Comprehensive coverage

Keren Lavia is the winner of the PaymLab 2011 competition

Lavia is a doctoral student in a direct track for brain research at Bar-Ilan and Haifa universities. This is the fifth year in a row that the competition has been held and in all the competitions so far female scientists have won. Lavi will travel to the Science Festival in Chelantham, UK

Winners of the FaymLab 2011 competition. From the right: Rafi Arzi (third place), Keren Lavia (first place) and Michael Talias (second place). Photo: Sion Black
Winners of the FaymLab 2011 competition. From the right: Rafi Arzi (second place), Keren Lavia (first place) and Michael Talias (third place). Photo: Sion Black

Keren Lavia is the winner of the FaymLab 2011 competition that was held last night at Hamada in Tel Aviv. Lavia, 27 years old, is a doctoral student in a direct track for brain research at Bar Ilan in collaboration with the University of Haifa. Second place went to Rafi Arzi, a student for an advanced degree in mathematics and computer science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. And in third place, Michael Talias, PhD student at the Ichilov Hospital and the Hebrew University.
The finals were attended by nine young scientists from all over the country who had advanced from preliminary stages held at the Technion, Hamada and the Science Museum in Jerusalem. The judges in the final competition were Lior Noy, who is both a scientist at the Weizmann Institute and a facilitator and teacher at the Playback Theater Ayelet Baram-Zabari, a faculty member at the Technion in the field of scientific communication, Doron Marko - an entrepreneur and inventor, and the actor and science enthusiast Sharon Alexander.
The competition was held in cooperation with the British Council and the winner will travel in about two weeks to the science festival in Chelantham in the UK, and will represent Israel in the international FeyLab competition. Eitan Crane, the host of the evening said that the competition was made possible thanks to the contribution of Prof. Michael Sela, former president of the Weizmann Institute and his wife Sarah, thanks to his personal contribution the competition is being held this year. The director of Hamada Tahila Ben Gaya said: "In recent years, 25 people have participated in a science culture project that we organize at Hamada, and I see this evening as the pinnacle of all the activities of science culture."
Simon Kay, head of the British Council in Israel: "Scientific training gives everyone the ability to explain complexity. Different perceptions in a way that doesn't patronize people. I think all the participants did a good job."

Keren Lavia, the winner of the FaymLab 2011 competition. Photo: Sivan Shavor
Keren Lavia, the winner of the FaymLab 2011 competition. Photo: Sivan Shavor

In her lecture, Lavi referred to her field of scientific practice - memory. "When I was little and studying for exams, my father told me that you could hear the gears in my brain working, I wanted to add oil that would make it easier for the system to operate and increase memory. My academic grandfather (the supervisor of my supervisor), Prof. Yadin Dodai from the Weizmann Institute conducted experiments on rats that liked to drink fresh water, then made them nauseous from the fresh water and checked whether they remembered this and avoided this water. Then he blocked the activity of a protein that caused the rats to forget everything they knew about the taste and they did not remember the previous experiences and approached the water. The next time they caused an increased production of the protein, rats that had high levels of the protein remembered better what the rats in the control group managed to forget."
"The conclusion - memory is not a one-time process but something dynamic that the brain needs to maintain and manipulate and this protein is the engine's oil. If we activate it the memory is better. Maybe it is possible to create a miracle pill that if we take it we will have a memory so that we don't forget anything, but do we really want that?"

In a conversation with the science website, Lavi explains: "I research learning and memory processes in rats. I came to the competition through Hamda, I come here to hear lectures. I think that bringing science to the general public is very important. I have been a science lover since a young age, even when I was in the gifted project in Holon, I participated in lectures at Tel Aviv University as part of science-seeking youth.

"I started my studies during my military service in the computer unit of Maram, at the Open University. And upon release, I continued to study while working in high-tech. When I finished my bachelor's degree, I realized that I wanted to continue working in science, so I devoted all my time to that. money is not everything."

Rafi Arzi spoke in his lecture about distributed algorithms and mathematical bits of artificial intelligence. And asked what can be learned from ants walking in a straight line.
An ant walks alone in a room on a rather long and winding path. Finds a hotel, returns to the nest and calls everyone. It turns out that even though it is returning on the same winding route, the convoy of ants following it is going in a straight line, the shortest line to the destination.
It turns out according to him that the rule is simple, the ants are limited in their mental capacity and therefore their rule is simple. Each ant must follow the ant in front of it in a straight line. It turns out that each ant shortens the original route a little until you reach the shortest possible route - a straight line.
This has implications for the field of robotics, when ant robotics were developed - each robot has limited knowledge of the local environment. It turns out that such robots can be sent to field cells and they will transmit details about it, when if you feed them in this port algorithm, with very few robots you can cover a large field cell.

Michael Talias PhD student at the Ichilov Hospital and the Hebrew University deals with a field that combines neuroscience and fetal development. Babies on order.
In his lecture, he explains: "Where I work, we do a fantastic medical process. Couples come who want to be parents who carry a hereditary disease and do not want a child born to them with a serious disease. We take eggs and sperm, produce embryos, when each embryo develops into 8 cells we take a single cell, run a genetic test on it and the healthy ones are returned to the womb. The point is that apart from genetic diseases it is possible to check if he is male or female. And in a few years we will be able to check whether the fetus will be blonde with blue eyes or short and fat. We can engineer babies before they are made and this provokes harsh reactions people say we are playing God.
"There are many philosophical and ethical problems, but there is another side to the coin. If in a few years we can know the genes that control human intelligence, we can engineer babies who will be smarter than us. In 3 generations to double the IQ. It can be a disaster or a simply amazing thing. It could also be the next step in the evolution of humans. After all, from the beginning we are interfering in the evolutionary processes. Once with a stick and a stone today in the laboratory. This is a fascinating subject and contains many dangers and many hopes."

Also participated:
Idan Yelin, PhD student in the Faculty of Biology at the Technion who spoke about epigenetics when parents pass messages to their children about nutrition in addition to genes.
Racheli Yuval, who graduated with a bachelor's degree in mathematics and physics at the Hebrew University and did research work in nonlinear physics, which spoke about the relationship between a garbage bag and curled lettuce, and it turns out that the curls in both cases are fractals, that is, they are similar on any scale on which they are viewed.
Guy Ulmer is a software engineer at Cadence and has a degree in computer science at the Hebrew University who talked about multiplayer computer games such as World of Warcraft, and their relationship to predicting epidemics. This follows an epidemic that broke out and killed characters in the game, and what can be learned from this about the spread of epidemics in the real world. Except for one thing - the game developers revived dead characters, something that is a bit difficult to implement in reality.
Michal Samoni-Blank who spoke about Snow White and the poisoned apple, it turns out that not only in fairy tales, apple seeds like the seeds of many edible plants contain toxins and in particular cyanide and therefore it is not recommended to crack a cherry seed, for example. Snow White's mother just crushed an apple for her including the seeds inside.
Dafna Shizaf, who graduated with a master's degree in computer science and specialized in the field of computer translation, talked about the difficulties in the field - especially entering so many rules and linguistic rules into the computer so that it would know how to choose the right translation. It turns out that instead of making an effort, it's better to just give the computer texts in both languages ​​- for example Harry Potter books, and more. In her opinion, Shakespeare should only be translated once, and it is better for a person to do it.
Yael Barel - graduated with a bachelor's degree in biology and philosophy at the Hebrew University and has a certificate in developmental biology at the Hebrew University spoke about the toolbox of the animal world. It turns out that genes used in one animal for one thing are used in another animal for a completely different organ, which shows that the biological toolbox is limited, but diverse things can be built from it.

16 תגובות

  1. To all the detractors, the fact is that even in England they appreciated the presentation and liked the lecturer very much.
    There are people who preach about science, but they are not charismatic and there is no ear that would want to listen to them, in short they are boring, and nothing will save them...

  2. Tell me, for the next stages of the finals, isn't it worth having two parts - one in Hebrew and one in English? If you take a look on YouTube, you will see a frustrating gap between the eloquent expression in Hebrew and the slow and hard-to-understand accent in English of our beautiful scientific representatives - both straight-haired and curly-haired.
    And from another practical point of view - how can it be that such a Hamada does not have an auditorium? The whole setting was that of an end of first grade party. And it's a shame, because it was interesting and fun, just uncomfortable and not respectful enough.
    Ethan Crane, try to make your instructions more precise. You went to chat and dragged out the evening beyond what was required.

  3. It's a shame that among the first three there could only be the first three because if others were among the first three then the first three would not be the first three.

  4. The event was very fascinating and interesting. Not only the most fascinating lectures of the competitors but also the transition sections of the moderator, Eitan Crane!
    It's a shame that they gave up the crowd favorite award this year. I have no doubt that the choice of the audience was different from the choice of the judges!
    Rafi and Michael were excellent and they deserve the place they won. Regarding Keren - it is not clear how it got to the first place. Her presentation was okay, but not very interesting and rather formulaic.
    Racheli Yuval gave a fascinating and moving lecture and to my great disappointment she didn't even get third place.
    Idan Yelin also gave an excellent and surprising lecture, and demonstrated a very impressive level of mastery of the material even in the subsequent questions, which surpassed Keren's lecture.
    The comments of some of the judges, especially Doron Marko and Sharon Alexander, testified to an approach far from scientific. The scales have tipped too much towards the popular and obvious and less towards science which is interesting in itself.
    The moment that clouded the evening for him, apart from Racheli not winning, was Doron Marko's comment about Michael Talias' lecture. Mr. Marko claimed that there was no need to intervene in the selection of embryos for carriers of serious genetic diseases. This is a fundamentally wrong claim that shows ignorance and insensitivity.
    Uncle

  5. Eran -
    From the area in the audience where I sat, the feeling was that Keren was the best (even if the differences were almost negligible). To the best of my understanding, the judges acted objectively, and I agree with their decision. You can disagree with the decision they reached, but I think it's a shame to spoil this beautiful competition by throwing mud at the judges.

    And on a more positive note: congratulations to the three winners of the competition, and to all the participants in general. I enjoyed hearing you speak and being impressed by the variety of interesting topics you chose to present to us. I have no doubt that we will hear your voices again in the scientific and scientific-popular community in Israel.

  6. For 8,

    There is also a positive correlation between the final position of your favorite contestant and the degree of support for the winner. Or in simple Hebrew frustration. And that and only out of familiarity with human nature without watching the competition.

  7. In an old reader on the site and a person who was in the audience,
    It was clear that Rafi Arzi takes it in stride. I think foreign considerations came into play here.
    At best I'd say it's peer preference, at worst I'd say it's pure racism.

    The audience in this case was no less learned and no less sharp than the judges. If you ask most people what that girl's talk was about they probably won't be able to answer you, because she was much worse in terms of her interest, content, way of presentation and even punctuality. And so I think there was a kidnapper here.

    In any case - on a slightly more positive note, good luck to everyone.

    Eran

    P.S. It's a shame that by the time I respond after such a long time, it's a negative review, given these circumstances.

  8. There is also a positive correlation between early acquaintance with the judges and winning first place

  9. There is a positive correlation between the size of the contestants' smile and their position in the competition.

  10. Congratulations to the winners and on this occasion many thanks to Rafi Arzi for the great podcast. I very much hope that you will continue your important and interesting enterprise of bringing Torah to Israel and enriching our knowledge of important figures from history.

    Shabbat Shalom,
    Ami Bachar

    post Scriptum.
    It's a real pleasure to hear Rafi Arzi's accent and spelling

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.