Comprehensive coverage

Filed a lawsuit against carbs

More data has been discovered showing that it is pure carbohydrates, and not fats, that endanger the heart

Food rich in carbohydrates. From Wikipedia
Food rich in carbohydrates. From Wikipedia
By Melinda Wenner Moyer

"Eat less saturated fat!" This has been the message of the United States government to the public for the past 30 years. And Americans did heed the message and, since 1970, have reduced their daily intake of calories derived from saturated fat. However, during this period the rate of obesity doubled, the rate of diabetes tripled and heart disease is still the number one cause of death in the US. A flurry of new studies, including a meta-analysis of nearly 24 studies, now points to why: The researchers may have ordered the wrong suspect. It is possible that processed carbohydrates, which many Americans eat today instead of fat, increase the risk of obesity, diabetes and heart disease even more than it does - a finding that has weighty implications for the new dietary guidelines expected to be published this year.

In March 2010, the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition published a meta-analysis, that is, an analysis of data from several different studies, in which they examined the relationship between the declared daily food intake of almost 350,000 people and the risk of developing a disease in the cardiovascular system over a period of 5 to 23 years. The analysis, conducted under the supervision of Ronald M. Krause, director of atherosclerosis research at the Oakland Children's Hospital Research Institute, found no relationship between the amount of saturated fat consumed and the risk of heart disease.

This finding joins other conclusions that have emerged in recent years, challenging the popular opinion that saturated fat is harmful to the heart because it raises the total cholesterol level. This opinion "is largely based on assumptions that are not supported by the data," Kraus says.

One of the flaws in the old way of thinking is that "the total cholesterol level is not such a good measure of the level of risk," says Meir Stamper, professor of nutrition and epidemiology at Harvard University's School of Public Health. Saturated fat does raise the levels of "bad" cholesterol, LDL, in the blood, but it also raises the level of "good" cholesterol, HDL. In 2008, Stamper participated in a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in which 322 moderately obese subjects were followed for two years. In these two years, the subjects followed one of three dietary regimes: a low-fat diet with a restriction on the amount of calories, based on the guidelines of the "American Heart Association"; Mediterranean diet with calorie restriction, rich in vegetables and low in beef and a low-carb diet, without calorie restriction. Although the subjects who followed the low-carb diet ate the most saturated fat, the ratio between HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol was the healthiest for them, and they lost twice as much weight compared to the subjects who ate little fat.

Stamper's findings not only suggest that saturated fat is not so bad, they also show that carbohydrates may be more harmful than it is. In another study in which Stamper participated, published in 1997 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, 65,000 women were examined and rated according to the consumption of carbohydrates that are easy to digest and assimilate, that is, carbohydrates with a high glycemic index. They found that the risk of women in the top 20% of this ranking, that is, those who consumed the most easily digestible carbohydrates, of developing type 2 diabetes was 47% greater than women in the lowest 20% of the ranking (the amount of fat the women ate did not affect the risk of developing in diabetes.) A study conducted in the Netherlands in 2007 and published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology examined 15,000 women and found that women with excess weight in the highest quartile, that is, those who consumed meals with the highest average glycemic index (this is an estimate that takes into account the size of the portion) are at high risk 79% develop coronary artery disease compared to similar women in the lower quartile. Part of the explanation for these trends could be the see-saw effect that carbohydrates with a high glycemic index have on the blood glucose level. These fluctuations can stimulate the production of fats and encourage the development of inflammation, increase total calorie intake and reduce insulin sensitivity, says David Ludwig, director of the obesity treatment program at Boston Children's Hospital.

Will the current concept regarding fats and carbohydrates be expressed in the federal dietary guidelines for the American public in 2010, guidelines that are updated once every five years? It depends on the reliability of the evidence, says Robert C. Post, deputy director of the USDA's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. Findings that are "less established are added to the to-do list that requires further research." Right now, Post explains, the main message from the authorities to the American public is to reduce calorie consumption in general, regardless of the type of food. "We believe that the message to consumers should be short, simple and to the point," he says. Another issue facing the regulatory authorities, notes Temper of Harvard, is that "the sugary drink industry operates a very strong lobby and tries to cast doubt on all these studies."

No one is saying that everyone should be chowing down on saturated fat right now, even if that sounds tempting. There are types of unsaturated fats, such as those found in fish and olive oil for example, that can protect against heart disease. Furthermore, there are certain high-fiber carbohydrates that are undoubtedly healthy for the body. But it may eventually turn out that saturated fats have almost no effect compared to carbohydrates and processed sugars found in, for example, breakfast cereals, bread, pasta and cookies.

"If you reduce the consumption of saturated fat and replace it with carbohydrates with a high glycemic index, not only is there no benefit, it may even be harmful," claims Ludwig. The next time you eat toast with butter, he says, think about the fact that the butter is actually the healthiest ingredient in it."

9 תגובות

  1. This lifestyle suits me very well (a genetic factor that can be tested by trial and error or by a test ordered online that answers whether a low-fat or low-carbohydrate diet is suitable - inherenthealth.com)

    Some interesting links:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_research_related_to_low-carbohydrate_diets

    An Israeli study among the most important conducted in the field (tested on the population of KMG employees)
    http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/3/229

    In my opinion, the real and simple reason behind the success of low-carb diets: more satisfying proteins
    http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/87/1/44

    For the "published instructive study" - very interestingly, the research was done on human cells, in contrast to similar studies done on mice.

    For health

  2. Normal cells survived longer and pre-cancerous cells died when given
    A smaller amount of glucose diets that limit calories - especially
    In the form of limiting glucose consumption - helping the body's cells to live a long time
    יותר

    ▪ ▪ ▪
    The decision to eat another dessert after the meal may not be
    The best strategy for a long cancer-free life. So according to researchers
    from the University of Alabama, who were able to show exactly how restrictive diets
    Calories - especially in the form of limiting glucose consumption - help cells
    the body to live longer.

    This discovery, published in the online edition of the FASEB newspaper, could perhaps
    lead to the development of drugs and treatments that will slow down the aging process and prevent it
    Cancer development in the future.

    The researchers hope that the knowledge that reducing the amount of calories prolongs
    The lifespan of normal cells will lead to further discoveries of the causes
    for these effects in different cell types, and will help in the development of innovative approaches
    for life extension. They also hope that these studies will contribute to the improvement of the roads
    To prevent cancer and other diseases related to aging with the help of controlling consumption
    The calories of specific cell types.

    To reach the discovery, the researchers used normal lung cells and cells
    Pre-cancerous lung that was in the beginning stages of cancer formation. two
    The cell groups were grown in the laboratory and given normal or elevated levels
    Low glucose (sugar). As the cells grew over a period of no
    For weeks, the researchers monitored their ability to divide, and continued to monitor
    The number of cells that survived during the period.

    They found that the normal cells survived longer, and many of the cells
    The pre-cancers died, when they received a smaller amount of glucose. activity
    The genes were also measured under the same conditions. The limited consumption of
    The glucose caused a greater activity of a gene in the normal cells
    which dictates the level of telomerase - an enzyme that extends their lifespan -
    and to a lesser activity of a gene (p16) that slows down their growth. effects
    Epigenetics (effects unrelated to gene mutations) were the cause
    the main one in changing the activity of these genes when they responded to a decrease in levels
    the glucose.

    The researchers are convinced that they are on the right track to "convince" the cells to allow us
    To live many more years, and maybe even healthier years and without cancer.

  3. Well, in the end it will be like in a sleepy movie... Woody Allen probably really predicted the future...

    Personally, I really avoid a lot of carbs,
    Meat, vegetables and grass (lettuce, bibi) is most of my food.
    There are of course carbohydrates, but relatively the distribution is equal.

    And after that I go to the meadow and rummage…. 😀

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.