Motions of satellite galaxies around groups and clusters of giant galaxies could provide valuable insights into their evolution. The observations of such motion provide crucial clues about the age of the universe
A study using data from the "Sloan Digital Sky Survey" reveals that the universe may be younger than current estimates, and challenges the accepted cosmological models, by analyzing the movements of satellite galaxies around giant galaxy clusters.
In standard cosmological models, the process of formation of cosmological structures begins with the appearance of small structures, which then undergo mergers that depend on the size and mass of the structures, leading to the formation of larger systems. As the universe ages, giant galaxy groups and clusters, which constitute the largest systems, tend to increase in mass and reach a more dynamic state.
Motions of satellite galaxies around groups and clusters of giant galaxies could provide valuable insights into their evolution. The observations of such motion provide crucial clues about the age of the universe.
Using publicly available data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), a research team led by Prof. Qi Guo of the National Astronomical Observatory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (NAOC) analyzed the kinematics of satellite galaxy pairs orbiting giant galaxy clusters. . The team's findings suggest that the universe may be younger than predicted by the LCDM model with Planck's cosmological parameters.
The study was published in Nature Astronomy on January 22.
The researchers tracked the motion of pairs of satellite galaxies located on opposite sides of giant galaxy clusters by using their line-of-sight velocity differences from the central galaxy. They are the age of pairs showing correlated speed differences compared to pairs showing opposite speed differences.
"An excess of correlated satellite pairs indicates the presence of satellite galaxies that have recently merged or are currently merging," said Prof. Chi Guo, another author of the paper.
Such an excess is also found in recent cosmological simulations, but the magnitude of the effect was significantly lower than in observations. The significant discrepancy between the observations and the simulations suggests that massive galaxy clusters are younger in the real universe.
"Since the age of massive galaxy clusters can be closely related to the age of the universe, these findings indicate a younger universe compared to that derived from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) by the Planck partnership," said Dr. Qing Gu, first author. of the article.
These findings pose a challenge to the current cosmological model and may provide important insights into the Hubble constant. Hubble's law, or the Hubble-Lametre law, is a law in astrophysics and cosmology related to the expansion rate of the universe, according to the big bang theory. The value of Hubble's constant, as previously measured, is 67.11 kilometers per second per million persec. According to this, the age of the universe is calculated to be 13.819 billion years. The law is named after the astronomer Edwin Hubble, who in the late 20s discovered that the universe is expanding. He identified a redshift in the spectrum of distant galaxies, indicating that they are moving away from us. Hubble has collected data showing that the speed of a galaxy's receding is directly proportional to its distance from the Milky Way galaxy.
For the scientific article on the Nature website
More of the topic in Hayadan:
Comments
Asbar decorated this map.
I think there is a mistake in the translation. What is huge is the galaxies, rather the clusters of galaxies
This time, distinguished by a clock, does not exist in physical reality, and it exists only in the mind of man.
This time deserves the name, active time - because as soon as you think about it, it disappears.
The active time was invented by man, to help human society function.
Active time does not exist at all in physical reality, therefore there is no point in talking about the past and the future.
Physical reality exists without any relation to active time, therefore the phrase "the big bang happened 14 billion years ago" makes no sense in physical reality there is an eternal moment and there is no past and no future.
In physical reality there is passive time, which first appeared in neurophysics.
A. Asbar
Perhaps the dimension of time behaves differently from what we know within our atmosphere, just as time behaves differently in the unified field
Who said that the rate of expansion of the universe has not changed.
Who said space was permanently expanding/expanding everywhere? Or didn't new additional expansions begin at some early stage within the main expansion? It is not certain that there is uniformity, and based on the amount of heavy elements present in the solar system and the ages of the stars, it is likely that the universe is older.
There is no fear that they will reach the age of 10,000 years.
It's nice to see that science is making strides towards creationists.