A 600 million year drought wiped out life on Mars

This is according to a study by a team from Imperial College London, whose members participated in the Phoenix mission and used the microscope on the spacecraft to analyze the particles

Soil excavation on Mars by the robotic arm of the Phoenix lander in 2008. Photo: NASA
Soil excavation on Mars by the robotic arm of the Phoenix lander in 2008. Photo: NASA

Mars was completely dry for over 600 million years. This form made it too hostile to any possible form of life to survive on the planet's surface. This is according to a study by researchers from Imperial College London, who analyzed the Martian soil data. The group, led by Dr. Tom Pike from Imperial College, will present the findings tomorrow, February 7, at the European Space Agency conference.

The researchers spent three years analyzing data on the Martian soil collected during NASA's 2008 Phoenix mission to Mars. Phoenix landed in the northern Arctic looking for signs of habitats and analyzing ice and soil on the surface.

The results of the analysis at the Phoenix landing site raise the possibility that Mars was completely dry for hundreds of millions of years, despite the fact that it has ice today and the fact that previous studies have shown that Mars was once warmer and wetter in its early history over 3 billion years ago. The team also estimated that the Martian soil has been exposed to liquid water for a maximum of 5,000 years since the planet's formation billions of years ago. They also found that the soil of Mars and the moon formed under the same dry conditions.

Satellite photographs and previous studies have proven that Martian soil is uniform across the entire planet, therefore they concluded that the findings from the Phoenix landing site are relevant to all of Mars. This means that life had a very short time to grow roots on the surface.
Dr. Pike, from the Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering at Imperial College who was the principal investigator of the article published in the journal Geophysical Research explained:

"We found that despite the wide distribution of water ice, Mars experienced a super-drought that could have continued for hundreds of millions of years. We believe that the Mars we know today is in stark contrast to its early history, which was a time when it was warm and wet and suitable for life. Future NASA missions" A and the European Space Agency will be required to dig deeper in search of evidence of life that might have found refuge underground."

During the Phoenix mission, Dr. Pike and his team were one of 24 teams that sat at the Control Center at the University of Arizona, operating the laboratories inside the lander. They analyzed soil samples dug up by the robotic arm using an optical microscope to image the large particles, and an atomic force microscope to Produce a three-dimensional visualization of the surface of the particles that are 100 microns in size since completion The mission They were busy cataloging the size of individual particles to better understand the history of the Martian soil.

In the study, the researchers looked for microscopic clay particles formed when rock is broken by water. Such particles are important markers of the connection between the liquid water and the soil and they form a distinguishable population of grains. The team found no such markers. They concluded that even if the few particles they saw in the sample were clay particles, they made up less than 0.1% of the total soil volume in the samples. On Earth, such clay constitutes 50% of the total soil content, so this figure shows the very dry history of the soil.

Such a rate indicates an exposure of no more than 5,000 years to water, if you compare it to the rate of clay crystallization in the earth's rocks. The team also found additional evidence supporting the idea that Martian soil has been dry throughout the planet's history by comparing soil samples from Mars, Earth and the Moon. The researchers concluded that the soil was formed in similar ways on Mars and the Moon because they were able to match the size distribution of the soil particles. On Mars, wind and meteorites broke the soil into smaller particles. On the Moon, meteorite impacts broke up the rocks and turned them into soil, because there is no flowing water or atmosphere to erode the particles.

to the notice of the researchers

11 תגובות

  1. Every planet was once a living place, our earth will also look like this in the end: dry, desolate and lifeless. Believe it or not, but they will come to this conclusion in the end.

  2. Once again NASA is telling you that there is no life on Mars...that there was no life...and suddenly there was life...suddenly water...
    The sequel is that they found fossils... Then creatures.... Then humanoid.... Finally they will tell you that they decided to colonize Mars... building a research base...

    The thing is, all this has already happened...
    For those who did not realize that it has already started, start reading the science news of the last few years
    who started the process of preparing humanity for additional partial information that has been hidden until now.

    Cynicism and negation (what happens in responses to those who claim different things than the king (official scientists) think)
    This is also what happened to our last Nobel Prize winner... a source that in the end, even here, those who despised him in the past years greeted him with admiration.

    A bit open minded and dynamic...

  3. I agree with the previous commenters. The title is misleading, one can conclude from it that there were lives and they were destroyed, although the content of the article implies that the probability that they ever existed is extremely low.

  4. Peace be upon my father
    Read the comments and internalize them.
    Too much gossip and too little accuracy.

  5. Bombard Mars with bacteria and germs, and that's the end of the drought, simple as that.

    And if there was life there before, they would already find their way out, and disappear

    In the meantime, they are just throwing money there and burning time for nothing.

  6. The title claims that there was life on Mars and they were wiped out by drought. Populist.
    The title should have read: No more than 5000 years of humidity on Mars left no chance for life to develop.

  7. "Destroyed life"?
    The title implies that there were lives, and the drought wiped them out. I immediately clicked to read about the life that was, and it turns out that what was destroyed was not the life but the chance for life.
    Please stay in the realm of factual science, not fiction.

  8. If I understood correctly, they believe that there was water on Mars for no more than 5,000 years, I doubt if life can form in such a short period of time

  9. For some reason, it seems to me that the Americans may be talking about looking for life on Mars, but in reality they are looking for oil.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to filter spam comments. More details about how the information from your response will be processed.