The Canadian researchers argue that generative artificial intelligence - including large language models such as chatGPT - and social networks can divert attention from pressing global issues, foster feelings of hopelessness and reduce creative thinking and problem-solving abilities.
Researchers claim in a new forum paper published in the journal Global Environmental Politics that generative artificial intelligence and social networks could sabotage efforts to deal with climate change.
University of British Columbia professor Hamish van der Veen and his colleagues argue that generative artificial intelligence – including large language models such as chatGPT – and social networks can divert attention from pressing global issues, foster feelings of hopelessness and reduce creative thinking and problem-solving abilities.
A common perception is that artificial intelligence, social networks and other technological products and platforms are neutral or have a net positive effect on climate change actions.
"Most of the analyzes we have seen so far focus on counting the direct emissions associated with the life cycle of technological products," said Dr. van der Ven, senior lecturer in sustainable business management of natural resources.
"We know, for example, about the direct impact of internet infrastructure such as server farms, bitcoin mining and similar things. But there is very little examination of the negative and indirect effects of generative artificial intelligence and social networks on the climate. These technologies affect human behavior and social dynamics, shaping attitudes and responses to climate change."
He noted that artificial intelligence and social technologies can reduce our concentration on the climate crisis. “By offering new and ever-changing content, social media platforms can divert attention from slower-moving issues. The flip side of this is that constant exposure to negative news on social media can also erode optimism and increase feelings of hopelessness. All of this may prevent us from organizing or taking collective action on climate change."
The researchers call for careful consideration of generative artificial intelligence. As people become more dependent on it, we may find that our capacity for creativity and forward-thinking solutions diminishes, noted Dr. van der Ven. Both social media and artificial intelligence are known to contribute to the spread of false or biased information – which can paralyze the actions we need to take on climate change.
"We call for more skepticism about individuals and businesses that position digitization as a solution to the climate crisis. We urge researchers to shift some of their focus away from the direct effects and toward the indirect effects of Internet-based technologies. Only through fact-based analysis can we achieve a more holistic understanding of the Internet's true impact on the climate," he added.
