British scientists attached a rock rich in organic materials to the outer side of a spaceship, and when it returned to Earth it turned out that life did not survive * The main researcher: Maybe we need a bigger rock
Experts from the University of Aberdeen managed to attach a rock to an unmanned Russian spacecraft and found that life can only survive in large meteorites. Further explanations will be given at the British Highlands Science Festival on November 3rd.
A stone slab cut in Croadi, Sandvik, was sent to Vienna to be shaped in the right way. The rock, which was cut to the size of a hill, was attached to the outside of the European Space Agency's Photon M3 spacecraft that was launched from Kazakhstan last month. Prof. John Parnell, Chairman of the Department of General Geology and Petroleum Geology, studied the effect of heat in the return of the rock to the Earth, together with Dr. Stephen Bowden.
The Orcadian rock was chosen for being rich in organic materials and particularly hard. Prof. Farnell said that primitive creatures cannot survive on a small meteorite due to the heat, but he believes that they could survive in the center of an asteroid with a diameter of several tens of centimeters. However, if such a hard meteorite hits the ground, it will disintegrate and vaporize.
The British Science Festival will take place until November 17 in the town of Venus in Inverness-shire, Dingwell and Applecross. One of the events will focus on Loch Ness, and another event will focus on a film made by the photographer Raymode in the Senate about the fulmar - a sea fowl of the tern family.
17 תגובות
Dear Yehuda
It's called what you wrote to me, and for which I woke up, in free translation: an elegant wing.
But I would be very happy to continue to translate for you yourselves, your exploits, your advantages, etc., etc.
Good,
Good Morning.
Yehuda is indeed right.
Any help will be appreciated
to hug
You don't have to pay, but from time to time, each of the regular commenters helps my father here and there in the system, so if you really want to help, my father will be very happy if you help him a little with translations, for example, right, my father?
good evening
Sabdarmish Yehuda
Avi Blizovsky, are you sure you are not a relative of Helena Blizovsky? The founder of the Torah
The comparability in the world? Because according to all the fascinating articles you present to us here, it's simply amazing
To see your closeness to all contexts, well, so now the cynical look is gone from your eyes, and maybe
Also a tear here and there..but the reactions of the talkbacks speak for themselves..everyone asks
the most essential questions to our origins, origins, purposes... in a scientific way, in a knowledgeable way, in a way
Magdit, in a cynical and suspicious skeptical manner, in short in all ways.
I can only wish you, that you continue to feed us with all the possible articles.
Personally, as an avid reader of translated books from all over the world, for scenarios from all aspects,
It is evident that I have now found amazing "food" for my inexhaustible curiosity.
Since I'm not in the habit of being indebted in any way, in any form.."and somehow"..I was drawn to your site.
My innocent question is... do I have to pay you money for this service??..
Or, that you, like me, really share your special ways??? Just say.
Just food for thought:
But what if God created everything by His will, blessed is it a problem for a bacterium to survive or a simple meteorite to penetrate with a biological warhead.
As far as I remember resistant germs in space this was proven when NASA sent a spacecraft into space a sample of which was accidentally contaminated by one of the scientists and after its return to Israel when it was tested the bacteria were discovered and it turned out that they had traveled to space and stayed there, so it is possible that life was created on another planet and survived the stay in space but I share the opinion that believes that by doing so we are only postponing the end of the question of where and how life was created.
To me, it actually seems probable that life was created in space in a suitable place and rich in suitable material for that...and then "transported" all over the galaxy to spread life organisms in it!!
It is even possible that a special subject structure was created for the organism, as the seeds here lie inside hard-to-crack kernels that open any variety under predetermined conditions!
It is even possible that there were many central places where the organisms were created..let's say by a beam of special particles that when they hit the places where the conditions were right, organisms were created and...it sounds like science fiction but this is what today's science will look like to people a thousand years ago!!
And if indeed life was created in space and spread everywhere.. that means life on other planets also started from the same organisms!!
On the contrary, this is not the conclusion. Darwin's theory has been proven countless times, and the point they are looking for is the starting point that has not yet been found. Duarwin's theory supports a continuous evolutionary process in which single points, regardless of whether they came from our planet or from another planet. From which began the evolution of life here.
The Darwinist theory also does not deny the existence of God, Hawking as an atheist discussed this issue in 'The Short History of Time' and did not come to an unequivocal conclusion, he only noted that in order for us to correspond here, the Earth had to be located within a very precise range from the Sun and after the exact number of years in which the Sun cooled enough and bigger. And this is a fairly zero probability.
On the other hand, he points out that the Earth is an average star in an average galaxy containing 10,000 million stars, and is in an average place in a universe containing about 100,000 million galaxies. So there is actually no reason for God to create this entire vast universe just for one average star. Therefore it is likely that there are millions more stars that contain intelligent life, assuming that God does exist.
In conclusion - a heavy blow to Darwin and his foolish followers
Bacteria show a fantastic ability to survive so that even in the conditions of Kirana as in the vastness of space it will not be surprising to hear that they could or can survive. There are many stars, more than we know where there are conditions for the formation of life like Earth twins.
It is clear that the theory does not answer the initial question, what is the origin of life? She pushes her into the vastness of space. Witch or not is as legitimate as any other scientific inquiry.
By the way, my father, an excellent book was published that was not translated into Hebrew (will it be translated???, not sure) by Richard Dawkins - THE GOD DELUSION in which he claims that the statement that the question of God's existence is outside the discourse of science is a false claim. Science can and should deal with it, it is within the scientific discourse and not outside it as many atheists claim. Recommended even though I haven't finished it yet.
I don't understand what is so magical about this theory.
Even if it is true, life still had to form somewhere. Is it "easier" for people to assume that life was created in a certain place in the universe and fell to Earth than that it was created here or is created locally wherever there are suitable conditions?
In my opinion, panspermia is not that likely for the following reasons:
1) The event that will create the nucleus is very violent and energetic and will probably destroy it.
2) Space does not support life (radiation, etc.)
3) The entrance to the planet is also very violent
4) The organism should match both the source planet and the destination planet.
It's really not that hard for the anonymous user to accept your claim, if they simply ignore all scientific knowledge and choose the interpretation of all kinds of scumbags for science. They probably help digest the complicated material better than this site, but what, they don't base themselves on science like I do but on wishful thinking.
Why is it so hard to accept that there is a guiding hand in the universe?
Not necessarily related to one religion or another...
There can still be innumerable correct combinations in the structure of the meteors that could make panspermia. For example, a comet or a large block of ice arriving at another planet with genetic cargo, and also a block of ice mixed with meteors. Take for example the comet that hit Tegusca, it exploded in the atmosphere but if there were life-carrying meteors in it, they would have been able to survive.
The experiment could show SA what the minimum size and composition is for panspermia, but could not rule out the idea of pespermia.
may we have a nice week
Sabdarmish Yehuda