Comprehensive coverage

Did Churchill and Eisenhower cover up a UFO report?

On Friday, 18 new files on UFO reports were published in Britain. One of them reveals that a man whose grandfather was one of Churchill's bodyguards claims that the Prime Minister of Great Britain and the Commander of the Allied Forces in World War II concluded that the discovery of the existence of extraterrestrial beings would endanger the citizens' faith in the Church * The British Ministry of Defense in response: none were found documents

Churchill makes a V sign on Victory Day in World War II. From Wikipedia
Churchill makes a V sign on Victory Day in World War II. From Wikipedia
The British Ministry of Defense released on Friday, as part of an ongoing three-year collaboration with the National Archives, 18 files containing alleged reports of sightings of unidentified objects. These are more than 5,000 pages of documents containing eyewitness testimony, letters from the public and studies discussing the question of how to handle the issue when it comes up in parliament, as it did happen from time to time.
One of the claims is that Winston Churchill plastered such a report during World War II. A scientist wrote to the Ministry of Defense that his grandfather was one of Churchill's bodyguards. He claimed that Churchill met with General Dwight Eisenhower, commander of the Allied armies in World War II and later also the President of the United States, and they discussed a case during World War II in which a British Air Force plane returned from a bombing mission and saw an object flying at an enormous speed and performed maneuvers impossible According to the bodyguard's claim, the two agreed to keep the information confidential from the public in order to prevent panic and to prevent a possible loss of people's faith in God and the church. Officials at the Ministry of Defense are investigating the claims but have not found any documents to support them, although they have admitted that documents on UFOs created before 1967 were destroyed five years later.
The documents revealed this week also show that in 1957 the joint committee of the intelligence agencies discussed the mysteries of the UFOs and at the meeting it was decided to conclude that four cases in which these objects were observed using radar remained unsolved. The report was given to the committee by the head of intelligence at the British Aviation Ministry. This kind of interest from senior officials always attracts attacks from conspiracy theorists, especially when the word intelligence appears next to the phrase UFO.

Indeed, the accusations were not long in coming, one of them being that the committee's decisions were a factor that prevented the broadcast of stories related to UFOs in the British media. There is also correspondence about two cases in which UFOs allegedly crashed - one in Wales and the other in the Peak District, and that the wreckage was disappeared by government agents. There has also been speculation about a prototype aircraft and even documents about UFO researchers being arrested after trying to break into Rodlow Manor Air Force Base in Wiltshire, where they believe UFO secrets are kept.
In any case, despite these strange cases, the Ministry of Defense continues to explain that it has not been proven so far that UFOs are what they claim to be - alien aircraft, and there is absolutely no evidence of their existence. A British national sought the help of an office to collect a gambling debt after betting 100 to 1 that aliens would land by the end of the 20th century. The office informed him that there is no evidence of such a landing.

And another prime minister who is required to handle reports about UFOs and whose correspondence with him was published in the new cluster. Elaine Pert from the city of Peterborough in the UK said she saw a bright ball from her yard. The ball flew in the sky over the city of Southall, west of London, in 1999. "I live on the flight path of civil planes and I know planes. The speed of the object was high and also its direction of flight was not similar to normal airplanes.

She wrote a letter to the Prime Minister of Great Britain at the time, Tony Blair, because she was concerned about Britain's national security. But according to her, her letter was not taken seriously. According to her, she received an answer from Konit and from her she understood that they did not intend to investigate the issue.

Civilian pilots claim that an unidentified object flew by them

Another case described in the reports revealed this week is from January 1995, when crew members of an Ahzri plane claimed that they almost collided with a UFO on a night flight near Manchester Airport.

The BBC site is removed Because it is a Boeing 737 model plane, and according to the pilot and the first officer, the object flew very close to the plane, which caused them concern. In the detailed report that the two gave to the Civil Aviation Authority, the pilot confirmed that this happened at an altitude of 4,000 feet, about 15 km east of Manchester Airport when the two saw something shining through the cockpit window.

The pilot described the object as a shining object flying under the plane on the right side of the plane at high speed in the opposite direction. The first officer said the bone was wedge-shaped, with a black stripe down the side. He estimates that its size was between a light plane and a jetliner.

At the request of the authority, the two drew what they saw. The pilot was also convinced that small white lights like a Christmas tree emanated from the bone. He was able to track the bone for two minutes through the front window and the side window. Both were sure that it was a solid bone and not a meteorological phenomenon, a balloon or any other familiar aircraft, including a military bomber. The investigation revealed nothing as to the identity of the object.

47 תגובות

  1. Liair - you are really wrong. There is much more soup of evidence, and I suggest you study the subject and not jump into different and strange claims that are not true. There is no shortage of unequivocal physical findings, so the argument that there is no evidence is either a populist argument or one that stems from a lack of knowledge.

  2. Don't know what's going on in all these classified documents, but 20% or 5% or some percentage of "undeciphered" cases does not mean that they are beings from another planet.

    As one who served in the control system of the Air Force, I can testify to dozens of cases in which I was personally involved with UFOs. The vast majority of these UFOs are clouds, or an unidentified aircraft that later became identified, atmospheric phenomena, balloons, and a wide variety of things.

    There are also reports of civilians, and not only civilians but Air Force personnel, and the rest of the security forces that follow are pretending to be nothing. Not only ground forces, aircraft also report such events at times.

    There are also the launches of Israeli fighter jets towards things like that, even again - nothing happened and Itti still hasn't come to visit us.

    There are also a large number of "unsolved" cases. These cases do not mean that we tried to find out what the reason is with a conventional explanation, but that simply no one cares. So the radar detected something. Good. The country still exists and nothing was bombed, so we will give up on the incident and not investigate it. Of course, UFO enthusiasts of any kind will immediately jump on the bargain "The Air Force launched fighter jets at an unexplained target!". No bears and no forest. Simply no one had the strength to check what it really was.

    I am XNUMX% sure that the air forces of Great Britain and the United States also operate in the same way. A UFO, to remind you - is an "unidentified object". The fact that he is unidentifiable does not necessarily mean that we tried very hard and called scientists and established investigative committees to try to identify him without success, but that it was simply not important enough to anyone to identify him.

  3. Freak - gray-green - ginger???
    Life (the world of thoughts) came to earth from space according to NASA - that is, everything we think is definitely not random and encrypted in our minds that have reached maturity and understand that we are not alone - if they were here or not it doesn't matter because our source is from the universe that multiplies and spreads life! Like stars, galaxies and universes.

  4. For anti-extraterrestrials, no less stubborn than the owners of the extraterrestrials,
    Machal offers us the question of whether there are scientific confirmations for extraterrestrials. We need confirmations, without the word scientific.
    If the claim that governments possess physical evidence of aliens and hide it is false, then all the public has is observational evidence. Hundreds of thousands of testimonies.
    You may claim that all these testimonies are - misinterpretations - hallucinations - lies.
    Since these types of arguments are repeated, the claims are also repeated. I'm reposting something I wrote before in this forum:
    The man who invented the phrase translated into Hebrew "flying saucer" was a veteran pilot in the American Air Force, more than 60 years ago. He was not drunk at the time of that flight, was not an alcoholic, not schizophrenic, lived a settled life, was an excellent technical professional - this I conclude from the fact that he was a veteran American pilot. At that time there was no alien trend.
    He returned from a training flight and reported an unusual sighting: kites much faster than his plane, round and saucer-shaped, 9 in number.
    The US Air Force mowed down this testimony using the word mirage, meaning hallucination, as Wikipedia reports.
    Anyone who knows of good reasons to deny this testimony (and several testimonies of similar weight), is welcome to justify its denial.
    The question of whether extraterrestrials have arrived in Israel should not be based on belief, nor on von Däniken, but rather on the assessment of the quality of the evidence regarding observations.
    The claim that flights assumed to be extraterrestrials have never been detected by radar is inaccurate.
    Also the claim that the existing scientific knowledge actually excludes the possibility of beings from light years away arriving in the land is true, but weak, and may be invalidated when the knowledge changes.

  5. Yes I'm sure that our extraterrestrial, which has probably traveled millions of light years in the galaxy, and most likely passed through some wormholes by the warping of space since the speed of light itself is meaningless for the distances in question.. passed through all that but!!!! It is the Earth's atmosphere that destroyed it!! Or alternatively he couldn't hide it from the other people..
    Friends, do me a favor, if you ask me if aliens exist, I will surely say yes!, if they were here? Friends, you are living in a movie, maybe we will start to believe that people will communicate with spirits?.. No alien came through here, everything is a figment of man's imagination..
    And an association like yours is natural to exist.. You are just part of the human deviations from the line of reality.. That is why we cannot make you disappear..
    In any case, maybe so that I can fly to some canteen in the distant galaxy of Starverse.. You know sitting in a pub with all kinds of races from the galaxy..

  6. During the Cold War - like the links on the website.
    With the Americans, unidentified objects would be detected over American cities the size of a human plane - do you think Russia existed? Did the world exist?

    Does it make sense that the most sophisticated intelligence systems we have do not recognize aliens but the human eye of all kinds of strangers does? Are the aliens smart enough to evade all our detection devices but dumb enough for all sorts of weirdos to find them?

    I do not rule out the existence of aliens. I reject the claim that all kinds of aliens came to Israel as long as there is no reliable evidence.

    I also think that any person who presents himself as an expert on aliens and has seen the same number of aliens as I have (it's a round number…..) is an impostor, and gives his words a false scientific appearance. 

    And by the way - I agree with every word of Michael.

  7. In the thousands of years that have passed, testimonies have accumulated about flying demons, witches who perform sorcerers and saints who fight them, the stories have changed, the demons and witches have become extraterrestrials and thousands of testimonies have accumulated from people who have met them, to all those who claim an encounter with extraterrestrials, tell them where they come from, (probably from the sun).

  8. Ron, we're done, I block you and delete any of your messages that you manage to filter if it says good morning.
    If my time is not valuable to you, then your efforts to spread nonsense are not valuable to me either.

  9. common extraterrestrial:
    Your words are not correct.
    There is no person who does not believe in mathematics because mathematics is based only on laws without which our lives are not possible.
    Even deciphering a sentence is not possible without faith in the laws of mathematics.
    Mathematics in general has no axioms that humans can disbelieve.
    It should be understood that in mathematics (as it is perceived today) all the axioms describing mathematical structures do not have to be true in the physical world (in the sense that there does not have to be a physical model that supports them).
    Mathematics only deals with what follows from these axioms in case they are true, but not with the question of their truth.
    The question is what do you believe beyond mathematics.
    This is the field in which science deals, on the one hand, and faith - on the other.
    Science deals with identifying the correct laws in nature - those that can be used as axioms of a mathematical structure.
    He verifies the validity of the laws through an experiment that tests their existence directly or the existence of their consequences obtained by a mathematical calculation that assumes their correctness.
    Faith says that there is nothing to check because we believe that certain laws are true and we do not need any convincing and we certainly do not want to encounter a refutation.
    so that's it.
    I answered you even though it doesn't really belong to the discussion.
    This discussion takes place between people who all claim to accept the scientific approach and do not believe in anything (apart from the laws of logic - which, as mentioned - the whole world believes in) without being scientifically tested.
    The debate here is whether or not there is scientific confirmation of the existence of aliens.
    The aliens claim there is.
    The others claim that there is not, and that the physical knowledge we hold greatly reduces the likelihood that we will ever come across such confirmations because aliens - most likely - cannot get here at all because of the enormous distances they have to overcome.

  10. Okay, I understand, my father.

    40-year-old virgin gentleman - I despise you

    Without a choice, I will end with this:

    Secret official documents of the FBI, CIA and US Air Force from the US Archives released through the Freedom of Information Act

    *proving* that the phenomenon is real, is taken seriously by the establishment and is confidential.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdKCc8YhzaU

  11. Maybe you didn't understand the sense of humor, I meant to say that in that there is a chance of alien bacteria (even if slight) I agree with your opinions, and for that I wanted to and even gladly. Beyond that, we do not agree on the issue of encounters with aliens.

  12. Father, you are completely confused - where did I talk about adjusting opinions? I told the respondents that you wanted us to understand that we respect each other despite our differences of opinion. It's strange to me because you felt differently, and I think this is another example of how you use the reflections of your heart to interpret reality, not necessarily the facts. By the way, the fact that you haven't heard doesn't make the thing you didn't hear non-existent, as you know and indeed there are certainly "encounters with alien bacteria", but that's not the point and it's not the subject of the discussion.

    As far as the validity of conspiracy theories is concerned, I recommend that you read my article that deals with the detail of how conspiracy theories should be approached and analyzed from a scientific point of view, as it explains the difficult problem when one begins to develop theories, or reject them, based on emotions and beliefs:

    http://www.nrg.co.il/online/15/ART1/619/058.html

  13. Just to remove doubt and to explain a little:

    1. The cases published in Great Britain are civil cases. They do not contain information concerning national security. All in all, they contain information that came from the public and sometimes from the security forces. There is no research or research results. There are only testimonial forms.

    2. In the Blue Book Project, Report No. 14, which was an official project of the USA - about 21% of all events remained unsolved. I won't go into detail, but tests were done that rule out any other possibility, including natural phenomena, forgeries, identification errors, etc.

    3. In the Condon report, of the University of Colorado - about 30% of the incidents (probably even up to 50%) remain unsolved.

    The small examples above, which constitute only a part of all the studies that were published, only make it clear that the subject has not been studied enough and to say that the percentage of incidents is negligible and therefore there is nothing to study, has no hold on reality and the studies that have already been done.

    Hanan Sabat
    http://WWW.EURA.ORG.IL

  14. Ron, you probably don't care if there are new updates on the site tonight, because you think all I have to do in life is watch conspiracy movies on YouTube. And I ask, don't divert the discussion. Remember that at the time I blocked you and you agreed to be satisfied with one response to the article in exchange for the removal of the block. Your opinions do not interfere with the fact that you are taking up resources, mainly my time and the time of commenters.
    post Scriptum. You only forgot to point out that none of the 95% that were explained were in the explanation you would have wanted, i.e. aliens, but natural phenomena or technology. Do the math yourself, what is the chance that among the remaining five percent there will be something different?

    Gilian - I really wanted to speak to you, I lecture to everyone who invites me, and my opinions do not change depending on who invites me. I told about the discoveries on Mars about the possibility of having microscopic life in the past or in the present. But what does this have to do with the stories of the giants, after all, I have not yet heard a story about encounters with alien bacteria...

  15. Ron, what you present is not proof of the existence of extraterrestrials, but rather, proof of the existence of other people who think like you.
    This of course does not prove the existence of extraterrestrials, but it can certainly explain the phenomenon of the '40-year-old virgin'.

  16. It's very simple Ron - with all due respect to my father (who even lectured at our conference two years ago, for those who haven't caught on yet), he speaks from his heart's thoughts and private beliefs, while completely ignoring facts and findings. This is also how, for example, fans of delusional conspiracy theories operate (see for example the "Other Truth" and "Conspill" websites) - in both cases, at both extremes, what influences the opinions are beliefs and gut feelings, not an objective and scientific examination of the findings and data.

  17. Abi - don't block the discussion on such an important issue with a wave of your hand

    Come on, explain to me how this is a conspiracy theory and doesn't hold water:

    1990 The UFO incident in Belgium - radar reception + police testimony + planes launched and radar reception as well - the UFO makes impossible maneuvers and speeds - the commander of the Belgian Air Force declares - this is not human technology

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7psGj4M1ZI

  18. Ron, all conspiracy theories do not hold water from the simple explanation, these phenomena are simply observations of known phenomena, which come from an unfamiliar angle or a wrong interpretation of known phenomena. It is a fact that even the British who looked into the matter came to the conclusion that there are maybe 4 cases (out of tens of thousands) of phenomena that have not yet been deciphered, but with a very reasonable chance they too will turn out to be like the others - phenomena caused by nature or man.

    And besides, this time I took pity on you and consolidated your responses, you are not living up to the agreement.

  19. Descendant of Seidenberg:
    He who wrote the mathematics can be tested but not those who believe in it or in anything else as a starting point for their unique approach to reality
    Beliefs cannot be tested just as axioms cannot be tested
    It is not possible to check that the axioms on which mathematics is based are the best and most successful. It is possible that extraterrestrial beings exist that can show you that they are very bad and limited.

  20. And back to the topic of the article...

    Avi - thanks for the article.

    The issue is real - and one would have to be a witch not to see it after reviewing the material

    For the lazy :^) All the information on one page

    http://www.richplanet.net/group.php?thegroup=2

    See also the panel on the left side under
    Researchers
    Witnesses
    Evidence

    The big question - why is it hidden? Includes another and current answer
    to the aspect written in the article.

    And it is described by Steven Greer, head of the exposure project -
    A project that collected over 400 recorded testimonies of people from within the system
    (On its many arms - NASA and Kiyove intelligence security)
    People who decided to open their mouths and reveal the truth about the above issue

    Here is a link describing the situation
    http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=4CCE445516C207FB

  21. Indeed Arie, your correction is correct. Thanks. Just as he said, my nickname is known, and in addition, since Oni always attaches the association's website address to each of my messages here, it is not easy to find all my details there.

  22. Outside - so that's it, the math can be checked. What Gilan says is impossible. (If possible she was a millionaire....)

    Gillian - I assume that according to your answers here to me and Aria you would not have passed Question 300. I invented that you turn to the proofreader. Tell them you want to check and give them this site as an example. They will already help you.

    In general, this game of "We already know who you are" is suitable for children who read the story of Raspberry Juice and for people who believe in aliens, so I will stop here...

    And don't get me wrong. I'm really not trying to be funny or nice. I think you are endangering the public by spreading false beliefs. I am completely hostile to the ideas you spread and in my opinion it is the duty of every member of culture to behave as I do. (I don't think you have the right to present your opinions. It's just that a reformed society should expose crooks who claim the existence of aliens or connections with them without being able to prove their claims... - lest other people, easy to convince, fall into the trap!)

    And one more little thing... Wow what incredibly childish and sexist responses I had on the topic of you being over me. But I showed uncharacteristic maturity and held back!!!

    Ahhh and one more little thing...Michael...I thought about what you were thinking. Is it true that such an answer was hilarious?

  23. Michael Rothschild
    Everyone has their own star.
    Gillian has her beliefs in the stars she came from
    Others believe in New Age religions and astrology.
    You yourself have the math star and the beliefs it represents for you and your views.
    So what's the point of checking and measuring the beliefs of others according to your scale.
    After all, it is not possible to test the belief itself, so there is no point in testing such and such consequences
    that arise from the same belief for a certain person.
    After all, everyone projects their faith on everyday reality. Which makes certain facts seem tailored to that person's private beliefs.
    For this one has different standards for truth that actually stem from his belief.
    There is no advantage or benefit in testing others according to a uniform mathematical scale.
    Conflicts of this type are intractable in the first place, not even NP complete

  24. Gillian – maybe I should have written it like this:
    Netzer - it is not true that Gillian refuses to identify herself by name. Gillian is simply a nickname by which she is known.
    On the next page you can find both her full name and her nickname.
    http://www.notes.co.il/eshed/56530.asp
    For those who are interested - on the above page you can read about the "wars" of the Abami and foreigners in Israel.

  25. Gillian:
    When Netzer says that you refuse to identify yourself by name, he is telling the truth and when you claim that he is lying - you are lying.
    When someone says that you refuse to identify yourself - it is clear that what is meant is that you refuse to identify yourself as the writer of the specific comments in question and not that you refuse to identify yourself at the bank.
    Here on the site - you have never identified yourself as far as I know (and I checked carefully after you once told me a similar lie).
    By the way - if by chance I missed something and yet you identified - then your claim against Aryeh Seter is empty of content! There is no offense in voting on the identity of someone who has already identified himself.

    And just a piece of advice: you would have a much better chance of convincing people of the alien lie if you hadn't lied even on subjects they could check.

  26. Respondent 17

    Sorry, you were right. These were indeed trolls and not aliens!

  27. Respondent 17

    liar!! I went to the link and all I saw there were aliens!

  28. Refuse to identify yourself by name??? Mila is rude and ignorant, but also a liar??? It's amazing that a person like you allows himself to laugh at people several levels above him, if I were you I wouldn't dare to laugh even at a garbage worker.

    And no, don't take criticism from me - just look at yourself in the mirror, because I didn't address you at all and I didn't slander you - I don't even know you, you are the one who decided to slander the association and its members in a way that would challenge the market at best, not someone who supposedly has three degrees Universities (and if that is indeed true, I wonder who the idiot is that gave them to you).

    And here's something from "the troll who pollutes the site": (Pay attention to minute 5:00 onwards: Oh, wait - who is that there? Could it be???)

    Really friendly advice - you should check things out before you show your amazing ignorance in public and make yourself a chucha and italola in the phrase, and especially you should know who you are talking to before you even start thinking about what you are talking about.

    And to Mr. Aryeh Seter: If you had consulted your lawyer before you wrote what you wrote, he would have explained to you that what you did was a violation of the privacy law, even though of course everyone who enters the association's website immediately knows who I am and even my phone number. Still - you are not allowed to write the things explicitly elsewhere.

    And there is no need to read Eli Ashad's article - the association and its members appear in countless interviews and television programs as well as articles in major newspapers (in contrast to Ashad's small, marginal and unimportant website), a small Google search is all that is needed.

  29. outsiders….

    No!!!!!!! No!!!!!!! Please do not!!!!!!!!

    I will do everything! I'm even ready to see the second Star Wars trilogy! I love Gar-Gar Binks!!!!!!!! Please… ahhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!

    Gillian….

    As someone who refuses to be identified by name and belongs to an association that does not allow people to read the contents (however, they register.... interesting....) founded by "one of the leading UFO researchers in Israel" (I wonder at which university UFO studies are taught and which outsider authorized them exactly .) But it's not really clear who the Magnificent Seven are... (Are you ashamed of your opinions? In the meantime, I'm risking kidnapping and torture by outsiders here.) It's a bit hard to take criticism from you seriously.

    If you are sure of your opinions, it is not clear why you are not picking one of the prizes promised to those who present evidence of supernatural phenomena - then you are like experts. Sounds simple doesn't it? It's also not clear why you need to make up an imaginary name for yourself that sounds like it came from the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. If you've already chosen to identify yourself with a pseudonym, then just Michal or Dana or Siglit isn't good enough? Maybe you're trying to hint at something?

    And maybe... just maybe... You have no proof of the existence of aliens.
    The English government is an exemplary democracy - precisely because it allows all kinds of deranged people to write nonsense in the Sun and all kinds of UFO researchers to believe.
    The only aliens that have landed on Earth go to UFO conferences and the Rocky Horror Picture Show.

    Maybe the science site should censor... comments from people who are not ready to stand behind them with their full names.

    And yes... when I was a child my hero was Jean-Luc Picard, I really wanted to fly in fantastic ships between planets and meet sexy aliens with short mini-skirts and blow up Klingons with terrifying phasers...

    The point is that there is no proof of the existence of aliens.

    All there is is evidence of a collection of eccentricities that would not be accepted by any practical test
    Another collection of crooks who make money from the whole story. And a collection of grown children who still enjoy watching Klingons explode and sexy aliens in mini shorts.

    Now tell me which of the groups you belong to.

    And yes, I'm laughing at you or rather at the association that you represented and put a link on it - in your name.

    If you have conclusive proof of the existence of aliens as of now, proof that (speaking of England) would be signed off by Lloyds of London... then I apologize. eat the hat And even happy.
    Both because the dream of aliens can come true and also because it will finally shut up all but those who are sure that God created us only and of them I fear more. But if you don't have one, then I may be a troglodyte, but you -for sure- are a troll who pollutes a site dealing with science with baseless propaganda.

    I'm going to sleep well tonight. And if outsiders come, I hope they will look like this...
    http://www.toomanymornings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/seven-of-nine.jpg

    And by the way, I'm not the only one laughing at you, I'm pretty sure there are outsiders up there too... (I don't know him)

  30. Gillian:
    First of all - if it takes one to know one and you were able to identify such in you, it implies that you are one too.
    Besides, I didn't see that Netzer wrote that he was looking for *** at the age of 10.
    Apart from that - maybe you can clarify for us which Bib language you are talking about? After all, you also used the word *** and the fact that you used asterisks instead of letters is just a matter of spelling. What bothered you was the word "carbon"?

  31. Descendant:
    Be warned! We read what you wrote and registered you. Pay attention tonight you are in the crosshairs.
    Gillian
    Thank you very much for drawing our attention to Netzer's problems.

  32. By the way, Netzer, I would like to point out that relative to someone who boasts 3 academic degrees, your language remains the language of bibs. Needless to say, this type of language caused the suspension from the association's website of those troglodytes you apparently represent. I will thank my father if he censors the obscenities in your original message as well. The knowledge site is, after all, a serious and high-level site that has no place for market language of the lowest kind.

  33. Shhhhh... you just forgot to mention what you eat. By the way, were you looking for *** already at the age of 10? A bit early, isn't it? And like a good Jew, I will answer you with a question after a question: who are "the members of your association"?

  34. Gillian…. You are quite right except for the issue of facial hair. That's a fairly accurate description of me at age 10.

    In the meantime, I developed facial hair, limited willingness to shave (and bathe), got married, had a daughter, earned 3 college degrees, worked long periods in 4 countries, founded a company, raised money, took 2 trips around the world, did business, made money, lost money, I've been to a live Bruce Springsteen concert, I've played in the European Student Bridge Championships, I've written code that is used by millions of people and I've achieved ***. Several times.

    It's a shame that the company in your association stayed at age 10...

    (And another question.. Why did you suspend them?)

  35. We certainly had some such operatives, and they were of course suspended. I believe that since you were able to give such precise and scientific signs in them, that you yourself were one of them because it is known that it takes one to know one.

  36. It may just be my opinion but it seems to me that aliens have indeed arrived on Earth.

    To the rabbi, these are young guys, with excess facial hair, sometimes they look like a tzuvka. They are thought to be volcanic. They also eat what Klingons wouldn't touch and can't get a fuck.... (The kind that involves another carbon-based creature and goes for two...)

    Oh yes... and they are active on the site http://www.eura.org.il

  37. Michael - the quote you brought from "Haaretz" is an interpretation of the local reporter, not a correct figure. Surely there is a launch of planes for any unidentified object, whether it is from here or not, it is ridiculous to think that there won't be one. What a luck that neither you nor the "duplicated" reporters of the country, do not sit in Haya'a!

    But what is more interesting here is that you always deal with all kinds of delusional nonsense and stupid comments by reporters, not only without knowing at all what it is about, but systematically and blindly just to try in a truly pitiful way, to refute reality, just to push your private beliefs.

  38. For more information, I invite surfers to contact the website of the UFO Research Association:

    http://WWW.EURA.ORG.IL

    To Michael - the addition of the Haaretz website does not exist in the records, but was added thanks to the reporter herself, who decided to add information that has no basis in reality.

    The UFO phenomenon never went away and never stopped in Britain.

    Aircraft launches exist everywhere, even in Israel, but not as it was in the Soviet Union (where there was an order to try and intercept any unidentified object), after all, in Israel (and probably in all countries belonging to NATO), an order was issued that these objects should not be intercepted unless In the event that a direct order was given to do so.

    Hanan Sabat
    http://WWW.EURA.ORG.IL

  39. See here:
    http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/spages/1183367.html

    I am qouting:

    One of the documents is a memorandum, from which it appears that fighter jets of the Royal Air Force were launched approximately 200 times a year during the Cold War to investigate UFOs that appeared on radar. With the collapse of the Soviet bloc, and after Moscow stopped sending spy planes into British airspace, this phenomenon of jet-launching disappeared.

  40. So since everyone has cameras on their cell phones the aliens decided not to come anymore? 🙂
    Wait, maybe people take pictures of them all the time, but the aliens wipe their brains. Or better yet, the government, with the help of alien technology, is erasing their brains... wait, I know, the government is the aliens! Conspiracy, anyone?

  41. As said here:
    "Agreed to keep the information confidential from the public to prevent panic and prevent a possible loss of people's faith in God and the church."
    I'm sure that they are hiding from the innocent citizen, or whatever you call it, evidence, etc., of the crooks.
    With the things I experienced I am 100% sure of what I saw and with certainty I say that everything exists.
    I would detail here what I saw, but there are so many things that there is no point in it and no one will believe it anyway..

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.