Comprehensive coverage

Women win Nobel Prizes in science - are we at the beginning of a trend?

The number of women who received the Nobel Prize in physics increased from three to four, and in chemistry from five to seven (in both cases including Marie Curie). Is this a coincidence or the beginning of a trend * Prof. Yael Rauchman from the Faculty of Chemistry at Tel Aviv University believes that the fact that the chemistry award is a relatively new discovery indicates the integration of women in science in the 21st century, Dr. Hadas Cohen from the Center for Gender Studies at the Hebrew University: still Successful women pay a large social price

On the right, Jennifer Daudena and Emmanuel Charpentier. Illustration: © Nobel Media. Ill. Niklas Elmehed.
On the right, Jennifer Daudena and Emmanuel Charpentier, winners of the 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Illustration: © Nobel Media. Ill. Niklas Elmehed.

These two lists say it all:

  • Women who win the Nobel Prize for Physics: 2020 Andrea Gass, 2018 Donna Strickland, 1963 Maria Goffert Meyer and of course the founding mother Marie Curie who won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1903. 
  • Women winning the Nobel Prize in Chemistry: 2020 Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna, 2018 Frances Arnalod, 2009 Ada Yonet, 1964 Dorothy Croft Hodgkin, 1935 Irene Julio Curie, 1911 Marie Curie (i.e. the short list of laureates in the exact sciences includes one name twice).

The list of winners of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine also includes only 12 names, the last of which Tu Yoyo won the prize for her part in discovering a treatment for malaria in 2015.

If we had to publish the list of men who won the three awards, we would have to turn the article into a phone book.

Prof. Yael Rauchman from the chemistry section of the Faculty of Exact Sciences at Tel Aviv University says that this year three women won prizes in chemistry and physics out of eight winners: at least for the prize in chemistry, the prize is for a recent discovery made eight years ago. As you get closer to the present, you see a change in tone - there are more women in senior positions in academia than before, and therefore more Nobel Prize winners.

My prediction is that we will see more and more women winning Nobel Prizes, now as the revolution of more and more women entering academia. In physics, one of the winners is Roger Penrose for works from the XNUMXs, a time when women were given credit. Today it is impossible to avoid it. Everyone who shares the discovery gets credit. Women are not behind, but lead research groups and see the impact immediately."

Dr. Hadas Cohen, a lecturer at the Gender Center at the Hebrew University, explains that the gates of higher education were not open to women. The fact that the late Bader Genisburg studied law at Harvard University was a cover for women.

Winners of the 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics: Named: Andrea Gaz, Reinhart Ganzel, Roger Penrose. © Nobel Media. Ill. Niklas Elmehed.
Winners of the 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics: Named: Andrea Gaz, Reinhart Ganzel, Roger Penrose. © Nobel Media. Ill. Niklas Elmehed.

"What is really behind this are the social perceptions regarding the place of women in society. The classic role of women to be wives and mothers was seen as the proper way to model female success. A woman will be considered successful if she has children. If she has a doctorate in physics and chemistry and if she managed to get a senior professorship at a reputed university, that doesn't count."

According to her, a large percentage of women abroad who work in an academic career do not have children or give birth for the first time in their forties. There is advance paving of women for other positions in society. Much has been written about the fact that in kindergartens and elementary schools, boys are encouraged to study mathematics and science much more than girls. In the first degree, you often see a female majority, at least in the social sciences. In the exact sciences, absolutely not. There is a minority of women already in the bachelor's degree and as you progress to the master's degree and doctorate there are far fewer women, and this is reflected in the share of women in the standards for teaching positions in the academy."

It is difficult to get a postdoctoral position

"Another important characteristic is that many women in senior academic positions around the world do not have children. We talk about the fact that women have the first and second shifts - work outside the home and work at home - taking care of the family after they return from work, and today we are talking about the third shift which means responsibility for all the emotional aspects of the family. It is very difficult for them to invest the time that men were allowed to invest in work in general. When you look at the academy in Israel, in order to advance in the academy you have to do a doctorate outside the country, a post-doctorate in research institutes that are not in the country where the doctorate was done. If the man is a female academic, she will move with her partner and family to the country where he needs to study. The opposite phenomenon exists much less. It is very rare for a man to move with his wife, who is a chemistry researcher, to a research institute in Idaho and for two or three years raise the children at home."

"Staying abroad is necessary in order to later obtain tenure and advance in the academic track, and thus we are slowly seeing how the pool of women from which to choose Nobel Prize winners is small. And that's even before we mentioned the amount of work and time required to bring results from the lab, travel to conferences and more. These things make it difficult for women to both do what is required within the family and invest in academia to the same extent."

"You see a change, there is more equality for women, but still if we are talking about a country like Israel where not being a mother is considered an exceptional trait that has a great social cost. In European countries or in the big cities in the USA, you see a change taking place, but even today, if I'm not mistaken, over half of the women in academic positions at American universities are childless, or if they are, they get pregnant in their forties. It is very difficult to combine the two things."

Prof. Rauchman says that the feminist revolution began in World War II, when women wanted to work and after the war many of them decided that they did not want to give up. Women today are forced to choose a career because in many places in the world it is impossible to live from one career. In recent years, serious moves have been made in Europe and the US for equal opportunities and the promotion of women in science, and there are scholarships, awards and requirements from academic conferences that will ensure gender equality as much as possible."

"It started with affirmative action which helped to admit the first women and as soon as it was created as something possible already a lot of women know it is possible and apply more to the academy. There are still gaps, there is still no perfect equality of opportunity. In the field I am researching at Tel Aviv University Chemistry and Biophysics in the chemistry department when I arrived I was the only one after many years that no women had joined. We took in a faculty member a year ago and next year we will take in another faculty member, but in my broader field the university has taken in ten women in recent years. We are witnessing the beginning of a transformation."

Dr. Cohen suggests proactively encouraging programs in the fields of science in girls' and even girls-only schools because studies have shown that when girls study separately from boys, they are more successful, and do not have to deal with social conventions and compare themselves to boys.

Even in universities, women should be encouraged to integrate into the scientific professions with the help of scholarships, which is something that happens partially, and also recognize the complex reality that women face and not expect that each one will fight her own battle personally, but rather come towards them, for example to allow her to be a mother as well, it is possible to delay by a year or two the exam for tenure.

A personal example like Ada Yonat

Prof. Rauchman recommends personal examples. From a female undergraduate lecturer to female scientists winning Nobel Prizes against all odds. According to her, after Ada Yonat won the Nobel Prize, interest in science increased among girls in Israel.

Dr. Cohen concludes by saying: "We are in a time when we are making a change, in the US there was a presidential candidate who received the majority of the voters' votes, but on the other hand there is an American president who said he could grab any woman by her genitals and women still vote for him. This is not considered severe enough. The misogynistic conditionings still exist in society and still exist within the very complex reality. As long as these gender structures do not change in society, it will be very difficult for women to reach senior positions, whether it is winning the Nobel Prize or whether it is the presidency or CEO positions."

More of the topic in Hayadan:

Nobel Prizes 2020

14 תגובות

  1. To my father, the editor of the site.
    Thank you very much for putting in the response against Nostradamus. It just sickened me to see the misogynistic reaction of Nostradamus and I felt obliged to respond.
    You like it!

  2. I am amazed at the racist and misogynistic response of 'Nostradamus' and that they left it here on the site. His ideas are Nazi racism plus stupid misogyny. In connection with his stupid assertion regarding the difference between male and female brain mass, it should be noted that researchers have long since established that there is no connection between brain mass and weight and wisdom and intelligence. His opinions are unfounded and lack any scientific basis, and what do they have to do with a site that defines itself as secular and enlightened?

  3. Nostradamus' response is racist and misogynistic to the point of nausea. It is clear today that there is no connection between the physical size of the brain and wisdom. His racism also reminds me of the Germans before the Holocaust. Shame his response remained on the site.

  4. Nostradamus' response is racist and misogynistic to the point of nausea. It is clear today that there is no connection between the physical size of the brain and wisdom. His racism also reminds me of the Germans before the Holocaust. Shame his response remained on the site.

  5. Men's brains are 10% larger than women's brains.

    • Does the size and weight of the brain affect intelligence? We answer it this way: take for example the brain of the cow, which is larger than the brain of almost any species of monkey. Unless she is really, really good at hiding her wisdom - a cow is not cognitively developed like the monkeys of all kinds. Did you understand?

  6. Your words are full of racism and baseless prejudices. Regarding brain size, the only difference that the entire scientific community fully agrees on is that men's brains are on average about 10% larger than women's brains. However, it is important to remember that men are physically larger on average than women. Just like elephants and whales have a significantly larger brain than ours, but also a larger body, so this does not necessarily make them more intelligent. There is no connection between the size of the brain and its weight and wisdom.

  7. You seem to have an obsession against women scientists. You probably don't understand anything about science. Regarding scientists who received a Nobel Prize, there is no protection here. They received the award by merit and not by grace. In 2012, the two biochemists demonstrated for the first time the use of the CRISPR/cas system to cut DNA outside the bacterium. The innovation in this research is the use of an RNA sequence that consists of the trcrRNA and crRNA segment, and caused a boom in the field.

  8. Your words are full of racism and baseless prejudices. Regarding brain size, the only difference that the entire scientific community fully agrees on is that men's brains are on average about 10% larger than women's brains. However, it is important to remember that men are physically larger on average than women. Just like elephants and whales have a significantly larger brain than ours, but also a larger body, so this does not necessarily make them more intelligent.

  9. Economics and law is not a science at all. In the theoretical real science and not the application of existing science like the two ladies above. Like theoretical physics or biology or chemistry and also engineering (although it is not theoretical)... the absolute majority is male and this is not surprising because at the highest levels of Aikido only men appear (men of European origin then East Asian and at the top Jewish Ashkenazi men except for engineering) and this is a biological fact. Women and men are not biologically equal and the male brain is larger in mass. Also race is an existing thing and the races are not equal neither in terms of intelligence nor in many other physical attributes. And precisely mixing between the races is what will cause the loss of diversity and the retreat of intelligence and with it progress. These facts have no agenda and do not consider people's feelings. This is life and the more the facts of life are accepted by more people the better for both sexes and all races and everything in between.

  10. It is interesting that women have not won yet in economics.
    And even though this is not a relatively male field,
    Many women study economics and business administration, there are many who also reach senior positions and there are also many women in academia in the field.
    It is possible to point out, for example, that there was a woman at the head of the Federal Reserve, and there was a woman at the head of the International Monetary Fund. As an undergraduate economics student, there were many women in the list of articles in the seminar course, and it doesn't seem to me that the lecturer chose by gender. (In Israel in general it is possible to note positively the integration of women at the top of the economy, the governor of the Bank of Israel, the deputy governor's chief economist, many women who have overseen the banks, two CEOs of a large bank one after the other, an economic advisor to the chief of staff - the most senior economic position in the army and many more examples) At least in Israel, it seems that the field of economics is second only to law in the integration of women at the top of the public sector.

  11. "Nostradamus" - Crisper has many fathers and mothers. You can't give everyone a Nobel Prize. The Japanese scientist who discovered the sequence on Koli Island, who would later be called "Crisper", was just one link in the long chain of discoveries.

    The Nobel Prize was awarded for the development of the genetic engineering tool based on CRISPR, not the discovery of CRISPR in bacteria. It is therefore quite clear why Daudena and Charpentier won the prize. The puzzlement is mainly why Feng Zhang, thanks to whom the system was adapted to eukaryotes and became the useful tool it is today, did not win the Nobel with them.

  12. The question is where the change is: are more women senior researchers, or does the award committee put more emphasis on women

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismat to prevent spam messages. Click here to learn how your response data is processed.