This was the conclusion of a panel held as part of the Silicon Club meeting. However, participants explained that the transition to smart technology is a gradual process, dependent on strategic preparedness and policies that will guide technological adoption in a way that ensures the continuity of human activity.
At the Silicon Club Forum meeting held on April 1 at the Ano Museum at Tel Aviv University, a panel will be held on the topic "How long do you have until a bot replaces you?"
This panel discussed fundamental questions about the future of work in the age of artificial intelligence, and whether and to what extent intelligent systems will be able to replace the human worker. Panelists included Prof. Gil Epstein, former Dean of Social Sciences at Bar-Ilan University and now a lecturer and senior researcher at the Taub Center; Inbal Netzer Lenziano, management and leadership consultant; Daniel Schreiber, CEO of Lemonade and founder of the Mosaic Institute for Artificial Intelligence Policy; and Prof. Anat Lechner, professor of business administration at NYU's Stern School of Business, specializing in implementing change in organizations. The panel was moderated by Shlomo Gerdman, CEO of ASG.
"How much time do you have left until a bot replaces you?"?"
To Shlomo Gerdman's question, "How long do you have until a bot replaces you?", the panelists responded as follows. Schreiber explained that the process does not happen overnight, but rather develops gradually. He referred to studies and data that were collected, which found that within one year we will see an increase of approximately 12% to 17% in exposure to artificial intelligence technologies, but of course the assessment depends on many factors - such as the degree of adoption in the market, investment in employee training and the adjustment of public policy. He emphasized that the implementation of the system is not intended to completely replace the human worker, but to enhance and streamline work processes through technological integration.
Professor Epstein elaborated and explained that the data and projections on the subject vary from study to study, with some indicating that up to 30% of workers may be affected by this technological advancement. However, he emphasized that this is a process dependent on factors related to the adaptation of government and organizations to technological changes. According to him, this is not a complete replacement in one day, but a constant change that also requires consideration of the social and economic resilience of workers, and finding solutions that will ensure a smooth transition to an era in which technology plays a central role in work processes.
Netzer-Lanziano brought a broad managerial perspective and explained that beyond counting the number of employees who may be replaced, we must focus on the question of what the integration of smart technologies into the work system means. According to her, it is not just about replacing personnel with technology, but about a fundamental change in the way we think, learn and develop as employees and as a society. She emphasized the need to build renewed training systems, aimed at training employees to use technology wisely, thus enabling them not only to adapt to the changing reality, but also to develop and enhance their personal and professional abilities.
Prof. Lechner, who focused on organizational and educational aspects, noted that beyond the technical replacement, we are witnessing a change in the way the meaning of work in society is constructed. She explained that the question "How long do you have until a bot replaces you?" does not only refer to the economic or technological aspect, but also to changes in the roles and skills required of the employee. According to her, we must invest in an educational system that promotes critical thinking, creativity, and coping with technology, in order to enable employees to integrate positively and professionally into the new era.
Preparing for the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Beyond the central question, the participants emphasized that dealing with artificial intelligence is not just a technological issue, but touches all levels of society – the economy, education, culture and public policy. Schreiber believed that artificial intelligence should be adopted critically and responsibly, while combining it with other means such as advanced information search and process management. According to him, it is a tool that can enhance efficiency and create new opportunities if we only use it wisely.
Netzer-Lanciano stressed the importance of formulating a national policy to guide technological adoption. She explained that such a policy would need to include steps to ensure that while technology may replace some jobs, it will also enable the creation of new jobs and contribute to a higher quality of life. She also noted the challenge of maintaining societal values and cultural continuity, while not letting technological progress outweigh the importance of the human and ethical aspects.
Prof. Lechner reinforced the words of her colleagues and added that preparing for change also requires a fundamental change in the organizational structure and the way we define roles within institutions. According to her, the organizational system must be rebuilt to allow for the smooth integration of smart technologies, while maintaining a gradual transition that will ensure the continuity of business and social activity. She emphasized the need to retrain employees and develop new skills that will allow employees to function in a rapidly changing environment.
Philosophical implications
During the discussion, deep thinking was evident about the implications of the transition to the era of artificial intelligence, with each participant bringing their own unique perspective and expressing their thoughts in detail. Schreiber explained: “The transition to artificial intelligence is happening quickly, but its implementation depends on many factors such as market adoption and investment in employee training.” This quote indicates the understanding that change does not happen all at once, but is a gradual process that requires investment and systemic change at all levels – from technological infrastructure to human capital.
Professor Epstein addressed the data and predictions in depth in the field, saying: "Some argue that perhaps 30% of workers will be affected by the changes, but this is an ongoing and complex process that varies depending on the social and political context." His words emphasize the need to look beyond the numbers and see the growing impact of technology on the labor market, with adaptation also depending on social and political factors, which cannot be accurately predicted in advance.
Netzer-Lanciano expanded on the managerial and social aspect of the change, explaining: "The question is not just how long it will take for a bot to replace the worker, but how we will use technology to improve our personal and professional capabilities." She emphasized the need to focus on creating added value, by moving from focusing solely on technical replacement to combining human capabilities with technology, which will allow employees to develop and contribute more significantly within the organizational and social framework.
Prof. Lechner summarized the challenges and opportunities in the age of artificial intelligence and put it this way: "We must invest in education and training of employees to ensure positive coping with technological changes and to derive real synergy from them with the new systems." This statement points to the importance of building an educational and professional system that is appropriate for the new era, in which the employee not only receives technological tools but also develops critical thinking, creativity, and the ability to adapt to the rapid changes in the labor market.
A national strategy for artificial intelligence is needed
"The government needs to formulate a national strategy in the field of artificial intelligence," said Daniel Schreiber, CEO of Lemonade and founder of the Mosaic Institute for Artificial Intelligence Policy. Schreiber emphasized the critical importance of informed government action to ensure that the country maximizes the potential inherent in artificial intelligence, while minimizing the risks associated with it. Schreiber said these words as part of the Silicon Club Forum meeting held in early April, organized by ASG, and which dealt with the impact of artificial intelligence on the professions.
"The government must develop a multi-year strategic plan, which will include clear goals, measurable indicators and a division of responsibility between the various bodies," said Schreiber. "The plan should focus on a wide range of areas, including: investing in research and development, promoting collaboration between the public sector, the private sector and academia, and formulating tailored education and training programs."
Employee retraining program
Schreiber, who appears before numerous Knesset and government committees, addressed the impact of artificial intelligence on the labor market at length, emphasizing the need for early preparation for the expected changes. "The government must develop vocational retraining programs for workers who will be affected by increasing automation, and invest in advanced technological education, in order to ensure that the next generation is prepared for the challenges of the future labor market," Schreiber said. He emphasized the need for a long-term view, taking into account the expected effects of artificial intelligence on various professions, and called on the government to work to formulate customized training programs that will allow workers to acquire new skills and integrate into the changing labor market.
In addition, Shriver addressed the ethical and social aspects of artificial intelligence, emphasizing the need to formulate a regulatory framework that will ensure the protection of human rights and prevent misuse of the technology. "The government must promote transparency and accountability in the development and implementation of artificial intelligence systems, and ensure that the technology serves the public interest," said Shriver. He called on the government to work to formulate clear rules regarding the use of personal data, to prevent discrimination, and to promote equal opportunities.
A comprehensive national body
Schreiber called on the government to establish a national body that would coordinate activities in the field of artificial intelligence, and serve as a coordinating body between the various bodies. "This body should have broad powers, and the ability to lead the implementation of the strategic plan," Schreiber said. He emphasized the need for cooperation between various government ministries, and called for the formulation of a joint action plan, which would allow the country to operate in an efficient and coordinated manner.
"Investing in artificial intelligence is an investment in the future of the country," said Schreiber. He called on the government to work to formulate a comprehensive strategic plan that will ensure the country's prosperity in the age of artificial intelligence.
More of the topic in Hayadan:
- Artificial intelligence: government policy in Israel and the West
- For the first time in Israel: implementation of artificial intelligence in government offices
- Human services are collapsing: can artificial intelligence be the lifeline?
- The European Union has approved a draft law to regulate artificial intelligence - this is how it will work
11 תגובות
The most interesting thing is how someone who has a mortgage will pay the money back to the banks hahahahahaha
This is a coincidental date due to venue availability. The host said this at the beginning of the evening.
Excellent, and we'll pay with ice cubes.
The meeting was held on April 1.
Just saying…
Robots will never replace the ultra-Orthodox.
Sitting around and learning nonsense and thinking they are smart and geniuses and above everyone else and with a chosen people is something a robot wouldn't do because it has more professional integrity and would rather say it's a burden than lie that it's not.
Robots will replace humans and humans will become unemployed robots. Think about humans.
Shame on you, you infidel, get out of the land of Israel. This is the land of Jews, not of infidels and gentiles.
God forbid, the article says the same things over and over again. If there is a minimum word limit, it's better to try to invent than to write the same thing 10 times in one article.
And this is exactly what will bring a holocaust to humanity, when the wealthy, with capital, will reduce their expenses and return them with more and more money, trampling on the weak, who we have built, the uneducated, manual workers who will have no income and will not be able to support themselves, and this will be the beginning of a holocaust that will leave these weak with no choice but to use violence to survive. The greed of the capitalists is an existential danger.
I think the panelists will be among the first to be replaced by artificial intelligence.
Enter the prompt "How long will it take for artificial intelligence to replace workers?" and you will get roughly the answers they gave.
We can already replace the rabbis today with a device that constantly says:
The era of religions is over,
There is a God and he is secular,
Religious coercion is a crime against humanity,
Go learn a profession and live on your own.