Extraordinary discovery in China: 300,000-year-old wooden tools change what we thought about early humans

Dozens of carefully crafted wooden tools for digging and processing plants have been discovered at a Pleistocene site in southwestern China – indicating a technology far more complex than that attributed to early populations in East Asia.

New findings from a Pleistocene site in southwestern China reveal the oldest known use of carefully crafted wooden tools in East Asia, dating back more than 350,000 years. Credit: Liu et al., 10.1126/science.adr8540.
New findings from a Pleistocene site in southwestern China reveal the oldest known use of carefully crafted wooden tools in East Asia, dating back more than 350,000 years. Credit: Liu et al., 10.1126/science.adr8540.

Rare archaeological finds from the Gantangqing site in southwest China reveal the earliest known use of elaborately crafted wooden tools in East Asia. The tools date back to between 361,000 and 250,000 years ago, and indicate advanced technology and the ability to process vegetation – long before this was thought possible in this region.

Although humans have been known to have made wooden tools for over a million years, such objects are rarely preserved, especially from the Early and Middle Pleistocene. Most of the tools that survive from these early periods have been found in Africa and western Eurasia – spears and throwing sticks from Germany and Britain, wooden structures from Zambia, and digging sticks from sites in Israel and Italy.

For years, archaeological theory was dominated by the "bamboo hypothesis," which suggested that early humans in East Asia made most of their tools from this organic material, and therefore left behind almost no tools made of stone (a bit of an odd argument, talking about tools made of organic material that didn't survive, why do they say that stone tools didn't survive?) or wood. Now, the discovery of the tools at Gantangqing poses a serious challenge to this hypothesis.

The researchers, led by Jian-Hui Liu, present 35 wooden tools found at the site – all showing clear signs of deliberate design: carving, grinding and wear from use. Most were carved from pine wood, and include two-handed digging sticks, smaller one-handed tools, and even hook-shaped tools that may have been used to cut plant roots.

The analysis suggests that the tools were not used for hunting, but for everyday activities such as digging and processing plant material – suggesting a more complex lifestyle than previously attributed to Paleolithic populations in Asia. The researchers note that unlike sites from the same period in Europe, which were characterized by medium-sized hunting tools, the Chinese site displays a wide variety of small tools intended for agricultural or pre-agricultural uses.

This find highlights how organic artifacts – which are often not preserved – can change our understanding of human history. These tools reflect advanced technological mastery and high cognitive ability in the processing of soft materials. It is proof that the material culture of ancient humans was not limited to stone alone – but also included an intensive and creative use of wood.

for the scientific article

More of the topic in Hayadan:

8 תגובות

  1. It's not a scientific article if there isn't at least one blacksmith with the well-known aphorisms like "Man was created on Friday from mud and Eve from his rib" or "5785 years and it costs me more."
    And a political snark on the dime like "But Bibi was before the world, wasn't he?"

  2. I thought that early man was a retarded person who walked around the forest all day with a spear and killed animals for fun. Now, after reading the article, I realize I was wrong.

  3. I don't think Shafan could have written in his book that a rabbit is unclean: "However, you shall not eat these among the animals that go on the prowl or among those that have cloven hooves: the camel, the hare, and the rock badger, because they go on the prowl and do not have cloven hooves; they are unclean to you." (From the Book of Deuteronomy, which was obviously written by Shafan the Little Rabbit)

  4. A. This is not stated anywhere in the Torah, there is no reference to dates until much later – during the time of the Mishnah and the Talmud. Until then, the years of the reign of kings were used to indicate dates. B. Who said that the Torah is holy? Shefan the scribe was not, to the best of my knowledge, a holy man, but an official of King Josiah who could read and write.

  5. Who is the idiot who wrote this nonsense?
    How is 300 thousand years if the world has existed for less than 6000 years?
    This is what the Holy Torah states:
    How long will we have to encounter a site here that is supposed to be knowledgeable and yet is filled with complete ignorance about the real world?

Leave a Reply

Email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to filter spam comments. More details about how the information from your response will be processed.