Comprehensive coverage

The inhabitants of ancient Carthage did sacrifice their children

The researchers seek to disprove the prevailing theory that one should not rely on Greek and Roman writings tainted with anti-Carthaginian racism is out of place, especially when the archaeological findings support the theory of the victims

Children's cemeteries in Carthage. The children were sacrificed to the gods. Photo by Dr. Josephine Kennin, University of Oxford
Children's cemeteries in Carthage. The children were sacrificed to the gods. Photo by Dr. Josephine Kannin, University of Oxford

After decades of tending to deny the claim that the people of Carthage sacrificed their children, a new study has revealed "overwhelming" evidence that this ancient culture did indeed perform the controversial ritual.

A joint article by researchers from academic institutions around the world, including the University of Oxford, suggests that the parents of Carthage ritually sacrificed young children as an offering to the gods. The article claims that well-intentioned attempts to identify ancient baby graves as those where babies who died of natural causes are buried are wrong. According to the researchers, the practice of sacrificing babies is what caused the establishment of the Carthaginian culture in the first place.

The study reviews literary evidence, epigraphy (the field of research that deciphers and investigates inscriptions that appear on pottery, etc.), archeology and the historical records of the Greeks and Romans that were studied until the seventies of the 20th century when researchers began to claim that the sacrificial theory is simply propaganda against Carthage.

Dr. Josephine Quinn from the Faculty of Classical Studies at the University of Oxford, one of the authors of the article, said: "It is becoming more and more clear that the stories about child sacrifice in Carthage are true. This is something the Romans and Greeks reported, and it was part of the popular history of Carthage in the 18th and 19th centuries.

"But in the 20th century, more and more people began to support the opinion that this was racist propaganda on the part of the Greeks and Romans against their political enemy, and that Carthage should be protected from this terrible slander. "What we are saying now is that the archaeological, literary and documentary evidence for child sacrifice is overwhelming and that instead of rejecting it outright, we should try to understand its meaning. "

The city-state of ancient Carthage was a Phoenician colony located in present-day Tunisia. It operated from approximately 800 BC until 146 BC when it was destroyed by the Romans.

Children, both boys and girls, at the age of a few weeks were sacrificed by the Carthaginians in places called Toft (Teft). In practice these rituals were also performed by the residents of other Phoenician colonies in Sicily, Sardinia and Malta. The dedications from the children's parents to the gods are engraved on stone tablets above their cremated remains, which ended with the explanation to the god or gods concerned "Hear my voice and bless me".

Dr. Quinn said: "People have tried to claim that these archaeological sites are cemeteries for children who were killed or died young, but apart from the fact that a weak, sick or dead child would be a rather poor offering to God, and that the animal remains found at those sites were treated in exactly the same way, It is hard to imagine how the death of a child can be considered an answer to prayer.

"Today it is difficult for us to understand people's motives for carrying out this action and why the parents agreed to it, but it is worth trying." "Perhaps this stemmed from deep religious piety, or the feeling that the good that the victim could bring to the family and the community as a whole outweighed the life of the child.

"We need to remember the high level of infant mortality in antiquity. It would have made sense for parents not to get too attached to a child who may not even make it past his first birthday. '

Dr. Quinn added: "We think of the victimization claim as libel because we see morality in our own terms. But people looked at it differently 2,500 years ago. We don't have to imagine that ancient people thought like us and were horrified by the same things."

The reaction against the idea of ​​the Carthaginian child sacrifice began in the second half of the 20th century and was led by researchers from Tunisia and Italy, the countries where the inferno sites were found. Dr. Quinn added: "Carthage was much bigger than Athens and for many centuries much more important than Rome, and this is a fact that many have forgotten."
If we accept the fact that the sacrificial ritual did take place on a large scale, it explains why the colony was founded in the first place. It is possible that the reason the people who founded Carthage and its neighbors left the Phoenicians' original home in present-day Lebanon was because other Phoenicians objected to their unusual religious practice.

 

"Child abandonment was common in the ancient world, and human sacrifices were found in many historical societies, but child sacrifice was relatively rare. Perhaps Carthage served its founders like the founders of the settlement in America at Plymouth Cliffs, were pious in their devotion to gods who were no longer welcome in their home."

"Rejecting the idea of ​​sacrificing children stops us from seeing the bigger picture. ” she concludes.

For information on the Oxford University website

 

12 תגובות

  1. Miracles
    You meant the word, you should know that the conjunction circumcision is only since
    Abraham's attempt to sacrifice his son,
    - Those who refer to the subject must internalize the difference between a word and a covenant,
    - There were no Jews before the birth of Judah and the creation of the tribe of Judah,

  2. Carthage in Greek and Latin is a corruption of the Canaanite word "Karta Hadta" and in Hebrew "the new city" in contrast to the city of Tire in Lebanon which was the origin of the settlers in Carthage.

    The researchers' conclusions agree nicely with what is written in the Bible about the corrupt and immoral Canaanite worship.

  3. As for the child sacrifices in Phoenician Carthage, a chilling Talmudic testimony tells of the origin of the name Guy ben Hinnom - at the top of which one-year-old babies would crash to death and so that the mothers would not hear the cry of the unfortunates, the priests would beat drums and percussion instruments with great force. Later, the sacrifice was transformed, sublimatively, into a goat, a goat (hence the name goat of hell), in which all the sins of the children of Israel were burned, and in his cruel death, atonement and forgiveness came to them.
    It can also be assumed that the ritual of redemption of the eldest son had its origin in a human sacrifice which was converted into an animal sacrifice and the latter was converted in the modern ceremonies of the redemption of the eldest son with a symbolic payment

  4. The reaction against the idea of ​​the Carthaginian child sacrifice began in the second half of the 20th century and was led by researchers from Tunisia and Italy, the countries where the
    There was no criticism of the Japanese for two thousand five hundred years? It seems that the researchers did not read the text Natmachi. There are severe warnings against idolatry (the Philistines would throw their children into the fire of an idol called Moloch). It was an ancient ritual that continued even after...how do we know? Because Muhammad also warns against the same ritual in the Koran

  5. Our father Abraham was also about to sacrifice his son Yitzchak, since this is where the custom of the word comes from.

  6. The ritual of child sacrifice in pagan religions in the Middle East was a common ritual and has many references and evidences in the Bible.
    The Phoenicians who originated from Tire and Sidon worshiped Baal who was also the main god in the countries of origin. The cult also penetrated into Judah and it is said that King Ahaz passed his son through fire. A sharper proof is found in the war against Moab where they sacrificed the king's son to Chemosh in order to save the city. It makes a lot of sense with all the sympathy for the Phoenicians who did act like that.

  7. I guess the S is because they found quite a few sites like this. Do you think it should be translated to "hell" (as it is written in today's Hebrew?)

  8. The translation of the article should not include the word "tophets" as it is, because there is simply no such thing as 'tophets' in Northern Canaanite which is Phoenician. The letter 'S' comes only in English, in plural. There is only a 'tafat' (T in a dreamless one) - a focus, a fire [see for example: Jeremiah 14:10, or XNUMX Kings XNUMX:XNUMX]. Anyone who has ever studied the Bible in the Hebrew education system should know this or at least understand it, and also understand the compromise of the idol phenomenon discussed in the article according to the meaning of the concept in the Bible.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.