Comprehensive coverage

"We received an important message from the first fractions of a second of the universe after the Big Bang"

This is what Prof. Mark Kamionkowski, a theoretical physicist from Johns Hopkins University, who proposed conducting the experiment at the South Pole, said in an interview with the Hidan website. Prof. Kamionkowski was a guest at the Hebrew University and delivered the lecture named after Arnold Rosenblum at the Rakeh Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University.

Mark Kamionkowski. From his home page on the Johns Hopkins University website
Mark Kamionkowski. From his home page on the Johns Hopkins University website

"The discovery of the pattern in the cosmic background radiation, and therefore the proof of inflation is the most important discovery in cosmology, but it created new questions about what preceded inflation and how it was conducted in all its stages." Says Prof. Mark Kamionkowski, a theoretical physicist from Johns Hopkins University, who suggested conducting the experiment at the South Pole in an interview with the Hidan website. Prof. Kamionkowski was hosted by Prof. Zvi Piren at the Rakeh Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University and delivered the Arnold Rosenblum lecture to the Institute's researchers. A lecture that of course dealt with the important discovery of the discovery of gravitational waves in the cosmic background radiation.

As I recall, at a press conference in which Prof. Kamionkowski also participated on March 17, astronomers from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Massachusetts, from the California Institute of Technology (CALTECH) and from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California announced that, according to their calculations, they had discovered evidence of the existence of gravitational waves - ripples in the fabric of space-time. This is the first direct evidence that the universe underwent a brief but massive rapid expansion immediately after the Big Bang.

The result was obtained by scanning a section of the sky while looking for tiny changes in the pattern of the cosmic background radiation, the echo of the Big Bang that can be seen today in every direction in the sky in the microwave field, at a temperature of three degrees Kelvin. Back in the late 2010s, Prof. Kamionkowski proposed to place a telescope at the South Pole, to examine the cosmic background radiation, a discovery that was eventually made with consecutive observations over three years 2012-XNUMX by the team that announced the findings about two weeks ago.

"The discovery of cosmic inflation is surprising and tells us things we didn't know before. This is by far the biggest discovery since the cosmic constant (and the fact that the universe is expanding rapidly) in 1998. In my opinion, over time it will be revealed that this is an even more important discovery. In any case, both discoveries were unexpected and through them we learned new details about the universe and how it behaves.

If we interpreted the signals correctly, this is a greeting from the universe when it was a trillion-trillionth of a trillionth of a second after the big bang. We know this is only the tip of the iceberg. The list of things we don't know will always be longer than the list of things we already know and it's exciting to discover something new every time.

The current inflation model generically predicted the existence of gravitational waves, but we did not know how strong the signals we would see, once we discovered the signs and we know their strength it will be easier to focus the search and answer other important questions such as how the inflation of the universe developed step by step, and in particular what It preceded it, because inflation has the property of erasing all the information that existed before its occurrence.

What caused inflation?

"That's a good question. As I mentioned, the observations made as part of the research give us reason to believe that there was inflation. There are many theories that try to explain why it happened. We still don't know what the correct inflationary theory is, but the range of possibilities has narrowed and through further research and measurements we will know why it happened."

Why was it actually necessary to move to the South Pole, is it because there are continuous nights for half a year, doesn't that make the research more expensive?

"The cost of a telescope at the South Pole is not that great. It is difficult to estimate its exact cost acceleration because the National Science Foundation (NSF) already operates the station at the South Pole for other purposes, so there was already an infrastructure for such an experiment. The cost of the telescope and the experiment itself is not that great, compared to cosmological studies. Indeed, the team members went down there in our winter - which is summer in the southern hemisphere, and they leave in the Antarctic winter, except for a researcher on duty who operates the systems in winter, the observation work itself was carried out remotely. Since these are radio waves, day or night does not matter, except for the hours when the sun is directly above you and in the observations conducted over three years. In addition, this is an area free of disturbances."

"Their data spans from 2010-2012. They also used data from a previous study carried out (with less advanced equipment) in 2006-9 and collaborated with another study whose results were also included in the calculation."

They discovered a pattern in the polarization of the cosmic background radiation known as BMODE, which is proof of the existence of gravitational waves. However, they observed a very small part of the sky, less than 1% of the surface of the sky. We can try to measure the pattern in larger areas of the sky. From what we understand so far there is some code in this pattern and so far we have only read a small piece of the message. The next step will be to map a larger area of ​​the sky. As mentioned, this was enough to obtain proof that inflation occurred, but further measurements will reveal to us how it developed over time, and the mechanism that preceded it. There are different types of physics in areas where the conditions were completely different from those where we experience the four forces of nature today. Measuring these patterns over a larger portion of the sky may provide evidence of how this happened."

Does inflation have an effect on the way galaxies are formed?

Prof. Kamionkowski: "The answer is not much. The current discovery has not changed the knowledge we have regarding the question of how galaxies were formed, but it does raise a question regarding the effect of expansion on the distribution of galaxies in the universe. We may be able to answer a simple question through a comprehensive galaxy survey.”

What do you think about multiverse theories?
"The multiverse solution is one of the theoretical explanations for the question of why inflation was created. One of the problems with inflation is that it erases almost any sign of what came before. The new discovery does not tell us what preceded inflation, but I hope that future experiments will give us answers on the matter. However, the multiverse idea is an immature theoretical idea. The theorists refer to him all the issues for which we do not have an answer. I hope that the new measurements will find answers to questions that are still open, whether they prove this theory or another. I don't know yet what they will be. It's good because surprises are the best thing about science. Surprises by definition cannot be predicted.”

Do you believe the results, or is there still room for doubt?

"Yes, these are results with incredible consequences. If the claim is true, it is exceptional from any other claim in science, it requires exceptional proof, as the late Carl Sagan said more than once. The next thing, as with any scientific discovery, is that other groups will make the same measurements, and that their friends will re-examine all the assumptions, and then we can determine with greater certainty whether what they see is indeed garlic. The current team raised the issue. They did a good job and scrutinized the results. They examined every alternative explanation and rejected several of them. Results on such a scale should be checked again, and I believe that in a year or two we will have additional information that will allow us to prove this."

Prof. Avi Leib from Harvard University and you stated that this is a discovery on the scale of a Nobel Prize, is this something close to the Higgs boson for which Higgs and Engler won the Nobel about six months ago?

"This is an even more important discovery than the Higgs. By the time the Higgs was discovered the theory was already established, many of the alternatives had been eliminated and it was just a question of building a complex device that could provide the result. In the current case, as I mentioned, we also discovered things we didn't know, and therefore it's a more exciting theory."

17 תגובות

  1. Eran,

    The Inflatons have long since faded to the ground state - this happened a fraction of a second after the big bang and that is why inflation stopped. As of today, the universe is accelerating for a different reason.
    Mathematically, it seems as if there is a constant in the equation describing the expansion of the universe that can be interpreted as "energy of the void" or what is known as "dark energy". As of today there is still no good understanding of what this thing is and how exactly it works, but it is unlikely that it is a mechanism like the Pleton of the beginning of the universe, since this would require a quantum field to exist for billions of years without reaching a stable state (where it can no longer "inject" energy into an explosion ).

  2. Thank you very interesting, so basically once the energy of the Plutons runs out, the universe should slow down the expansion? Or continue to spread but regularly and not accelerate?

  3. Eran,

    The comparison to a normal explosion is incorrect.
    To understand what the difference is (beyond the geometric explanation that Nissim gave), we will talk about the inflation phase in which there was accelerated expansion and not about today's accelerated expansion, the reasons for which are still unclear.

    The idea of ​​inflation was born to explain many problems in the big bang model that required fine tuning.
    The assumption is that in the early stages of the universe most of the energy was in particles called "inflatons".
    These particles were originally in an excited state and as the universe cooled down to their ground state - as a result they released a lot of energy and this caused the expansion of the universe to accelerate.

    I will leave the exact details of the idea, but for the purpose of comparison with a normal explosion, note that there is a significant difference here:
    In a normal explosion the amount of energy available for the explosion decreases with time or at most stays the same. In the Big Bang, on the other hand, energy was "injected" into the universe that was previously stored in inflatons (I say "injected" in quotation marks because this energy was not created out of nothing, it was simply not available for the expansion of the universe before inflation). It was this energy that went from the inflatons to free energy for the expansion that made the accelerated expansion possible.
    This is similar to a normal explosion that disperses pellets of explosive material that were constructed so that when the pressure drops below a certain critical threshold, the pellets begin to explode. An explosion of this kind will spread at a constant speed or slow down until the critical pressure is reached and then suddenly gain a lot of energy and begin to accelerate again as more and more pellets explode. The "inflation" in this case will stop when the spheroids run out or in the case of inflation in the universe, when the inflaton reaches the ground state and can no longer inject energy.

  4. Nissim, I read the link you sent, I think there are 50 people in the whole world who can understand it 🙂

  5. Shmulik
    You're right. The photons were created after 10 seconds, but were "free" after the time I mentioned. It was interesting to see it 🙂

  6. Miracles,
    As far as I know, it's not that the photons were created so late but that by the time you female, the universe contained a boiling plasma and that plasma is impervious to radiation. As the universe cooled, gradually, the universe became transparent and then photons could move from place to place, freely and this is indeed the background radiation that was discovered.

  7. Nissim Thanks for the explanation, I wanted to know why the universe is accelerating its expansion? Why is the spread not constant? Is the energy released infinite? Or does it increase over time to infinity?

  8. Eran
    The Big Bang is not an explosion in the sense of a bomb exploding into space. I explain it to myself like this: there are 4 axes in space, the usual 3 and another time axis. The idea is that all axes are equal, then they behave the same. All axes start at one point in the four-dimensional world. At the starting point, the length of all the axes is 0. That is - literally a point. As time passes - all 4 axis lengthen. It's a completely crooked explanation... but helps me visualize the situation.

    At a certain point, the first photons were created, about 380 thousand years after the beginning. It is expected and it was indeed discovered - this is the cosmic background radiation that was discovered about 50 years ago (Penzias-Wilson).

    At an earlier stage the mass was created - and this is what they say they discovered now, "echoes" from the creation of this mass.

  9. Can anyone explain how it is possible that the universe is accelerating its expansion? In any normal explosion the energy eventually slows down and in the universe this is not the case. The big bang doesn't behave like a bang, it has other properties, how can it even be determined that there was a big bang if it doesn't behave like this? And also regarding the cosmic radiation I understand that this is the smoking gun but maybe that is not the correct complete explanation? If acceleration occurs then maybe there was also a slowdown in the past or something else altogether, I would love to receive answers with great respect

  10. If I go further, will we have the technology in the future to build spaceships that work on the principle of disrupting the gravitation system and full control over space independent of the energy we currently use for spaceships

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.