set the sun as a reference point. It is still not completely accurate, but without changing the reference point, it is doubtful whether it would have been possible to progress in understanding.

    B.
    You should read Drake's (?) book on Galileo. Galileo did not want to quarrel with the church at all. He did not want to confront the church. He was at odds with the Academy of Natural Sciences which rigidly adhered to Aristotelian theories (even though the Aristotelian theories did not quite match the empirical tests). The Academy of Natural Sciences in Italy in particular was threatened by his approach because Galileo's ideas undermined the dignity and livelihood of many academics. Those academics who were particularly offended instigated the Inquisition against Galileo to silence him. The Pope and a number of important bishops in Italy secretly supported Galileo but preferred "industrial peace" and therefore did not openly stand by his side. However, the Pope and those bishops who sympathized with Galileo advised him how he should argue with the Inquisition so that he would not be severely punished. I say this because the site here has an overly romantic view of the behavior of the academy these days, as if everyone in the academy is driven by reasons of seeking the truth only. The truth is that even in academia today, normal people live with prosaic ambitions of financial status and a desire to gain respect.

  2. Eliyahu
    The model was much better than Ptolemy's. Not exactly his - you're absolutely right about that, but the essential difference is that the Earth is no longer in the center. Ptolemy had no logical explanation for the equants and all his strange things. I think that the idea of ​​the Earth is not in the center - in general, the Earth is in motion, the land we build on is constantly moving, this is a very brave idea. The church then believed in what was written in the Bible and Aristotle's writings. Even the Protestants, who only started in the time of Copernicus, did not think otherwise for a moment.

    Regarding Kepler, you are of course right. But, it is not true what you say that every reference point can be treated equally. I have a completely closed box, except for a few electrical wires, that knows how to recognize that the earth rotates on its axis. And I assume that even more sensitive equipment can sense our rotation around the sun (for example - perhaps by the change in the force of gravity at midnight compared to noon).

  3. miracles,
    Despite the romantic description of Eyal, the truth is that Copernicus' model was not much better than Ptolemy's. He also preferred movement in perfect circles, and had to add epicyclic wheels. The same with Galileo; Not all members of the church opposed his way, and precisely the Catholics (as opposed to the Protestants) allow an allegorical interpretation of the Bible. But, they were not in a hurry to replace a scientific theory that is anchored in tradition and has practical value, without unequivocal evidence. Galileo failed in the task, what's more, he was involved in politics and propaganda as much as the church itself.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei#Galileo.2C_Kepler_and_theories_of_tides

    The first to provide a simple model of the solar system was Kepler, who gave up on "perfect" circular motion and replaced it with elliptical motion.
    (Without anything to do with this, today any system can be described from different reference points, so it is not a "real" model but a simpler and more elegant model)

  4. Ofer
    I don't think like you. Since Galileo, science has undergone a transformation. Basically - it became "science". The ancient Greeks were highly developed and much of their genius was erased thanks to Aristotle and the Christian church that supported his teachings. The ancient Greeks thought the earth was round and revolved around the sun. They knew the sizes of the Earth, the Sun and the Moon, and also the distance between these bodies.

    Aristotle did a lot of damage to science. This is what happens when reality fits theory. This is what the church did.

    When they started making observations and experiments the world changed. Copernicus analyzed the books of Ptolemy and his friends, and Kepler learned from the observations of Thibaut Brahe. Galileo was the first scientist (I think) who made observations and experiments and built a model from it. Galileo did make a mistake in his inclined plane experiment, but luckily he arrived at a correct thesis.

    From then until today, an orderly scientific method has developed. Consider that no theory based on evidence has ever been disproved.

    No one laughs at Copernicus, or those after him. Once you take God out of the equation, everything works out in a very coherent way: both physics, biology and cosmology.

  5. What fun to laugh today at those bloated men from the distant past who stuck to vain ideas, and really violently prevented new ideas from flickering into consciousness. Then and even today there were and will be egos, vested interests and all that is needed... what will future generations say about us, take scientist number 1 and send him 3000 years ahead to teach science in an elementary school... everyone will burst out laughing

  6. Does not matter

    We will not meet Copernicus, but it is very possible that he read his writings. He had access to all the research writings thanks to the fact that he had patrons, among them bishops and the Pope himself.

  7. exciting. Thanks

    (Just a note - unlike usual, this article is very flawed in its editing and proofreading. There are spelling errors, addition of words, and the editing of the topics).

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.