Before the US elections: how can we identify "fake news"?

While the battle between the contenders for the US presidency is tighter than ever, researchers from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev have developed a method that will help verify facts in the amount of information that passes through social networks

Flooding the user on social networks with a lot of information shared by fake news. Illustration: depositphotos.com
Flooding the user on social networks with a lot of information shared by fake news. Illustration: depositphotos.com

"Fake news" is a well-known problem, which grows closer to the existence of election systems, due to the influence on the electorate through misinformation and conspiracy theories. While the battle between the contenders for the US presidency is closer than ever, researchers from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev have developed a method that will help verify facts in the amount of information that passes through social networks. The principles of the method were published at the leading international conference Kdd.

The dynamic nature and amount of information passing through the Internet makes the act of identifying false information in real time an extremely difficult task. The research group of Dr. Nir Greenberg and Prof. Rami Pozis From the Department of Software and Information Systems Engineering at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, they developed a method using machine learning to detect fake information sources.

The method is based on active machine learning that is based on the characteristics of the content that is distributed, the users that distribute it and the network structure of the consumers of the false content. The researchers examined the success of the method both retroactively and over time, and in effect simulated the way in which human fact checkers are required to identify false information.

For example, it was found that monitoring fake news sites, rather than individual articles or posts, can significantly reduce the burden on fact checkers and produce reliable results over time. The model also knew how to differentiate between temporary textual terms compared to terms known over time. It was also found that labeling popular sources may refer to the most common lies in the general population, but it is problematic for identifying new "fake" sources that often arise in certain communities where there is a demand for this type of content.

"The problem today with the spread of fake news is that fact checkers are overwhelmed. They can't check everything, but the extent of their coverage in a sea of ​​social media content is unclear. Furthermore, we don't know if fact checkers manage to get to the most important content to check, which has led us to develop a machine learning approach that can help fact checkers direct their attention better and increase their productivity," explains Dr. Greenberg.

Sources of "fake news" tend to appear and disappear quickly over the years, so maintaining lists of these sites involves a lot of cost and work. Their system considers the flow of information on social networks and the audience's appetite for this kind of information. The models developed so far are based on the common approach of identifying those who share misinformation. Now, the researchers have shown that their method can maintain the same level of accuracy (80% in PR-AUC measure) in identifying fake sources, while requiring less than a quarter of the cost of testing all sources.

"The system will never replace the human fact-checkers, but the method can flood new sources that seemingly require the attention of the fact-checkers today," noted Prof. Pozis. "Now, social networks have another tool that will make it possible to fight misinformation."

The research group included: Maor Reuven from the Department of Software Engineering and Information Systems at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and the independent researcher, Dr. Lisa Friedland.

3 תגובות

  1. Trump is indeed a Russian agent - if you listen to his statements towards Ukraine.
    Channel 14 is not the essence of democracy and the preservation of freedom of speech, but a propaganda channel that spreads conspiracy theories and serves one person and not all citizens and opinions in Israel.

  2. And who will train the machine? clear. Those people who won't be able to identify fake news even if he punches them in the face and screams: I'm fake news!

    The people who believed that Hunter Biden's laptop from hell was a fake from Russia, and didn't bother to be informed otherwise.
    The people who believed (and still believe) that Trump is a Russian agent.
    The people who thought Biden was sharp as a razor, running errands around his team and not senile at all.
    The people who think Harris is fit for president, even though she can't get a coherent sentence out of her mouth without a teleprompter nearby.
    The people who believe that men (with, and even without any additional hormonal treatment) are women, only because they started to claim that they are women, and that they are allowed in sports for women, and that it would be fair.
    The people who somehow came to the conclusion that "it's racism" to believe that the virus emerged from the corona labs in Wuhan, instead of the official version that it came from a pangolin cooked in a Wuhan market, 2 kilometers away.
    The people who believe that "you are the head - you are guilty" even though the head is surrounded by gangs of the "rule of law" and of the "seniors of the security system" who isolate him from any vital information and prevent their impeachment. And they call it "democracy", instead of "full blown fascism".
    The people who believe that closing Channel 14 is the essence of democracy and preserving freedom of expression.

    yes. These are the people we need to filter the news for us, under the guise of artificial intelligence training. clear.

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to filter spam comments. More details about how the information from your response will be processed.