The Hubble Space Telescope breaks the distance record when it photographed a galaxy as it appeared 400 million years after the Big Bang - allowing a glimpse of the first generation of galaxies in the universe
The image shows the most distant galaxy ever discovered by the Hubble Space Telescope's Deep Space Survey System. The field of view of the survey includes tens of thousands of galaxies throughout all time. The distant galaxy GN-z11 appears to us as it was 400 million years after the Big Bang, 3% of its current age. Credit: NASA, ESA, and P. Oesch (Yale University)
By pushing the capabilities of the Hubble Space Telescope to the limit, astronomers were able to break the distance record and observe the most distant galaxy in the universe so far. The galaxy existed about 400 million years after the Big Bang and provides new insights into the first generation of galaxies. This is the first time that the distance of such a distant object has been measured using its spectrum, which adds to the precision of measurements. The findings will be published in the Astrophysical Journal.
Using the Hubble telescope, members of an international team of astronomers measured the distance to this new galaxy GN-Z11. Although very dimly lit, the galaxy is exceptionally bright given its distance from Earth. The Z11-GN distance measurement provides further strong evidence that other unusually bright galaxies captured in previous images are at unusual distances, and that we are observing the first galaxies to form in the Universe.
The team used Hubble's Wide Field Camera (WFC3) to measure the distance to the galaxy by splitting the light into its component colors.
"Our spectroscopic observations revealed that the galaxy is even more saturated than we first thought, right at the limit of the distance of what Hubble can observe," explains Gabriel Breimer from the Space Telescope Science Institute and co-author of the article.
This moves Z11 GN into the distance range that was thought to be accessible only by the James Webb telescope, which will replace the Hubblen.
"We were able to look back in time to measure the distance to a galaxy that existed when the universe was only three percent of its current age. In the current era," says Pascal Och of Yale University and the main author of the article.
To determine distances as large as the distance to GN-Z11, astronomers need to measure the redshift of the observed object. This phenomenon is a result of the expansion of the universe; As the object is further away in the universe it appears to be moving away from us and as a result its light is stretched to the red wavelengths.
Until now, the redshift of the most distant galaxy before the one now discovered EGSY8p7(,) was estimated at 8.68, while the research team studying GN-Z11 found that its redshift is 11.1, which corresponds to the age - 400 million years after the Big Bang.
"The galaxy with the previous record was caught in the middle of the period when the stars started heating the cold hydrogen gas clouds," explains Richard Bowens of Leiden University, the Netherlands. This is a transition period known as the age of reionisation. The new galaxy, GN-Z11 is 150 million years older than its predecessor and is therefore near the beginning of this transition in the evolution of the universe."
The combination of observations made by Hubble and Spitzer revealed that the mass of the Hinoka galaxy was 25 times that of the Milky Way but only 20 percent of it was in the form of stars. And yet the number of its stars is growing and it is producing stars at a rate XNUMX times faster than the Milky Way today. This high star formation rate makes the distant galaxy bright enough to view and make detailed observations.
However, the discovery of this galaxy also raises many new questions such as the fact that the existence of such a large bright galaxy is not predicted by theory. "It is amazing that such a massive galaxy existed only 300-200 million years after the first stars began to form. It had to grow fast and produce stars at an enormous rate," explains Gareth Illingworth from the University of California, Santa Cruz.
92 תגובות
I wrote to myself.
rival,
The main thing is not Alberto
Correction - Albanzo (or how it is pronounced in Hebrew)
Happy Purim!
Out of the box,
Look how many excuses you need to justify a stupid legend you believe in, look how many excuses you need to justify the nonsense written by sages.
Saying that there might be a species of bat somewhere that lays eggs or something similar to eggs, is like saying that there might be a species of mice that lay eggs, delusional.
Albert Einstein did not believe in God, certainly not one who follows us. He emphasized this several times in the letters he wrote and there were articles about it here on the science website, but you and the other believers will not stop repeating this lie. Do you really not understand that "God does not play with dice" is just a kind of parable? Or maybe you also think that Einstein believed that God held dice in his hand?
Alberzo - with the blind believers' method of excuses it can certainly be, and maybe God in the Torah is actually a ladybug, who knows.
for miracles
I'm done for now.. until I see the entire lecture that Yariv sent me to and read what I promised. It will take some time.. at least a month..
But one last detail... He who lives day by day with the limitless absolute infinity.. bears opposites.. his essence and essence. Yath. And for him it is a way of life. He probably does not understand the concept of infinity in the form of someone for whom it is some kind of mathematical calculation. Or some scientific theory.. or philosophy.. and that's it. that his treatment is extreme to the conclusion that it is an old legend.. Surely the treatment and understanding of the two parties will be different. So, if God wills, we will hear after the holiday of Purim the holiday of redemption and towards the holiday of Passover which is also a holiday of redemption
Out of the box
Please, enough with the rants about "infinity". Your lack of understanding plus your hollow arrogance do not contribute to the discussion.
outside the box.
I have read most of what Einstein wrote, except for articles that are beyond my understanding of course.
He wrote exactly what he thought about the Jewish God.
Rambam's intended reference to infinity is that God is one - he is neither two nor more than two, but one, whose uniqueness is not one of the ones in the world: not one as a species that includes many others, and not one as a body that is divided into departments and ends; But a uniqueness that has no other uniqueness like it in the world.
for miracles
Did you meet Einstein and he told you?
To my father
Indeed, in mathematics there are many infinities... there is no end of infinities as you define it... but the very fact that each d of the infinities has a definition such as no end of groups or no end of numbers shows that each of them is defined by a definition, after all the definition itself limits each one
Out of the box.
Einstein must not have believed for a moment in a God that resembles your God.
Einstein was imagined because he believed there was a God who read what a rival was saying
Out of the box.
You are only increasing your display of ignorance. Should not….
In mathematics, not only is there infinity, there are many types of infinity. Infinite types of infinity....
In physics there is also infinity.
And what does Einstein's cubes have to do with it?
Miracles
Numerical calculations are also measurement. In the field of mathematics there is A concept called infinity. But in Judaism this concept is called no number.
As I imagine Einstein was imagined, this is not what he said
Sha-Lakim doesn't play dice?
Einstein did his calculations with numbers. To the world the numbers constitute a quantity.. The mathematical concept of infinity is called in Judaism no number
rival,
You do not understand. The bat is a duck.
Out of the box.
No offense, but you have no idea what science is. What you said is nonsense. Measurements are only part of science.
Einstein, who never measured anything, said "there are only two infinite things - the universe and the stupidity of man, and about the first I am not sure".
Miracles
Science deals with measurable data in order to reach results. There is no end, it is not limited, therefore it is not measurable. Therefore it is outside the box of science is understood
It is written that the bat that lays eggs is a nurse [unlike the other egg-layers], whereas the bat we know does nurse, but it gives birth to children and does not lay eggs. Answer: First: The main novelty of the Gemara is that, despite the fact that the bat is a flying bird, and is therefore counted in the Torah as a bird, the bat is special among flying birds in that it nurses, so much so that in Britannica for Youth, vol. 1, p. 50, he writes with amazement how the Sages knew about this uniqueness so much long ago. Second: The bat we know is not the same bat that the Sages meant, since the Pentateuch in XNUMXth and Leviticus XNUMX verses XNUMX and XNUMX write the breath and the bat as unclean birds, and Rashi [as well as Hezekoni and other commentaries] from Beer Gabi. Breathe": "She is a kalaba shuritz and resembles a mouse and blooms at night". Namely: what we call a bat! So the "bat" written there later is certainly a different type from the well-known bat, even if it resembles it, and about which Sages said that it lays eggs and nurses.
There are more than 1000 species of bats, and almost nothing is known about many of them, and there are certainly some of them that are born if they don't lay eggs right then from something similar to eggs: when their placenta is covered in chrome it is difficult to preserve the embryo. Also in many of their species there is a special reproduction called "delayed pregnancy" in which the sperm begins to fertilize the egg and then the egg takes root in the uterus and develops only a few months later [Azaria Alon's Animal and Plant Index, vol. 7 p. 66], meaning that there is no body The mother participates in the growth of the fetus continuously as in other mammals, and this is similar to laying an egg in that the mother's body stops participating in the growth of the fetus.
Out of the box.
Why is science out there? Do you even understand what you are talking about, or are you quoting some uneducated rabbi?
Out of the box,
A breath is a bat, and a bat is a breath... simply amazing! And maybe God who appears in the Torah is actually a ladybug. What don't you do to keep believing in fairy tales that have nothing to do with reality.
"Everyone who gives birth nurses and everyone who lays eggs gathers. Except for the bat, which, although it lays eggs, nurses" (Talmud Babylon, Bekurut XNUMX).
Unfortunately for you and for the avoidance of doubt, Rashi interpreted this specific verse and on the word 'bat' he explains: "It resembles a mouse and has wings".
You ate her as they say.
Miracles
He is what I said.. about infinity.. Science is out there
outside the box
The thing that science doesn't know how to handle infinity is one of the stupidest ideas I've heard.
All science says about it is that today we don't know if the universe is infinite or not.
Please - make up what you want about religion but leave science alone 🙂
outside the box
The thing that science doesn't know how to handle infinity is one of the stupidest ideas I've heard. All that science says is that today we don't know about the universe.
rival
Sorry that I have to correct you, but with your permission... Rashi calls the soul a talfa, i.e. a bat. See the book of Leviticus, chapter XNUMX, verse XNUMX. And about the breath, he writes that it is similar to a mouse. Then some experts who live the revival of the Hebrew language come to reveal to us that Rashi did not know what a breath is. Well, for your information, the breath mentioned in the Torah is the bat of our language today. .. and the bat mentioned in the Torah is a chicken that lays eggs..
https://www.safa-ivrit.org/history/renaissance.php
Believe me I've already heard all the excuses, when you insist on believing in fairy tales then nothing will help. By the way, Rashi interpreted a bat as a mouse-like creature with wings, so there are really no doubts about it.
You have the right to believe in fairy tales, I'm just trying to show you the truth (it's a shame without much success).
Changes in the words between the Torah and the Hebrew that refer to our holy land stem from the Enlightenment movement that created the renewal of the Hebrew language
rival
As far as I know the dear editor, he will not be interested in us going into these topics. After all, they are purely Torah topics.. just to explain the ear.. In the Hebrew language today, the word edamdam is a kind of light red color.. In the language of the Torah, edamdam means blood red, i.e. the darkest red... For example, the ram mentioned in King David is an animal corresponding to the size of a giant dinosaur .. while the ram we mention in our day does not match this.. another example the dachshund mentioned in the Torah is an animal that was created only for that period and became extinct .. that is, it is not the dachshund known today and certainly not a dachshund dog.. the bat mentioned in the Torah is a bird from the owl family but I will not go into to that because I have already come across the counter-answers.. and the disdain.. so let's leave it for a Torah lesson.. it's better
You understood but you didn't understand, you say ok but think to yourself he is talking nonsense. It's a shame, it's a shame that you don't really understand and don't understand.
got it
Sages wrote so much nonsense, bats that lay eggs, lice are created from mud and sweat, a hyena that turns into a bat... So suddenly the rabbis became experts in atomic energy? How do you not understand yourself how ridiculous this story is? This is what happens when stories pass from word of mouth without any control, that's how stories develop.
OK
Out of the box,
The nation of Israel is not a legend, nor am I dismissing with a wave of the hand all the stories of the Torah, some of them are true, but legends of this type have also developed in other nations, this is not such an unusual thing and God is still a legend.
What you told me sounds like an urban legend pulled from the finger, in your public such stories are accepted very easily and without too much skepticism, it's a shame.
In the 3s (about XNUMX) after midnight suddenly without warning police cars appeared and blocked all access to the street, snipers appeared on the roofs and a helicopter hovered above. Then XNUMX limousines arrived and a number of people got out of them and went directly into the Rebbe's room. Outside there were agents and even One was not allowed to enter. After about half an hour they left the place. They asked the Rebbe, who were they? The Rebbe answered: "These were the members of the US Atomic Energy Council." And what did they want? They asked again. The Rebbe replied: "They reached a dead end It's been half a year in one of the calculations and they haven't been able to make progress, so they came to consult".
The Rebbe answered: There are 3 reasons
1. The calculations are for civilian miners for peaceful purposes and one can derive a lot of benefit from this
2. The USA is a benevolent country for the Jews and it is my duty to help them
3. So that they know who is the owner of the house....
rival
Of course I will watch the lecture in Gaza until the end..
By the way, the existence of our nation has been built for thousands of years on this legend.. It turns out that our nation is a nation from legends.. Even the language we speak in now and the letters that our nation preserves is part of that legend.. By the way, above Yariv has meaning only in the language of legends or miracles or Yehuda..this is also a false imagination..even Michael comes from this legend. Tsiki Chan is more suitable.. for those who want to get out of the limitations of this legend called Israel.
Out of the box,
I'm not an expert in embalming matters, but I know that even nowadays people and animals can be embalmed. And let's say the Egyptians had knowledge that was forgotten over time and lost, so what? What does this prove?
Science doesn't know everything, but the little (which is quite a lot to be honest) because we managed to learn in a way that doesn't imply in two faces that God is a stupid fairy tale that it's time to say hello and goodbye.
And watch the lecture until the end, caught up in the most insignificant thing that was said in it instead of seeing the main point.
rival
Science, with all the wonderful tools it has, is not able to do what the Egyptians did, that is, embalming the dead...that is, with the conditions they had then. Even then in Egypt Pharaoh said.. I did not know God bye bye.
You are not a novelty at all..
In addition, science, with all the tools it has, cannot measure infinity.. therefore it also cannot refer to infinity of possibilities. Science is limited by contemporary measurements of matter.. and it is a shame that people like you do not notice that the study of science is also limited.. just as the human mind is limited to five senses (perhaps six) and in a simple sense it is understood that a limited thing cannot be seen outside of its borders..even in the lecture that she sent me to at least the lecturer is honest and says that perhaps the universe is infinite because it is impossible to know its borders...science is a great tool for understanding the world around us..for improving or To the destruction of the little ball in which we live. To improve life expectancy.. and quality of life.. but when you come to theories it is still a non-binding opinion if you add another figure called without limit of probabilities. The scientific dear can't deal with this. In fact, Schröder brings it..
Out of the box,
Science certainly has enough scientific tools such as the study of the Bible, the study of the development of myths in different cultures, the theory of evolution, the study of the universe, the study of the earth, archeology and many other tools that all show us that God is a ridiculous legend that it is time to say bye bye to it, we have grown up enough.
Sabdarmish Yehuda
As strange as it may sound to you.. My opinion is in your opinion that this website is intended for scientific topics only.. for example when you bring an article on the website that tries to prove that there is no God, then you are referring to something abstract metaphysical.. that does not have a body and does not have the image of the body.. and of course it is not scientific. Even such articles, in my opinion, you should ask to be deleted from the content presented on the site.
In addition, when it comes to theories, no matter how solid they are, there is still room to refer to places where the theories are unstable and check them. There have been cases in the world of science in which theories They rose and fell over time..or were pushed to the side because of another theory..
I am personally in favor of the development of science. It is wonderful to me. Moreover, to me it is part of a sublime and great process... My problem with trying to show through this wonderful tool called science is that science does not have any tools to test the subject.. such as God and miracles. or concepts that are above nature and enough to understand
According to the sages, the earth stands on pillars:
"Tanya Rabbi Yossi says... What does the country stand on? About pillars, it is said (Job XNUMX) 'He who disturbs the earth from its place and its pillars will be split asunder'. Pillars on water, as it is said (Psalms Klu') 'To trample the earth on the water'. [The water] is on the mountains, as it is said (Tahilim Ked') 'Water will stand on the mountains'. Mountains in the wind, as it is said (Amos XNUMX) 'For here is a maker of mountains and a maker of wind'. A stormy wind, as it is said (Tahilim Kamach') 'A stormy wind does its thing'. And a storm hangs in the arm of God, as it is said (Deuteronomy XNUMX) 'under the arms of eternity'.
"And the sages said about twelve standing columns, as it is said (Deuteronomy Lev) 'He established the boundaries of nations according to the number of the Israelites.' And some say seven pillars, as it is said (Proverbs XNUMX) 'He cut out seven pillars'. Rabbi Ben Shmoe says about one pillar, and his name is tzaddik, as it is said (Proverbs XNUMX) 'And tzaddik is the foundation of the world'"
rival
I meant his rabbi. Imagine someone coming to his rabbi and saying to him: How do you say that it is written that the world is round, if it is written in the Psalms, "Jehovah, the king of the tide, wears, wears, wears, the Lord is strong, even the high school of the world is without timut"???
Imagine someone asking how come the sun is still in Gibeon, and not the earth???
Why don't you understand that the clerics have a strong desire to drag the science commentators in the direction of a religious debate. If they succeed, that's good, if they didn't succeed, then interfere and then even better. Don't follow them, it's a waste of energy, let's respond only in matters of science and my dear father, delete the above responses that only come to disturb. We are here only in my eyes science!!!
Yehuda
Miracles,
"I'm sure you've never read the Torah without someone giving you a contradiction"
why are you so violent Why do you give contradictions to people? It hurts.
outside the box,
And yet God is an imaginary figure that only exists in your imagination. Isn't it a shame to waste such a precious life praying to the air?
Out of the box.
Too bad. You could learn something.
Do you want me to bring the quotes that show I'm right?
I'm sure you've never read the Torah without someone giving you a contradiction every time you express reservations about the excuses of the "scholars". Am I right or wrong?
Miracles
My opinion over the years has been formed according to the Torah of Israel. In what completes my perception I strengthen
I have already referred to the fact that in Judaism there is no belief in a flat world. And I don't have the energy to waste time on it. Forgiveness is with you.
Correction of a word: it should be the worshipers instead of the lonely
Out of the box.
The same 99% that Riv spoke about include the Jews. The Greeks are the ones who realized that the earth is not flat.
Out of the box.
So I understand that what the majority think is true - only when it suits your opinion? 🙂
rival
The same 99%. A percentage worked idolatry. That's why they thought so.. because they believed in the forces of nature.. if it's in the stars that influence their lives. or energies of any kind.. the energy of fire or wind. or the sun or the water or the energy inherent in the earth and matter.. they did not have Torah a-lokot .. therefore they lived in error.. today there are those who follow the laws of nature.. in a different way.. therefore they too are in a kind of error.. the laws of nature limit the space Their perception.. because they worship them as an absolute thing.. as it was in the past
Miracles
Indeed, this is how most of the world thinks about Israel. that in every generation we stand before our brides... and God saves us from them
Out of the box,
At one time 99% of people were also sure that the earth was flat, so it must be true. God is an imaginary figure that exists only in your imagination, no matter how strongly you believe in him that fact is not going to change.
Out of the box.
Most people in the world think that Israel should not exist. Do you really not see how bad your response is?
rival
This similarity exists in most people... as the pale tracker says "if everyone says it's probably true"
It is interesting to Rival that this similarity exists in most people... how do you say the pale tracker "if everyone says it is probably true"
Out of the box,
You have the right to believe this nonsense but the Torah is not holy, and God is an invention of humans just like fairies, dragons and invisible unicorns. God did not create anything and did not establish anything, he exists only in your imagination.
It's sad to see how people waste their lives.
(Jeremiah 5776:XNUMX): "Thus said the Lord, if I do not make covenants day and night, the heavens and the earth will not be destroyed." ... The Holy Torah already in Genesis and in several other places refers to the laws of nature as creatures.. When the Creator of the world decides to change the laws of nature, he does so. This is what we call a miracle from the language of exaltation above the laws of nature (like a miracle and a flag). An example of the form in which they crossed the Jordan.. read there the priests floated over the waters of the Jordan with the ark that carried them in the air. To Daniel who was in the lion's den, another prophet was sent from the Land of Israel who flew in the air and ate his lunch. Jacob our father simply lived the quantum theory when he wanted to pray in Beit Al-L (search on Google under the words and it will hit the spot). The Torah of Israel has no problem with the laws of nature, on the contrary.. The Torah demands that they be used in order to fulfill the will of the Creator.. A Jew desecrates the Sabbath according to a doctor's order.. Many calculations are made and are required to be made according to the laws of nature.. because that is what the creator of these laws commanded. Only that these laws were created approximately XNUMX years ago. Including the tree with the rings, it was initially created with a certain amount of rings. The stars and galaxies were created together with the light at the same time... After all, absolute infinity (because in the lecture he also talks about the possibility of an infinite universe) does not have the limitations that he himself created. They have an infinite reality.. anyway in a certain way.
Out of the box,
In Deka 25:27 the lecturer says that the theory begins with two primary assumptions in the vernacular (axioms) a. The laws of nature are the same laws everywhere and at all times b. The universe is homogeneous at large distances'
It could be that beyond your building there is a place where if you jump you stay floating in the air, gravity just doesn't work there. It may also be that there are places in the world where there are people with horns, you never know and you must not assume homogeneity.
Out of the box
These assumptions, of homogeneity and so on, were made for two reasons. The other is that they are simple and logical assumptions. When you pour a glass of water from the tap, you assume it's like any other water you've drunk. You assume that after every day there is a night, and you assume that every person you accidentally step on hurts, so you apologize.
The second reason is that these assumptions explain our observations very well. For example - dating according to carbon 14 corresponds to dating according to tree rings. For example, calculating a range according to the flickering of Cepheid stars corresponds to calculating a range according to other methods. And there are many more examples.
The source of laws in nature is our mind. They don't exist by themselves, and you certainly don't need to look for "God" to invent them - especially when you allow that God to cancel them at will 🙂
If you think otherwise - try to find a law in nature that does not depend on human understanding at all.
Out of the box,
What you managed to see is the most boring part of the lecture, I suggest that by the time the book reaches you, you watch the lecture in its entirety. By the way, your (imaginary) friend is also mentioned there.
This helped I can't believe it, your comments have been released.
(You see I'm trying to help you)
Enough God has already released his response, you completely exaggerated.
rival
Many couriers to the place
I was just joking with you 🙂
Unless the site manager meets the definition for you.
Aren't you tired of constantly repeating the same arguments over and over again?
Obviously
Out of the box,
Is your response delayed? It's all from above.
A rival and miracles
I responded to both of you and also watched in my free time part of the lecture you sent me Yaniv. And this is also what I was referring to. It seems to me that they are checking my response... for a while... maybe they will upload them
Rival I started watching the lecture you sent me to. Due to the shortness of time, I watched until the 25th minute or so, I will continue to watch it later.. but already at the beginning of the lecture, minute 18.53, the lecturer says that the universe is huge, perhaps infinite, as he says. Apparently it doesn't matter about the conclusions he will reach... but our knowledge of the size of the universe is of enormous significance. Because this changes the reference to the energy contained in the universe of matter and mass. and mutual and comprehensive effects on movement in the universe. It turns out that there is already an essential figure that is being ignored.
At minute 25:27 the lecturer says the theory begins with 2 primary assumptions in the vernacular (axioms) a. The laws of nature are the same laws everywhere and at all times b. The universe is homogeneous at great distances. That is, to begin with, he eliminates the possibility of a creator who created the laws of nature. That is, there are laws of nature that emerged from May, which is a place of eternal and unchanging existence. It's actually an absolute assertion. I call this assertion the God of science.. Where did the laws come from, how did they become interesting? It's a complete disregard. . And the second axiom is that the universe is homogeneous. based on what??? After all, he does not know the size of the universe .. so far for now.
To add another detail, Judaism went further back and says that before all these laws there is a primary absolute law, there is the foundation of the foundations and the pillar of wisdom.
rival
It is the nature of man to be biased. for all kinds of reasons. If it's basic nature that he was born with, if it's an environmental influence. If it is self-taught material. His angle of view is conditioned by these data. A person who says he is not personally biased seems to me to be a liar. And if he believes it, the person he is lying to is himself..first
For miracles, our Holy Torah says, "This is compared to that which God created." In front of a pure Godly truth, there is a lie just as there is black and white, up and down, left and right, etc. So are the words of God that were spoken to Moses by the Creator. Just as there is the manner of the creation of the world according to the Torah. Thus there is the theory of evolution. Since the Torah is absolute truth, it simply follows that the theory of evolution is nonsense.
Out of the box
You wrote "Unfortunately, I still haven't read the talk about evolution". Is it bullshit just because it contradicts your religious belief? Don't you have any thoughts of your own? I'll be real with you - I'm sad for you.
And I liked your honesty: "I'm not objective" 🙂
Out of the box,
You are absolutely right, the creator of the world is not limited, this is because it exists only in your imagination, and imagination, as we know, is not limited in any way.
By the way, do you have access to the link I gave earlier or is this site blocked for you? I know you usually surf through a censored internet.
Rival and miracles unfortunately I will be real with you. I am not objective. to begin with. The Creator of the world is not limited. And he was not created as one of the creatures either.. If you want to know how I relate to the Creator, read Rambam in his book The Strong Hand. Chapter one and two..
So I admit the truth, I'm biased.. There's nothing to do. My Jewish soul shines..but I will read the book because I promised..and believe me deep down, I will leave the order of reading to myself.
According to this excellent lecture, the rapid formation rate of suns in a young galaxy is actually understandable to us. I recommend everyone to watch, the lecture starts at 18:20:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1daxJocJ7Qw
Out of the box
And after you understand that evolution is true, I will refer you to several books. Each of them represents a hypothesis of how life began. We do not know if one of these hypotheses is correct, but from reading them it is clear that the origin of life is not an unsolvable mystery either.
Out of the box,
"My friend Rival, yesterday I ordered the book you mentioned and I believe it will reach me in the next few days. It is understandable to you that at the same time I will read a book that says the opposite, in which it is about why the theory of evolution is not possible."
First of all you made me happy, I hope you enjoy the book ("Why evolution is true", by Jerry Quinn) I will only ask you to read it with an objective approach without prejudices and without an anti-approach.
Regarding the second book that thinks the opposite - I'm just telling you in advance that if he tries to convince you that statistically "there is no chance that the first living cell was formed by itself" it has nothing to do with evolution. Evolution talks about how life developed *after it was already created*, so even if God created the first living cell, this does not contradict the theory of evolution at all, mind you.
And I would suggest that you don't mix joy with Shashon, first read the book "Why evolution is true", then the second book.
Miracles
Regarding the fact that others don't think like us.. after all, there is already the article of our sages, their memory is blessed.. just as their faces are different so are their opinions
Various..
Yariv my friend yesterday I ordered the book you mentioned and I believe it will reach me in the next few days. It is understandable to you that at the same time I will read a book that says the opposite in which it is about why the theory of evolution is not possible. I will treat it accordingly. Patience takes time and the valley. The mind goes here and there.. In any case, don't forget that Adar enters from many happily
Rafi gross/out of the box
Just because someone thinks differently than you doesn't mean they are stupid.
From listening to you... quite the opposite
Out of the box,
You got a little confused, evolution is a fact unfortunately. These ramblings are the words of vanity written by Sages which can be attributed to a thousand and one events with your best imagination, just like the prophecies of Nostradamus.
Rafi Gross
There is a parable they bring about the big bang theory.. it's the inflating balloon paste. Maybe you know.. The scientists of this theory are also aware that they don't know what is beyond these limits.. They have an interesting word called singularity I think. Look at Wikipedia.. It just seems to me that this whole balloon will soon burst in their faces.. and like any little child they will cry over the lost balloon
And what is the size of the space? 400 light years after this galaxy) and what comes after that? So the size is infinite and this is not possible just as the size is finite. All scientists do not understand anything.
My opponent
Unfortunately, I still haven't read the talk about evolution... for technical reasons only. It's not that I'm afraid of it, I was just busy seeing how the words of the Sage were being realized before our eyes, the beginning of the war between Islam and Christianity. dash Etc. the economic status of the rising Israel. and so' …
Regarding the heart surgery, I completely agree with you. Indeed, for this, the promise "and fill the foreskin of your hearts" must be fulfilled, and this is also part of the expected process soon
Something is not clear to me. The planet Pluto, the telescope could not see clearly. That's why New Horizon was launched. So if Hubble couldn't really see Pluto, how did he manage to find this galaxy?
….he said that he has a much stronger and more stable alternative theory that has already proven itself in at least ten predictions.
Outside the box, your theory about an omnipotent god who created everything in hocus pocus needs a lot more than crutches, it needs open heart surgery.
PS - I don't know if you read my previous response, you disappointed me very much that you didn't read the book ("Why evolution is true") You told me about six months ago that in a few days you would buy and read it, why didn't you do so?
So to understand correctly if such a galaxy is not predicted according to the theory (probably the big bang theory) then the theory needs to be upgraded and new ideas invented...more crutches to strengthen the theory.
It does look like a galaxy four hundred million years after the big bang and it is good that the human race can investigate this, draw scientific conclusions and move forward, this is exactly what is commanded in the Torah of Moses, but we should not forget that it was created a little over 5775 years ago to look as if its time is 400 million years later The big bang, and that's on
a question:
Why does the article refer to the galaxy in the past tense? Does she no longer exist now? Dead galaxies?