According to a study from Sweden "the natural cause of the warming of the Arctic Circle" is "an increased circulation of energy in the atmosphere that moves from south to north and around the Arctic Circle"
Cooperation between man and nature causes the "cooking" of the Arctic region. This is what the results of a study published in Nature show in an article written by Rune Graversen from Stockholm University (Rune Graversen, meteorology researcher, Stockholm University – Sweden). According to the study, in addition to the global warming caused by greenhouse gas emissions, the warming caused by human actions, natural processes cause further warming of the Arctic Circle. A warming that is much faster than the predictions with the help of computer simulations, a warming that causes a massive melting of glaciers, a warming that, according to the researcher, "pushes the Northern Circle beyond the threshold", the "threshold" is an imaginary boundary line that is gradually materializing, a situation from which there is no return, when the warming reaches a certain level , to the "boundary", the effects of extreme warming will be more extreme than expected and more predictable.
According to the study "the natural cause of the warming of the Arctic Circle" is "an increased circulation of energy in the atmosphere that moves from south to north and around the Arctic Circle". The transfer of energy comes with the help of storms, storms that move north under the influence of ocean currents, when you add to this the fact that ice sheets return (radiate) the sun's energy, when the ice melts there is less return of the radiation - more absorption of radiation / energy, i.e. more warming.
The combination of warming due to natural conditions and warming due to man-made conditions constitute a "knock-out" blow that "brings the Arctic Circle to the ground."
There are those who define the results/effects of warming in the Northern Circle as "scary". The prominent examples are: the critical situation of the polar bears, the situation of the Inuit who live in the Arctic Circle, and more. Others welcome the opening of the sea passage in an area that was covered with ice. Which enables the movement of ships carrying goods in the Arctic Circle, either way Ron's research takes part of the responsibility for the results off the shoulders of humanity and transfers it to... nature!
With modesty, humility and great caution I allow myself to question and wonder about the conclusions of the study: for the saying: "The natural reason for the warming of the Arctic Circle is an increased circulation of energy in the atmosphere that moves from south to north and around the Arctic Circle". Darshani says. Where does that "increasing circulation of energy" come from? Maybe this is a result of global warming in which the human hand is a big part?
The time has come that instead of controlling the environment for the sake of the human population, there will be control of the human population for the sake of the environment.
Dr. Assaf Rosenthal, ecologist,
Tour guide/leader in Africa and South America.
For details: Tel. 0505640309 / 077-6172298,
Email: assaf@eilatcity.co.il
7 תגובות
Why buy land in Antarctica?! Enough with the modernization, you don't need to move it everywhere in the world! Antarctica belongs to the polar bears! The bears are also a nation, leave them!! ):
It is not possible to actually settle in Antarctica, even if the temperatures rise significantly, simply because there will always be 4 months of darkness in the winter in its northernmost part.
Another one of those stupid studies that make unfounded apocalyptic predictions.
Such studies cause great harm. In the short term the people are pressured and enact dangerous laws to prevent the disaster. In the long run people stop believing in science. And it's just as dangerous.
A general impression of the situation that is not an opinion and without any obligation according to any law:
Antarctica is, according to international treaties, res communis, meaning an area under the common sovereignty of all mankind, like the open sea beyond two hundred nautical miles from the coast.
The issue of whether it is possible to acquire private ownership in a property that is res communis has not yet been discussed in binding forums (in the open sea, for example, there is a ban on obstructing the passage of vessels).
Anyone who buys land on the moon or Antarctica is probably putting their money on the penguin's beak.
This expression of "a combination of human actions and the forces of nature" seems ridiculous to me.
There is nothing in the world that does not operate within the laws of nature and everything that man does creates the results (desired and unwanted) through the laws of nature.
The fact that the emission of certain gases creates a greenhouse effect is also a result of the laws of nature, so those who find solace in blaming nature could have used this argument since time immemorial.
It is important to understand the mechanisms and learn how to harness the forces of nature to our advantage. It is dangerous to try to share the blame with nature (or with the supernatural).
You cannot buy land there. This is neutral territory that no country has control over.
Anyone interested in buying land in Antarctica is the time.
The prices are in the bargain. Instead of buying land on the moon.
In the coming years, the continent of Antarctica will become one of the most sought-after real estate districts in the world.
While the rest of the continents will suffer from severe desert heat and huge floods. The weather in Antarctica will become tropical and warm.
A fresh continent with oil minerals and clean air.