"Don't Look Up", the new film by Leonardo DiCaprio and Jennifer Lawrence, presents a satirical and poignant look at humanity and the role of the media in the fight against today's major environmental problem
By Dr. Neta Lipman, Angle - Science and Environment News Agency
This week saw the release of "Don't Look Up", the new film by the American director Adam McKay, starring a number of brilliant Hollywood actors (Leonardo DiCaprio, Jennifer Lawrence and more). I went to see the movie this week and at the end of it, leaving the theater, I heard two typical Yorkers rave about the movie. One of them stated: "Truthfully, I think this is a film that every citizen in the world should see."
I'm not sure that this is exactly the film I would choose to show to all the inhabitants of the planet, but it is definitely an interesting and thought-provoking work that presents the viewers with a large two-and-a-half-hour long mirror in which they are satirically reflected along with the world in which we all live and which a great disaster is going to affect.
McKay himself did not hide that he wanted to make a film about how we perceive, or fail to perceive, a major disaster that is looming, and more precisely, a film about the insistence of many of us not to look up and see the global climate crisis.
Lawrence and DiCaprio against the world
Without spoiling your enjoyment of watching the film, here is the plot summary: Kate Dibiansky (Lawrence) is an astronomy student who one day discovers a new asteroid, which she and her lecturer, Dr. Randall Mindy (DiCaprio) quickly discovers, that it is about to collide with Earth with the certainty of One hundred percent according to all their exact mathematical calculations.
When? Another six months. So what do two scientists do who made a sensational discovery that has the power to change the face of the world? They meet the president of the United States (a former nude actress played by Meryl Streep), who shows at best indifference and at worst disdain for the pair of scientists, as if saying: Do you know how many times I've heard in the last two years that the end of humanity is near? The president has more important things on his mind than an asteroid that is going to end our life on this planet. She has mid-term elections.
They are sorry, they turn to the media. A rock about 9 kilometers in size is about to collide with us, it is certainly an important matter for the media and we must report it to the world. The scientists arrive at the morning program studios when, just before the broadcast, one of the producers prepares them: "Just keep it light, yes, let it be fun." At this point, Dibiansky loses it: "Maybe the destruction of the entire planet shouldn't be fun?" She exclaims, "Maybe it's supposed to be scary and disturbing and you have to stay up all night, every night, crying?"
It seems that for McKay, the Oscar winner ("Money Machine"), the climate crisis that scientists are warning about is something so big and disturbing that it should keep us all up at night. in interviews The director said he tried five different ideas for a film about the climate crisis before writing the script: "How do you tell the biggest story in 66 million years?" he wondered.
Watching the film, it is clear that McKay is troubled that Climate Crisis is not taking its rightful place at the forefront of media coverage. Indeed, the film serves as a sharp critique of the conduct of the media. Despite the fact that it features crazy politicians and wealthy people full of absurd whims who deny reality, it seems that the real villain here is the media, which is forever chasing ratings and public opinion and is only careful not to bother the public with the complex and worrying truth.
But how do we really talk about the Climate Crisis amidst all the breaking news, the stirring current events, and the conflicts of economic interests? Because in our real story, in the face of the challenges of the Climate Crisis, we still have the ability to change course. At the end of the day, scientists have a very important role in our lives to bring knowledge, monitor the changes that are going on in the Earth, the seas, the air, and the life on it, and explain what damage this is causing to our world and life on it, or in other words, our future.
It seems that McKay made an easy assumption for himself: a meteorite colliding is very obvious - here is a large body and here it is coming towards us and then we will die - but you explain silent, almost invisible, cumulative, long-term processes. Those that have always occurred only now are stronger and more frequent and more powerful and more dangerous and they are created because of the greenhouse gas emissions we produce.
When we look up, we see sky, not a giant asteroid hurtling toward us.
It's all math
Before DiCaprio approaches the television studios, a colleague tells him: "Speak clearly, without the math" and DiCaprio answers embarrassed: "How without the math, it's all math." This is perhaps the constant dilemma of the scientist and his role in serving the public in the crisis imposed on us. Climate experts, space explorers, ocean scientists are people who have built their careers on the basis of learning, deciphering data and creating models that help them explore and understand the meaning of the universe. Mathematics is one of the basic tools they rely on and thanks to it they can say what they have to say. The question "how" to say is the important question.
The media wants to entertain the public and not scare or worry. When the film scholars come to talk about the impending disaster (one item after the imaginary singer "DJ Cello" proposes to his unfaithful girlfriend, Ariana Grande, live) the hosts introduce them as "here now In our science corner, two scientists who discovered a new comet..." The main thing is to have fun and cool.
Depressing, but important
It's not easy to talk about the environment, or science, and certainly not to talk about the complexity of changing temperatures and the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the air. It's not that cool, not fun and sometimes even quite depressing, but it's always interesting.
In addition, this crisis did not suddenly come to us from space, it is something that humanity created and therefore humanity can deal with it with the help of scientific knowledge and tools. The scientists may not have chosen for themselves the role of prophets, they did not ask for microphones and really their "scientific" language is one that is not always clear and simple to understand. But at the precipice of the times, and we are, how to say, at the opening of the precipice, we have no choice but to clear the stage for them and listen to them and the knowledge they have accumulated and the data they have collected and understand what awaits us if we do not act now. Because there is still time, although it is limited, but it is not over.
Hollywood also has an important role in shaping such messages and it's great that a star director like McKay has assembled a glittering cast of stars to bring us all in front of the tribal fire and make fun of our situation today. The film may be an imaginary satire, but at the pace of our lives and the reality of the ratings that surrounds us, it is not completely far-fetched.
More of the topic in Hayadan:
- Danger is coming from a tiny asteroid
- The precious metal-rich asteroid 16 Psyche may not be a solid lump of metal after all but a pile of rocks
- Space - the spaceship "Humanity" / Cameron M. Smith
- 50 years ago, humans took the first full image of Earth from space – Climate crisis means it's time to take another picture from the same angle
- The war on science is getting a step higher: we must restore trust in science to save democracy and the future of humanity
