Research at the Hebrew University found that the brain does not need eyes to read

The study revealed that the same area of ​​the brain responsible for reading is activated in both sighted and blind people when reading 

Dr. Amir Amadi (Photo: Astrid de Gerrard)
Dr. Amir Amadi (Photo: Astrid de Gerrard)

The part of the brain responsible for reading does not require sight at all - according to a new study by scientists from the Hebrew University and France. The study revealed that the same area of ​​the brain responsible for reading is activated in both sighted and blind people when reading.

The researchers performed functional brain imaging on the brains of blind people while they read words written in braille and found that the brain shows activity in the same area that is active in sighted people while they read. The findings challenge the concept that has prevailed in research so far that there are areas in the brain that specialize in processing information that comes through the perceptual senses.

"The brain is not a sensory machine, although it is often perceived as such," says Dr. Amir Amadi of the Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Research and the Israel-Canada Medical Research Institute of the Hebrew University School of Medicine, who led the research. "The brain is actually a task machine that every area in which it fulfills a unique function. In the current study, we found that the area responsible for reading in the brain is not related to the ability to absorb data through vision."

Unlike other tasks performed by the brain, reading is a relatively new task that was developed in humans only about 5,400 years ago, while Braille has only been used for the last 200 years. "This is a relatively short time for the brain to change from an evolutionary point of view and a new area that specializes in reading abilities will open," explains Dr. Amadi.

Previous studies have shown that there is an area of ​​the brain known as the area of ​​the visual system that specializes in reading (Visual Word Form Area). However, until now it was not known what goes on in the brains of the blind from birth who read Braille.

In the current study, the research group, which also included research student Lior Reich from Dr. Amadi's laboratory, used functional brain imaging (fMRI) to measure the activity of nerve cells in the brains of eight blind people from birth while they read braille or non-tactile braille. If correct it was Assuming that the brain operates according to the processing of sensory information, it was reasonable that the act of reading Braille among the blind from birth would rely on areas of the brain dedicated to the processing of information related to the sense of touch. However, the researchers found that the peak activity in the area of ​​the brain specialized in reading occurs among blind people. The researchers conclude from this that the brain is actually task oriented, contrary to the assumption that it is oriented according to senses.

Another comparison conducted by the researchers between the brain activity of blind readers and sighted readers revealed that the patterns of activity in the area of ​​the brain specialized in reading was the same between the two groups.

"The main functional components of the area responsible for reading, as identified in sighted people, are also found in blind people, so these components are independent of the senses and do not even require visual experience," the researchers wrote in an article published last weekend in the journal Current Biology.

7 תגובות

  1. interesting Difficult to prove for the rabbis, not for the scientists who have already explained that there is no problem in reconstructing the evolution of the eye.

  2. So, what will the opponents of evolution say now? After all, the eye is one of the most difficult factors to prove from an evolutionary point of view.

  3. Anat:
    Without going into the question of the exact division of the brain (and I always thought that the functional division played an important role and what I wrote about The development of language related to this) In my opinion, there are both parts related to the senses and parts related to function. After all, the different sensory nerves connect to certain parts of the brain and not to each and every cell.

    Regarding the control group, your claims are not justified.
    There was a control group of sighted people and the comparison was between their brain activity while seeing and the brain activity of the blind while touching.
    The "review group" you describe would not allow any review. It would simply reveal the experiment planners' misunderstanding of the fact that interpreting sensory input is a matter of study.
    If you had read the link recommended in response 2, you would have seen that untrained people (in that case with voice input) do not activate the areas of meaning that were previously thought to be the areas of the sense of sight.
    The same would also happen to the sighted "touchers". Only after training could it be expected that their brains would know how to interpret the touch and activate the correct areas.

    In general, your reaction seems unjustifiably arrogant to me ("Hold on, didn't you get a little carried away... isn't it clear to you..." especially when the research shows that it is completely clear to them and that they even predicted it in advance and designed the experiment to show it - which you did not do)

  4. Wait, you didn't get carried away a bit
    Isn't it clear to you that deciphering information and insights will take place in part in the same areas of the brain and it doesn't matter what the source of the information is.
    A good study also needs a correct control group, so wouldn't it be wise to also add to the study a study on blindfolded people?

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to filter spam comments. More details about how the information from your response will be processed.