The article was published in the last issue of "Astronomy", in the town of the Israeli Astronomical Society
Yehuda Sabdarmish
Direct link to this page: https://www.hayadan.org.il/kgchange270304.html
introduction
The weight of a body on Earth should be a constant size over time. No existing theory allows for the existence of a change in weight solely because time has passed.
Is it possible that reality is not like this?
This article was written following an article published in the New York Times on May 27.5.2003, XNUMX and posted here, on Avi Blizovsky's Hidaan website. The name of the dictation:- when the kilogram loses weight.
With the permission of Avi Blizovsky, below is the beginning of the article as it appeared on the Hidan website. (The emphasis in the article was made by the author of the article):-
********
When the kilogram loses weight
Scientists around the world are looking for an alternative definition for the kilogram, after the basic unit of measurement proved unstable
By New York Times 12.6.2003
Direct link to this page: https://www.hayadan.org.il/kilogram1.html
It seems that the cult of thinness has also attacked the kilogram itself: according to scientists, the standard unit of weight is losing weight, and this causes those involved in science embarrassment and confusion. The kilogram is defined by a platinum-iridium cylinder, cast in England in 1889 and kept under heavy security in an estate outside Paris. No one knows why it loses weight, at least compared to other weights, but the change has sparked international research in an attempt to find a more stable definition for the kilogram.
Although the change in the kilogram is only 50 micrograms, less than the weight of a grain of salt, this is enough to disrupt scientific calculations. "It certainly doesn't help to have a standard that changes," said Dr. Peter Becker, a scientist at the US Federal Standards Laboratory, where 1,500 scientists dedicate all their work to improving methods for accurate measurement.
********
(end quote)
We will examine how the "simple universe theory" relates to this strange reduction of weight.
Well, the simple universe theory, which was published about three years ago ("Astronomy", volume 26, issue 3), does not consider that there is an error in the measurements or neglect of the standard kilogram in Paris,
The simple universe theory says unequivocally that:
Bodies lose their weight over time and they do so inversely proportional to the sixth power of the linear expansion of the universe!
This calculation completely matches the measurements made on the standard kg.
I must emphasize: this is not about losing mass. This is only about losing weight.
The proof of the change in weight according to the simple universe theory
To remind you, the simple universe theory is a hypothesis theory or an idea, written by the author of the article. It is unproven (yet) and looking for the proof of its existence or its refutation.
The basic assumptions of the theory are that the universe is full of tiny particles - elementary particles, which move from anywhere and everywhere. The elementary particles actually define the universe as a large mass of gas. In addition, these particles have mass but do not have any gravitational properties. All attraction features including the gravity feature are created as a result of the impact of the elementary particles. We will explain for example the feature of gravity.
Gravity in the simple universe is obtained in the following simple way: suppose two bodies are next to each other. Bodies are hit by elementary particles from every direction except the one between them, where fewer elementary particles hit. As a result of the impact of the elementary particles, a force is obtained that brings the above-mentioned bodies closer to each other, a kind of gravitational force.
It is easy to prove that the above force acts inversely proportional to the square of the distance, and directly proportional to the product of the masses. (Proof will be sent to anyone who requires it.)
It is clear that large masses absorb more elementary particles than small masses, therefore they are heavier.
In general, a mass of XNUMX kg absorbs twice as many elementary particles as a mass of half a kg.
Why is there weight loss over time, and what is its size?
We see that the magnitude of gravity in the simple universe is determined by the flux of elementary particles hitting the weighted body.
If the flux of particles of the striking element decreases for any reason, then the weight of the weighed bodies will also decrease.
Since in the expansion of the volumetric universe, the number of elementary particles per unit volume is getting smaller, therefore the weight of the bodies will also decrease.
.
Since we know the size of the linear expansion of the universe determined by Hubble's constant, we can calculate the volumetric expansion which is a third power of the linear expansion.
But gravitation is proportional to the product of the masses, so this decrease must be multiplied by the additional decrease of the impact of the elementary particles on the earth, which is also proportional to the third power of the linear Hubble expansion; That is, reducing the flux of the striking elementary particles is similar to the situation in which we deal with smaller masses, both of the weighed body and of the earth.
Hence the weight loss will be proportional to the third power times the third power and hence, to the sixth power of the linear expansion of the universe according to Hubble.
Calculation of the size of the deviation in weight
Calculate the linear expansion of the universe for a year, i.e. how many times the length of one mega-persec in km will increase as a result of the Hubble expansion (about 65 km per second per mega-persec. One mega-persec is equal to 3.2616 million light-years).
A. The propagation of Hubble during a year is about 2.051 billion km per megafarsec (65 km per second times the number of seconds in a year).
B. Since one mega-persec per km is 3.0857 times ten to the power of nineteen km, therefore the linear expansion of the universe increases the mega-persec by 1.000000000066468 over a year. The sixth power of this number is about 1.00000000040.
third. Hence, each kilogram will lose over a year about 0.4 billionths of its weight, which is 0.4 micrograms. (microgram = millionth of a gram).
Conclusions
Pay attention to the following details that appear in the article:
A. 114 years have passed since the casting of the standard kilogram (from 1889 to 2003).
B. The standard kilogram weight loss measured in Paris is about 50 micrograms.
third. The weight loss according to the above theory is about 45.6 micrograms (0.4 micrograms per year multiplied by 114 years)
d. The deviation between what was measured and what was calculated in the simple universe theory (45.6 micrograms) is only about ten percent!
God. This small deviation can be due to a number of reasons such as inaccurate measurement of the weight deviation, constant - the weight used for the calculations is not accurate, etc.
In conclusion
It is hard to ignore a theory that so accurately predicts the phenomenon of weight loss of bodies over time, a phenomenon that other theories don't even believe exists.
There will be those who will say that this is probably a measurement error. Of course, this possibility always exists, but the author of the article thinks that the chance of this is small. They probably checked very, very well before publishing the weight loss phenomenon. This phenomenon should exist for all bodies. The uniqueness of the standard kilogram is that we have accurate measurements for it over time.
The simple universe theory is the only one that explains the strange weight loss of bodies over time,
The magnitude of the change is tiny. If we assume that the Hubble constant has not changed in the last billion years (which is not true), then a million years ago the same kilogram weighed 1000.4 grams and a billion years ago it weighed 1400 grams.
In addition, an accurate measurement of the change in weight will allow us to determine the Hubble constant accurately. For example, if the measured weight loss is really 50 micrograms, this will set us a larger Hubble constant, about 71 km/s per mega-persec.
Sabdarmish Yehuda
sevdermish@surfree.net.il
sevdermish@astronomy.org.il
The author of the article is a member of the Israeli Astronomical Society and the article appears in the association's "Astronomy" booklet that is being published these days.
The Israeli Astronomical Society
A compilation of Yehuda Sabdarmish's articles
https://www.hayadan.org.il/BuildaGate4/general2/data_card.php?Cat=~~~796349312~~~60&SiteName=hayadan
