Comprehensive coverage

The oldest star discovered - 13.5 billion years old

Astronomers have allegedly discovered the oldest star in the universe and thus broke the hypothesis that small stars did not form in the early universe. The celestial body is made of the material released after the big bang

The discovery of the 13.5 billion year old star may indicate the existence of other small stars with low mass and metal density - these are the first stars of the early universe. The recently observed star is unique because it resides in the thin and distant layer of our galaxy (in this region our sun also resides). Because the star is so old, researchers believe our galactic cluster is more than 3 billion years older than previously thought.

The image shows the location of the discovered star, and its full name: 2MASS J18082002–5104378 B Credit: ESO/Beletsky/DSS1 + DSS2 + 2MASS

Heavy elements are born

The first stars formed after the Big Bang contain mostly hydrogen, helium, and a little lithium. The internal gravitational forces of the star produce tremendous pressure in their core and create heavier elements in the process of nuclear fusion. Thus, in fact, heavy elements were created in the universe and dispersed at the end of the star's life in a process called supernova (for stars with a sufficiently large mass). After the material is dispersed in space, it is accumulated back with the help of gravity into new stars with higher metallicity. This periodicity indicates that young stars must contain a relatively high concentration of metallicity while ancient stars contain a tiny percentage of metals in them. The newly discovered star contains a relatively low concentration of metals that matches the profile of ancient stars. By comparison, the star's metal concentration is similar to the metal profile of the planet Mercury, while our Sun, the result of many stars that died before it, has a metal concentration 14 times greater than the planet Jupiter.

Astrophysicists have previously discovered 30 stars with a similar metal profile with a mass close to the mass of the Sun, but the Johns Hopkins researchers who published the latest discovery showed that the mass of the new star is 10 times smaller than our Sun (about 14 percent to be exact).

about the surprising discovery

The discovery began when researchers from Johns Hopkins looked at an ancient bright star discovered by another team of researchers. The research led them to conclude that the star belongs to a binary system - that is, it is "paired" with another star that both rotate around a common center. The second star discovered is much weaker than the observed star and even predates it. The researchers were able to measure the mass of the star by the tidal forces exerted by its partner in the binary system. The researchers measured the concentration of the metals based on the light spectrum emitted by the star and thus estimated the age of the star. Since the 90s, researchers believed that only massive stars could form immediately after the Big Bang. Because their estimated mass is so large, the nuclear fuel burns relatively quickly, so scientists believed they were unobservable. At the same time as technological progress, simulations became more sophisticated and computer models hinted that low-mass stars may be discovered from the early universe and indeed the latest observation strengthens the claim. Unlike giant stars, the life time of small stars is much longer. Red dwarfs for example can live for trillions of years.

The findings were published in the journal  The Astrophysical Journalby researchers from Johns Hopkins in the United States.

for the scientific article

7 תגובות

  1. It should be explained that when astronomers use "metals" in the composition of a star, they mean all elements heavier than lithium, including metals, halogens, noble elements and all non-metals. The name was thus accepted as a very imprecise abbreviation in their community.

  2. My father - this is what the Torah says. God created the entire universe including us including everything in 6 days and then rested a day. Even if it is true, who are you to say what is the day of God? Maybe he is our billionth year?.. You say potato and Annie says potato - and in the end - it's the same thing.

  3. In my opinion, this research finding should be treated with great caution.
    The finding is based solely on the profile of the elements in the star. But such a profile may be obtained not precisely as a result of the antiquity of the star, but - with a certain probability that is not great but also not eliminated - as a result of chaotic events that are in the nature of a possible standard deviation. When a galaxy has hundreds of billions of stars, there will probably also be stars with such a profile that are not ancient, especially in sparse regions at the edge of the galaxy - and the star in question is indeed in a sparse region of the galaxy.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.