Comprehensive coverage

to act against the criminals for the sake of nature

Recently, the nature conservationists celebrated Wildlife Day. On the occasion of the day, the President of the UN General Assembly and the Secretary of the Organization hosted representatives of countries and organizations who are discussing the possibilities and challenges to increase the international efforts to fight crimes against wildlife and the environment.

A young orangutan in Borneo. Photo: shutterstock
A young orangutan in Borneo. Photo: shutterstock

Recently, the nature conservationists celebrated Wildlife Day. On the occasion of the day, the President of the UN General Assembly and the Secretary of the Organization hosted representatives of countries and organizations who are discussing the possibilities and challenges to increase the international efforts to fight crimes against wildlife and the environment.

In Kenya, the president set 5 tons of tusks on fire. According to the reports, there are about 15 more tons in the warehouses that were confiscated. If you calculate the maximum weight of large elephant tusks at 40 kg, then in a careful calculation, in order to collect so many tusks, at least 500 elephants were killed, and this is only what was seized in Kenya, that is, the numbers are tens of thousands larger.

Many different organizations are initiating discussions, proposing initiatives and working to reduce the harmful activity, while at the same time there is increasing recognition of the direct connection between the damage to the environment and the activities of criminal organizations and armed militias around the world.

According to UN Secretary Ban Ki-moon: "The criminal trade in wildlife undermines the security of countries, harms the environment and is an obstacle to the efforts of rural and indigenous populations to manage natural resources in a sustainable manner, the fight against crimes is essential for conservation as well as the possibility of sustainable development", more The secretary added that "this struggle will contribute to achieving security and peace in troubled areas where conflicts and confrontations are fueled by criminal activities."

According to a report by the "State of Biodiversity in Africa", about 6500 animal species and 3000 African plant species are defined as facing extinction. In the last 20 years, wetlands and lakes, rainforests and dry forests have been destroyed at a rate of XNUMX percent every year.

Africa has the highest percentage of developing countries in the world and accordingly a constant increase in the demand for resources. When the exploitation of natural resources exceeds the rate of regeneration and when there is added to that wild hunting of animals and cutting of trees that goes against the laws and regulations, the natural environment is in tangible danger. Severe damage to forests and wetlands causes a significant danger to the ability to supply water to people (and nature).

Every year, swamps and lakes are drained and about 30,000 square kilometers of forest are cut down to provide food for the growing population and make room for agriculture and, moreover, to develop industrial crops such as oil palm and jatropha (for bio-fuel).

The data shows that an attack carried out by criminal organizations is considered one of the larger "initiatives" of the criminal organizations, an activity equal in size to the trafficking of drugs, weapons and people. The criminal trade causes destruction to natural resources and seriously harms the economy of developing countries, damage estimated at billions of dollars.

Every year, about 25,000 elephants are killed in Africa out of a population of about 500,000. Between 2002 and 2011, the Philly-forest population was reduced by 62%, all this to satisfy the demand for ivory that was sold to consumers (mainly in China) for about 170 million dollars.
According to data from CITES, the killing of elephants exceeds the natural growth capacity of the elephant population. According to the report, in 2007 "only" 20 rhinos were killed in South Africa, but in 2014 the number reached 1,215, meaning a rhino was killed every eight hours. The value of the rhinoceros horns that reached the market was close to 200 million dollars.

Great Apes Survival Partnership (GRASP) reports that the illegal trade in live apes has increased to the point of a real risk to: chimpanzees and gorillas in Africa and orangutans in Asia, in 2014 2 orangutans were captured every week. Many of the monkeys do not reach the "market" as they die during and after the capture. The estimated harm is to 220 chimpanzees and 15 gorillas every year.
- One of the symbols of Rio (Brazil) is the blue macaw (Spix's macaw) which is considered one of the rarer species, today there are about 80 individuals, most of them in the hands of foreign "bird watchers",
- Pangolin is considered one of the most sought-after mammal species in the market (for traditional medicines). According to an estimate in the last decade about a million individuals were hunted.

I should point out that rhinoceros horns and pangolin scales are made of keratin (like hairs and nails) and are mainly used for "medicine" and that is why in the past I have already offered consumers to chew nails.

- Not only animals, plants are also destroyed for the fulfillment of unnecessary ambitions/ one of the victims is the "rose tree" (Delbergia) which is used for luxury furniture and musical instruments, various species that grow in the forests until they are cut down and trafficked against the law and again those involved are criminal organizations.
According to CITES, significant amounts of the wood are cut and smuggled from Madagascar, Southeast Asia, and Central America. Between 2011 and 2014, about 5,000 tons of wood smuggled from Madagascar were seized (in different countries). In December 2014, Hong Kong seized 90 tons of wood smuggled from Honduras, as well as shipments of wood from Southeast Asia. It is clear that the "seizures" are a small part of the smuggling that has been increasing in recent years,

On the margins of things, the close connection between the protection of the natural environment and the importance of encouraging and helping the existence of indigenous populations becomes clearer and clearer, a global organization for the protection of indigenous rights (Survival International) reveals vulnerabilities in tribal populations (in the name of protecting wild animals).

The conservationists and indigenous populations have similar goals and similar enemies, therefore there is a constant search for a common basis that will allow the preservation of forests inhabited by indigenous people whose existence in the forest in many cases improves the condition of diverse habitats.
Many of the natives who live in the forests have traditions and behavioral systems of sustainable resource consumption, for example when the "Baka" people clear a forest clearing. Over the years, the clearing becomes a secondary forest, which the gorillas prefer, when they collect roots and edible plants they (always) leave plant parts that grow, multiply and are eaten by pigs or elephants.

External pressures such as deforestation, road construction, quarrying, drying up of swamps, etc. cause the removal of the natives from the area and a double harm: to the natives and to the natural environment.
- The Bayaka people ("Bayaka" Pygmies) who live in the forests of the Congo basin live in a close and intimate relationship with their environment, and yet they suffer harm from the hunting inspectors who are appointed and financed by international conservation organizations,
- The lives of thousands of Baiga people in India were destroyed when they were forced to evacuate the Kanha Tiger Reserve. The people were scattered and left without land and without an existential basis. Of course, tourists who visit the reserve and enjoy it are not aware of the damage.
The organization Survival International calls for a radical change in the conservation policy, which will be based on the principle that the natives/tribals are the good keepers and usually their removal from their territory causes environmental damage.
Therefore, those who are involved in the conservation of nature and the environment must recognize that - people of tribes / native populations manage their environment in a sustainable manner over generations. Usually, when they are removed from their territory, damage is caused to the environment, this removal also constitutes a violation of human rights and therefore the conservationists must oppose it. In many cases, the most correct way to preserve an area of ​​environmental importance with a high diversity of species would be by respecting the rights of the natives.

In terms of nature conservation organizations, one of the best ways to promote conservation is through tourism development. For native populations, sustainable use of animals and plants for food and medicine is a vital need, therefore when developing tourism in reserves it is necessary to find a way to integrate the natives and not evict them. This is done in a number of reserves in East Africa or the Amazon basin, where the natives are the inspectors and the officials such as guides, or hotel workers. The same is the case in Namibia, where you can travel with a Sun (Bushman) guide in the Kalahari,

Nature conservation organizations have learned to recognize and appreciate the contribution of indigenous people to the environment and there are more and more collaborations, for example between the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and the organization for the protection of indigenous rights - Survival International. As part of the partnership, it is necessary to overcome corruption in local governments,
As well as the enactment of local and international laws that will establish the status of the natives and at the same time strengthen the activity against hunting and wild logging. Collaborations that integrate the natives so that their status will be preserved and at the same time they will serve as part of the system for preserving nature.

To stop the ongoing damage to the environment and indigenous populations, African countries are taking steps and measures designed to initiate development without damage. Countries initiate a "practical policy for the conservation of biological diversity" (National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP)).
Several countries have already exceeded the goal of 11% protected areas. In cooperation with other countries, African countries are launching ten-year plans for "Sustainable Consumption" and in cooperation with neighbors, trans-boundary conservation measures are being established.
In many countries there is activity of afforestation and restoration of wetlands. With the help of external organizations, there are (successful) attempts to moderate the wild hunter and the wild animal trade.

Many Israelis visit Africa and enjoy one of the most beautiful natural spectacles, they should be aware of the dangerous state of the natural environment and the African wildlife.

8 תגובות

  1. Markets:
    Read again... the ivory is not used by the natives but is sold mainly to markets in Asia,
    Read again... it doesn't say "do what they want" but: integrate them into supervisory positions
    and providing tourist services,
    positions that will allow them to profit from conservation
    and thus improve their quality of life,
    He improved to include: education, medicine, etc.
    (It has already been said that "reaction threshold in reading comprehension")...

  2. Hello Assaf,

    I didn't understand how in the same article you talk about the obligation to take better care of criminals who kill elephants for the ivory.
    whose value is high mainly because it is used by African natives as sham drugs and sorcerers.
    After that you say that it is better to let the natives take care of nature and do what they want. This may be true if the natives are almost completely cut off from the world or if you deny those natives access to medicine and technology, so that they cannot hunt effectively and most of them will also die in childhood, which is much more immoral than turning them away.

  3. It may be that many Africans see the elephant as a danger and a factor that occupies agricultural land and destroys agricultural crops. Therefore, they are in favor of killing elephants + eating meat + selling ivory. But this is just a hypothesis because I am not African.

  4. I can't understand why instead of fighting the demand for tusks there isn't a STARTUP that produces tusks by cloning germs.
    It's a placebo anyway.
    Produce enough -> price drops -> won't be worth hunting

  5. Regarding the wild boars, isn't it better that the Ministry of Agriculture finances the fencing of the agricultural area, than a hunter of the animals? Or surrendered to an illegal hunter (Thailand workers also hunt). There was a public struggle for the deer in the Jerusalem deer valley, why isn't there a similar struggle for the Golan deer?

  6. To ask:
    - Since I am not in the center of things, according to the external impression:
    In the academy, theories are dealt with, when they are proven to be applicable the "authority" is supposed to approve,
    As a rule, the field personnel of the "authority" are dedicated and excellent,
    What cannot always be said about the management and its leader (who hopes for "God's help"),
    The director of the "authority" and the minister of the environment are political appointments, so nature conservation is secondary
    to the nation of keeping the throne,
    - Israel is not a "lost case" since the best demographers and geographers come back and offer
    Renovate old neighborhoods and build higher (clearance) instead of encroaching on green areas.
    - In many of the settlements there is a trend of gardening with natural plants...
    - The otters return to suitable water bodies and habitats,
    - Breeding of protected wild animals (according to law)...problematic, poachers have to "deal with" aggression.
    - The pigs in the square were destroyed because they were a pest in agriculture,
    There may still be pigs on the east side of the perimeter fence.
    - After 67 it turned out that the Golan was empty of soldiers and a project of recapture was carried out,
    (Goats were also resettled in the Jewish forest),
    Over the years they have multiplied but due to pressure from farmers/cattle herders
    In front of deer, wolves and jackals, there was (and is) mismanagement of the system
    which causes unnatural pressure on the deer population...
    - As in the Golan, so in large areas the (relatively new) Israeli farmers
    They didn't learn what every farmer in Europe knows - wild animals are neighbors not enemies,
    Since farmers have a strong "lobby", once again the politicians are the ones who decide
    and not the professionals,
    The best example of this is the wrong treatment of dogs that went wild...

  7. Assaf Ham As an ecologist, you know if there are in the Academy and the Nature Authority. Strategies for preserving Israeli nature? Is this a lost cause, in the face of development pressures? Maybe using natural plants for gardening and urban decoration? Let's say Aloni Tabor in the streets of Tiberias. Or giving permission to breed porcupines and golden squirrels by citizens, so that they are not hunted in the wild, and so that they are returned to the wild in cases of successful breeding.

  8. In Israel, the Nature and Parks Authority has failed to protect wild boars in the square (their southernmost distribution area) and also a big failure in protecting otters. Porcupines have become rare (their meat is loved by hunters). Regarding the rosewood, it seems to me that a subspecies of it (perhaps the wing) is used in Israel for decoration. Musical instrument manufacturers use it (builder of more and guitars). Perhaps we can point out that the Israeli wild deer is almost extinct from the Golan. Your thread is interesting, and fun to read. Asaf.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.