Comprehensive coverage

The Predator - the controversial figure of a half-billion-year-old biological terrorist

Anomlocaris was unlike any other known creature that lived in its time. In fact, many believed that it was also unlike any creature that exists in the present

Reconstruction of the Anomalocaris skeleton. From Wikipedia
Reconstruction of the Anomalocaris skeleton. From Wikipedia

Fossils found in western China shed new light on the nature and modus operandi of one of the earliest super predators on Earth. A top predator is an animal that stands at the top of the food chain in a given environment. That is, it feeds - directly or indirectly - on almost all other animals, and no other animal feeds on it. This is an extinct animal called Anomalucaris, which about half a billion years ago, probably ruled the water bodies of the earth, like a fox in a chicken coop.

The first fossils of Anomlocaris were discovered more than a hundred years ago, in 1866. Unfortunately, these were parts of an external skeleton, from which it was very difficult to reconstruct the body structure of the entire animal. Since then, more fossilized exoskeleton parts of the Anomlocaris have been found in various parts of the world, but no complete exoskeleton has ever been found. This is how the paleontologists tried, for years, to put together the different known parts of the animal, like trying to put together the pieces of a puzzle game.

It seems that during these assembly attempts quite a few researchers made mistakes in their diagnosis of most of the known organs of the animal. The errors resulted from an over-reliance on the animal species that were known to the researchers. But as it turned out later, the Anomlocaris did not resemble any other known creature that lived in its time. In fact, many believed that it was also unlike any creature that exists in the present. The name of the animal - Anomlocaris - which means "strange snail", was given to it based on a wrong assumption that it is some relative of the snails - shrimp. The discoverer of the first fossilized exoskeletons of Anomlocaris, the Canadian paleontologist Jay Whitebbs, actually found only the frontal appendages of the animal, and due to their shape he believed that he had an exoskeleton of a strange exoskeleton.

Some paleontologists who came across the fossilized remains of the Anomlocaris body believed that they were facing a sea cucumber. In other cases, the researchers tried to assemble separate organs of Anomlocaris on the skeletons of other animals. The fearsome round jaws of the ancient predator were diagnosed as the remains of a jellyfish "with a hole in the middle".

Only about 100 years after its first remains were discovered, the skeleton of Anomalucaris was assembled for the first time by Harry Whittington and Dark Bridges of the University of Cambridge, England. They recognized for the first time, together, the connection between the round jaws, the protrusions that bring the food to the mouth and the whole body, which is made up of eleven parts.

From the work of Whitington and Bridges, a creature 60 centimeters long was depicted, which moved through the water using horizontal wing-like fins. The frontal appendages, which appeared to Waitives like parts of a shrimp, were in fact organs exquisitely adapted for capturing prey, cracking shells and bringing the prey to the jaws. According to this description, Anomlocaris was able to easily crack the rigid shell of the trilobites that inhabited the world's water bodies at that time. The predator's eyes were carried on short stalks and gave him good spatial vision. In its strange round mouth, the like of which was not known in the animal kingdom, there was a round ring containing 32 teeth. This ring was unable to close, but it could crush the prey and pass it inside, to another ring of teeth, and it is possible that after the second ring, deep in the creature's mouth, a third ring of teeth was waiting to complete the job.

The skeleton assembled by Whitington and Briggs looked "correct" and "logical", but it did not fit into any known group of animals. Parts of him corresponded to one group, while other parts indicate, so to speak, his belonging to another group. Because of this, it was difficult to find the evolutionary position of Anomlocaris, which raised doubts or at least discomfort as to the correctness of Whittington and Bridges' conception.

Fossils found in western China, by paleontologist Chun Yan Shen from the Institute of Geology and Paleontology in Nanjing, China, helped here. Shen found that Anomlocaris, after all, was not lonely. He was a member of a small group of animals similar to him, which Shen called "Anomlucaridids". The group was assembled on the basis of fossil finds found in western China. Since then, the findings have been studied by Shen and his colleague, Lars Ramskold, from Uppsala University, Sweden.

In their research report, Shen and Ramskold describe three different species of anomalucaridids. At first they added to Whitington and Briggs' Anomlucaris, a sort of broad tail from which two stingers extend. The second species is characterized by a wider body than the original Anomlocaris, and by shorter and thicker front extensions, which are equipped with a kind of pincers like a pair of daggers. The third species was diagnosed only based on its fossilized jaws 25 centimeters in diameter. According to the diameter of the jaws, Shen and his colleagues claim that this third species from the Anomlucaridid ​​group reached a length of two meters. Shen and his colleagues also believe that anomlucaridids moved through the water using body movements and vertical fins, similar to fish, rather than using horizontal wing-like fins, as suggested by Whitington and Bridges.

Shen and his colleagues even suggest associating other animals from the Cambrian period, to a broader group of association, together with the Anomlucaridids. The first of these distant relatives, according to Shen, is the animal from Greenland called Krigmachela, which also has two flexible front appendages, an 11-part body structure, similar limbs and two tail spines. Shen believes that another distant relative of the anomalucariids is the animal called Opbinia. This animal feeds with tube-like frontal appendages, which it uses to suck up food. It has eyes borne on short stalks and organs of movement similar to those of the anomalucariids.

Shen and his colleagues believe that the group of animals that includes the Anomlucaridids, along with the Crigamchela and the Opbinia, is a relatively close group to the group of arthropods that includes the insects and crustaceans. If this theory is correct, this means that at least a small part of the "genetic heritage" of these ancient sea monsters survived many ages and reached the animals that exist today. In fact, if this theory is correct, because then the original name given to Anomalucaris by mistake - "Strange Hasilon", is not so wrong as it might have been thought until now.

11 תגובות

  1. Come on, I don't really know what's going on with this site, but it's funny that in about three comments you managed to go from an ancient madman to a Muslim. Barbak don't be tactless.

  2. It's simply amazing, it's apparently the winning proof that Islam precedes all religions
    And this is indisputable, all the best to the Chinese researchers

  3. What to do, I live in the State of Israel and the first one who might suffer if there is a Halacha state here. Other than that, this is just a sample for sure there are more, which I will tag on occasion to bring them together.
    If you read here and there my statements regarding Iran in talkbacks as well, you would understand that I do not give a damn about fundamentalist religions, not to mention dozens of articles about the stupidity of the seminary of fundamentalist Christianity against evolution.

  4. Really, my father, this is a drop in the ocean compared to the hatred for the ultra-Orthodox, and also in the examples you brought, the criticism there is very refined. Only with your "demon-haunted country" have you already reached the XNUMXnd.

  5. Read examples about Islam on the science website, before you respond. Every religion is criticized here. Both Christianity and Islam, we simply live in Israel and see our humpback, but there are and there are other humpbacks as well. There are also Muslims who see their own hump as you can see in the following examples.

    https://www.hayadan.org.il/dan-david-prize-2205061/
    https://www.hayadan.org.il/religion-and-bioethics-1-140902/
    https://www.hayadan.org.il/category/society/skeptic/religion/911/
    https://www.hayadan.org.il/category/society/skeptic/religion/islam/

  6. Really Chaim, there is no politics on this site, on this site you should only hate Haredim, not Muslims!

  7. to Joel Although I don't usually respond but only to the point, the word terrorist is out of place and it is appropriate that the author of the article should also treat it accordingly. The correct translation is "fear" and this is how the translator should treat it. You are right that political elements should not be introduced here. But what to do, politics controls us.
    good day everybody.

  8. for life. be ashamed Go chat with the evil talkbackists of Scientific Yedioth Ahronoth and leave us out of politics on this site!

  9. I do not understand. He was a Muslim. Because there are no biological terrorists. He was hungry so he ate what he had.
    Not all Muslims are terrorists. But, all terrorists are Muslims.

  10. Looks like a very interesting creature.
    But how did you get that he is a predator?
    Or "terrorist", what's the deal?

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.