The forgotten father of the theory of evolution

100 years since the death of Alfred Russel Wallace

Alfred Russel Wallace in a photograph from 1895. From Wikipedia
Alfred Russel Wallace in a photograph from 1895. From Wikipedia

On June 18.6.1858, 22, Charles Darwin received a letter that changed his life. Darwin was already a well-known and respected biologist and geologist, but only some of his closest friends knew about the revolutionary theory that had been taking shape in him for a long time. 30 years have passed since Darwin returned to Britain from the voyage of the ship "Beagle" around the world. In the years after the voyage, Darwin published many findings, but at the same time he wrestled with the question that preoccupied him the most: how new species of living creatures are created. Already at the end of the XNUMXs, he realized that the answer lies in the mechanism of natural selection. Each individual in the population differs from the others in a tiny, random difference, such as a slight change in the length of the neck. Sometimes a change in nature may give an advantage to one of these individuals, for example a drought that dries up the vegetation and gives an advantage to those with long necks, who can gnaw the highest leaves. In such a situation, it is likely that more long-necked animals will survive, and will be able to produce offspring, probably they will also be long-necked. That is, it is nature that selects the most suitable individuals for survival. The continuation of the hot and dry conditions will give rise to more and more cycles of such selection, until the long-necked animals will already be completely different from their ancestors, who may have migrated to a more suitable environment, adapted to a different food source or simply become extinct. Congratulations! A new species is born.

Theory pending

For many years Darwin included the theory, developed it and collected more and more findings that support it. However, he was very afraid to publish the new theory. Darwin realized that an explanation for the formation of species that does not coincide with the biblical story of creation, could arouse strong opposition. He also predicted that the debate would soon come to the question of the origin of man - which according to him was no different from other animals in the way of his formation - a position that would surely be frowned upon not only in the eyes of the church, but in the eyes of broad circles in Victorian England, who would not look kindly on the heresy. Darwin continued to polish the theory for many years and worked it into a tight and reasoned connection, until he received the letter that dropped the ground from under his feet. An almost completely unknown naturalist, Alfred Russel Wallace (Wallace), asked him to go over an article he had written, in which he explains the formation of species in an almost identical way to Darwin's ideas, although he did not use the term "natural selection" coined by Darwin.

On the water

Wallace was very different from Darwin and his friends, both in terms of professional background, but mainly in terms of economic and social status. He was born in Wales in 1823 (14 years after Darwin), the seventh of nine children of an English mother and a Scottish father, a rather unsuccessful businessman who mostly managed to lose the little family fortune. Shortly after graduating from elementary school, he began working with his older brother, William, who was a land surveyor. A few years later, William's business ran into difficulties, and Alfred began teaching drawing at Leicester College, spending most of his free time in the public library there, Goma Science Books. There he also befriended the young entomologist (insect researcher) Henry Bates (Bates) who instilled in him the love of the field. In 1845 William died, and Alfred tried to restore the surveying business on his own. Working a lot in rural areas allowed him to dedicate more and more time to his new hobby - collecting insects and studying them. Three years later, Wallace decided to try to make a living from his hobby, left the business to another brother who worked with him and went with Bates to the Amazon basin in Brazil, where he hoped to make a living by collecting rare insects and other animals, and selling them to museums around the world. At the end of four years of travels in Brazil (and after falling asleep), Wallace sailed back to England with his great booty. Unfortunately for him, the ship he was sailing on caught fire and sank, with all its cargo. The passengers and crew floundered for ten days in two lifeboats, before another ship picked them up on its way to England. For a year and a half, Wallace lived off the insurance money of the sunk collection, enjoyed some success in the scientific society of London, wrote articles and published two books - a diary of his journey in Brazil and a professional book on the different types of palm trees in the Amazon region. Both evoked positive reactions, but nothing more. At that time, Wallace also began to give his opinion more seriously on the question of the ways of development of new species, but he still did not write anything. In 1853 he set out on a new collecting trip, to the Malay Archipelago, the area that is now Indonesia and Malaysia.

Evolution of theory

During the eight years he stayed in the Malay Archipelago, Wallace was one of the most prolific naturalists of his time. He collected almost 130,000 items, including about 1,000 species of animals that were new to science. He completed many research tasks, and largely became the founder of biogeography - the field of research that deals with the distribution of different species. During his work, Wallace made connections with museums, collectors and researchers. One of them was Darwin himself, who hoped that Wallace would be able to obtain a rare bird for him. In 1856, Darwin read an article by Wallace, and praised his work in a personal letter he sent to him. In February 1858, while battling malaria, Wallace experienced a moment of inspiration. He thought about human populations in Papua, and how settlers from Malaysia were pushing the feet of the natives and then made the extrapolation to animals and the idea that the environment selects the individuals best suited to survive. When he recovered a little, Wallace hastened to formulate his ideas in an article, and send them to Darwin. When the stunned Darwin read the article, he wrote to his close friend Charles Lyell, "Had Wallace's sketch of my 1842 manuscript come into my hands, he could not have composed a better summary."

Natural selection

It was not for nothing that Darwin felt that the ground was falling from under his feet. The rules of gentlemanly honor of the time obliged him to allow Wallace to be the first to publish the theory. However, Darwin's close friends, who knew about his life's work, believed that there was room for maneuver. According to their suggestion, the new theory was presented in two papers - Wallace's and Darwin's - at a scientific conference in London just two weeks later. Wallace knew nothing of it. It was only a few months later that the letter from Darwin and his friends reached him in Indonesia, explaining the circumstances and proposing the joint declaration arrangement (which already existed by the time he received the letter). Wallace later admitted that he was shocked by the letter, but immediately responded positively and wrote to Darwin and his friends that the arrangement was acceptable to him. It can be argued that Darwin was being generous to Russell, because he could remove the paper sent to him and present his theory alone. However, the settlement agreement can also be seen as an exploitation of Russell, who could not oppose this proposal due to his low status. He lacked a formal education, lacked the solid economic foundation that Darwin and his cohorts enjoyed, and was never accepted as an equal member of London's scientific aristocracy. Wallace remained in the inventory area and continued his work. Darwin, on the other hand, sat down to write with full vigor, and in November 1859 he published his most famous book "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection". Although the theory of evolution (yet to be called that) began to cause a public uproar after the joint declaration in the summer of 1858, it was the appearance of the "descent of species" that caused the great public uproar, and provoked sharp disputes between the followers of the theory and the "creationists", and in a broader view - a clash Frontal between science and religion.

Just because of the wind

Most of the public uproar was already forgotten by 1862, when Wallace returned to England after eight years in the Indonesian region. Wallace and Darwin not only met face to face, but also became friends out of mutual appreciation. However, the idyll did not last long. Several scientific controversies emerged between the founders of the theory of evolution, primarily the question of human development. As mentioned, Darwin saw man as another link in the evolutionary chain, which was created according to the same rules of natural selection, and even published these things in a separate book "The Descent of Man" in 1871 (in "The Descent of Species" he was careful not to deal with the issue, for fear of upsetting the clergy too much ). Wallace, on the other hand, claimed that evolution only pushed the apes to the brink of humanity, but that at this point consciousness or spirit entered the arena, changing the rules of the game. Wallace joined the spiritualist religion, which advocates the continued existence of the soul even after the death of the physical body, argued that evolution cannot explain phenomena such as reason and morality, which shaped human civilizations. Darwin, by the way, reacted strongly to this position published by Russell and wrote to him "I hope you have not murdered your child and mine". However, despite the sharp disagreements on several issues, Wallace remains a loyal follower of the theory of evolution and of Darwin himself. In 1889 (seven years after Darwin's death), he published one of the most prominent books explaining the theory of evolution, and gave the book (and the theory) the name "Darwinism".

Ahead of his time

However, the work on the theory of evolution was only a small part of Wallace's extensive scientific work. He continued to publish in March many studies on diverse biological topics, mainly the classification of species and their distribution. On many issues he was ahead of his time, and so for example he warned more than a hundred years ago that excessive deforestation in tropical areas would cause heavy environmental damage, due to soil erosion. Wallace was also one of the first to use scientific tools to address the question of whether there is extraterrestrial life, and even published a book on the subject. He also often engaged in various social issues, and argued that the state should buy (or nationalize) a lot of land, in order to rent it out at an equal price for everyone. Among his many other activities, Wallace managed to repeatedly get involved in embarrassing incidents. He strongly opposed the administration of vaccines on the grounds that they are not useful, and was even accused of misleading a royal commission that discussed the issue and heard his testimony. For years he waged high-profile battles with vaccine advocates, which damaged his scientific prestige. In another case, Wallace, always in need of money, accepted the challenge of a capitalist who believed with all his heart that the earth was flat, and offered a fortune of £500 to anyone who would disprove the claim. Wallace, always in need of money, did this by placing distant posts at the same height, so Looking through the telescope it was possible to see that one of them looked lower, which proves that the earth is spherical. He won the intervention, but instead of paying him, he sued the same man for fraud, and the protracted litigation cost Wallace not only much frustration, but also a far greater sum than the original award.

Late recognition

Despite his turbulent professional life, Wallace led his personal life in relative silence. Four years after his return from Indonesia, he married Annie Mitten, the daughter of a botanist he had befriended in Brazil, and they had three children. Throughout his life he struggled for his financial existence, and many times needed the help of friends (including Darwin) to receive research grants or other assistance. However, despite his financial situation and despite the fact that his health was not always good, he lived until after his 90th birthday, and continued to work until he died in his sleep, exactly 100 years ago today.

Wallace won awards during his lifetime and the same recognition for his comprehensive work, which amounted to more than 4,000 articles and books, but after his death he was not included in the golden books of British scientific history, probably also due to his low status and stormy life. However, over the years it gradually became clear that his great contribution to many fields such as biogeography, ecology, and of course the theory of evolution. In recent years, his name has been revived, partly thanks to several biographies that sketch his complex portrait and shed light on the importance of his scientific work.

27 תגובות

  1. Shashi may not have meant it, but technically he is right...
    "Creation" (and not the biblical or the theological one) - that moment when inert matter became living matter (and yes it is a problematic definition) is not described or ruled out by evolution.
    Evolution assumes that there are already individuals with variation, a way to pass variation to the next generation, and environmental pressure.
    The question of "creation" is a completely different issue (and no, I don't think the spark was divine)

  2. gift
    It is true that it is impossible to see to prove that God does not exist. This is true of anything, like Bigfoot and Santa Claus. Therefore, it is an uninteresting direction.
    You again interpret as you see fit - putting an obstacle in front of a blind person is quite simple to understand and that's exactly what you blamed God for. You can't tailor everything to the purpose you want to display.
    You mentioned that there are rules because there must be rules. If I said that the sky is blue because it must be blue, would that seem like a smart argument to you?

  3. to an anonymous (unidentified) user,
    "Gods-sea=legend", according to all logic your equation is not correct for the simple reason that you cannot prove it.

  4. Miracles,
    I understand "before urbanization,,," differently, and I suggest you check.
    As for the "majority", there are cultures where the majority does something very bad, would you suggest that the minority behave like a majority like in Germany in the XNUMXs for example?
    And as for the nickname "stupid", it's a shame that you choose to use such words, it adds neither to you nor to the debate.
    And finally, the non-existence of God cannot be proven, are you familiar with the story about "black swans"? There was an agreement in the old world that all swans were white until black swans were also discovered in Australia and the old agreement is invalid, it may be an urban legend but the obvious conclusion is clear and therefore it is worth considering all the possibilities.

  5. Anonymous (unidentified) user
    I didn't say otherwise. Studies show that there is an inverse correlation between religious belief and intelligence.

  6. Miracles, if I remember correctly surveys show that the majority of people in the world do believe in God to one degree or another, but this statistic changes completely when you check it among educated people (with academic degrees) and especially those with degrees in the fields of biology, where there is a huge majority who accept the theory Evolution and rejects creation stories (see for example "Project Steve").

  7. gift
    You fit the facts to your description, instead of doing the opposite. Your two "excuses" are beside the point. This is a very difficult claim for God to say that he is trying to put doubt in our hearts. It is written in the Torah "You shall not put an obstacle before a blind person" - do you really think that God would act contrary to his instructions??

    Next - you say that there must be laws in the world for us to investigate them. What is the basis for this statement? Between us (and no one else except Silk will read!!!) I must point out that this is a pretty stupid argument….

    It is true that there are scientists who are believing Jews. There are also believing Christians. And there is a huge majority who are atheists. Don't you think it makes more sense to go with the majority?

  8. It would be nice if the science site would open a mobile application or at least adapt the site to a mobile browser, thanks.

  9. For miracles, if you ignore the Mishnah and the Gemara, which are an explanation and an integral part of the Torah, perhaps it would be possible to agree with your words, and as for the contradiction, the world does work and progress according to the theory of evolution (more or less) and we must investigate it, develop science and progress, and bring help and blessing to humanity with the help of science with The laws of evolution as we understand them from observation. Now, let's say that according to the big bang theory the world expands in three dimensions in space and in addition in the dimension of time. The evolutionary axis of progress so that everything was created and looks as if it happened 14,000,000,000 years ago (according to the latest information) including the fossils, including carbon-14, including galaxies, etc., and if you ask why God chose to create his world this way then there are at least two answers, The first is to put doubt in our hearts, and the second is because the world has laws to follow and so that we can study it and know how to derive a blessing from it.
    And finally, there are many academics who are Jewish believers and do not find a contradiction between evolution and creation, on the contrary, science explains creation beautifully, the main thing is how each person chooses to see and interpret it.

  10. I'm sorry... I didn't mean to offend. These two people corresponded a lot. Darwin published articles already as a student, about 30 years before "The Origin of Species". Wallace also published articles, a little later - and on the same subject that Darwin published (beetles....).
    Therefore, I don't think it should be surprising that they knew about each other.
    Note that the first one who talked about evolution with the help of natural selection was unknown to both of them (probably) - the same Mathieu I mentioned.

    And again... sorry.

  11. Nissim, once again you come down on me and this time I'm sure it's not right. According to the article, Darwin may have been famous, but not in connection with the study of the origin of species, so Wallace had no particular reason to send him the letter, moreover, from the body of the text it is impossible to see, or perhaps it is possible with a faint hint, that Darwin was at all known in the field of science. He wanted a bird and thought of one of Wallace's articles which is good, that's it. You see that in the story of the article there is a missing link in the connection between Darwin and Wallace, so don't jump to call me stupid so quickly

  12. It is worth remembering that Wallace believed in the theory of evolution, as long as it involved man. In a letter Darwin sent to Wallers, Darwin wrote "I hope you have not completely murdered your offspring and mine".

    In addition - the first article that talked about evolution is by someone even less known - a Scot named Patrick Matthew. He wrote about it almost 30 years before "The Origin of Species".

  13. Gilgamesh
    If you had read the article you wouldn't have spouted such nonsense.... Both personalities were known from publications, so it is only logical that they would know about each other.

  14. gift
    If you read the Torah, you will see that the description there is completely different from what we know about the world today.
    If you don't see it, I'll be happy to detail…

  15. Why did Wallace actually send a letter to Darwin about evolution before Darwin announced that he had such an idea? He just likes an intelligent guy? He randomly sent him? Or maybe billions of years of natural selection brought Wallace to write specifically to Darwin?
    Or maybe there is an upper yes here?

  16. Is the letter that Darwin and his friends sent to Alfred Russell Wallace (regarding the declaration of the common theory) available to read online? I would really like to read it, can someone help me find it?

    I would be very happy, thank you.

  17. Of course there is. The first is countless empirical proofs, the second is wishful thinking and based on something like the Brothers Grimm fairy tales

  18. There is a huge contradiction between evolution and creation. According to creation we and all animals were created as we are in less than a week, according to evolution we slowly developed over hundreds of millions of years, step by step.

    How can you say that there is no contradiction? (And that's without even mentioning the funny stories about talking snakes, people who live 3 days inside the belly of a leviathan, and a 600-year-old man who still has enough energy to build a big ship and gather all the animals in the world into it. Come on)

  19. Evolution is a process that is not unique to animals. It can be compared to the second law of thermodynamics: it is not a physical law like gravity, but a static phenomenon that in everyday life (and for any other need) can be seen as an immutable law. Like animals, galaxies, technologies, dunes, and ideas (etc.) all go through some process of evolution. When you delve deeper into the creation of breakthrough (and non-breakthrough) scientific theories, you can recognize that the "genius scientist" never creates a theory out of thin air (without diminishing anything from his genius). Theories are always created when the company is ripe for a contractor, and do not depend at all on this or that person (perhaps in a few years here or there). More precisely, theories are created all the time, sometimes the company is ripe for a contractor!. I want to say that it is indeed important to know the geniuses on whose shoulders we stand, but we must remember that if it weren't for them, the theory would have found another way to come into the world, because it is an evolution of ideas and it is unstoppable! (like the second law).
    or not.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to filter spam comments. More details about how the information from your response will be processed.